ONLY 9% of other countries are confident about Trump

[HillaryWins]

Hilarious, Pew research polled multiple countries and internationally there's only 9% confidence that Trump would be a good leader, make good foreign policy choices, etc. The exception was that CHINA, yes China has a 40% confidence rating of Trump.

Most foreigners believe he's ignorant to foreign relations, is too quick to react and reacts with poor judgement, and the negative views go on.

Looks like Republicans are the only ones with their heads in the sand about Trump. Everyone else even internationally can see how horrible of a President Trump would be.

[Don Baldwin]

And I saw a poll that said that 100% of people who rely/believe polls are idiots.

Polls are propaganda to sway your opinion, convince you that everyone else is thinking a certain way and so should you. Polls are the new statistics.

[HillaryWins]

And yet when Trump was winning he would announce how great he was doing in the polls, guess that makes your boy Trump a huge idiot. And, by the way, Pew research is non-partisan and their funding doesn't come from lobbyists etc.

[billethkid]

Actually who cares what the other countries care about the candidates.

You forgot to also make note of how many do not support Clinton.

If they are a benefactor of the current crony establishment in America, then they should be concerned.

No, what they think is no more worthy of a thought than a fly spec in the pepper!!

[jimbo2012]

Understand this thread was started by a troll with a new user name today

HillaryWins


exposed

[HillaryWins]

Keep calling me a Troll as you are uninformed as usual.

Its actually pretty important what other countries think of us since we live in a world economy and are dependent on trade and need allies when dealing with wars. Outside of that, it just goes to show when the MAJORITY of the US and World think Trump would be a horrible president that republicans have their head up their a**.

Also regarding Hillary, countries have a 60% confidence level in Hillary, jusssst slightly better than Trumps 9%

[n8xwb]

As stated in your other post.....perhaps it is because Mr. Trump has been quite clear about wanting to put America first??? Just saying.....

[MDLNB]

Far as I know, no other country gets to vote for our president. Of course, Democrats seem to make their own rules up as they go, so I might be wrong.

[tomwed]

Far as I know, no other country gets to vote for our president. Of course, Democrats seem to make their own rules up as they go, so I might be wrong.Maybe they don't vote but they can influence or maybe they can interfere with the technology of the election. Putin thinks that HRC interfered in their election.

Is there a history of Russia or any other foreign country trying to influence the results of a presidential election? I don't think so.

Why Putin fears a Clinton presidency (opinion) - CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/15/opinions/putin-clinton-hate-affair-ghitis/)

Worth reading.

[MDLNB]

Well, Obama attempted to influence Israel's election.....and failed of course. I still wonder how what he did was not construed as illegal. I thought congress held the purse strings.

[HillaryWins]

At the end of the day I'd rather have a President who can actually work with countries on things like foreign policy, trade, and being allies. And if the majority of the world hates Trump, with him in office, well we are going to be on a very isolated island which is not good in this world. Trump spells disaster for our place in the world if only 9% of the world likes him.

[AJ32162]

At the end of the day I'd rather have a President who can actually work with countries on things like foreign policy, trade, and being allies. And if the majority of the world hates Trump, with him in office, well we are going to be on a very isolated island which is not good in this world. Trump spells disaster for our place in the world if only 9% of the world likes him.

Hillary has clearly demonstrated her ability to work with other countries, as evidenced by her "successes" in Syria, Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Iran, etc. And, let's not forget her success in filling the coffers of the Clinton Foundation with foreign government donations in exchange for influence and special favors.

[tomwed]

Hillary has clearly demonstrated her ability to work with other countries, as evidenced by her "successes" in Syria, Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Iran, etc. And, let's not forget her success in filling the coffers of the Clinton Foundation with foreign government donations in exchange for influence and special favors.How well did she work with our allies? Won't we need them?

[AJ32162]

How well did she work with our allies? Won't we need them?

Not as much as they NEED us!

[Rockyrd]

Not as much as they NEED us!


THAT THOUGHT is very naive and very Trump like

[AJ32162]

THAT THOUGHT is very naive and very Trump like

Please explain your reasoning.

$2,957,000,000: U.S. Taxpayers Will Fund Lion’s Share of UN Budget Again in 2016 (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/three-billion-and-counting-us-taxpayers-will-fund-lions-share-un)

[Rockyrd]

Please explain your reasoning.

$2,957,000,000: U.S. Taxpayers Will Fund Lion’s Share of UN Budget Again in 2016 (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/three-billion-and-counting-us-taxpayers-will-fund-lions-share-un)

Your link is about the United Nations. Your original thought was that we do not need other countries. Two different scenarios.

If you are saying we do not need any help, then we will have a heated conversation, because I can show you how dependent we are on allies, pacts and treaties with others.

If you are simply speaking to our share of United Nations budget, I would need to do some research to see exactly the method of determing hat. You will admit, we got more money, thus we pay more, but still need to check how it's done before saying more.

So which is it ?

[Rockyrd]

Please explain your reasoning.

$2,957,000,000: U.S. Taxpayers Will Fund Lion’s Share of UN Budget Again in 2016 (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/three-billion-and-counting-us-taxpayers-will-fund-lions-share-un)

Just quickly thought would share. Not detailed enough but a start to understand


"As expected, United States of America contributes the highest with a share of 22%. USA’s GNP is approximately 27% of the total GNP of all the member countries of the UN and thus its highest share of contribution is justified."

How much do various countries contribute to the UN Budget? (https://factly.in/united-nations-budget-contributions-by-member-countries/)

[AJ32162]

Your link is about the United Nations. Your original thought was that we do not need other countries. Two different scenarios.

If you are saying we do not need any help, then we will have a heated conversation, because I can show you how dependent we are on allies, pacts and treaties with others.

If you are simply speaking to our share of United Nations budget, I would need to do some research to see exactly the method of determing hat. You will admit, we got more money, thus we pay more, but still need to check how it's done before saying more.

So which is it ?

My original post was, as I stated, "not as much as they need us". I NEVER stated that we DO NOT need other countries as allies.

The link to the article stating America's contributions to the UN is just ONE example of our contribution to our allies. Review your world history, America has ALWAYS done the heavy lifting when it comes to international and global affairs.

I stand by my original premise: Other countries DO need us more than we need them.

[Rockyrd]

My original post was, as I stated, "not as much as they need us". I NEVER stated that we DO NOT need other countries as allies.

The link to the article stating America's contributions to the UN is just ONE example of our contribution to are allies. Review your world history, America has ALWAYS done the heavy lifting when it comes to international and global affairs.

I stand by my original premise: Other countries DO need us more than we need them.

Maybe you are right.

I feel a bit more comfortable knowing we have allies, that supply to us needed assets we either do not have or could not supply if we carried the entire load.

[MDLNB]

Hillary has clearly demonstrated her ability to work with other countries, as evidenced by her "successes" in Syria, Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Iran, etc. And, let's not forget her success in filling the coffers of the Clinton Foundation with foreign government donations in exchange for influence and special favors.

Exactly! Hillary might as well work in Vegas with a sign over her home that says "FOR SALE." Apparently, liberals have no problem with her being more open to being bought than a Bangkok whore. After all, ALL liberals are for sale to highest bidder for their vote.

[Don Baldwin]

Exactly! Hillary might as well work in Vegas with a sign over her home that says "FOR SALE." Apparently, liberals have no problem with her being more open to being bought than a Bangkok whore. After all, ALL liberals are for sale to highest bidder for their vote.

Funny how the whore meme fits liberals so well...they ARE after all mostly women. Most women are used to "selling the goods"...after all...what IS marriage? Room and board for sex? What is dating? Dinner and a movie for sex. What do women bring to the table? Sex. So, "whoring" comes natural to them. It's what they do. They get things by promising sex.

[ColdNoMore]

Hilarious, Pew research polled multiple countries and internationally there's only 9% confidence that Trump would be a good leader, make good foreign policy choices, etc. The exception was that CHINA, yes China has a 40% confidence rating of Trump.

Most foreigners believe he's ignorant to foreign relations, is too quick to react and reacts with poor judgement, and the negative views go on.

Looks like Republicans are the only ones with their heads in the sand about Trump. Everyone else even internationally can see how horrible of a President Trump would be.

I'm rather surprised it's as high as 9%.