Sanctuary City Question

[Sandtrap328]

Some sanctuary city mayors are saying they will continue to be sanctuary cities. Trump has threatened to cut off their federal funding. One goofball sheriff said the mayors should be arrested for violating federal law of harboring illegals.

However, there are some entire states who have no penalty for marijuana possession or usage. This is a violation of federal law. Where is the umbrage here? We have heard lots of REGRESSIVES on here saying smoking marijuana is the gateway to heroin and a life of crime.

We have not heard Trumpanzee say anything about cutting federal funding to those marijuana allowing states.

[dirtbanker]

We have not heard Trumpanzee say anything about cutting federal funding to those marijuana allowing states.

No Sandy we have not heard Trump address that issue, yet...

Do you suppose that was something that should have been done prior, like when the states legalized it years ago? I suspect the use of heroin has increased since the legalization, as it seems to be in the news all too often these days ($hit let me google that one Heroin use in U.S. reaches "alarming" 20-year high - CBS News (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/heroin-use-in-u-s-reaches-alarming-20-year-high/)). I believe the last president smoked pot...kind of explains why he did nothing to prevent the states legalization...hopefully Trump will do as he campaigned and address the drug problem. Madonna will probably throw on a pot leaf tee shirt...Get ready for some more protesting!

Change , good or bad, seems to deserve protesting!

[Don Baldwin]

Some sanctuary city mayors are saying they will continue to be sanctuary cities. Trump has threatened to cut off their federal funding. One goofball sheriff said the mayors should be arrested for violating federal law of harboring illegals.

However, there are some entire states who have no penalty for marijuana possession or usage. This is a violation of federal law. Where is the umbrage here? We have heard lots of REGRESSIVES on here saying smoking marijuana is the gateway to heroin and a life of crime.

We have not heard Trumpanzee say anything about cutting federal funding to those marijuana allowing states.

Allowing people to smoke marijuana isn't even CLOSE to ENCOURAGING the destruction of the country by turning it into Mexico II.

One is a personal decision that affects the individual, the other will lead to the eventual destruction of America and our culture.

[rubicon]

Some sanctuary city mayors are saying they will continue to be sanctuary cities. Trump has threatened to cut off their federal funding. One goofball sheriff said the mayors should be arrested for violating federal law of harboring illegals.

However, there are some entire states who have no penalty for marijuana possession or usage. This is a violation of federal law. Where is the umbrage here? We have heard lots of REGRESSIVES on here saying smoking marijuana is the gateway to heroin and a life of crime.

We have not heard Trumpanzee say anything about cutting federal funding to those marijuana allowing states.


There is no argument in favor for allowing legal recreational use of marijuana but that argument does not belong in this topic.

Instead consider that Americans who commit felonies in this nation are tried, sentence and imprisoned. and yet we have government officials who continue to give sanctuary to illegal aliens.

Further, let any American in any other country on this earth commit a crime and you can bet they will be imprisoned . Heck in some of these nations the government will even make up an excuse and imprison an American well because they are Americans.

The insanity of government officials, defending criminals and granting them sanctuary just because they are illegal aliens, escapes progressives

Personal Best Regards:

[billethkid]

Allowing people to smoke marijuana isn't even CLOSE to ENCOURAGING the destruction of the country by turning it into Mexico II.

One is a personal decision that affects the individual, the other will lead to the eventual destruction of America and our culture.

Some things just bear repeating:

"Allowing people to smoke marijuana isn't even CLOSE to ENCOURAGING the destruction of the country by turning it into Mexico II."

[Sandtrap328]

There is no argument in favor for allowing legal recreational use of marijuana but that argument does not belong in this topic.

Instead consider that Americans who commit felonies in this nation are tried, sentence and imprisoned. and yet we have government officials who continue to give sanctuary to illegal aliens.

Further, let any American in any other country on this earth commit a crime and you can bet they will be imprisoned . Heck in some of these nations the government will even make up an excuse and imprison an American well because they are Americans.

The insanity of government officials, defending criminals and granting them sanctuary just because they are illegal aliens, escapes progressives

Personal Best Regards:

However, BOTH are against Federal law, aren't they? Why should one Federal law be overlooked and the other prosecuted?

If you are in favor of an Illegal Immigrant Federal Force to round up ALL illegal immigrants, branding them on their forehead with a huge "I", and deportation- just say so.

You are putting yourself - once again - into the same mold as the resident racist, Don Baldwin. Congratulations!

[rubicon]

However, BOTH are against Federal law, aren't they? Why should one Federal law be overlooked and the other prosecuted?

If you are in favor of an Illegal Immigrant Federal Force to round up ALL illegal immigrants, branding them on their forehead with a huge "I", and deportation- just say so.

You are putting yourself - once again - into the same mold as the resident racist, Don Baldwin. Congratulations!

So you believe that illegally smoking dope equates to an illegal murdering an innocent American?

I did not say that the federal law should not be enforced against illegal use of marijuana. it should and I believe marijuana is harmful. However what I said is that the comparisons you use are not of equivalent value.

the shielding of illegals committing crimes is plain insanity and there is no rationale to justify such protections by any governmental official.

Personal Best Regards:

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

I'm thinking that either we might see something from the feds that sanction states that allow marijuana sales or a new federal law loosening the restrictions on it. If that's the case, it doesn't have the priority of fixing our illegal immigration problem.

Please explain why these mayors should not be looked up for committing a federal crime? Are they not harboring fugitives from the federal law?

[Don Baldwin]

However, BOTH are against Federal law, aren't they? Why should one Federal law be overlooked and the other prosecuted?

If you are in favor of an Illegal Immigrant Federal Force to round up ALL illegal immigrants, branding them on their forehead with a huge "I", and deportation- just say so.

You are putting yourself - once again - into the same mold as the resident racist, Don Baldwin. Congratulations!

Because one is just and the other is unjust...repelling invaders IS just...locking people up for a plant found in nature is not.

Why not brand them? They snuck in once, what makes you think they won't again? Muslims cut off hands for stealing...this is nothing. And it would make it very hard to sneak back in and get a job with that big I on their forehead. Because part of the "I" is you're banned, NEVER getting in legally.

I know where you're going with this...I'm NOT stupid... The Jews WERE a problem in Germany. Just like they do here in America...Jews run the banks, the media, entertainment, music, movies, TV, newspapers. They're like 3% of the population but own so much more of it. Their success got them noticed and blamed. I'm NOT saying they WERE and I'm NOT saying they weren't. I wasn't there and "his-story" can't be trusted. I've heard too much on BOTH sides to know what happened.

I do know too...that is wasn't JUST the Jews rounded up...EVERYONE they "didn't want" went to "work". And when they DIED, they were burned, not before. There's a LOT of propaganda on both sides.

You think it's GOOD that whites are being bred out, replaced by Hispanics? You think the country will IMPROVE when whites are the minority? Has it EVER gotten better with them running things?

So you believe that illegally smoking dope equates to an illegal murdering an innocent American?

I did not say that the federal law should not be enforced against illegal use of marijuana. it should and I believe marijuana is harmful. However what I said is that the comparisons you use are not of equivalent value.

the shielding of illegals committing crimes is plain insanity and there is no rationale to justify such protections by any governmental official.

Personal Best Regards:

It shouldn't be enforced and many states have already said they won't. It's unjust to deny people something they want that harms no one.

You're right...and they're becoming the majority meaning THEY will be voting in THEIR politicians...and that will be the end...Mexico II.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

However, BOTH are against Federal law, aren't they? Why should one Federal law be overlooked and the other prosecuted?

If you are in favor of an Illegal Immigrant Federal Force to round up ALL illegal immigrants, branding them on their forehead with a huge "I", and deportation- just say so.

You are putting yourself - once again - into the same mold as the resident racist, Don Baldwin. Congratulations!

To answer your first question, we have limited resources to enforce federal law so a list of priorities must be developed. I personally would not put marijuana at the same priority level as illegal immigration. Additionally, I think that we're probably going to see a softening of federal marijuana laws at some point so I can't see dealing with this right away.

In answer to your second question, I don't think that there are too many people that want that, including the president.

Illegal immigration is a complex problem because there are many different reasons that people are here illegally. Again, we must prioritize. Some people have been here for a long time and have simply forgotten to renew their 10 year visa. Those people need to be contacted and reminded that they need to renew. At that point they should be given the option of renewing or returning to their homeland. Depending on how late they are, a small fine might be appropriate.

A second group are those who were brought here by their parents at a very young age and are illegal through no fault of their own. Each of these cases needs to be reviewed on it's own merits. If the person has been a productive, contributing member of our society for a long time then we might offer them a chance to become legal and maybe even offer a pathway to citizenship. If however they do not have a job and/or have been involved in other crimes, then they should be punished and then deported. But as I said, each case has to be judged on it's own merits.

A third group may be people that came here illegally with no intent to do malice and are still here. These people also need to be looked at individually. Some of them have been contributing members of our society and they certainly deserve to be treated differently from those who are collecting welfare or committing crimes.

Then there are people who came here to work at low wage jobs such as picking fruit etc. We need to create a day visa program for these people so that they can go back and forth without a problem. These visas must be easy to obtain and inexpensive. Perhaps the employers should be made responsible for them and be made to pay for the visas since they are the ones benefitting from them. Or perhaps we could use federal prisoners to work in the fields to offset the cost of their incarceration and not have a day visa program.

Then there are criminals. The illegal drug trade from Mexico is huge. Anyone caught in this country selling or distributing drugs from Mexico needs to be imprisoned. Not only are the selling and distribution of illegal drugs crimes in their own right, but there are all kinds of other crimes that are caused by it. Any illegals caught stealing, robbing, or committing and other crime that can be shown to be connected to drugs must be treated the same as the drug dealers.

I would also seek permission from the Mexican government to send troops into Mexico to deal eradicate the drug lords. These organizations are as heavily armed as some small armies and the only way that they are going to be stopped is to send a powerful military after them. Police forces and border patrols cannot deal with them. We know who they are and where they are. Our military could easily destroy them. They pose a threat to this country and taking them out would be an act of self defense.

Anyone caught or committing planning acts of terror must be detained and imprisoned. I would send them to Guantanamo. Perhaps the drug dealers can go there as well. Personally, I would give them both the death penalty. They are either killing US citizens or planning to. Any illegal immigrant caught committing any other crime should be imprisoned and eventually deported.

No one is in favor of just rounding up all illegal immigrants and deporting them. This is a big problem and will take a very complex solution.

In the meantime, we need to stop the flow of illegals entering through our southern border and have the SJC properly define the 14th amendment so that we no longer have birthright citizenship. That alone would slow the rate of illegals coming here substantially. Yes, we need to build a wall and then find and seal all of the tunnels. Again, this is not a job for border security alone. We need tens of thousands of people down there doing this.

And by the way, this has nothing NOTHING to do with race. If white Canadians were doing the same thing, I would suggest the same actions.

[Don Baldwin]

To answer your first question, we have limited resources to enforce federal law so a list of priorities must be developed. I personally would not put marijuana at the same priority level as illegal immigration. Additionally, I think that we're probably going to see a softening of federal marijuana laws at some point so I can't see dealing with this right away.

In answer to your second question, I don't think that there are too many people that want that, including the president.

Illegal immigration is a complex problem because there are many different reasons that people are here illegally. Again, we must prioritize. Some people have been here for a long time and have simply forgotten to renew their 10 year visa. Those people need to be contacted and reminded that they need to renew. At that point they should be given the option of renewing or returning to their homeland. Depending on how late they are, a small fine might be appropriate.

A second group are those who were brought here by their parents at a very young age and are illegal through no fault of their own. Each of these cases needs to be reviewed on it's own merits. If the person has been a productive, contributing member of our society for a long time then we might offer them a chance to become legal and maybe even offer a pathway to citizenship. If however they do not have a job and/or have been involved in other crimes, then they should be punished and then deported. But as I said, each case has to be judged on it's own merits.

A third group may be people that came here illegally with no intent to do malice and are still here. These people also need to be looked at individually. Some of them have been contributing members of our society and they certainly deserve to be treated differently from those who are collecting welfare or committing crimes.

Then there are people who came here to work at low wage jobs such as picking fruit etc. We need to create a day visa program for these people so that they can go back and forth without a problem. These visas must be easy to obtain and inexpensive. Perhaps the employers should be made responsible for them and be made to pay for the visas since they are the ones benefitting from them. Or perhaps we could use federal prisoners to work in the fields to offset the cost of their incarceration and not have a day visa program.

Then there are criminals. The illegal drug trade from Mexico is huge. Anyone caught in this country selling or distributing drugs from Mexico needs to be imprisoned. Not only are the selling and distribution of illegal drugs crimes in their own right, but there are all kinds of other crimes that are caused by it. Any illegals caught stealing, robbing, or committing and other crime that can be shown to be connected to drugs must be treated the same as the drug dealers.

I would also seek permission from the Mexican government to send troops into Mexico to deal eradicate the drug lords. These organizations are as heavily armed as some small armies and the only way that they are going to be stopped is to send a powerful military after them. Police forces and border patrols cannot deal with them. We know who they are and where they are. Our military could easily destroy them. They pose a threat to this country and taking them out would be an act of self defense.

Anyone caught or committing planning acts of terror must be detained and imprisoned. I would send them to Guantanamo. Perhaps the drug dealers can go there as well. Personally, I would give them both the death penalty. They are either killing US citizens or planning to. Any illegal immigrant caught committing any other crime should be imprisoned and eventually deported.

No one is in favor of just rounding up all illegal immigrants and deporting them. This is a big problem and will take a very complex solution.

In the meantime, we need to stop the flow of illegals entering through our southern border and have the SJC properly define the 14th amendment so that we no longer have birthright citizenship. That alone would slow the rate of illegals coming here substantially. Yes, we need to build a wall and then find and seal all of the tunnels. Again, this is not a job for border security alone. We need tens of thousands of people down there doing this.

And by the way, this has nothing NOTHING to do with race. If white Canadians were doing the same thing, I would suggest the same actions.

You're IGNORING the FACT that minorities are ALREADY the majority below age 7.

No you wouldn't because you'd NEVER know they were Canadians. Because Canadians look, act, speak like we do...they're the SAME as us...whereas blacks/hispanics do not and are NOT the same as us.

You're sitting on your hands waiting for a "just" solution and there isn't one. They're taking over...and when they do...America is done. The great experiment will have failed. We couldn't keep it...we gave it away...to THEM. Ignorant 3rd worlders...because bleeding heart women felt sorry for them!

[Sandtrap328]

So you believe that illegally smoking dope equates to an illegal murdering an innocent American?

I did not say that the federal law should not be enforced against illegal use of marijuana. it should and I believe marijuana is harmful. However what I said is that the comparisons you use are not of equivalent value.

the shielding of illegals committing crimes is plain insanity and there is no rationale to justify such protections by any governmental official.

Personal Best Regards:

You are now claiming that an illegal who murders an American or commits other crimes against property or persons while living in a sanctuary city will not be prosecuted? They may not be turned over to ICE but they certainly will be prosecuted for crimes .

So nice to see that you are now openly agreeing with Don Baldwin. Glad you came out of your closet and in for your measurements for your white sheet.

[dirtbanker]

You are now claiming that an illegal who murders an American or commits other crimes against property or persons while living in a sanctuary city will not be prosecuted? They may not be turned over to ICE but they certainly will be prosecuted for crimes .

So nice to see that you are now openly agreeing with Don Baldwin. Glad you came out of your closet and in for your measurements for your white sheet.

Sandy - I read Rubi's post and I don't see any claim "that an illegal who murders an American or commits other crimes against property or persons while living in a sanctuary city will not be prosecuted...how did you arrive to that?

I do know the girl that was killed in San Fransisco was killed by a illegal immigrant that had been arrested days earlier and was released, but I believe he was prosecuted for the murder. A point to be made against the sanctuary cities is this murder most likely would not have happened if they turned him over to ICE. I am sure you can agree it is a shame this lawful citizen lost her life to a person that should not have even been in the country? A google search brought up several of these type stories...

I feel it is wrong to harbor these illegal immigrants, they should be deported and then they can apply for citizenship, the way the legal immigrants have all done. If these cities want to disregard the law, then I don't want to reward them with my tax money. Maybe the illegal immigrants can pay the difference??

[rubicon]

Sandy - I read Rubi's post and I don't see any claim "that an illegal who murders an American or commits other crimes against property or persons while living in a sanctuary city will not be prosecuted...how did you arrive to that?

I do know the girl that was killed in San Fransisco was killed by a illegal immigrant that had been arrested days earlier and was released, but I believe he was prosecuted for the murder. A point to be made against the sanctuary cities is this murder most likely would not have happened if they turned him over to ICE. I am sure you can agree it is a shame this lawful citizen lost her life to a person that should not have even been in the country? A google search brought up several of these type stories...

I feel it is wrong to harbor these illegal immigrants, they should be deported and then they can apply for citizenship, the way the legal immigrants have all done. If these cities want to disregard the law, then I don't want to reward them with my tax money. Maybe the illegal immigrants can pay the difference??

You are splitting hairs and accusing me of claims that I did not make.

First you make this a racist issue while I spoke only to criminal acts.

Secondly you ignore the fact that cities such as San Francisco hide illegals and by hiding them they are free to commit crimes when they should have been deported...and if they had been deported people like that young lady killed in San Francisco would not have become a victim .Now go back and practice your alinsky

Personal Best Regards:

[ColdNoMore]

Sandy - I read Rubi's post and I don't see any claim "that an illegal who murders an American or commits other crimes against property or persons while living in a sanctuary city will not be prosecuted...how did you arrive to that?

I do know the girl that was killed in San Fransisco was killed by a illegal immigrant that had been arrested days earlier and was released, but I believe he was prosecuted for the murder. A point to be made against the sanctuary cities is this murder most likely would not have happened if they turned him over to ICE. I am sure you can agree it is a shame this lawful citizen lost her life to a person that should not have even been in the country? A google search brought up several of these type stories...

I feel it is wrong to harbor these illegal immigrants, they should be deported and then they can apply for citizenship, the way the legal immigrants have all done. If these cities want to disregard the law, then I don't want to reward them with my tax money. Maybe the illegal immigrants can pay the difference??



You are splitting hairs and accusing me of claims that I did not make.

First you make this a racist issue while I spoke only to criminal acts.

Secondly you ignore the fact that cities such as San Francisco hide illegals and by hiding them they are free to commit crimes when they should have been deported...and if they had been deported people like that young lady killed in San Francisco would not have become a victim .Now go back and practice your alinsky

Personal Best Regards:

:1rotfl:

And you're so dumb, you quoted the wrong post...and are attacking your butt buddy DirtBag. :oops:

Thanks for the guffaw. :thumbup:

Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

You're IGNORING the FACT that minorities are ALREADY the majority below age 7.

No you wouldn't because you'd NEVER know they were Canadians. Because Canadians look, act, speak like we do...they're the SAME as us...whereas blacks/hispanics do not and are NOT the same as us.

You're sitting on your hands waiting for a "just" solution and there isn't one. They're taking over...and when they do...America is done. The great experiment will have failed. We couldn't keep it...we gave it away...to THEM. Ignorant 3rd worlders...because bleeding heart women felt sorry for them!

Since this thread is anonymous I'm not really sure who you are, but you sound like someone in another post who is confusing illegal immigration with the growth of the minority population.

One has nothing to do with the other.

Illegal is illegal no matter what color you are.

[Don Baldwin]

Since this thread is anonymous I'm not really sure who you are, but you sound like someone in another post who is confusing illegal immigration with the growth of the minority population.

One has nothing to do with the other.

Illegal is illegal no matter what color you are.

Au contraire...the "confusion" is all yours...

Illegal immigrants...11 million a year going back and forth for the past 30 years...dropped "anchor babies" (in my mind illegal) in the US. These anchor babies are now in their 30s and had their OWN (in my mind still illegal) kids who are now having their own (in my mind STILL illegal) kids who now number so many...100 million?...that THEY...Hispanics...are now 1/3 the population and the MAJORITY below the age of 7.

You never noticed because it was hidden from you because they were classified as "white".

Joe Biden...remember him? In a speech admitted that "whites are no longer a majority", we've slipped below 50% of the US population.

Here...listen for yourself: Joe Biden: "Whites will be a Minority in US by 2017 - and that's a good Thing" - YouTube (https://youtu.be/kAGhyFHnuv8?t=22)

Where has a decreasing white population EVER been good? Has ANYWHERE...EVER...improved with "white flight" and a majority minority? I've been asking and nobody can seem to find a "black villages" anywhere. They've searched the whole planet...couldn't find ONE black paradise...same can be said about the Hispanics...WHERE do they improve places when they become the majority?

Hispanics ARE breeding us out...the US...WILL be Mexico II within 30 years. It's a mathematical certainty.

If you disagree...I'd love to see your facts.

[MDLNB]

You are splitting hairs and accusing me of claims that I did not make.

First you make this a racist issue while I spoke only to criminal acts.

Secondly you ignore the fact that cities such as San Francisco hide illegals and by hiding them they are free to commit crimes when they should have been deported...and if they had been deported people like that young lady killed in San Francisco would not have become a victim .Now go back and practice your alinsky

Personal Best Regards:

Why bother? You know how it ends with these type. If you do not agree, they shout that you are a racist. Who cares what they think?

[bbbbbb]

[QUOTE=Guest]Some sanctuary city mayors are saying they will continue to be sanctuary cities. Trump has threatened to cut off their federal funding. One goofball sheriff said the mayors should be arrested for violating federal law of harboring illegals.

However, there are some entire states who have no penalty for marijuana possession or usage. This is a violation of federal law. Where is the umbrage here? We have heard lots of REGRESSIVES on here saying smoking marijuana is the gateway to heroin and a life of crime.

We have not heard Trumpanzee say anything about cutting federal funding to those marijuana


bbbbbb
Let me give you some first hand experience with gaTeway drugs from a direct experience.
I was in the Maritime Service for 7 years, also called the Merchant Marine etc. So, the US Coast Guard was absolutely Zero Tolerance on drugs, any drugs, NADA.
I had a good foster dad who enlightened me and was a godsend in my life. He clarified what I saw on some ships. Some mariners, not all, booze it up, smoke pot and also hit the heroin. It was well known on a ship of 35 persons, for maybe a year, who does what and when. Drugs were totally forbidden in any form, if the Captain or any Officer found it,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, THAT PERSON IS PUT OFF AT THE NEXT PORT,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, NO EXCEPTIONS and their US papers are taken and they will never go on a US ship again.
I wanted to make money, save money, go to college, and so I stayed clear but I saw it all. Is WEED a gateway drug? YES, I saw it over and over, first the weed, then the heroin and also the opium in Asian Ports. I saw it ruin the lives of some nice and smart guys. If I was around users, I have had several tell me : DO NOT START, DO NOT TRY IT, EVER!!!! I can look at it in a different light than other folks. I fortunately went to college, got a good education and did well. Drug sellers should be shot or put away for life, no parole, drugs are a way of life with them, they cannot quit.
chilout

[ColdNoMore]

Let me give you some first hand experience with gaTeway drugs from a direct experience.
I was in the Maritime Service for 7 years, also called the Merchant Marine etc. So, the US Coast Guard was absolutely Zero Tolerance on drugs, any drugs, NADA.
I had a good foster dad who enlightened me and was a godsend in my life. He clarified what I saw on some ships. Some mariners, not all, booze it up, smoke pot and also hit the heroin. It was well known on a ship of 35 persons, for maybe a year, who does what and when. Drugs were totally forbidden in any form, if the Captain or any Officer found it,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, THAT PERSON IS PUT OFF AT THE NEXT PORT,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, NO EXCEPTIONS and their US papers are taken and they will never go on a US ship again.
I wanted to make money, save money, go to college, and so I stayed clear but I saw it all. Is WEED a gateway drug? YES, I saw it over and over, first the weed, then the heroin and also the opium in Asian Ports. I saw it ruin the lives of some nice and smart guys. If I was around users, I have had several tell me : DO NOT START, DO NOT TRY IT, EVER!!!! I can look at it in a different light than other folks. I fortunately went to college, got a good education and did well.

First of all, anyone who is not smart enough (after months of being here) to properly quote another poster...should have everything they say questioned. :oops:

Secondly, your anecdotal experience...does not automatically constitute reality.

There are MILLIONS of pot smokers who only do pot...and don't even drink.

However, since alcohol is the most widely ABUSED DRUG there is...why don't you consider it a "gateway drug" also?

And just in case you even want to try and argue on whether alcohol is a drug...let me disabuse you of that notion immediately. ;)

What Is Alcohol? Is Alcohol a Drug? Alcohol Content - Drug-Free World (http://www.drugfreeworld.org/drugfacts/alcohol.html)

WHAT IS ALCOHOL?

Alcohol is a drug.

It is classed as a depressant, meaning that it slows down vital functions—resulting in slurred speech, unsteady movement, disturbed perceptions and an inability to react quickly.







Drug sellers should be shot or put away for life, no parole, drugs are a way of life with them, they cannot quit.
ALL drug sellers and/or users?

Which remember...INCLUDES alcohol.

There go a lot of your friends (if you even have any) and neighbors. :oops:

You are one sick, ignorant person. :ohdear:

[autumnspring]

some sanctuary city mayors are saying they will continue to be sanctuary cities. Trump has threatened to cut off their federal funding. One goofball sheriff said the mayors should be arrested for violating federal law of harboring illegals.

However, there are some entire states who have no penalty for marijuana possession or usage. This is a violation of federal law. Where is the umbrage here? We have heard lots of regressives on here saying smoking marijuana is the gateway to heroin and a life of crime.

We have not heard trumpanzee say anything about cutting federal funding to those marijuana allowing states.

you are not worth a reply

[Sandtrap328]

you are not worth a reply

But, Susie, YOU did reply!

Obviously, not the brightest bulb, are you? Saying I am not worth a reply and then replying? Well, what else can be expected of a REGRESSIVE?

Oh yeah, check out the proper spelling of "TRUMPANZEE ".

[MDLNB]

but, susie, you did reply!

Obviously, not the brightest bulb, are you? Saying i am not worth a reply and then replying? Well, what else can be expected of a regressive?

Oh yeah, check out the proper spelling of "trumpanzee ".

troll

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

Illegal immigrants...11 million a year going back and forth for the past 30 years...dropped "anchor babies" (in my mind illegal) in the US. These anchor babies are now in their 30s and had their OWN (in my mind still illegal) kids who are now having their own (in my mind STILL illegal) kids who now number so many...100 million?...that THEY...Hispanics...are now 1/3 the population and the MAJORITY below the age of 7.

I shouldn't really have to point out that what is illegal "in your mind" is not what is actually illegal.

Under our current laws, these anchor babies are legal U.S. citizens. You don't have to like the law, but you really can't argue that they are not legal.

I believe that the 14th amendment of our constitution has been wrongly interpreted and that needs to be changed. But what's done is done and can't be changed. These people are legal U.S. citizens.

As I also pointed out earlier, this shift in demographics is also the result of white people deciding to have fewer children. This is especially true of wealthy white people.

What we've been experiencing is that the people that can afford multiple children are making a decision to not have many and the poorest among us, black, white, yellow and red are having more and more kids.

So what I see as a problem is we're going to have more children dependent on government assistance than ever before. And many of them are white, so I don't see this as a race issue and I really don't see what can be done about it unless you want the government to dictate how many children you must have.

[Don Baldwin]

I shouldn't really have to point out that what is illegal "in your mind" is not what is actually illegal.

Under our current laws, these anchor babies are legal U.S. citizens. You don't have to like the law, but you really can't argue that they are not legal.

I believe that the 14th amendment of our constitution has been wrongly interpreted and that needs to be changed. But what's done is done and can't be changed. These people are legal U.S. citizens.

As I also pointed out earlier, this shift in demographics is also the result of white people deciding to have fewer children. This is especially true of wealthy white people.

What we've been experiencing is that the people that can afford multiple children are making a decision to not have many and the poorest among us, black, white, yellow and red are having more and more kids.

So what I see as a problem is we're going to have more children dependent on government assistance than ever before. And many of them are white, so I don't see this as a race issue and I really don't see what can be done about it unless you want the government to dictate how many children you must have.

"Under the jurisdiction of" does NOT mean here illegally to drop a "citizen" so the rest of the family can live here off welfare because the "citizen" child needs assistance. Because THEY interpret it differently doesn't make THEM right either. Many things are "politically" interpreted wrong. Look how they took homosexuality OUT of the DSM...it was POLITICALLY taken out, it's completely "normal" to stuff your schlong into your "lovers" butt, while someone who chews ice suffers from pica.

What's done is done...and what's done is America and white culture. What's done id they now number 100 million and make up 1/3 the population. What's done is minorities are the MAJORITY of children now...under age 7 is a majority minorities. Joe Biden in a speech said whites are ALREADY at 49% and dropping.

I've said it too...and I volunteered to do my part...bring me your granddaughters. Abortion and birth control destroyed the white race...unchecked immigration is putting in the final nail.

Because we PAY them for more kids. The mother doesn't get the welfare...the CHILD does. Each child qualifies for more. A single mother of 4 can get $60,000 a year in welfare benefits. We're PAYING them to breed us out of our own country.

Hispanics have been counted as white. In reality white people aren't on welfare very much...unless they have MIXED race kids.

Take a trip to any welfare office...what do you see? black and brown women...not many whites at all...and when you do see them, they have mixed race kids.

[ColdNoMore]

But, Susie, YOU did reply!

Obviously, not the brightest bulb, are you? Saying I am not worth a reply and then replying? Well, what else can be expected of a REGRESSIVE?

Oh yeah, check out the proper spelling of "TRUMPANZEE ".

:boom:


:a20:


:thumbup:

[Don Baldwin]

:boom:


:a20:


:thumbup:

You found it necessary and had the time to craft a comment to THAT?

And left the REAL discussion...the post above...to languish?

Don't you and Susie have your own forum where you can giggle back and forth at each other?

[Rosie1950]

Gee if he cuts off funding To NY City will he have to move his little hottie to the WHITE HOUSE with their offspring, can't expect the cuts to stop NY police from patrolling other parts of the city to protect his Immigrant and their offspring because she feels the White house isn't good enough or gold plated enough for her. I personally think she's had enough of him and divorce is on her mind, I think she's the BRAINS in the family.

[Don Baldwin]

Gee if he cuts off funding To NY City will he have to move his little hottie to the WHITE HOUSE with their offspring, can't expect the cuts to stop NY police from patrolling other parts of the city to protect his Immigrant and their offspring because she feels the White house isn't good enough or gold plated enough for her. I personally think she's had enough of him and divorce is on her mind, I think she's the BRAINS in the family.

She's...they're...waiting for the smell to go away in the White House. It may need to be razed...a new one built...because the stink may never go away.

[MDLNB]

Gee if he cuts off funding To NY City will he have to move his little hottie to the WHITE HOUSE with their offspring, can't expect the cuts to stop NY police from patrolling other parts of the city to protect his Immigrant and their offspring because she feels the White house isn't good enough or gold plated enough for her. I personally think she's had enough of him and divorce is on her mind, I think she's the BRAINS in the family.

Yes, I am sure you are right.....not. WOW! What a great contribution to the political forum.

NEXT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>