Reasoning Results By Progressive

[rubicon]

Here are a few examples of progressive reasoning. Feel free to add to this list. Anticipate that progressives on this forum will do their due diligence to sabotage this thread, as do their brothers and sister across the nation.



Progressives are howling that the issue of "drinking milk" is racist. Why? because one of the claims for drinking milk is to guard against osteoporosis. However osteoporosis has a lower incidence in the black community. Ergo this hasn't been clearly acknowledged by the milk industry and hence it is viewed as being discriminatory.

Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin signed into law a bill making attacks on police, and emergency responders a hate crime ( Blue Lives Matter). Civil rights leaders objected stating harsh penalties already exist . Apparently only Black Lives Matter? . Does hae really discriminate?

Do you suppose progressive have figured out that people initially start a business for their economic benefit? Given the push by progressives via labor unions you would believe that these new start ups exist only to serve unions to help grow their membership.

Personal Best Regards:

[wjboyer1]

Here are a few examples of progressive reasoning. Feel free to add to this list. Anticipate that progressives on this forum will do their due diligence to sabotage this thread, as do their brothers and sister across the nation.



Progressives are howling that the issue of "drinking milk" is racist. Why? because one of the claims for drinking milk is to guard against osteoporosis. However osteoporosis has a lower incidence in the black community. Ergo this hasn't been clearly acknowledged by the milk industry and hence it is viewed as being discriminatory.

Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin signed into law a bill making attacks on police, and emergency responders a hate crime ( Blue Lives Matter). Civil rights leaders objected stating harsh penalties already exist . Apparently only Black Lives Matter? . Does hae really discriminate?

Do you suppose progressive have figured out that people initially start a business for their economic benefit? Given the push by progressives via labor unions you would believe that these new start ups exist only to serve unions to help grow their membership.

Personal Best Regards:

BREAKING: After seven years of criticizing Obamacare, Republicans couldn't even pass their OWN bill.

[MDLNB]

BREAKING: After seven years of criticizing Obamacare, Republicans couldn't even pass their OWN bill.

It ain't over until the fat Hillary sings...:a20:

Remember, it is your country that you are wishing it to fail. Obamacare is failing and will be defunct by the middle of the year. If you want zero health care for others, then keep cheering any hindrance or failure. Being a prissy little girl does not help the country.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

BREAKING: After seven years of criticizing Obamacare, Republicans couldn't even pass their OWN bill.

And this has what to so with the subject of the OP?

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

More progressive logic.

The head of the FBI says that so far, there is no evidence that something occurred. This is the considered "demonstrable evidence" that it did not occur.

The really sad thing that that both sides do it. That take quotes that are favorable to their side an use them to in an attempt to bolster their argument. And they take quotes that are possibly unfavorable to the opposition and misuse them to knock down their argument.

This is just so much silliness. Until we stop playing "gotcha" we'll never get any problems solved.

[Don Baldwin]

More progressive logic.

The head of the FBI says that so far, there is no evidence that something occurred. This is the considered "demonstrable evidence" that it did not occur.

The really sad thing that that both sides do it. That take quotes that are favorable to their side an use them to in an attempt to bolster their argument. And they take quotes that are possibly unfavorable to the opposition and misuse them to knock down their argument.

This is just so much silliness. Until we stop playing "gotcha" we'll never get any problems solved.

And until we're HONEST...none of our problems will be solved.

[Rockyrd]

More progressive logic.

The head of the FBI says that so far, there is no evidence that something occurred. This is the considered "demonstrable evidence" that it did [I[/I]not occur.

The really sad thing that that both sides do it. That take quotes that are favorable to their side an use them to in an attempt to bolster their argument. And they take quotes that are possibly unfavorable to the opposition and misuse them to knock down their argument.

This is just so much silliness. Until we stop playing "gotcha" we'll never get any problems solved.

The Russian government attempted to influence an election in the United States.

THIS IS A FACT

This fact verified by all 17 units of the US intelligence community, PLUS other allies throughout the world.

Very serious thus congress began an investigation into that.

Part of that investigation involved asking HOW, WHY, and was anyone in USA involved.

During that investigation, the President of the United States made a claim that he was phone tapped by Past President Obama, and HE, the President asked that comm to add to their charge to look into wiretapping of him or his campaign by Barrack Obama.

The investigation found thus far that the attempt took place, and that the influence was to hurt Clinton to insure. Victory for whomever she ran against. That was the original intent of the Russians, As things progressed and Trump became the candidate, there seemingly was much contact between the Trump campaign and Russian organizations known to be fronts. And of course since that is where this investigation took them they continues.

The hearing last week...

1. Assured us that the Russians did make the attempt in concert with Wiki leaks. It was discussed HOW they did it, much of the timin, etc.

2. Explanations given as to the many faceted things that must occur to have anyone wiretapped, and statement that nobody has any information to President Obama being involved in any wiretapping. Sine the President publicly to international media accused Britain of helping Obama, that was investigated and shown false. This was added if you recall at the request of the President.

3. It was revealed that there is an investigation into whether any collusion between Trump campaign and Russia. That investigation is still on going.

So, I am not sure what you folks are saying. Do not get caught up in defending if there is nothing to defend.

I am also struck by the total silence if all good patriots with a foreign country getting involved in our electoral process.

You would expect that no matter your political leanings, that would be a primary source of anger and wanting an investigation, but seems not so much

PS: keep in mind, there is no onus on anyone to prove Obama DID anything. The onus is to find out if Trump's unfounded (by him) accusation of a felony committed by Obama took place.

[dave harris]

Here are a few examples of progressive reasoning. Feel free to add to this list. Anticipate that progressives on this forum will do their due diligence to sabotage this thread, as do their brothers and sister across the nation.



Progressives are howling that the issue of "drinking milk" is racist. Why? because one of the claims for drinking milk is to guard against osteoporosis. However osteoporosis has a lower incidence in the black community. Ergo this hasn't been clearly acknowledged by the milk industry and hence it is viewed as being discriminatory.

Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin signed into law a bill making attacks on police, and emergency responders a hate crime ( Blue Lives Matter). Civil rights leaders objected stating harsh penalties already exist . Apparently only Black Lives Matter? . Does hae really discriminate?

Do you suppose progressive have figured out that people initially start a business for their economic benefit? Given the push by progressives via labor unions you would believe that these new start ups exist only to serve unions to help grow their membership.

Personal Best Regards:

The greatest years of this country were when the unions were strong. reagan showed the companies how to break the union, now you have people unemployeed and their paychecks so bad they are living paycheck to paycheck. The union's were the check and balance, now you have big business controlling everyhing, even you.

[Don Baldwin]

The greatest years of this country were when the unions were strong. reagan showed the companies how to break the union, now you have people unemployeed and their paychecks so bad they are living paycheck to paycheck. The union's were the check and balance, now you have big business controlling everyhing, even you.

"Everybody" got a more equal share of the profits.

Now the top 25 CEOs make over $20 million a year when you add up all their compensation. Boards of directors are making $ millions. The top is sucking out more than the bottom now.

[Rockyrd]

"The chairman of the House intelligence committee has backed down from his dramatic assertion that Donald Trump and his aides were "monitored," by U.S. spies — a claim the Republicans have cited this week in emails to loyalists."

Nunes Backs Down From Assertion Trump Was Monitored - NBC News (http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nunes-backs-down-assertion-trump-was-monitored-n738151)


In a very "classy "move.....


On Thursday, the Republican Congressional Campaign Committee sent out an email about Nunes' remarks with the subject line, "Confirmed: Obama Spied on Trump."
"
"As for Trump's assertion that Obama wiretapped him, Nunes repeated Friday what he has said previously, telling reporters, "That didn't happen."

