The Clinton-Obama-Soros Terrorist Organization.

[MorTech]

They need a civil war in order to distract their retarded tax cattle citizenry from their crimes. The only way these political terrorists can stay out of jail is to start a civil war.

[dave harris]

They need a civil war in order to distract their retarded tax cattle citizenry from their crimes. The only way these political terrorists can stay out of jail is to start a civil war.

What a truely thought out post, by a deranged mind. The sky is falling. Did you go to trump university?

[ColdNoMore]

Anything to try and distract from the main clown...of the Trump Circus, eh? :D


Most accurate comment I've seen yet...

The Trump administration has given every indication, that it is the political equivalent...of the Jerry Springer Show. :boom:


Please keep it up though, as the entertainment value...is priceless. :thumbup:


Donald, Donald, Donald..... :1rotfl:


Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[affald]

The thing is about to explode, this will be more fun than election night, boom....
So… Hillary Knew About The Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election (http://eheadlines.com/so-hillary-knew-about-the-trump-wiretap-tweeted-about-it-one-week-prior-to-election/)

[Don Baldwin]

They're ALL crooked and corrupt...BOTH sides...get that through your heads.

[MDLNB]

The thing is about to explode, this will be more fun than election night, boom....
So… Hillary Knew About The Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election (http://eheadlines.com/so-hillary-knew-about-the-trump-wiretap-tweeted-about-it-one-week-prior-to-election/)


Killary and Obie will always get away with their felonies. They have documented proof that Pedesta and Killary received large quantities of money from Russia, and they still won't do anything about it. No one touches the Clinton corruption.

[Don Baldwin]

They need a civil war in order to distract their retarded tax cattle citizenry from their crimes. The only way these political terrorists can stay out of jail is to start a civil war.

The civil war comes in about 30 years when white people are 25% of the population and getting harassed by the new majority.

[rubicon]

Killary and Obie will always get away with their felonies. They have documented proof that Pedesta and Killary received large quantities of money from Russia, and they still won't do anything about it. No one touches the Clinton corruption.

you speak truth. The MSM, et will always circle the wagons around progressives. They have no shame but are masters at blame and deceptions and outright lies. they can do so under the cover of darkness, darkness provided by MSM...and people complain that Trump speaks out against MSM shame on you CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC,

Personal Best Regards:

[Rockyrd]

you speak truth. The MSM, et will always circle the wagons around progressives. They have no shame but are masters at blame and deceptions and outright lies. they can do so under the cover of darkness, darkness provided by MSM...and people complain that Trump speaks out against MSM shame on you CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC,

Personal Best Regards:

Your avoidance of issues, and total concentration on your hatred is duly noted.

Also, your avoidance of speaking about honesty in government.

Seems as long as the people you hate are harangued by you, all is good in your world.

[cologal]

Killary and Obie will always get away with their felonies. They have documented proof that Pedesta and Killary received large quantities of money from Russia, and they still won't do anything about it. No one touches the Clinton corruption.

Please post any evidence that President Obama wire tapped President Trump or Trump Tower.

If you have any proof that President Obama committed a felony please post it here.

We will await your answer from any creditable source.

[dave harris]

Killary and Obie will always get away with their felonies. They have documented proof that Pedesta and Killary received large quantities of money from Russia, and they still won't do anything about it. No one touches the Clinton corruption.

Show the documentation or SHUT UP!

[dave harris]

The civil war comes in about 30 years when white people are 25% of the population and getting harassed by the new majority.

You know turn around is fair play, people like have caused this problem.

[dillywho]

Show the documentation or SHUT UP!

Last time I checked, this is still a country of free speech and this is an opinion forum. Who are you to tell anyone on here to "SHUT UP!"?

Your side of the aisle is always crowing about free speech, but obviously that right is reserved for you guys.

[cologal]

Last time I checked, this is still a country of free speech and this is an opinion forum. Who are you to tell anyone on here to "SHUT UP!"?

Your side of the aisle is always crowing about free speech, but obviously that right is reserved for you guys.

Every one has the right to free speech but we all, I think you would agree, that the speech be true!

The President of the United States tweeted that a former President of the United States wiretapped him during the campaign. To date no one has provided any proof.. so where is the proof?

This comment.... What felony has former President Obama committed? What felonies has he been accused of?

Where is the proof that Hillary received large sums of money from Russia?

Killary and Obie will always get away with their felonies. They have documented proof that Pedesta and Killary received large quantities of money from Russia, and they still won't do anything about it. No one touches the Clinton corruption.

[MorTech]

It's actually the CIA-NSA-FBI-MSM-Hollywood-Clinton-Obama-Soros Terrorist Organization.

[dave harris]

Last time I checked, this is still a country of free speech and this is an opinion forum. Who are you to tell anyone on here to "SHUT UP!"?

Your side of the aisle is always crowing about free speech, but obviously that right is reserved for you guys.

You can't yell fire in a theater and you can't accuse peole without documentation, it's called libel. I stand by my post.

[dave harris]

It's actually the CIA-NSA-FBI-MSM-Hollywood-Clinton-Obama-Soros Terrorist Organization.

How about the koch brother's are they in there?

[dirtbanker]

You know turn around is fair play, people like have caused this problem.

I am sorry, another post of yours that I am unable to decipher...what are you trying to say??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[dirtbanker]

Every one has the right to free speech but we all, I think you would agree, that the speech be true!

The President of the United States tweeted that a former President of the United States wiretapped him during the campaign. To date no one has provided any proof.. so where is the proof?

Now ease up a little there, I don't see a lot of proof to back up your opinions...or did I miss something?

Accusations happen on a daily bases...Obviously, Trump will have to provide proof before charges are brought. If he was a polished politician he would have made waited till he had completed the investigation prior, made the accusation and arrested the guy all in the same day. He is learning as he goes??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[dirtbanker]

You can't yell fire in a theater and you can't accuse peole without documentation, it's called libel. I stand by my post.

You certainly can yell fire in a theater...if there is no fire you will be arrested.

Not sure what is libel?

I am sure you have never accused "peole" without documentation...


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[cologal]

Now ease up a little there, I don't see a lot of proof to back up your opinions...or did I miss something?

Accusations happen on a daily bases...Obviously, Trump will have to provide proof before charges are brought. If he was a polished politician he would have made waited till he had completed the investigation prior, made the accusation and arrested the guy all in the same day. He is learning as he goes??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Ok lets look at this in a slightly different way! Think of the Wizard of Oz. Don't look at the man behind the curtain look over there!!!! He accused the former President of the United States of America of a felony without any evidence and none has been forthcoming since. How long should we wait?

I would agree he is NOT a polished politician....

[dirtbanker]

Ok lets look at this in a slightly different way! Think of the Wizard of Oz. Don't look at the man behind the curtain look over there!!!! He accused the former President of the United States of America of a felony without any evidence and none has been forthcoming since. How long should we wait?

I would agree he is NOT a polished politician....

While the scarecrow was fooled, Toto was not fooled by the curtain...this has nothing to do with diversion as that would not be a sustainable ploy.

You are making an assumption when you say there is no evidence, and it has to go through the process before we will know what evidence there is, or is not.

Neither Trump nor Obamma are fleeing the country

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[dave harris]

You certainly can yell fire in a theater...if there is no fire you will be arrested.

Not sure what is libel?

I am sure you have never accused "peole" without documentation...


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

I do have documentation when i accuse. I guess you never made a spelling error, your so perfect. If you got arrested for it you do not have freedom to do it.

li·bel
ˈlībəl/Submit
noun
1.
LAW
a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
synonyms: defamation, defamation of character, character assassination, calumny, misrepresentation, scandalmongering; More
2.
(in admiralty and ecclesiastical law) a plaintiff's written declaration.

[Rockyrd]

While the scarecrow was fooled, Toto was not fooled by the curtain...this has nothing to do with diversion as that would not be a sustainable ploy.

You are making an assumption when you say there is no evidence, and it has to go through the process before we will know what evidence there is, or is not.

Neither Trump nor Obamma are fleeing the country

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

If President Trump has any evidence that the past President illegally tapped his phone, he has a responsibility to turn over such evidence to the proper bodies, and actually hold a public press conference and explain it to the american people.


TO make such serious accusations in a public forum and then tell these agencies to go out and see if they can find evidence, while saying you have it is simply

[dillywho]

You can't yell fire in a theater and you can't accuse peole without documentation, it's called libel. I stand by my post.

That is your opinion, as is your right to it.

Why, then, is it ok for the media, Hollywood elites, malcontents, etc. to say the things they say against President Trump, his family, his spokesperson, etc. without documentation? Why was it ok for Hillary and then-President Obama to say the things they say/have said about President Trump without "documentation". There is plenty said on here in both directions, past and present that, according to you, would be libel. Why is that ok? As someone else pointed out, why do you get to have your opinion, yes opinion, without documentation, yet you demand it of others who differ? Sorry, but that door doesn't swing just one way.

[cologal]

While the scarecrow was fooled, Toto was not fooled by the curtain...this has nothing to do with diversion as that would not be a sustainable ploy.

You are making an assumption when you say there is no evidence, and it has to go through the process before we will know what evidence there is, or is not.

Neither Trump nor Obamma are fleeing the country

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

I'm going with Clapper.... he says there was none on his watch! And that fact that none has been forthcoming since the early morning tweets! If he had the goods I think we would already know about it!

How about a small wager? Cup of Starbucks for me or Dunkin for you?

[dirtbanker]

Your on!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[cologal]

Your on!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Great!!!

[Don Baldwin]

That is your opinion, as is your right to it.

Why, then, is it ok for the media, Hollywood elites, malcontents, etc. to say the things they say against President Trump, his family, his spokesperson, etc. without documentation? Why was it ok for Hillary and then-President Obama to say the things they say/have said about President Trump without "documentation". There is plenty said on here in both directions, past and present that, according to you, would be libel. Why is that ok? As someone else pointed out, why do you get to have your opinion, yes opinion, without documentation, yet you demand it of others who differ? Sorry, but that door doesn't swing just one way.

They are "public figures"...there are different rules for them. That's why Trump can't sue everyone who says something he thinks is false. But a private citizen can.

Public figures are open to criticism. They CAN sue...don't get me wrong. But it's just not worth it...and it would open them up to investigation...and they DON'T want that...because just about all "public figures" have things to hide.

[dillywho]

They are "public figures"...there are different rules for them. That's why Trump can't sue everyone who says something he thinks is false. But a private citizen can.

Public figures are open to criticism. They CAN sue...don't get me wrong. But it's just not worth it...and it would open them up to investigation...and they DON'T want that...because just about all "public figures" have things to hide.

OK, I'll give you the part about "public figures". You still, however, did not address the last question as to why it is ok for you to put your opinion our there without having to provide "documentation", while demanding that others provide it.

[Don Baldwin]

OK, I'll give you the part about "public figures". You still, however, did not address the last question as to why it is ok for you to put your opinion our there without having to provide "documentation", while demanding that others provide it.

Slowly this time...he's a public figure...ANYONE can say pretty much ANYTHING about them without slandering.

[dillywho]

Slowly this time...he's a public figure...ANYONE can say pretty much ANYTHING about them without slandering.

Then, slowly this time, you cannot demand that someone who disagrees with you furnish "documentation" to back up an opinion.

[jebartle]

Killary and Obie will always get away with their felonies. They have documented proof that Pedesta and Killary received large quantities of money from Russia, and they still won't do anything about it. No one touches the Clinton corruption.

what felonies, fact check, fact check!!

[rubicon]

I often lean in close whenever someone says "prove it". Take Trump's claim that Obama and Company wiretapped Trump Towers. Progressives view this issue as they do the "GOD"issue...prove it exists and come to think of it WMD. With WMD all anyone can really say is that none were found. What we don't know is did Saddam move his cache? he certainly had plenty of time between the call to arms and America's first strike in Iraq.

Concerning GOD, it is one of those proving a negative scenario and one would have to visit every star, planet speck in the universe to make such a determination for those without faith. for those of faith the evidence is all around us.

As to Trump tower being wiretapped. Its clear that Michael Flynn was the subject of electronic surveillance for sometime.
And we know from Edward Snowden that the NSA was capturing electronic data from everyone and especially electronically spying on world leaders.

Now we find an independent contractor leaked information to wikileak titled Vault 7.

Its common and cceptabl knowledge that someone has been leaking information to the press and to the Democrats. Obama has in so many ways operated lawlessly using the IRS and DOJ to do his dirty work and has done so with impunity.

So its not a reach to consider that Trump may be right in making such a claim against Obama.

Generally speaking progressives are doing anything and everything they can remotely think of to stop Trump
and his agenda.

I believe Trump's claim that Obama via intelligence community Obama sycophants are doing everything they can to undermine Trump and they are using cold war tactics.

They should all be fired.

Personal Best Regards:

[Rockyrd]

I often lean in close whenever someone says "prove it". Take Trump's claim that Obama and Company wiretapped Trump Towers. Progressives view this issue as they do the "GOD"issue...prove it exists and come to think of it WMD. With WMD all anyone can really say is that none were found. What we don't know is did Saddam move his cache? he certainly had plenty of time between the call to arms and America's first strike in Iraq.

Concerning GOD, it is one of those proving a negative scenario and one would have to visit every star, planet speck in the universe to make such a determination for those without faith. for those of faith the evidence is all around us.

As to Trump tower being wiretapped. Its clear that Michael Flynn was the subject of electronic surveillance for sometime.
And we know from Edward Snowden that the NSA was capturing electronic data from everyone and especially electronically spying on world leaders.

Now we find an independent contractor leaked information to wikileak titled Vault 7.

Its common and cceptabl knowledge that someone has been leaking information to the press and to the Democrats. Obama has in so many ways operated lawlessly using the IRS and DOJ to do his dirty work and has done so with impunity.

So its not a reach to consider that Trump may be right in making such a claim against Obama.

Generally speaking progressives are doing anything and everything they can remotely think of to stop Trump
and his agenda.

I believe Trump's claim that Obama via intelligence community Obama sycophants are doing everything they can to undermine Trump and they are using cold war tactics.

They should all be fired.

Personal Best Regards:

Frankly and honestly, our President has attempted to de legitimize just about everything in this country, BUT ONLY WHEN IT WORKS TO HIS PERSONAL ADVANTAGE.

He has PUBLICLY smeared the American intelligence community (by the way, staffed by career hard working Americans...most working through and for 3/4 administrations)....he PUBLICLY and PERSONALLY smeared the character of at least 2 Federal Judges, who were already on the bench while he led the 5 years long lie about the Obama birth...oh, and by the way, hiding behind what he referred to as anonymous sources.

He has challenged without cause the USA voting procedure, falsely PUBLICLY saying that up to 1/2 million illegal immigrants voted.

I could go on and on, but since I, and nobody should, trust one single word that comes out of his mouth, why would anyone be surprised that good honest patriotic Americans would hope to slow him.

What irritates me about your posts is that they are so blind to the real world. Many of your critiques of groups would get a sympathetic ear ON ISSUES, but your blind adoration of Trump, without seemingly understand how totally un American he actually is, or recognizing the terror we should feel about not being able to trust our own President to tell us the truth.

[ColdNoMore]

I often lean in close whenever someone says "prove it". Take Trump's claim that Obama and Company wiretapped Trump Towers. Progressives view this issue as they do the "GOD"issue...prove it exists and come to think of it WMD. With WMD all anyone can really say is that none were found. What we don't know is did Saddam move his cache? he certainly had plenty of time between the call to arms and America's first strike in Iraq.

Concerning GOD, it is one of those proving a negative scenario and one would have to visit every star, planet speck in the universe to make such a determination for those without faith. for those of faith the evidence is all around us.

As to Trump tower being wiretapped. Its clear that Michael Flynn was the subject of electronic surveillance for sometime.
And we know from Edward Snowden that the NSA was capturing electronic data from everyone and especially electronically spying on world leaders.

Now we find an independent contractor leaked information to wikileak titled Vault 7.

Its common and cceptabl knowledge that someone has been leaking information to the press and to the Democrats. Obama has in so many ways operated lawlessly using the IRS and DOJ to do his dirty work and has done so with impunity.

So its not a reach to consider that Trump may be right in making such a claim against Obama.

Generally speaking progressives are doing anything and everything they can remotely think of to stop Trump
and his agenda.

I believe Trump's claim that Obama via intelligence community Obama sycophants are doing everything they can to undermine Trump and they are using cold war tactics.

They should all be fired.

Personal Best Regards:


Since you seem to have no problem with someone saying anything they want, WITHOUT PROOF...try this one.

"I heard you're secretly a pedophile...who prefers little boys."

See how that works? :ho:



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[ColdNoMore]

Frankly and honestly, our President has attempted to de legitimize just about everything in this country, BUT ONLY WHEN IT WORKS TO HIS PERSONAL ADVANTAGE.

He has PUBLICLY smeared the American intelligence community (by the way, staffed by career hard working Americans...most working through and for 3/4 administrations)....he PUBLICLY and PERSONALLY smeared the character of at least 2 Federal Judges, who were already on the bench while he led the 5 years long lie about the Obama birth...oh, and by the way, hiding behind what he referred to as anonymous sources.

He has challenged without cause the USA voting procedure, falsely PUBLICLY saying that up to 1/2 million illegal immigrants voted.

I could go on and on, but since I, and nobody should, trust one single word that comes out of his mouth, why would anyone be surprised that good honest patriotic Americans would hope to slow him.

What irritates me about your posts is that they are so blind to the real world. Many of your critiques of groups would get a sympathetic ear ON ISSUES, but your blind adoration of Trump, without seemingly understand how totally un American he actually is, or recognizing the terror we should feel about not being able to trust our own President to tell us the truth.

RubiTHECon has gone beyond what even someone with an IQ of 70 would be expected to say...in regards to lying and making statements without proof. :ohdear:

It's a hopeless cause. :oops:

[cologal]

RubiTHECon has gone beyond what even someone with an IQ of 70 would be expected to say...in regards to lying and making statements without proof. :ohdear:

It's a hopeless cause. :oops:

Actually Rubicon is underestimating the scope of the lies the current President of the United States is willing to tell.

For example President Trump actually said repeatedly 3-5 million illegals voted in the last election which cost him the popular vote. He also said he was going to have this investigated.

Without evidence, Trump tells lawmakers 3 million to 5 million illegal ballots cost him the popular vote - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/01/23/at-white-house-trump-tells-congressional-leaders-3-5-million-illegal-ballots-cost-him-the-popular-vote/?utm_term=.f5fa44febf51)

Have you seen any commission yet?

[cologal]

That is your opinion, as is your right to it.

Why, then, is it ok for the media, Hollywood elites, malcontents, etc. to say the things they say against President Trump, his family, his spokesperson, etc. without documentation? Why was it ok for Hillary and then-President Obama to say the things they say/have said about President Trump without "documentation". There is plenty said on here in both directions, past and present that, according to you, would be libel. Why is that ok? As someone else pointed out, why do you get to have your opinion, yes opinion, without documentation, yet you demand it of others who differ? Sorry, but that door doesn't swing just one way.

Was is OK for President Trump to claim for 7.5 years, without any documentation, President Obama wasn't born in the United States. Was it alright for the Right Wing websites to claim for 8 years that President Obama was a Muslim without any documentation.

So it appears you all did it for 8 years so we have a few years to catch up!

[Don Baldwin]

Actually Rubicon is underestimating the scope of the lies the current President of the United States is willing to tell.

For example President Trump actually said repeatedly 3-5 million illegals voted in the last election which cost him the popular vote. He also said he was going to have this investigated.

Without evidence, Trump tells lawmakers 3 million to 5 million illegal ballots cost him the popular vote - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/01/23/at-white-house-trump-tells-congressional-leaders-3-5-million-illegal-ballots-cost-him-the-popular-vote/?utm_term=.f5fa44febf51)

Have you seen any commission yet?

EVERY ONE of the "citizen" anchor babies votes were illegal. So it's closer to 10-20 million. They should NOT be citizens. Their parents were NOT under the jurisdiction of the U.S. They were here ILLEGALLY...therefore their child is NOT entitled to being a citizen.

[cologal]

Killary and Obie will always get away with their felonies. They have documented proof that Pedesta and Killary received large quantities of money from Russia, and they still won't do anything about it. No one touches the Clinton corruption.

We have waited for your documentation but you have provided none. That is because you have none. Your claim is untrue...and you have been called out!

This claim was made in a book titled Clinton Cash a Right Wing Rag published by Breitbart

Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations? (http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/)

This information has been reviewed and deemed false by Snopes the link is above.

[MDLNB]

We have waited for your documentation but you have provided none. That is because you have none. Your claim is untrue...and you have been called out!

This claim was made in a book titled Clinton Cash a Right Wing Rag published by Breitbart

Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations? (http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/)

This information has been reviewed and deemed false by Snopes the link is above.

I have the documented proof in PDF format that is 4 pages long. Russian bank documentation. Why don't you do some research before stupidly spouting off. AND it has nothing to do with that uranium deal, where the Clinton charity received a nice donation from Russia. Like I said, the Clintons will never see their due justice. They are blackmailing too many people that do not want to see them testify in court. If it got to that point, where they might have to go to court, I guarantee that they would likely disappear or have a sudden accident. That is how the D.C. underground works to protect it's own.

[cologal]

I have the documented proof in PDF format that is 4 pages long. Russian bank documentation. Why don't you do some research before stupidly spouting off. AND it has nothing to do with that uranium deal, where the Clinton charity received a nice donation from Russia. Like I said, the Clintons will never see their due justice. They are blackmailing too many people that do not want to see them testify in court. If it got to that point, where they might have to go to court, I guarantee that they would likely disappear or have a sudden accident. That is how the D.C. underground works to protect it's own.

I can't see it!!!

[MDLNB]

I can't see it!!!


Do you know how to use Google?

Never mind. You wouldn't want to believe it if it slapped you in the face and had an affidavit from the FBI assuring you that it was true.

You leftards are in denial, but what else is new?

[dillywho]

We have waited for your documentation but you have provided none. That is because you have none. Your claim is untrue...and you have been called out!

This claim was made in a book titled Clinton Cash a Right Wing Rag published by Breitbart

Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations? (http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/)

This information has been reviewed and deemed false by Snopes the link is above.

Hmm, wasn't it Snopes that was just found to be totally unreliable because they are wrong a good percentage of the time?

[dillywho]

I can't see it!!!

Too many people just want to stay alive.

[justjim]

Get over Obama and Hillary----move on. GOOD GRIEF!!

[ColdNoMore]

Hmm, wasn't it Snopes that was just found to be totally unreliable because they are wrong a good percentage of the time?

:1rotfl:

The right is really pizzed that Snopes/Fact or Fiction/PolitiFact/Etc. exist...because they can no longer get away with lying. :D

Here's a link to the best 6 fact checking sites (which includes Snopes ;) )...that you will want to make sure you avoid. :1rotfl:

The 6 Best Political Fact-Checking Sites on the Internet (https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/best-fact-checking-websites/)


Now show us a legitimate site where you saw Snopes had been... "proved wrong a good percentage of the time."

We'll wait. :popcorn:



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[dave harris]

Do you know how to use Google?

Never mind. You wouldn't want to believe it if it slapped you in the face and had an affidavit from the FBI assuring you that it was true.

You leftards are in denial, but what else is new?

Put the link's on here, you have them at your finger tips, and they have to be credible, no trump quotes.

[dave harris]

That is your opinion, as is your right to it.

Why, then, is it ok for the media, Hollywood elites, malcontents, etc. to say the things they say against President Trump, his family, his spokesperson, etc. without documentation? Why was it ok for Hillary and then-President Obama to say the things they say/have said about President Trump without "documentation". There is plenty said on here in both directions, past and present that, according to you, would be libel. Why is that ok? As someone else pointed out, why do you get to have your opinion, yes opinion, without documentation, yet you demand it of others who differ? Sorry, but that door doesn't swing just one way.

A lot of words that say nothing, . You have just made a lot of accusations, where is you documentation

[autumnspring]

That is your opinion, as is your right to it.

Why, then, is it ok for the media, Hollywood elites, malcontents, etc. to say the things they say against President Trump, his family, his spokesperson, etc. without documentation? Why was it ok for Hillary and then-President Obama to say the things they say/have said about President Trump without "documentation". There is plenty said on here in both directions, past and present that, according to you, would be libel. Why is that ok? As someone else pointed out, why do you get to have your opinion, yes opinion, without documentation, yet you demand it of others who differ? Sorry, but that door doesn't swing just one way.

re: Libel
The law is quite different when it comes to a,"Public Figure," Also, freedom of the press gives news reporters quite a lot of latitude.
re: PROOF
The Obama folks went for court permission not once but twice. The first time it was not granted-very unusual. Perhaps, like Trump's immigration restriction, the second time the request was rewritten and it was granted.
Does anyone either a democrat or a republican believe they had the right to clandestinely listen in AND THEY DID NOT USE IT???????? The right to listen in would be limited BUT, since the conversations are not controlled, you would of course hear things not authorized.

[autumnspring]

They need a civil war in order to distract their retarded tax cattle citizenry from their crimes. The only way these political terrorists can stay out of jail is to start a civil war.

On one side we had the democrats-people like Obama, the Clintons and Sorros. There view is for a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT with a view that the US should pay the bills for the rest of the world.

On both sides-EVEN THE PROGRESSIVE, SOCIALIST, LIBERALS
see that UNCLE SAM also known as the American TAXPAYER is busted. Our national debt is TWENTY TRILLION DOLLARS. Our infrastructure is in desperate need of repairs. We admire rapid rail transit in Europe and Japan while our rail system is 1940-1950 vintage. Our air transport is jet planes landing in airports that were designed and built in the 1950's. They have been patched and pieced together.

Our education system-well we score number 39 out of 50.
Our healthcare system-on other threads our people are bitching about that.

All that needs to be done, all we want to be done, all we wish to be done-COSTS MONEY.

What Obama, the Clinton gang, and Sorros want is not charity-IT IS AMERICAN SUICIDE.

However, vicious, REALITY is we simply cannot afford to pay for the evils in the world.

TRUMP who I voted for says if it is not good for the US go stuff it.

For the liberals, if you want to give YOUR MONEY to whatever charity you want to support, you have that right. When you tell me I should give my money, we should spend our money-THAT IS THE REASON WE VOTED FOR TRUMP.

[Rockyrd]

re: Libel
The law is quite different when it comes to a,"Public Figure," Also, freedom of the press gives news reporters quite a lot of latitude.
re: PROOF
The Obama folks went for court permission not once but twice. The first time it was not granted-very unusual. Perhaps, like Trump's immigration restriction, the second time the request was rewritten and it was granted.
Does anyone either a democrat or a republican believe they had the right to clandestinely listen in AND THEY DID NOT USE IT???????? The right to listen in would be limited BUT, since the conversations are not controlled, you would of course hear things not authorized.

You don't even understand this entire thing.

There are 2 ways to get a wiretap. Either FISA or criminal.

In both cases, you must go before a judge and offer sufficient evidence to allow it.

NO President or any other individual can get a wiretap.

From reports, two efforts to get a wiretap. First was denied, second one was okayed.

THIS is what President Trump tweeted.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

FOLLOWED BY

"Is it legal for a sitting President to be "wire tapping" a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!


FOLLOWED BY

"How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!

Here is the problem.

A sitting President accusing his predecessor of a felony.

Where did Trump get the basis to say..just found out ?

One of his conspiracy theory websites has hinted at this the night before, and Trump pretty much just repeated it as an accusation.

When you speak of libel, it is the consensus that should the info bear out that Trump simply made this up, Obama may have a strong libel case against him.

This is typical Trump behavior, and there is a story out that says he went out and played golf, and when he returned he admitted he may have gone to far. The response finally from the WH was about all they could do because this is fraught with many legal problems.

A sitting President accusing the past president of such a felony is so incredibly immature and morally corrupt, it defies imagination.

As President, if he actually knew such a thing...he should have had a press conference and laid out the details for all America. As it was, he easily could have made one call and verified it in 2 minutes.

I predict this is FAR from over.

If he was wiretapped there was just cause to do it, and that is a problem.

If he was not, it is bizarre behavior for not just a President, but any human being to make such a charge.

This is not over.

One source...

"President Donald Trump's newest pivot might be his way to divert attention from his own Russia troubles by leveling a Watergate-level conspiracy allegation at former President Barack Obama.

But this latest assertion that Obama ordered illegal surveillance of Trump Tower during the 2016 election — tweeted without evidence — could get the president into some legal hot water.

Although the law provides a great deal of leeway for political speech, that protection is not all encompassing. And because of the way Trump has leveled unsubstantiated accusations at Obama, he may have libeled his predecessor.

Analysis: Does Obama Have Grounds to Sue Trump for Libel? - NBC News (http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/analysis-does-obama-have-grounds-sue-trump-libel-n729376)

[Don Baldwin]

On one side we had the democrats-people like Obama, the Clintons and Sorros. There view is for a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT with a view that the US should pay the bills for the rest of the world.

On both sides-EVEN THE PROGRESSIVE, SOCIALIST, LIBERALS
see that UNCLE SAM also known as the American TAXPAYER is busted. Our national debt is TWENTY TRILLION DOLLARS. Our infrastructure is in desperate need of repairs. We admire rapid rail transit in Europe and Japan while our rail system is 1940-1950 vintage. Our air transport is jet planes landing in airports that were designed and built in the 1950's. They have been patched and pieced together.

Our education system-well we score number 39 out of 50.
Our healthcare system-on other threads our people are bitching about that.

All that needs to be done, all we want to be done, all we wish to be done-COSTS MONEY.

What Obama, the Clinton gang, and Sorros want is not charity-IT IS AMERICAN SUICIDE.

However, vicious, REALITY is we simply cannot afford to pay for the evils in the world.

TRUMP who I voted for says if it is not good for the US go stuff it.

For the liberals, if you want to give YOUR MONEY to whatever charity you want to support, you have that right. When you tell me I should give my money, we should spend our money-THAT IS THE REASON WE VOTED FOR TRUMP.

I'm starting to like you more and more...

I can tell you the reason we've fallen to #39 is the increasing minority population. As white went from 90% to the current 49%...we've dropped...from #1 in the 50s to #39 today.

WHY do we keep up the equality insanity as it destroys us?

[Rockyrd]

On one side we had the democrats-people like Obama, the Clintons and Sorros. There view is for a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT with a view that the US should pay the bills for the rest of the world.

On both sides-EVEN THE PROGRESSIVE, SOCIALIST, LIBERALS
see that UNCLE SAM also known as the American TAXPAYER is busted. Our national debt is TWENTY TRILLION DOLLARS. Our infrastructure is in desperate need of repairs. We admire rapid rail transit in Europe and Japan while our rail system is 1940-1950 vintage. Our air transport is jet planes landing in airports that were designed and built in the 1950's. They have been patched and pieced together.

Our education system-well we score number 39 out of 50.
Our healthcare system-on other threads our people are bitching about that.

All that needs to be done, all we want to be done, all we wish to be done-COSTS MONEY.

What Obama, the Clinton gang, and Sorros want is not charity-IT IS AMERICAN SUICIDE.

However, vicious, REALITY is we simply cannot afford to pay for the evils in the world.

TRUMP who I voted for says if it is not good for the US go stuff it.

For the liberals, if you want to give YOUR MONEY to whatever charity you want to support, you have that right. When you tell me I should give my money, we should spend our money-THAT IS THE REASON WE VOTED FOR TRUMP.

First of all, Trump never even implied the words you put in his mouth.

Secondly, and most importantly, he has ZERO CONTROL OVER ANY SPENDING....ZERO.

That is controlled by congress. You people are so hung up on Clinton/Obama/Soros, you lose all touch with reality.

Get with the present...we have problems and they are not it.

[autumnspring]

i'm starting to like you more and more...

I can tell you the reason we've fallen to #39 is the increasing minority population. As white went from 90% to the current 49%...we've dropped...from #1 in the 50s to #39 today.

Why do we keep up the equality insanity as it destroys us?

i do not want you to like me
i do not want to have anything to do with your crap.

[Don Baldwin]

i do not want you to like me
i do not want to have anything to do with your crap.

You mean the truth...you don't want to have anything to do with the truth?

Like Marsha...you get the facts right, but often the REASON wrong.

They keep the equality lies going because IF the truth was finally accepted...the blacks would go right back to slave status...everywhere. They're the bottom socially and financially EVERYWHERE they live...no matter the country or continent...blacks are at the bottom. The more blacks, the lower the standard of living and higher the violence..always.

You really should listen to me susie...I'll give you the rest...you're half way to enlightenment...don't quit now!

[cologal]

I have the documented proof in PDF format that is 4 pages long. Russian bank documentation. Why don't you do some research before stupidly spouting off. AND it has nothing to do with that uranium deal, where the Clinton charity received a nice donation from Russia. Like I said, the Clintons will never see their due justice. They are blackmailing too many people that do not want to see them testify in court. If it got to that point, where they might have to go to court, I guarantee that they would likely disappear or have a sudden accident. That is how the D.C. underground works to protect it's own.

You have proof of what? That the Clinton Foundation received a donation from Russia? But was it PAY FOR PLAY that is the rub! I did my reserch SNOPES deamed it FALSE.

What role did Hillary play in aproving the with Russia. Seems to me that Rex Tillerson has more PAY for PLAY issues than Hillary. Right now the oil off the coast can't be drilled due to the sanctions but if they are lifted then Katy bar the door. How much money does Trump have in that deal?

[cologal]

First of all, Trump never even implied the words you put in his mouth.

Secondly, and most importantly, he has ZERO CONTROL OVER ANY SPENDING....ZERO.

That is controlled by congress. You people are so hung up on Clinton/Obama/Soros, you lose all touch with reality.

Get with the present...we have problems and they are not it.

OMG NOT the ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGAIN? You keep beating the same old horse Soros.....How about your Koch Brothers and what they fund?

You he men are so afraid go a bunch of women in pink hats.