View Full Version : AP Exclusive: Trump campaign chief linked to Putin interests
wjboyer1
03-22-2017, 03:04 PM
AP Exclusive: Trump campaign chief linked to Putin interests (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/122ae0b5848345faa88108a03de40c5a/manaforts-plan-greatly-benefit-putin-government)
Former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort hid payments from pro-Russian party, Ukrainian lawmaker says: Former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort hid payments from pro-Russian party, Ukrainian lawmaker says - LA Times (http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-ukraine-manafort-20170321-story.html)
Reiver
03-22-2017, 03:33 PM
Well, it looks like Manafort should be forced to resign, eh?
wjboyer1
03-22-2017, 05:12 PM
Well, it looks like Manafort should be forced to resign, eh?
Perhaps you meant that he should be forced to stand trial:
On January 19, 2017, the eve of the Trump's presidential inauguration, it was reported that Manafort is under active investigation by multiple federal agencies including the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of National Intelligence and the financial crimes unit of the Treasury Department.[61] Investigations were said to be based on intercepted Russian communications as well as financial transactions
MDLNB
03-23-2017, 06:20 AM
What law(s) did he break? Tax evasion? If he broke the law, then he should be prosecuted. Oh, but lets prosecute the left when they break the law also. Time to quit allowing the left to pass due to their riding Obama's racist coat tail. If someone breaks the law, they should be held accountable. Hillary has broken many laws and has been given the "Obama/Clinton" pass. Lock them ALL up.
Love2Swim
03-23-2017, 06:31 AM
Well they did nine investigations on Hillary over Benghazi and still found nothing. Let's hope they will be as thorough in investigating Trump and his cronies. And that includes their emails and unsecured phones, and the Russian connections along with election meddling.
Sandtrap328
03-23-2017, 06:36 AM
What law(s) did he break? Tax evasion? If he broke the law, then he should be prosecuted. Oh, but lets prosecute the left when they break the law also. Time to quit allowing the left to pass due to their riding Obama's racist coat tail. If someone breaks the law, they should be held accountable. Hillary has broken many laws and has been given the "Obama/Clinton" pass. Lock them ALL up.
Doesn't MDLBQ ever get tired of his usual "Blah, Blah, Blah"?
Go back to your sheep.
MDLNB
03-23-2017, 07:04 AM
Doesn't MDLBQ ever get tired of his usual "Blah, Blah, Blah"?
Go back to your sheep.
Sandy, other than bad spelling did you have something to say regarding the subject? No? I hear they have shuffleboard lessons for the incontinent today. Did you sign up yet?
Taltarzac725
03-23-2017, 07:06 AM
Make America Great Again. Impeach Donald Trump.
MDLNB
03-23-2017, 07:08 AM
Well they did nine investigations on Hillary over Benghazi and still found nothing. Let's hope they will be as thorough in investigating Trump and his cronies. And that includes their emails and unsecured phones, and the Russian connections along with election meddling.
Where have you been? Those investigations found plenty. One thing they led to was the fact that Hillary had an illegal server and mishandled classified information. Just because she has not been indicted for it, does not mean they found nothing. It means that there is a lot of corruption at the top of our government. That's just fact. Those hearings also proved that Hillary would lie under oath as well as lie to America and the families of the victims of Benghazi. I wonder how you could vote for such a person/felon.
Rockyrd
03-27-2017, 09:33 AM
Make America Great Again. Impeach Donald Trump.
Just breaking....recall when Nunez shared "anonymous" source to cast doubt about the false Trump lie about being wiretapped. He subsequently walked that back and apologized.
The breaking news this morning is this....guess where the anonymous source was located...
THE WHITE HOUSE
Not a joke..just confirmed
dave harris
03-27-2017, 05:40 PM
Where have you been? Those investigations found plenty. One thing they led to was the fact that Hillary had an illegal server and mishandled classified information. Just because she has not been indicted for it, does not mean they found nothing. It means that there is a lot of corruption at the top of our government. That's just fact. Those hearings also proved that Hillary would lie under oath as well as lie to America and the families of the victims of Benghazi. I wonder how you could vote for such a person/felon.
"innocent until proven guilty" I know you would like the russian way of justice, assassination, but I don't think you will get it.
Chi-Town
03-27-2017, 08:14 PM
What law(s) did he break? Tax evasion? If he broke the law, then he should be prosecuted. Oh, but lets prosecute the left when they break the law also. Time to quit allowing the left to pass due to their riding Obama's racist coat tail. If someone breaks the law, they should be held accountable. Hillary has broken many laws and has been given the "Obama/Clinton" pass. Lock them ALL up.
One trick pony post once again
Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk
wjboyer1
03-27-2017, 11:42 PM
Where have you been? Those investigations found plenty. One thing they led to was the fact that Hillary had an illegal server and mishandled classified information. Just because she has not been indicted for it, does not mean they found nothing. It means that there is a lot of corruption at the top of our government. That's just fact. Those hearings also proved that Hillary would lie under oath as well as lie to America and the families of the victims of Benghazi. I wonder how you could vote for such a person/felon.
Actually, it was NOT an illegal server, you are misinformed or just plain stupid.
Much of the information found on the server was not classified at the time it was entered on the server, and NONE of it was hacked and spread throughout the world. Trump praised WikiLeaks and invited the Russians to hack into the Democratic servers, which they did....last time I checked there was a law that prohibited giving aid or comfort to an enemy....its called treason. Oh, and of course that is just plain peanuts compared to your myopic attempts at misjudging HRC.
If there was enough evidence to indict her, it would have happened....again you are either misinformed, or just plain stupid.
It has been shown that during the campaign, Trump told a minimum of 494 lies*, during his campaign, and the Trump administration, has been in office for 68 days. As of our latest update on day 63, we’ve counted 317 false or misleading claims**. So, the HRC "lie" is the only thing that disturbs you? again, you are just plain stupid.
*footnote data: Toronto Star Washington Bureau Chief Daniel Dale has made it a habit of compiling lists of lies that Donald Trump tells on the campaign trail. And now with the election days away, Dale compiled all the false statements into one handy “unauthorized database of false things.” The 494 falsehoods are sorted into 20 categories and analyzed.
**footnote data: 100 days of Trump claims - Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/?utm_term=.d5ce2d15fe45)
67188
67189
Taltarzac725
03-28-2017, 07:20 AM
Actually, it was NOT an illegal server, you are misinformed or just plain stupid.
Much of the information found on the server was not classified at the time it was entered on the server, and NONE of it was hacked and spread throughout the world. Trump praised WikiLeaks and invited the Russians to hack into the Democratic servers, which they did....last time I checked there was a law that prohibited giving aid or comfort to an enemy....its called treason. Oh, and of course that is just plain peanuts compared to your myopic attempts at misjudging HRC.
If there was enough evidence to indict her, it would have happened....again you are either misinformed, or just plain stupid.
It has been shown that during the campaign, Trump told a minimum of 494 lies*, during his campaign, and the Trump administration, has been in office for 68 days. As of our latest update on day 63, we’ve counted 317 false or misleading claims**. So, the HRC "lie" is the only thing that disturbs you? again, you are just plain stupid.
*footnote data: Toronto Star Washington Bureau Chief Daniel Dale has made it a habit of compiling lists of lies that Donald Trump tells on the campaign trail. And now with the election days away, Dale compiled all the false statements into one handy “unauthorized database of false things.” The 494 falsehoods are sorted into 20 categories and analyzed.
**footnote data: 100 days of Trump claims - Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/?utm_term=.d5ce2d15fe45)
67188
67189
Good arguments all.
wjboyer1
03-28-2017, 08:13 AM
what law(s) did he break? Tax evasion? If he broke the law, then he should be prosecuted. Oh, but lets prosecute the left when they break the law also. Time to quit allowing the left to pass due to their riding obama's racist coat tail. If someone breaks the law, they should be held accountable. Hillary has broken many laws and has been given the "obama/clinton" pass. Lock them all up.