[Cedwards38]

Of course, all of those thing you claim to be progressive reasoning are BS, but here is a list of conservative reasoning:

1. Corporations are people with free speech rights under the US Constitution and are legally allowed to spend as much money as they choose to influence the electoral process. (Citizens United)

2. The main objective of Republicans in Congress during a Democratic Presidency is to make sure the Democrat is a one term President, rather than to work together to do something good for the country and it's citizens. (Sen Mitch McConnell)

3. Obamacare must be repealed and replaced because it is a popular Democrat idea and not a Republican one. (Speaker Paul Ryan)

4. We want to start wars at the same time we decrease taxes and then complain about the budget deficit. (President George W. Bush)

5. It's important to elect an immoral, inarticulate, greedy, Russian controlled, compulsive liar to become POTUS, and then defend all of his ridiculous actions simply because he is a Republican. (Donald J. Trump)

6. We only care about our rich donors, so let's give them huge tax cuts that they don't need. Don't worry the middle class sheep will pay the bill because they can be controlled and convinced that the real problems in America are with moronic social issues like which bathroom we are allowed to pee in. (George W. Bush and the American Health Care Act)

7. Anyone who is poor in America is lazy and a drain on society. Cut them off, regardless of their lives, health, children, or future. (Speaker Paul Ryan)

8. If we give money to the rich, they will create jobs and the money will trickle down to the unwashed masses. This shall be known as Trickle Down Economics and we will espouse it regardless of how many decades it has failed. We also think if we have two dogs and give one a weenie, we can count on that dog sharing with the other. (President Ronald Reagan)

9. Continual war is the only way to keep the economy growing. (History)

10. Greed is good! (Gordon Gekko and American Fatcats)

[Reiver]

Now the top 25 CEOs make over $20 million a year when you add up all their compensation. Boards of directors are making $ millions. The top is sucking out more than the bottom now.
Pick one item for sale in Walmart (Target if you are more enlightened than others). Now tell me how you would get that item from the point of manufacture to the shelves of every store in the country. Detail the transportation methods used. Also make note of the federal, state and local laws that have to be followed. Arrange for the hiring of everyone involved, and the acquiring of the infrastructure and vehicles needed to facilitate the transport. Enumerate the methods you would use to ensure that a steady supply of the item is obtained, without having to store excess inventory.
Now tell me why you think it's just as hard to open a box and put that item on a shelf.

[rubicon]

Of course, all of those thing you claim to be progressive reasoning are BS, but here is a list of conservative reasoning:

1. Corporations are people with free speech rights under the US Constitution and are legally allowed to spend as much money as they choose to influence the electoral process. (Citizens United)

2. The main objective of Republicans in Congress during a Democratic Presidency is to make sure the Democrat is a one term President, rather than to work together to do something good for the country and it's citizens. (Sen Mitch McConnell)

3. Obamacare must be repealed and replaced because it is a popular Democrat idea and not a Republican one. (Speaker Paul Ryan)

4. We want to start wars at the same time we decrease taxes and then complain about the budget deficit. (President George W. Bush)

5. It's important to elect an immoral, inarticulate, greedy, Russian controlled, compulsive liar to become POTUS, and then defend all of his ridiculous actions simply because he is a Republican. (Donald J. Trump)

6. We only care about our rich donors, so let's give them huge tax cuts that they don't need. Don't worry the middle class sheep will pay the bill because they can be controlled and convinced that the real problems in America are with moronic social issues like which bathroom we are allowed to pee in. (George W. Bush and the American Health Care Act)

7. Anyone who is poor in America is lazy and a drain on society. Cut them off, regardless of their lives, health, children, or future. (Speaker Paul Ryan)

8. If we give money to the rich, they will create jobs and the money will trickle down to the unwashed masses. This shall be known as Trickle Down Economics and we will espouse it regardless of how many decades it has failed. We also think if we have two dogs and give one a weenie, we can count on that dog sharing with the other. (President Ronald Reagan)

9. Continual war is the only way to keep the economy growing. (History)

10. Greed is good! (Gordon Gekko and American Fatcats)

counter points.

1. Citizens United has been such a big thorn in progressives side that Obama actually reached out during his State of the Nation and mocked the Supreme Court. Why? Because Citizens United balanced the scales with Unions ability to force their membership not only to vote for the union's choice of candidate, but finance it with union dues.

2. Don't have any problem with the opposition working toward regaining the majority. However, I do have a problem when the opposition utilized the unethical and unsubstantiated attacks and intentional sabotaging be conducted by progressives today.

3. Obamacare was a completely partisan bill passed with the undertone that you had to pass it to see what was in it. Obamacare actuaries knew Obamacare would implode but that was the intent because progressives really wanted and want a single payer plan .

I am pleased that Republicans are having a real legislative debate because we haven't seen real politics at work for many years. Any changes to Obamacare in my view should be incremental.

4. We don't want to start wars we want to prevent wars from escalating. A strong defense has proved to be a deterrent against war. Obama leading from behind has indeed left us behind and we need to let our friends and foes that a new sheriff's in town

5. When Clinton was using the oval office for other than conducting business the progressive mantra was "character doesn't matter."
Obama is one of the most unethical non transparent backstabbing president to have served in the last hundred years. Finally we have Hillary's allegation as to Benghazi, personal e-mail server, Clinton charitable Foundation. Trump's doesn't seem to be creative with the use of cigars.

6. Don't believe me but check the zip codes and you will find the greater percentage of the so called 1% in this nation are Democrats.

7. Conservatives are not adverse to hand ups, and clearly there is a small % of a nation'spopulation that will always need a nation's help. However, one become a little curious when entitlements move from one generation to the next. One becomes curious when the average income considered to be below the poverty level far exceeds the median level of income in other nations.
It should be an moral imperative of this nation to ensure that truly needy people are helped otherwise all we have accomplished is making economic slaves of able bodied people

Will what you say or say what you will but it has been an economic
fact since the forming of this nation that small businesses create growth and growth creates jobs....Obama has been suffocating businesses with regulations, etc . Look at the weak recovery we have had since 2009

9. see my comments in #4

10. Greed. Define greed. Profits are not an evil thing. However, I do have a major concern with corruption. So if greed is driving corruption then and that's what you mean then we agree.

Personal Best Regards:

[Rockyrd]

counter points.

1. Citizens United has been such a big thorn in progressives side that Obama actually reached out during his State of the Nation and mocked the Supreme Court. Why? Because Citizens United balanced the scales with Unions ability to force their membership not only to vote for the union's choice of candidate, but finance it with union dues.

2. Don't have any problem with the opposition working toward regaining the majority. However, I do have a problem when the opposition utilized the unethical and unsubstantiated attacks and intentional sabotaging be conducted by progressives today.

3. Obamacare was a completely partisan bill passed with the undertone that you had to pass it to see what was in it. Obamacare actuaries knew Obamacare would implode but that was the intent because progressives really wanted and want a single payer plan .

I am pleased that Republicans are having a real legislative debate because we haven't seen real politics at work for many years. Any changes to Obamacare in my view should be incremental.

4. We don't want to start wars we want to prevent wars from escalating. A strong defense has proved to be a deterrent against war. Obama leading from behind has indeed left us behind and we need to let our friends and foes that a new sheriff's in town

5. When Clinton was using the oval office for other than conducting business the progressive mantra was "character doesn't matter."
Obama is one of the most unethical non transparent backstabbing president to have served in the last hundred years. Finally we have Hillary's allegation as to Benghazi, personal e-mail server, Clinton charitable Foundation. Trump's doesn't seem to be creative with the use of cigars.

6. Don't believe me but check the zip codes and you will find the greater percentage of the so called 1% in this nation are Democrats.

