MSNBC Caught Showing Clear Bias for Hillary

[Guest]

A newly leaked email from the Clinton campaign appears to show an MSNBC producer fawning over Hillary Clinton, calling her an “amazing, intelligent woman” who is “smarter than most men,” in an effort to get an aide to appear on her show.

The April 2015 email, obtained by DC Leaks and reported by The Daily Caller, shows “All in with Chris Hayes” producer Sheara Braun pitching a “Hillary Clinton for Milennials” segment to the Clinton campaign in order to get an aide to appear. Braun presents the segment as one that would present Clinton controversies of the 90s in a positive light – referring to them as “crap and nonsense.”

"The point of the segment is basically to inform young people about all of the crap and nonsense that Sec. Clinton and President Clinton (but mostly Sec. Clinton) had to face back in the 90s when President Clinton was running for office," Braun says to Clinton campaign spokeswoman Adrienne Elrod, "...everything from cookie-gate to stand-by-your-man-gate to Hillarycare."

[Guest]

MSNBC is biased? :rant-rave::rant-rave::rant-rave::rant-rave:
...and Faux :loco: News is "fair and balanced".

[Guest]

News is no longer unbiased, not that I'm totally convinced it ever was fair and balanced. On the plus side, at least today's media doesn't even pretend to be unbiased. Facts are hidden if it might cause a news article to go in a different direction than the message the reporter and editor want. Some stories never see the light of day. And so on and so forth. Best way to get the news is go to at least three sources -- one that shares your point of view, one diametrically opposed to your point of view and foreign source that is as neutral as possible. Read, listen, watch all three versions. The facts reported by all three are probably the true facts. The rest are up for grabs.

Red

[Guest]

It's unfortunate that no one ever gave Al-Jazeera a chance. It was truly, fair, balanced and unbiased. It was not the pro-terrorist station most people thought it was.

[Guest]

News is no longer unbiased, not that I'm totally convinced it ever was fair and balanced. On the plus side, at least today's media doesn't even pretend to be unbiased. Facts are hidden if it might cause a news article to go in a different direction than the message the reporter and editor want. Some stories never see the light of day. And so on and so forth. Best way to get the news is go to at least three sources -- one that shares your point of view, one diametrically opposed to your point of view and foreign source that is as neutral as possible. Read, listen, watch all three versions. The facts reported by all three are probably the true facts. The rest are up for grabs.

Red

:agree:

[Guest]

It's unfortunate that no one ever gave Al-Jazeera a chance. It was truly, fair, balanced and unbiased. It was not the pro-terrorist station most people thought it was.

Just another liberal network.

[Guest]

/////

[Guest]

Just another liberal network.

:bigbow:

[graciegirl]

News is no longer unbiased, not that I'm totally convinced it ever was fair and balanced. On the plus side, at least today's media doesn't even pretend to be unbiased. Facts are hidden if it might cause a news article to go in a different direction than the message the reporter and editor want. Some stories never see the light of day. And so on and so forth. Best way to get the news is go to at least three sources -- one that shares your point of view, one diametrically opposed to your point of view and foreign source that is as neutral as possible. Read, listen, watch all three versions. The facts reported by all three are probably the true facts. The rest are up for grabs.

Red

I very much agree.

[Taltarzac725]

I try to google many sources about the events of the day.