67197
tcxr750
03-29-2017, 07:54 PM
Remember in the good old days when someone with ties to communism would be persecuted. Now Americans accept this as just making good business sense. It's a shame the Republican Party has no problem with the ties to Vladimir Putin. Let's make Russia great again.
MDLNB
03-30-2017, 09:48 AM
Actually, it was NOT an illegal server, you are misinformed or just plain stupid.
Much of the information found on the server was not classified at the time it was entered on the server, and NONE of it was hacked and spread throughout the world. Trump praised WikiLeaks and invited the Russians to hack into the Democratic servers, which they did....last time I checked there was a law that prohibited giving aid or comfort to an enemy....its called treason. Oh, and of course that is just plain peanuts compared to your myopic attempts at misjudging HRC.
If there was enough evidence to indict her, it would have happened....again you are either misinformed, or just plain stupid.
It has been shown that during the campaign, Trump told a minimum of 494 lies*, during his campaign, and the Trump administration, has been in office for 68 days. As of our latest update on day 63, we’ve counted 317 false or misleading claims**. So, the HRC "lie" is the only thing that disturbs you? again, you are just plain stupid.
*footnote data: Toronto Star Washington Bureau Chief Daniel Dale has made it a habit of compiling lists of lies that Donald Trump tells on the campaign trail. And now with the election days away, Dale compiled all the false statements into one handy “unauthorized database of false things.” The 494 falsehoods are sorted into 20 categories and analyzed.
**footnote data: 100 days of Trump claims - Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/?utm_term=.d5ce2d15fe45)
67188
67189
Actually, it WAS AN ILLEGAL SERVER, when goverment business was transmitted over it. She had NO permission to use it for work.
Comey said classified was found on the server. That is a felony. Intent has nothing to do with it.
Once classifed is found on her computer, it should have been immediately seized and destroyed appropriately. The gov uses a completely secured, encrypted and isolated separate system for transmission of classified.
YOu are talking out your @ss, assuming you know something about it.
Trump did NOT invite the Russians to hack any computers. If you had listened to what he said, you would know that. Instead, you simply regurgitate or parrot liberal (lying) talking points. You claim to be a lawyer, but it is obvious by your stupidity that you are lying. I head what Trump said and he did not ask or even suggest that the Russians should hack anyone.
Hillary also transmitted Amb Stevens travel Itinerary over the Internet. That is a violation too. That information is classified Secret/code word. I know this for fact. It is possible that this information could have caused those deaths in Benghazi.
Your radical partisanship makes you feel the need to protect a scumbag like Hillary and persecute Trump without any evidence of his collusion with the Russians.
Come back and discuss this issue when you have had 20 years of experience handling classified information. Oh, that's right they would never clear you for a security clearance, so that becomes a moot point.
Hillary is a not yet convicted felonious criminal traitor. In my opinion, the Clintons are only free from prosecution until such time as they lose favor with George Soros, their benefactor.
wjboyer1
03-31-2017, 12:02 AM
Actually, it WAS AN ILLEGAL SERVER, when goverment business was transmitted over it. She had NO permission to use it for work.
Comey said classified was found on the server. That is a felony. Intent has nothing to do with it.
Once classifed is found on her computer, it should have been immediately seized and destroyed appropriately. The gov uses a completely secured, encrypted and isolated separate system for transmission of classified.
YOu are talking out your @ss, assuming you know something about it.
Trump did NOT invite the Russians to hack any computers. If you had listened to what he said, you would know that. Instead, you simply regurgitate or parrot liberal (lying) talking points. You claim to be a lawyer, but it is obvious by your stupidity that you are lying. I head what Trump said and he did not ask or even suggest that the Russians should hack anyone.
Hillary also transmitted Amb Stevens travel Itinerary over the Internet. That is a violation too. That information is classified Secret/code word. I know this for fact. It is possible that this information could have caused those deaths in Benghazi.
Your radical partisanship makes you feel the need to protect a scumbag like Hillary and persecute Trump without any evidence of his collusion with the Russians.
Come back and discuss this issue when you have had 20 years of experience handling classified information. Oh, that's right they would never clear you for a security clearance, so that becomes a moot point.
Hillary is a not yet convicted felonious criminal traitor. In my opinion, the Clintons are only free from prosecution until such time as they lose favor with George Soros, their benefactor.
stop taking your meds have you?
67277
rubicon
03-31-2017, 04:46 AM
Actually, it WAS AN ILLEGAL SERVER, when goverment business was transmitted over it. She had NO permission to use it for work.
Comey said classified was found on the server. That is a felony. Intent has nothing to do with it.
Once classifed is found on her computer, it should have been immediately seized and destroyed appropriately. The gov uses a completely secured, encrypted and isolated separate system for transmission of classified.
YOu are talking out your @ss, assuming you know something about it.
Trump did NOT invite the Russians to hack any computers. If you had listened to what he said, you would know that. Instead, you simply regurgitate or parrot liberal (lying) talking points. You claim to be a lawyer, but it is obvious by your stupidity that you are lying. I head what Trump said and he did not ask or even suggest that the Russians should hack anyone.
Hillary also transmitted Amb Stevens travel Itinerary over the Internet. That is a violation too. That information is classified Secret/code word. I know this for fact. It is possible that this information could have caused those deaths in Benghazi.
Your radical partisanship makes you feel the need to protect a scumbag like Hillary and persecute Trump without any evidence of his collusion with the Russians.
Come back and discuss this issue when you have had 20 years of experience handling classified information. Oh, that's right they would never clear you for a security clearance, so that becomes a moot point.
Hillary is a not yet convicted felonious criminal traitor. In my opinion, the Clintons are only free from prosecution until such time as they lose favor with George Soros, their benefactor.
You are spot on. But you are wasting your time trying to effect a logical conversation with a progressive because all you are going to get from them is "you suck:1rotfl:"
Progressives have the know how, desire, willingness and media backing to commit any crime, and never to be held accountable just ask Hillary Clinton, Maxine Waters and Charley Rangel as just three of many examples in that party.
Progressives following the hateful Alinsky paradigm and they all agree that the more partisan they become the more they can claim the moral high ground and thus claim they are the true tellers of truths . Its a scam and its worked well for them over the years. And, its worked well because the end justifies the means and so they can do or say anything with impunity.
What is happening in Washington and around the country is the progressive's political version of the dirty dozen and Schumer's sleazy smirk personifies it all...and the beat goes on
Personal Best Regards:
ColdNoMore
03-31-2017, 05:22 AM
Remember in the good old days when someone with ties to communism would be persecuted. Now Americans accept this as just making good business sense. It's a shame the Republican Party has no problem with the ties to Vladimir Putin. Let's make Russia great again.
And that in a nutshell...is exactly what is happening. :ohdear:
Garry Kasparov summed it up perfectly!
Twitter (https://twitter.com/Kasparov63/status/843844130799304704)
"The house is on fire, Trump is running around with a box of matches, and the GOP demands to know who called the fire department."
:oops:
Taltarzac725
03-31-2017, 06:57 AM
Actually, it was NOT an illegal server, you are misinformed or just plain stupid.
Much of the information found on the server was not classified at the time it was entered on the server, and NONE of it was hacked and spread throughout the world. Trump praised WikiLeaks and invited the Russians to hack into the Democratic servers, which they did....last time I checked there was a law that prohibited giving aid or comfort to an enemy....its called treason. Oh, and of course that is just plain peanuts compared to your myopic attempts at misjudging HRC.
If there was enough evidence to indict her, it would have happened....again you are either misinformed, or just plain stupid.
It has been shown that during the campaign, Trump told a minimum of 494 lies*, during his campaign, and the Trump administration, has been in office for 68 days. As of our latest update on day 63, we’ve counted 317 false or misleading claims**. So, the HRC "lie" is the only thing that disturbs you? again, you are just plain stupid.
*footnote data: Toronto Star Washington Bureau Chief Daniel Dale has made it a habit of compiling lists of lies that Donald Trump tells on the campaign trail. And now with the election days away, Dale compiled all the false statements into one handy “unauthorized database of false things.” The 494 falsehoods are sorted into 20 categories and analyzed.
**footnote data: 100 days of Trump claims - Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/?utm_term=.d5ce2d15fe45)
67188
67189
This is all starting to look like a bad movie.
MDLNB
03-31-2017, 07:22 AM
Where is the investigation regarding Podesta and Clinton receiving millions from Russia? Seems like it would be easier to prosecute than the goose chase regarding the witch hunt related to Trump and Russia. Anyone wishing evidence related to Podesta and Clinton and Russia will find it easy on the Internet. Just search follow the money. There are bank records available on line. I have copies, and they show a money trail leading from Russia to Podesta and Clinton. How about Pay for Play? I guess it is just the usual, "nothing to see here, folks" cr@p that D.C. habitually pushes on us.
And now, those of you that accused Trump of lying about being surveilled by the Obama administration are finding out that he was telling the truth. It must be discouraging to you leftards to find out that The Donald is right again.
wjboyer1
03-31-2017, 07:31 AM
where is the investigation regarding podesta and clinton receiving millions from russia? Seems like it would be easier to prosecute than the goose chase regarding the witch hunt related to trump and russia. Anyone wishing evidence related to podesta and clinton and russia will find it easy on the internet. Just search follow the money. There are bank records available on line. I have copies, and they show a money trail leading from russia to podesta and clinton. How about pay for play? I guess it is just the usual, "nothing to see here, folks" cr@p that d.c. Habitually pushes on us.
And now, those of you that accused trump of lying about being surveilled by the obama administration are finding out that he was telling the truth. It must be discouraging to you leftards to find out that the donald is right again.
67289
MDLNB
03-31-2017, 07:55 AM
67289
In your case, you can't defend the left so you attack the right with lies to keep everyone's eyes off of the corruption on the left.
dave harris
03-31-2017, 07:59 AM
Where is the investigation regarding Podesta ad Clintonn receiving millions from Russia? Seems like it would be easier to prosecute than the goose chase regarding the witch hunt related to Trump and Russia. Anyone wishing evidence related to Podesta and Clinton and Russia will find it easy on the Internet. Just search follow the money. There are bank records available on line. I have copies, and they show a money trail leading from Russia to Podesta and Clinton. How about Pay for Play? I guess it is just the usual, "nothing to see here, folks" cr@p that D.C. habitually pushes on us.
And now, those of you that accused Trump of lying about being surveilled by the Obama administration are finding out that he was telling the truth. It must be discouraging to you leftards to find out that The Donald is right again.
If there was anything illegal your repub hounds would be ecstatic. Put the documentation on here, and use valid sources
MDLNB
03-31-2017, 08:10 AM
If there was anything illegal your repub hounds would be ecstatic. Put the documentation on here, and use valid sources
What good would it do for me to attach that evidence? You are in denial and can't live with the fact that Killary lost. I bet there is a long list of calls from you on record to the special hotline set up for depressed losers.
The evidence has been listed many times. If you didn't get it the first time your read it, then you won't get it now. No one can fix stupid, and you just keep proving it every day when you post on here. My patience with your type is as short as your little play thingy. Dealing with someone that got his GED from Walmart takes more patience than I have.
dave harris
03-31-2017, 08:17 AM
Where have you been? Those investigations found plenty. One thing they led to was the fact that Hillary had an illegal server and mishandled classified information. Just because she has not been indicted for it, does not mean they found nothing. It means that there is a lot of corruption at the top of our government. That's just fact. Those hearings also proved that Hillary would lie under oath as well as lie to America and the families of the victims of Benghazi. I wonder how you could vote for such a person/felon.
trumpster's are holding all the cards now, why don't they prosecute? Maybe just like all the right wing witch hunts they come up empty. On the repub side the show is just beginning, stay tuned.
MDLNB
03-31-2017, 08:29 AM
trumpster's are holding all the cards now, why don't they prosecute? Maybe just like all the right wing witch hunts they come up empty. On the repub side the show is just beginning, stay tuned.
Or maybe, just like the libtards on the left, the Right is also impaired by corruption and the need to protect their own (politicians). Any first year lawyer could get a conviction on Killary, even Tal. Well, maybe Tal.
Don Baldwin
03-31-2017, 09:00 AM
Or maybe, just like the libtards on the left, the Right is also impaired by corruption and the need to protect their own (politicians). Any first year lawyer could get a conviction on Killary, even Tal. Well, maybe Tal.
Ding ding ding...
Taltarzac725
03-31-2017, 09:02 AM
Where is the investigation regarding Podesta and Clinton receiving millions from Russia? Seems like it would be easier to prosecute than the goose chase regarding the witch hunt related to Trump and Russia. Anyone wishing evidence related to Podesta and Clinton and Russia will find it easy on the Internet. Just search follow the money. There are bank records available on line. I have copies, and they show a money trail leading from Russia to Podesta and Clinton. How about Pay for Play? I guess it is just the usual, "nothing to see here, folks" cr@p that D.C. habitually pushes on us.
And now, those of you that accused Trump of lying about being surveilled by the Obama administration are finding out that he was telling the truth. It must be discouraging to you leftards to find out that The Donald is right again.
What a lot of crap. Try Googling!
Taltarzac725
03-31-2017, 09:08 AM
Or maybe, just like the libtards on the left, the Right is also impaired by corruption and the need to protect their own (politicians). Any first year lawyer could get a conviction on Killary, even Tal. Well, maybe Tal.
I am not a lawyer. I am a law librarian and it is just a hobby. My 224 613 Project. That is my now 26 year Project to get practical materials into libraries of all sorts for survivors/victims of crimes. With an assist by social workers, nurses, athletes, movie studio execs, CEOs, news anchors, librarians. Attorney Generals, some US and other country Presidents and VPs, Senators in other countries, psychiatrists, lawyers, book publishers, writers, scholars, etc.
And I could not get a conviction of Hillary Clinton. The Republican establishment has been trying to get one since 1992 or so. From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Primer on Bill and Hillary Clinton Scandals - The Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/tracking-the-clinton-controversies-from-whitewater-to-benghazi/396182/)
Now Donald Fraud Trump is a different story. They just need to investigate in a careful manner.
Reiver
03-31-2017, 11:00 AM
Actually, it WAS AN ILLEGAL SERVER, when goverment business was transmitted over it. She had NO permission to use it for work.
<SNIP>
The gov uses a completely secured, encrypted and isolated separate system for transmission of classified.
<SNIP>
Government servers also have two copy hard drive real time duplication and a daily tape backup.
You do NOT want to see what someone acts likes when the server loses official emails.
They behave worse than liberals when you threaten to take away their low wage crop pickers.
Anyway, all those backups are a scary proposition for someone like Hillary.
dave harris
03-31-2017, 05:13 PM
Just breaking....recall when Nunez shared "anonymous" source to cast doubt about the false Trump lie about being wiretapped. He subsequently walked that back and apologized.
The breaking news this morning is this....guess where the anonymous source was located...
THE WHITE HOUSE
Not a joke..just confirmed
Do you mean donny's boy's leaked classified information. I thought donny was against leaking.
Trump's flip-flop on leaks and the release of secret information | PolitiFact (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/feb/16/donald-trump/trumps-flip-flop-leaks-and-release-secret-informat/)
MDLNB
04-01-2017, 06:54 AM
I am not a lawyer. I am a law librarian and it is just a hobby. My 224 613 Project. That is my now 26 year Project to get practical materials into libraries of all sorts for survivors/victims of crimes. With an assist by social workers, nurses, athletes, movie studio execs, CEOs, news anchors, librarians. Attorney Generals, some US and other country Presidents and VPs, Senators in other countries, psychiatrists, lawyers, book publishers, writers, scholars, etc.
And I could not get a conviction of Hillary Clinton. The Republican establishment has been trying to get one since 1992 or so. From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Primer on Bill and Hillary Clinton Scandals - The Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/tracking-the-clinton-controversies-from-whitewater-to-benghazi/396182/)
Now Donald Fraud Trump is a different story. They just need to investigate in a careful manner.
I am not a lawyer, either. But, I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express. :a20:
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.