Cnn

[Paper1]

I've pretty much stopped watching Fox News as I didn't consider it news but right side opinion. I now see CNN is copying the Fox business plan and trying to be the anti Trump network as Fox was to Obama. I watched with interest the last couple days where two black males were arrested for brutally stabbing a 92 year old woman to death. CNN spent weeks reporting the story when the white police officer shot and killed Michael Brown in Ferguson. I've seen nothing about this except on local news. Where is Sharpton or Black Lives Matter? A 92 year old woman, really!

[rubicon]

since you label your thread CNN I'll stay to that issue.

CNN tactics are below contempt and by any measure they fail the ethical standards of journalistic reporting.

What causes me to furrow my brow is one someone comes to their defense. Why? because they end up with some manner of moral equivalency or moral relativism.

and I say to myself you are either ethical or you are unethical. To equivocate that A is more unethical than B does not compute.

Personal Best Regards:

[larbud]

Yep..

[Rockyrd]

since you label your thread CNN I'll stay to that issue.

CNN tactics are below contempt and by any measure they fail the ethical standards of journalistic reporting.

What causes me to furrow my brow is one someone comes to their defense. Why? because they end up with some manner of moral equivalency or moral relativism.

and I say to myself you are either ethical or you are unethical. To equivocate that A is more unethical than B does not compute.

Personal Best Regards:

A few responses....

Since you say "to equivocate that A is more unethical than B does not compute"...... does that apply to your rants about ALL progressives ? Or even your comparisons of Presidents ?

Also, as an avid reader and follower of the news, could you supply specific examples to back up your claim. Thank you.

You big words do not disguise that you said NOTHING of value or substance. Easy to come on here and condemn anyone or anything if your conscience allows to to then simply move n without any credence given

Not defending CNN' but you said "CNN tactics are below contempt...."

That sort of requires you to prove something like that.

I will not hold my breath, because youbare not in the habit of EVER backing up your many many accusations.

[affald]

A few responses....

Since you say "to equivocate that A is more unethical than B does not compute"...... does that apply to your rants about ALL progressives ? Or even your comparisons of Presidents ?

Also, as an avid reader and follower of the news, could you supply specific examples to back up your claim. Thank you.

You big words do not disguise that you said NOTHING of value or substance. Easy to come on here and condemn anyone or anything if your conscience allows to to then simply move n without any credence given

Not defending CNN' but you said "CNN tactics are below contempt...."

That sort of requires you to prove something like that.

I will not hold my breath, because youbare not in the habit of EVER backing up your many many accusations.
One word....... brazile......lol

[Rockyrd]

One word....... brazile......lol

I believe that's a person, not a network. Sort of like Bret Baier.

[affald]

I believe that's a person, not a network. Sort of like Bret Baier.
Once again you prove what a dumb shlt you are. Now stfu

[affald]

Who Leaked The CNN Debate Question To Donna Brazile? | The Daily Caller (https://www.google.com.do/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2016/11/02/who-leaked-the-cnn-debate-question-to-donna-brazile/)

[rubicon]

A few responses....

Since you say "to equivocate that A is more unethical than B does not compute"...... does that apply to your rants about ALL progressives ? Or even your comparisons of Presidents ?

Also, as an avid reader and follower of the news, could you supply specific examples to back up your claim. Thank you.

You big words do not disguise that you said NOTHING of value or substance. Easy to come on here and condemn anyone or anything if your conscience allows to to then simply move n without any credence given

Not defending CNN' but you said "CNN tactics are below contempt...."

That sort of requires you to prove something like that.

I will not hold my breath, because youbare not in the habit of EVER backing up your many many accusations.

Dear guest:

I have two responses for you.

1) since CNN never bothers to support their claims why should I?

2) I have no obligation to explain anything to you. If you disagree with my position then state your opinion (ie counterpoint) but don't waste my reading time with nonsense like the above-stated post you sent me.

By the way do you even understand what moral equivalency means?....never mind

Personal Best Regards:

[hypocritehunter]

since you label your thread CNN I'll stay to that issue.

CNN tactics are below contempt and by any measure they fail the ethical standards of journalistic reporting.

What causes me to furrow my brow is one someone comes to their defense. Why? because they end up with some manner of moral equivalency or moral relativism.

and I say to myself you are either ethical or you are unethical. To equivocate that A is more unethical than B does not compute.

Personal Best Regards:

Ya, keep believing more of Trump's lies. All the media is against him........ well, unless they say something positive about him then they are tremendous. Don't you right wing nutjobs get tired of always blaming the media? It's not the media's fault Trump is a pathological liar. Are they not supposed to report on them? Do you not want to hear them?

[hypocritehunter]

Dear guest:

I have two responses for you.

1) since CNN never bothers to support their claims why should I?

2) I have no obligation to explain anything to you. If you disagree with my position then state your opinion (ie counterpoint) but don't waste my reading time with nonsense like the above-stated post you sent me.

By the way do you even understand what moral equivalency means?....never mind

Personal Best Regards:

I thought 3rd graders weren't allowed to live in the Villages!:highfive:

[Rockyrd]

Dear guest:

I have two responses for you.

1) since CNN never bothers to support their claims why should I?

2) I have no obligation to explain anything to you. If you disagree with my position then state your opinion (ie counterpoint) but don't waste my reading time with nonsense like the above-stated post you sent me.

By the way do you even understand what moral equivalency means?....never mind

Personal Best Regards:

Problem is..you have no positions...none.

You give no reasons for your hate and condemnation...ever.

You are full of accusation, empty on any facts.

[Rosie1950]

Gee, last week Kellyanne Conway, when pressed had to say CNN was NOT fake news and she did NOT know who hands Chump his ill gotten remarks. So now we're back to CNN is fake news! Give me a break you guys must be on the same la la land bus that goes from Mass. to Vermont to vote. LOL.

[larbud]

cnn

[Chi-Town]

SNL'S take on CNN and Kellyanne Conway;

Jake Tapper - SNL - YouTube (https://youtu.be/2pRt4dFBkCA)

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

[affald]

cnn
How true.

This week's cable ratings - Media Life Magazine (http://www.medialifemagazine.com/this-weeks-cable-ratings/)

[MDLNB]

Problem is..you have no positions...none.

You give no reasons for your hate and condemnation...ever.

You are full of accusation, empty on any facts.

Say hello to the kettle, pot.

[dirtbanker]

How true.

This week's cable ratings - Media Life Magazine (http://www.medialifemagazine.com/this-weeks-cable-ratings/)
Do not see ROCKFACE'S famed MSM on the list...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T337A using Tapatalk