by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

[Guest]

Just keep on researching about these candidates before voting!!!

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.

[Guest]

Just keep on researching about these candidates before voting!!!

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.

You are self indulging in partisan BS and wishful orgasmic endings.

My post from the other USA Today thread bears repeating:
------------------------------------------------
ANYBODY who think USA Today is just being a good citizen by giving it's advice against Trump, please get in line for the bridge sale and biggest measured cloud contest.

Somewhere back in the lineage there are politically involved persons who are linked to the establishment politicians that are vulnerable if Trump gets elected.
There may be a D or an R behind their name as the "establishment" resides equally in both parties.

So don't get all gooey and excited proclaiming this just another political rag representing the desparate.

[Guest]

You are self indulging in partisan BS and wishful orgasmic endings.

My post from the other USA Today thread bears repeating:
------------------------------------------------
ANYBODY who think USA Today is just being a good citizen by giving it's advice against Trump, please get in line for the bridge sale and biggest measured cloud contest.

Somewhere back in the lineage there are politically involved persons who are linked to the establishment politicians that are vulnerable if Trump gets elected.
There may be a D or an R behind their name as the "establishment" resides equally in both parties.

So don't get all gooey and excited proclaiming this just another political rag representing the desparate.

You are a miserable and nasty old fart. There is a difference between being rude, harsh and egotistical. You are just vulgar, too vulgar for the pubic. Go wash your mouth out with soap.

[Guest]

Just keep on researching about these candidates before voting!!!

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.

You may feel that Trump is not fit to be president, but I know that Hillary is not qualified to be president. She is not qualified for a security clearance, therefore not able to function in the capacity of president.

[Guest]

USA Today is owned by the Gannett co, Which has transformed from a right leaning company in its beginnings to a progressive outlet in the present

[Guest]

USA Today is owned by the Gannett co, Which has transformed from a right leaning company in its beginnings to a progressive outlet in the present

Thank you Cliff Clavin. :clap2: