Psychologist Speaks Out – Psychiatry Profits From Lying About Mental Disorders

[Don Baldwin]

You should watch this...really.

Psychologist Speaks Out - Psychiatry Profits From Lying To Public About Mental Disorders - YouTube (https://youtu.be/9Zrzqct4yqk)

[Rockyrd]

You should watch this...really.

Psychologist Speaks Out - Psychiatry Profits From Lying To Public About Mental Disorders - YouTube (https://youtu.be/9Zrzqct4yqk)

This is part of the Alex Jones info world area.

No thanksi.....I enjoy reality

[Taltarzac725]

There are problems with how psychiatry is practiced in the US but they are very complicated. One of them is when this bureaucracy is used as a political weapon which is common in societies which are becoming less and less based on laws. This was common in Nazi Germany where Nazi officials could just say that their enemies were mentally ill and put these people in the nut house. Stalin did this quite a bit as did Communist China.

Our problem seems more one of incompetence, the reliance on drugs rather than therapy, poor training of psychiatrists, drug company profits, etc.

[Don Baldwin]

This is part of the Alex Jones info world area.

No thanksi.....I enjoy reality

EVERYTHING he said was TRUE.

It's a "disease" ONLY when they SAY it's a disease...homosexuality...it's NOT in the DSM. A man who craves sticking his ***** into another man's as$ is perfectly normal...but as someone here said earlier...liking women's feet is a fetish. Really? You don't think that's "just a bit" political?

They don't sent you to the lab for blood work, there's no biopsying...they ask you questions, they look at behavior. Then they label and drug you.

How many boys are labeled ADD for simply being boys cooped up in a quiet classroom for hours on end? That's NOT what boys do...that's what GIRLS do. Women are the teachers, they are girls, they teach the ways girls like to learn. Everyone sitting around listening. Imagining. Boys want to be active, they want to learn by doing. They want to see it, touch it.

That's just a couple of examples.

It's a good and truthful video. The entire "medical industry" is just that...a FOR PROFIT INDUSTRY.

That IS reality...YOU are living a delusion. Believing what those who would profit from your believing them say.

[MDLNB]

We had two candidates with differing ideas of how this country should progress in the future. Both are considered to have mental deficiencies by the opposing party. Both are considered serial liars. Both wished for radical changes in our country's policies. One promised to balance the budget and reduce the size of the gov. He also promised to end the soon to be defunct Obamacare. He got elected.

The other, was challenged by a socialist and decided to reveal her true socialist nature in order to compete with him. He would have beat her, if not for her campaign corruption and dirty deals. She promised a socialist system but insisted that she would also continue Obama's failed policies. She was exposed for the corrupted criminal she is, but has not yet been indicted. She lost, as she should have in an honest society with justice oriented people.

The choice was two radically different people. Both have been accused of lying. Although, it seems there is some differing opinions as to what constitutes a lie. Trump may have unknowingly put out false information based on what he had heard from flawed sources. That does not mean he lied. It means he was wrong with his facts. Hillary lies purposely and knowingly with intent to deceive. That is the definition of a lie.

Half of the voters (the losers) will be disgruntled and despondent. That does not make it right to hinder government progress. It wasn't right when Obama was elected and it's not right when Trump was elected. Making up lies to support the tale that Trump has any ties to Russia is as bad a any LIE that they believe he has made. There is NO evidence that Trump has an association with Russia. On the other hand, look at political and charity donations that Hillary received. Look at who donated to Obama's campaign. That is evidence. That is evidence that has been discarded due to non-interest.

So, for those liberals that are wishing for something to grab hold of to vindicate your loss......blame Hillary for being such a bad candidate. Blame the DNC for choosing the worst candidate to represent you.

But, who cares? It's over now so get on with your lives. There is nothing that Trump can do that will hurt your livelihood. If anything, you will probably start seeing an improvement, even here.

"Mental disorders" ????? With a candidate like Hillary and observing her antics, you on the left should not be casting stones.

[Reiver]

They don't sent you to the lab for blood work, there's no biopsying...they ask you questions, they look at behavior. Then they label and drug you.

On the contrary, expect to give about 6 vials of blood, and take at least one MRI. They will rule out all possible medical reasons before they're willing to declare a chemical imbalance in the brain.

As for a "biopsy"... WHY in the name of all that's holy would you think that a friggen BIOPSY would indicate a mental illness. A biopsy OF WHAT? The prefrontal cortex? The amygdala? The hypothalamus? The SPLEEN? Man... you certainly are a special potato, aren't you?

[Don Baldwin]

On the contrary, expect to give about 6 vials of blood, and take at least one MRI. They will rule out all possible medical reasons before they're willing to declare a chemical imbalance in the brain.

As for a "biopsy"... WHY in the name of all that's holy would you think that a friggen BIOPSY would indicate a mental illness. A biopsy OF WHAT? The prefrontal cortex? The amygdala? The hypothalamus? The SPLEEN? Man... you certainly are a special potato, aren't you?

There are NO indicators of mental illness to be found in the blood. There is no PHYSICAL thing you can look for to determine mental illness. THAT was the point. There are NO medical tests for mental illness and there ARE for most everything else. There are no PHYSICAL manifestations of disease that can be physically tested for.

[graciegirl]

You should watch this...really.

Psychologist Speaks Out - Psychiatry Profits From Lying To Public About Mental Disorders - YouTube (https://youtu.be/9Zrzqct4yqk)

I know this. OP.

You ain't right.

[Rockyrd]

I know this OP.

You ain't right.

Any one who follows Alex Jones and infowars types is sketchy

Although he does have influence in our WH

[Reiver]

I'm starting to wonder if the special potatoes on the forum are scientologists.

[graciegirl]

I'm starting to wonder if the special potatoes on the forum are scientologists.

I don't know, nor can't remember meeting anyone like some of these folks on this forum.

I think I would have just left the room, left the area, left the situation, or would have left the job if I would have had to be in any prolonged contact with this kind of hatred and distrust and misinformation and mental confusion.

I often wonder if we have seen any of their mugshots on the other news source ...arrested for domestic violence???

[Taltarzac725]

No. But psychiatry is more of an art than a science and much of it is very culturally driven theory coupled with the greed of drug companies.

Scientologists go way too far with simple minded over-generalizations and poor logic.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

It's a "disease" ONLY when they SAY it's a disease...homosexuality...it's NOT in the DSM. A man who craves sticking his ***** into another man's as$ is perfectly normal...but as someone here said earlier...liking women's feet is a fetish. Really? You don't think that's "just a bit" political?


Not to take sides in this because I'm no expert and I don't know. But, homosexuality was considered a mental illness and was listed in the DSM and several courses of treatment were recommended until 1973 when due to political pressure from the gay community it was removed.

There were no tests, no reasons other than empirical evidence. I don't believe that this has ever been the case with any other disease in history.

Again, I don't want to get into an argument over whether homosexuality is a disease or not. I'm simply stating the facts and noting that it was mostly political pressure that caused the removal.

[Taltarzac725]

Not to take sides in this because I'm no expert and I don't know. But, homosexuality was considered a mental illness and was listed in the DSM and several courses of treatment were recommended until 1973 when due to political pressure from the gay community it was removed.

There were no tests, no reasons other than empirical evidence. I don't believe that this has ever been the case with any other disease in history.

Again, I don't want to get into an argument over whether homosexuality is a disease or not. I'm simply stating the facts and noting that it was mostly political pressure that caused the removal.

Being gay seems to be biologically driven and is somehow developed in childhood. That is just from my experiences around gay/lesbian people. It is not really chosen.

It has as much to do with mental illness as people liking blondes with Kentucky accents.

[MDLNB]

Being gay seems to be biologically driven and is somehow developed in childhood. That is just from my experiences around gay/lesbian people. It is not really chosen.

It has as much to do with mental illness as people liking blondes with Kentucky accents.

You just disqualified your whole comment with the last line.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

Being gay seems to be biologically driven and is somehow developed in childhood. That is just from my experiences around gay/lesbian people. It is not really chosen.

It has as much to do with mental illness as people liking blondes with Kentucky accents.

You might be right, but the problem is that is not the way that science works. Decisions are not made because of someone's experience around gay or lesbian people. There usually has to be a number of conclusive studies in order to remove something from a list such as this. Anecdotal evidence is never accepted as a legitimate reason to come to a conclusion in science.

[graciegirl]

You might be right, but the problem is that is not the way that science works. Decisions are not made because of someone's experience around gay or lesbian people. There usually has to be a number of conclusive studies in order to remove something from a list such as this. Anecdotal evidence is never accepted as a legitimate reason to come to a conclusion in science.

You are right as usual, Jim.

[Don Baldwin]

Being gay seems to be biologically driven and is somehow developed in childhood. That is just from my experiences around gay/lesbian people. It is not really chosen.

It has as much to do with mental illness as people liking blondes with Kentucky accents.

It's developed in the womb...it APPEARS when the child begins to mature and become sexually aware.

It's NOT their fault...but neither is a psychopath...a pedophile...they're born that way too.

You just disqualified your whole comment with the last line.

Isn't it funny how they LEAP to far fetched conclusions?

You might be right, but the problem is that is not the way that science works. Decisions are not made because of someone's experience around gay or lesbian people. There usually has to be a number of conclusive studies in order to remove something from a list such as this. Anecdotal evidence is never accepted as a legitimate reason to come to a conclusion in science.

"Science" has become political...why? The government pays for MOST of the studies. They fund the people who give them the answers they want.

They just took it out. Shoving your schlong up some others guy's a$s is PERFECTLY normal. WANTING some guy to shove his schlong up YOUR a$s is perfectly normal. But liking women's feet is a fetish.

[Taltarzac725]

You might be right, but the problem is that is not the way that science works. Decisions are not made because of someone's experience around gay or lesbian people. There usually has to be a number of conclusive studies in order to remove something from a list such as this. Anecdotal evidence is never accepted as a legitimate reason to come to a conclusion in science.

The science of sexual orientation: The latest on genes, chromosomes, and environmental factors. (http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/06/11/the_science_of_sexual_orientation_the_latest_on_ge nes_chromosomes_and_environmental.html)

Some of these studies look quite over broad with their conclusions. Is that twins in South Africa and the United States and many other places as well??

People's life experiences are often just as good as science if the science is not all that conclusive.

[Don Baldwin]

I don't know, nor can't remember meeting anyone like some of these folks on this forum.

I think I would have just left the room, left the area, left the situation, or would have left the job if I would have had to be in any prolonged contact with this kind of hatred and distrust and misinformation and mental confusion.

I often wonder if we have seen any of their mugshots on the other news source ...arrested for domestic violence???

When the truth comes out...run away?

The science of sexual orientation: The latest on genes, chromosomes, and environmental factors. (http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/06/11/the_science_of_sexual_orientation_the_latest_on_ge nes_chromosomes_and_environmental.html)

Some of these studies look quite over broad with their conclusions. Is that twins in South Africa and the United States and many other places as well??

People's life experiences are often just as good as science if the science is not all that conclusive.

Liberal bullsh!t...

"These findings are part of a report released by the Academy of Science South Africa, the outcome of work conducted by a panel put together in 2014 to evaluate all research on the subject of sexual orientation done over the last 50 years. It did this against the backdrop of a growing number of new laws in Africa that discriminate against people attracted to others of the same sex. The work was conducted in conjunction with the Ugandan Academy of Science."

African "science"...really?

"Global bodies, such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) declassified homosexuality
as an illness or disorder in 1990 and there is now
a wide global consensus among scientists that homosexuality is a normal and natural variation of human sexuality "

It's ALL political...

"This report explores but could find no evidence that sexual orientation can be acquired
through contact with LGBTI persons. Instead, the panel found substantial evidence that tolerance of same-sex orientation not only benefited LGBTI persons but impacted positively on public health, civil society and longterm economic growth in societies across
the spectrum of economic development. "

No it doesn't...political agenda.

"This study finds abundant and robust evidence that
more repressive environments increase minority stress and impact negatively on LGBTI health"

Ohhh poor babies...

The HIV/AIDS rates for gay men is through the roof...without gay men there wouldn't BE an AIDS epidemic.

This is just more crap to get us to "accept" deviants.