7. Conservatives are not adverse to hand ups, and clearly there is a small % of a nation'spopulation that will always need a nation's help. However, one become a little curious when entitlements move from one generation to the next. One becomes curious when the average income considered to be below the poverty level far exceeds the median level of income in other nations.
It should be an moral imperative of this nation to ensure that truly needy people are helped otherwise all we have accomplished is making economic slaves of able bodied people

Will what you say or say what you will but it has been an economic
fact since the forming of this nation that small businesses create growth and growth creates jobs....Obama has been suffocating businesses with regulations, etc . Look at the weak recovery we have had since 2009

9. see my comments in #4

10. Greed. Define greed. Profits are not an evil thing. However, I do have a major concern with corruption. So if greed is driving corruption then and that's what you mean then we agree.

Personal Best Regards:

Have not seen one "anti progressive", "staunch Make America Great Again" express even one single concern about our election process being invaded, about our President making KNOWINGLY FALSE ACCUSATION about Americans as well as our Allies.

Not a word...

[MDLNB]

counter points.

1. Citizens United has been such a big thorn in progressives side that Obama actually reached out during his State of the Nation and mocked the Supreme Court. Why? Because Citizens United balanced the scales with Unions ability to force their membership not only to vote for the union's choice of candidate, but finance it with union dues.

2. Don't have any problem with the opposition working toward regaining the majority. However, I do have a problem when the opposition utilized the unethical and unsubstantiated attacks and intentional sabotaging be conducted by progressives today.

3. Obamacare was a completely partisan bill passed with the undertone that you had to pass it to see what was in it. Obamacare actuaries knew Obamacare would implode but that was the intent because progressives really wanted and want a single payer plan .

I am pleased that Republicans are having a real legislative debate because we haven't seen real politics at work for many years. Any changes to Obamacare in my view should be incremental.

4. We don't want to start wars we want to prevent wars from escalating. A strong defense has proved to be a deterrent against war. Obama leading from behind has indeed left us behind and we need to let our friends and foes that a new sheriff's in town

5. When Clinton was using the oval office for other than conducting business the progressive mantra was "character doesn't matter."
Obama is one of the most unethical non transparent backstabbing president to have served in the last hundred years. Finally we have Hillary's allegation as to Benghazi, personal e-mail server, Clinton charitable Foundation. Trump's doesn't seem to be creative with the use of cigars.

6. Don't believe me but check the zip codes and you will find the greater percentage of the so called 1% in this nation are Democrats.

7. Conservatives are not adverse to hand ups, and clearly there is a small % of a nation'spopulation that will always need a nation's help. However, one become a little curious when entitlements move from one generation to the next. One becomes curious when the average income considered to be below the poverty level far exceeds the median level of income in other nations.
It should be an moral imperative of this nation to ensure that truly needy people are helped otherwise all we have accomplished is making economic slaves of able bodied people

Will what you say or say what you will but it has been an economic
fact since the forming of this nation that small businesses create growth and growth creates jobs....Obama has been suffocating businesses with regulations, etc . Look at the weak recovery we have had since 2009

9. see my comments in #4

10. Greed. Define greed. Profits are not an evil thing. However, I do have a major concern with corruption. So if greed is driving corruption then and that's what you mean then we agree.

Personal Best Regards:

Good post, Rubi....:eclipsee_gold_cup:

[Don Baldwin]

Pick one item for sale in Walmart (Target if you are more enlightened than others). Now tell me how you would get that item from the point of manufacture to the shelves of every store in the country. Detail the transportation methods used. Also make note of the federal, state and local laws that have to be followed. Arrange for the hiring of everyone involved, and the acquiring of the infrastructure and vehicles needed to facilitate the transport. Enumerate the methods you would use to ensure that a steady supply of the item is obtained, without having to store excess inventory.
Now tell me why you think it's just as hard to open a box and put that item on a shelf.

The CEO does none of that...various departments do that.

[rubicon]

I keep saying it over and over again progressives suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome and it has taken over their thinking and that's all they talk about. they won't talk policy, they won't engage in debate . You present a cogent argument supported by facts, ( fact checked facts) and stats and what you get in response is "Trump Sucks":1rotfl::1rotfl: its actually getting comical.

this thread is about progressive reasoning so I do you reason with a progressive who actually believes a person can chose their gender or invent something called non-gender?

How do you reason with people who claim ONLY Black Lives Matter?

How do you reason with people who only respond with one word accusations?

Personal Best Regards:

[ColdNoMore]

I keep saying it over and over again progressives suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome and it has taken over their thinking and that's all they talk about. they won't talk policy, they won't engage in debate

You keep saying a lot of things over and over that are complete lies...just like the sociopath in the White House.

When asked to link facts to your soapbox bloviating, you turn around and run...like a scared little bunny.



You present a cogent argument supported by facts, ( fact checked facts) and stats and what you get in response is "Trump Sucks" its actually getting comical.

What's really comical, is your inability to provide ANY facts/links to your bloviating. :1rotfl:

Your unwarranted arrogance is so great, that you think people should believe you...just because you said it. :oops:

Those of us who aren't Chump Cultists however, see right through your pathetic attempts and desperation to come across as even having a modicum of intelligence.

I'll bet that chaps your azz...doesn't it? :D



this thread is about progressive reasoning so I do you reason with a progressive who actually believes a person can chose their gender or invent something called non-gender?
It's not a matter of 'choosing' gender, it's a matter of those people being true to how they feel.

Given that they know they will be subjecting themselves to an avalanche of criticism from close-minded bigoted fake Christians like yourself, it takes more guts & courage than you will ever have...to go through what they do.



How do you reason with people who claim ONLY Black Lives Matter?

The reason people like you get properly called 'racist'...is due to ignorant statements like this. :ohdear:

I would bet big money that you're not smart enough to get past the name and actually look at what the movement is about.

It is NOT about ONLY black lives matter, it is the fact that it isn't unarmed white people getting gunned down...for oftentimes minor traffic offenses.

If the same thing were happening to young women, there would be a movement called 'Young Women's Lives Matter'...which also would not be saying that no other lives matter.

So once again, since you refuse (or more accurately, aren't intelligent enough) to do research into the issue...it's easy to call you the racist that you are.



How do you reason with people who only respond with one word accusations?

Personal Best Regards:

Given that brevity and succinctness is something you have no concept of...I'll try to explain it to you.

Standing on your soapbox, bloviating lies without providing ANY proof...makes it simple to label you with one word.



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[Rockyrd]

I keep saying it over and over again progressives suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome and it has taken over their thinking and that's all they talk about. they won't talk policy, they won't engage in debate . You present a cogent argument supported by facts, ( fact checked facts) and stats and what you get in response is "Trump Sucks":1rotfl::1rotfl: its actually getting comical.

this thread is about progressive reasoning so I do you reason with a progressive who actually believes a person can chose their gender or invent something called non-gender?

How do you reason with people who claim ONLY Black Lives Matter?

How do you reason with people who only respond with one word accusations?

Personal Best Regards:

First, when will YOU allow us all the made up stories you keep referring to ?

I stopped starting threads, butvstarted approx 11 breads on issues, mostly foreign relation, but including spending and deficit. I MAY BECWRONG BUT I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU POSTED IN ANY OF THEM.

Also, after a few posts, your pals came in with the standards...
Obam, Clinton posts,. All threads, I worded very carefully as to make them neutral regarding party or direction.

YOU keep maligning people on this but you refuse to do what you preach.

Finally, you speak of Trump. For me, and millions mor, HE is the issue. I can only speak for myself, but how will he get any issue resolved if not one country trusts what he says, and domestically, he wants to prepare a "hit" list, is trying to destroy an investigation into an actual invasion of our country, who continues to make knowingly false accusations.

Wake up, this country has deep and serious problems in the WH.

Cannot validate this, but if Kasich, Rubio, or even Bush were President, we would be working in a bi partisan way on health costs, would not be spending millions on investigating Presidential accusation made in childish tantrums, and be looking forward to more in the future.

[MDLNB]

Have not seen one "anti progressive", "staunch Make America Great Again" express even one single concern about our election process being invaded, about our President making KNOWINGLY FALSE ACCUSATION about Americans as well as our Allies.

Not a word...

Who cares what he says. I am paying attention to what he does. I enjoy seeing your heads explode on the left whenever he says something. While you are crying and complaining about his non-PC rhetoric, with his other hand he is getting things done. Reminds me of that old character Columbo. Acted naive while he solved all the murder mysteries.

[rubicon]

A school district in North Carolina has pulled a book that was set to be a part of First Grade curriculum after teachers and lawmakers complained about its content regarding a little boy who liked to wear dresses.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools had originally planned to make the book “Jacob’s New Dress” a part of the anti-bullying reading plan for Child Abuse Prevention Month. The 2014 book, written by Sarah and Ian Hoffman, is meant to teach children about those who are “gender non-conforming.”

“Jacob’s New Dress” is a story about a boy who likes to wear a princess dress for playtime at school, but is teased by his peers.
The purpose for reading this book is to teach children not to bully their peers. At least that is the claim of the school administration. But what it does is teach impressionable boys that it is okay to wear a dress.

Progressive, you got to love their linguistic constructivism ...gender non-conforming ..Geezzz

Personal Best Regards:

[ColdNoMore]

A school district in North Carolina has pulled a book that was set to be a part of First Grade curriculum after teachers and lawmakers complained about its content regarding a little boy who liked to wear dresses.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools had originally planned to make the book “Jacob’s New Dress” a part of the anti-bullying reading plan for Child Abuse Prevention Month. The 2014 book, written by Sarah and Ian Hoffman, is meant to teach children about those who are “gender non-conforming.”

“Jacob’s New Dress” is a story about a boy who likes to wear a princess dress for playtime at school, but is teased by his peers.
The purpose for reading this book is to teach children not to bully their peers. At least that is the claim of the school administration. But what it does is teach impressionable boys that it is okay to wear a dress.

Progressive, you got to love their linguistic constructivism ...gender non-conforming ..Geezzz

Personal Best Regards:

Your insecurity of being a supposed male, is eclipsed only by your insecurity of knowing that you're a pseudo-intellectual...trying to play out of your league. ;)



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[Reiver]

Jacob at age 35 - the possibilities:
a) Jacob is a trans-sexual, possibly a trans-gender, and is 13 times more likely to attempt suicide than other people.
b) Jacob is embarrassed and resentful that no one tried to correct his behavior when his mind was not fully developed enough to make good choices.
(assuming he survived when his parents bought him an umbrella and told him that his idea to jump off the roof and fly was a legitimate life style choice, since we shouldn't assume people's species)

[rubicon]

Your insecurity of being a supposed male, is eclipsed only by your insecurity of knowing that you're a pseudo-intellectual...trying to play out of your league. ;)



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

You got to stop flirting with me.

Personal Best Regards:

[MDLNB]

You got to stop flirting with me.

Personal Best Regards:

:boom:..:BigApplause:

[Don Baldwin]

A school district in North Carolina has pulled a book that was set to be a part of First Grade curriculum after teachers and lawmakers complained about its content regarding a little boy who liked to wear dresses.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools had originally planned to make the book “Jacob’s New Dress” a part of the anti-bullying reading plan for Child Abuse Prevention Month. The 2014 book, written by Sarah and Ian Hoffman, is meant to teach children about those who are “gender non-conforming.”

“Jacob’s New Dress” is a story about a boy who likes to wear a princess dress for playtime at school, but is teased by his peers.
The purpose for reading this book is to teach children not to bully their peers. At least that is the claim of the school administration. But what it does is teach impressionable boys that it is okay to wear a dress.

Progressive, you got to love their linguistic constructivism ...gender non-conforming ..Geezzz

Personal Best Regards:

The purpose should be...to teach little boys not to wear a dress at school. "The bullies", 50+% of the school...don't want/need to see that. A "defected" child acting strange. You don't let the sociopaths and psychopaths "be themselves" so why let this freak?

Jacob at age 35 - the possibilities:
a) Jacob is a trans-sexual, possibly a trans-gender, and is 13 times more likely to attempt suicide than other people.
b) Jacob is embarrassed and resentful that no one tried to correct his behavior when his mind was not fully developed enough to make good choices.
(assuming he survived when his parents bought him an umbrella and told him that his idea to jump off the roof and fly was a legitimate life style choice, since we shouldn't assume people's species)

He's also much more likely to be infected with HIV by the time he's in his 20s. Starting a gay lifestyle at that young age...he's likely not going to make it into his 20s.

HIV was originally a gay disease.

[ColdNoMore]

You got to stop flirting with me.

Personal Best Regards:

Fervent and secret wishing that I, a man, would flirt with you...needs to be directed toward someone else.

Not that I care about your secret fantasies...or feelings of emasculation.



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[dirtbanker]

Fervent and secret wishing that I, a man, would flirt with you...needs to be directed toward someone else.

Not that I care about your secret fantasies...or feelings of emasculation.



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

Your not a man...your just a (unt

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[ColdNoMore]

Your not a man...your just a (unt


:1rotfl:

You're confusing me with what you call females in your own life. ;)



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[rubicon]

Fervent and secret wishing that I, a man, would flirt with you...needs to be directed toward someone else.

Not that I care about your secret fantasies...or feelings of emasculation.



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

By your manner and tone on Political Talk I actually believed other posters who referred to you as not so nice a female ( don't use expletives ever). if you are a male I take exception to the man crush you have on me. Actually I still believe your female, at least believing so gives me peace of mind.

However I have discovered one interesting fact about you in my readings and it has to do with your handicap.
You initially said it was a 19. Then you said it was a 7. Then you came back and said well it was a 7 but now I am a 9.1. Hmmmm I thought this person is dyslexic and the 9.1 is really a 19. I have supervised dyslexic's so have an appreciation of your struggles

Personal Best Regards:

[ColdNoMore]

By your manner and tone on Political Talk I actually believed other posters who referred to you as not so nice a female ( don't use expletives ever). if you are a male I take exception to the man crush you have on me. Actually I still believe your female, at least believing so gives me peace of mind.

However I have discovered one interesting fact about you in my readings and it has to do with your handicap.
You initially said it was a 19. Then you said it was a 7. Then you came back and said well it was a 7 but now I am a 9.1. Hmmmm I thought this person is dyslexic and the 9.1 is really a 19. I have supervised dyslexic's so have an appreciation of your struggles

Personal Best Regards:
'You're.' ;)


As to the rest.....:1rotfl:

You're lying, obsession and public envy with my golf abilities... has become hilarious AND pathetic. :ohdear:

While I've NEVER said I had a 19 index (prove that I have), your constant reference to it...is a YUGE window into your own massive insecurities. :D

So thanks for that. :thumbup:

If it makes you feel any better, I've actually been in a slump of late and have just crept over a single digit index...and am now technically a 'double-digit' handicapper.

The only positive is that I can now count up to 7 strokes on any hole...instead of being restricted to only double bogies. :ho:

I'm still almost double digits...below a 19 however.

Sucks for you to be so publicly envious and obsessed with it though. ;)




Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[MDLNB]

By your manner and tone on Political Talk I actually believed other posters who referred to you as not so nice a female ( don't use expletives ever). if you are a male I take exception to the man crush you have on me. Actually I still believe your female, at least believing so gives me peace of mind.

However I have discovered one interesting fact about you in my readings and it has to do with your handicap.
You initially said it was a 19. Then you said it was a 7. Then you came back and said well it was a 7 but now I am a 9.1. Hmmmm I thought this person is dyslexic and the 9.1 is really a 19. I have supervised dyslexic's so have an appreciation of your struggles

Personal Best Regards:

Another :boom:....:BigApplause: