View Full Version : White House investigates leaks of Trump calls to Australia, Mexico
dave harris
02-04-2017, 07:03 AM
"Donald Trump invited Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails"
I invite the russians to tap all trump's phone calls, turnabout is fair play.
Don Baldwin
02-04-2017, 07:53 AM
"Donald Trump invited Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails"
I invite the russians to tap all trump's phone calls, turnabout is fair play.
One was a candidate...the other is THE sitting president.
BIG difference "Dave"...the woman pretending to be a man...your ignorance and lack of logic give you away.
IF they DID hack...I'm sure they hacked equally and hacked Trump too.
ColdNoMore
02-04-2017, 08:24 AM
"Donald Trump invited Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails"
I invite the russians to tap all trump's phone calls, turnabout is fair play.
You can bet Putin has already hacked Chump's e-mails, but has chosen to sit on them...so as to pull Trump's puppet strings. :ho:
dave harris
02-04-2017, 08:33 AM
One was a candidate...the other is THE sitting president.
BIG difference "Dave"...the woman pretending to be a man...your ignorance and lack of logic give you away.
IF they DID hack...I'm sure they hacked equally and hacked Trump too.
Oh, so you trust the russians to be equal hackers? Tell me what information on trump they released. Talk about ignorance and lack of logic, you are a perfect example of it.
Don Baldwin
02-04-2017, 09:07 AM
Oh, so you trust the russians to be equal hackers? Tell me what information on trump they released. Talk about ignorance and lack of logic, you are a perfect example of it.
ALL we know is what someone decides to tell us.
You assume the media is truthful and unbiased.
They are not.
Why WOULDN'T the Russians be an equal opportunity hacker? Don't you think they hack their "friends", their "employees" too? Wouldn't you? Or are you more of a checkers girl?
billethkid
02-04-2017, 09:29 AM
Too many people put too much stock in the magnitude of the issue of hacking e-mails.
What would someone discover about you if your emails were hacked? The average person, nothing of substance.
The whole email mania has been established, created, spawned by, a by product of Clinton's felonious activity and the openly breaking of the law. And using unsecured email as a conduit for communicating sensitive and classified content.
Most responsible people in such positions are not that stupid or self centered.
Rockyrd
02-04-2017, 09:32 AM
Too many people put too much stock in the magnitude of the issue of hacking e-mails.
What would someone discover about you if your emails were hacked? The average person, nothing of substance.
The whole email mania has been established, created, spawned by, a by product of Clinton's felonious activity and the openly breaking of the law. And using unsecured email as a conduit for communicating sensitive and classified content.
Most responsible people in such positions are not that stupid or self centered.
You are a bit confused.
TWO seperate items....the hacking was of the DNC and had no classified or secure material attached to that story...This is what the Russians hacked.
The other was in reference to a private server used while Secy of State.
Your post implies that they are one in the same and they are two distinct different stories.
Don Baldwin
02-04-2017, 09:37 AM
You are a bit confused.
TWO seperate items....the hacking was of the DNC and had no classified or secure material attached to that story...This is what the Russians hacked.
The other was in reference to a private server used while Secy of State.
Your post implies that they are one in the same and they are two distinct different stories.
They were BOTH purportedly hacked by the Russians.
Rockyrd
02-04-2017, 09:44 AM
They were BOTH purportedly hacked by the Russians.
Your accusation is not only not true but totally unfounded.
"Hackers from Russia attempted to break in to Hillary Clinton’s private email server although the cyber intrusions did not appear to be successful, according to FBI documents made public Monday."
Clinton Email Server Hit in Cyber Attacks From Russians (http://freebeacon.com/national-security/clinton-email-server-hit-cyber-attacks-russians-hackers/)
"Did the Russians hack Hillary Clinton? No. No one did."
Did the Russians hack Hillary Clinton? - Washington Times (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/14/did-the-russians-hack-hillary-clinton/)
Folks, either in error or on purpose, tend to mix these stories. Russia, our new friend, hacked the DNC and John Podesta
dave harris
02-04-2017, 09:55 AM
ALL we know is what someone decides to tell us.
You assume the media is truthful and unbiased.
They are not.
Why WOULDN'T the Russians be an equal opportunity hacker? Don't you think they hack their "friends", their "employees" too? Wouldn't you? Or are you more of a checkers girl?
Tell me what information on trump they released. Don't try to do the trump fancy dance.
MDLNB
02-04-2017, 10:44 AM
Trump does not use email. Maybe that's why nothing was released to the public. By using Twitter, he has shown that he has nothing to hide.
Rockyrd
02-04-2017, 10:46 AM
Trump does not use email. Maybe that's why nothing was released to the public. By using Twitter, he has shown that he has nothing to hide.
Now that there is funny
billethkid
02-04-2017, 11:01 AM
You are a bit confused.
TWO seperate items....the hacking was of the DNC and had no classified or secure material attached to that story...This is what the Russians hacked.
The other was in reference to a private server used while Secy of State.
Your post implies that they are one in the same and they are two distinct different stories.
My post does not imply both are the same.
My post is about EMAILS!!!!
You translated it to fit two other venues....not me.
Rockyrd
02-04-2017, 11:09 AM
My post does not imply both are the same.
My post is about EMAILS!!!!
You translated it to fit two other venues....not me.
Emails...
DNC was about emails
Posdesta was about emails
Clinton was about emails.
What did I confuse ?
DNC was one hack
Podesta was one hack
Clinton had no hack, just released emails from our own government
billethkid
02-04-2017, 11:20 AM
For clarification (hopefully):
"Too many people put too much stock in the magnitude of the issue of hacking e-mails.
What would someone discover about you if your emails were hacked? The average person, nothing of substance.
The whole email mania has been established, created, spawned by, a by product of Clinton's felonious activity and the openly breaking of the law. And using unsecured email as a conduit for communicating sensitive and classified content.
Most responsible people in such positions are not that stupid or self centered. "
dave harris
02-04-2017, 11:30 AM
One was a candidate...the other is THE sitting president.
BIG difference "Dave"...the woman pretending to be a man...your ignorance and lack of logic give you away.
IF they DID hack...I'm sure they hacked equally and hacked Trump too.
They are both citizens of the US, I guess your okay if someone hacks you.
dillywho
02-04-2017, 12:44 PM
Unbelievable! Leaked anything from the White House should be a concern for the safety of all of our country. Look what happened when we just lost Navy Seal Ryan Owens at Yemen. Somebody had to have given the killers a heads-up. Why else would they be locked, loaded, and ready for our people?
And yet, the p*****g contest goes on about hacked emails and Russian interference. Does it not concern anyone else that there is most likely a traitor within the White House?:ohdear:
dave harris
02-04-2017, 01:45 PM
Trump does not use email. Maybe that's why nothing was released to the public. By using Twitter, he has shown that he has nothing to hide.
"In testimony in 2013, Trump revealed that he had embraced email, but only slightly."
Slightly, who would ever believe this person. He never does anything slightly.
dave harris
02-04-2017, 01:47 PM
Unbelievable! Leaked anything from the White House should be a concern for the safety of all of our country. Look what happened when we just lost Navy Seal Ryan Owens at Yemen. Somebody had to have given the killers a heads-up. Why else would they be locked, loaded, and ready for our people?
And yet, the p*****g contest goes on about hacked emails and Russian interference. Does it not concern anyone else that there is most likely a traitor within the White House?:ohdear:
And we see it started when the trump people went in.
rubicon
02-04-2017, 02:03 PM
Dear Conservative Posters:
In the name of national security please do not interfere with this thread. We have progressives hard a work investigating the inner workings of the soviets spy network
Please leave them breathing room and let them tak the lead because they are on to something big here bigger than what Snowden had given to China and Russia. This is all going to be (Crazy Eddy) huuuge. Look for headlines on CNN:D
Personal Best Regards:
dillywho
02-04-2017, 05:55 PM
And we see it started when the trump people went in.
And that is total El Toro PooPoo! Unless, of course, you consider that the former occupant did not get his shill elected. Then I might have to agree. Whatever it takes to create failure, no matter the cost.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.