Fox News

[rubicon]

I continue to come across articles that suggest Fox News has been in the process of moving its political reporting to the left. The articles suggest that James and his wife Kathyrn Murdock ( part owners of Fox) have a radical left agenda . Kathyrn Murdock for example is a Director for the Clinton Climate Initiative and both James and kathyrn are close friends of the Clintons

Reports abound that Bill O'Reilly was really fired because of his political views. and that Sean Hannity was next. Sean Hannity was also accused of sexual harassment . He was at the ready given what happened to O'Reilly and had his law team pursue the accuser until she refuted her false claim. Jesse Watters also a target was falsely accused of making sexist remarks as respect Ivanka Trump

These same articles also make mention that a number of knowledgeable people have been having meetings for the purpose of starting up another conservative television news program

I am not interested in "he says she says" about the allegations against O'Reilly, Hannity or Watters.

What I am interested in is other posters opinions as to

1) do you believe Fox News will go left?
2) do you believe if it does viewership will drop?
3) do you believe another conservative news station will be created?
4) if a new station is created do you believe it will draw viewership in the same manner as Fox News?

Personal Best Regard:

[Rockyrd]

I continue to come across articles that suggest Fox News has been in the process of moving its political reporting to the left. The articles suggest that James and his wife Kathyrn Murdock ( part owners of Fox) have a radical left agenda . Kathyrn Murdock for example is a Director for the Clinton Climate Initiative and both James and kathyrn are close friends of the Clintons

Reports abound that Bill O'Reilly was really fired because of his political views. and that Sean Hannity was next. Sean Hannity was also accused of sexual harassment . He was at the ready given what happened to O'Reilly and had his law team pursue the accuser until she refuted her false claim. Jesse Watters also a target was falsely accused of making sexist remarks as respect Ivanka Trump

These same articles also make mention that a number of knowledgeable people have been having meetings for the purpose of starting up another conservative television news program

I am not interested in "he says she says" about the allegations against O'Reilly, Hannity or Watters.

What I am interested in is other posters opinions as to

1) do you believe Fox News will go left?
2) do you believe if it does viewership will drop?
3) do you believe another conservative news station will be created?
4) if a new station is created do you believe it will draw viewership in the same manner as Fox News?

Personal Best Regard:

Let's begin with what we know.

Roger Aisles is out there and is salivating for another network, so to question 3, yes there will be a new conservative station, but timing is something else. There are a lot of approvals needed, etc., and this will take time.

I do not think Fox will "go left" whatever that means. They have lost and are losing credibility because they tied themselves so closely to Trump. They have a lot of quality people there that are very frustrated, and want to report NEWS, and have the other radical folks that will support whatever lie or conspiracy theory is the newest. So, no to whatever going left means, but trying to become a more conservative answer with NEWS, yes. Thus, the door will open for Aisles to put together the extremists for a new network, while Fox can concentrate on news rather than what they have turned into.

If a new station is created in Aisles image with folks, the ratings will mirror the hard right extremists that support Trump no matter what he does or says. The extreme alt right has been looking for a voice, and they found him.

If what I am saying happens, the viewing numbers for conservative viewers will get split, as Fox would then be trying to compete with CNN and MSNBC.

I abhor cable news channels in general, and haveing "NEWS" be referred to as LEFT or RIGHT is very disconcerting. News is news.

Of course, producers who decide what is presented will oft times as human beings lean one way or another.

I detest cable news. Does not mean I do not watch. I like selected people on each channel. I also hate the demeaning of these channels by the President, posters, etc. I much prefer to read ALL sides, which allows me not to be distracted by personalities, and to verify what I am hearing.

[MDLNB]

Yep, it appears that the left has influence on FOX. Shepherd Smith is an example of gay liberalism. But, I have a feeling that it may not be a total change in trend. I think they just did not ever really accept Trump as a serious contender for president. Just an opinion.

[Rockyrd]

Yep, it appears that the left has influence on FOX. Shepherd Smith is an example of gay liberalism. But, I have a feeling that it may not be a total change in trend. I think they just did not ever really accept Trump as a serious contender for president. Just an opinion.

Why is Shepherd Smith considered by you to be "an example of gay liberalism" ?

I think you should try and get a bit better informed before making such accusations. He is an extremely well though of NEWSman.

Bad mouthing people, and calling them names because they have integrity is a reflection on the accuser

-----------------------------

"The Fox Report with Shepard Smith was a top-rated newscast in cable news and has been ranked third in the top programs in U.S. cable news.[5] Smith tied for second (along with Dan Rather and Peter Jennings) as the most trusted news anchor on both network and cable news in a 2003 TV Guide poll.[6] In addition to anchoring Fox News Channel's flagship news program, Smith also anchors most prime time news presentations provided by Fox News for the Fox television network.[7]

On November 19, 2007, The New York Times reported that Smith had signed a three-year contract giving him between US$7 million and US$8 million per year. This contract places Smith into the same pay league as anchor Brian Williams of NBC and former anchor Charles Gibson of ABC.[8] Smith renewed his contract with Fox on October 26, 2010, for another three years.[9]

On September 12, 2013, Smith and Fox News announced that, along with another multiyear renewal of his contract, his role in Fox News would shift. He would become the managing editor of Fox News' new breaking news division and the host of Shepard Smith Reporting.[10] Both Studio B and The Fox Report were phased out, and in October 2013 Shepard Smith Reporting began airing in the 3 p.m. ET time slot."

Shepard Smith - Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shepard_Smith)

[rubicon]

Yep, it appears that the left has influence on FOX. Shepherd Smith is an example of gay liberalism. But, I have a feeling that it may not be a total change in trend. I think they just did not ever really accept Trump as a serious contender for president. Just an opinion.

Its getting difficult to separate fact from fiction because many on the left have gone to extremes to topple Trump & Company and the left owns most of the media. The radical left is determined to shut down free speech and there are plenty of examples across the nation to support that statement.

Personal Best Regards:

[MDLNB]

Why is Shepherd Smith considered by you to be "an example of gay liberalism" ?

I think you should try and get a bit better informed before making such accusations. He is an extremely well though of NEWSman.

Bad mouthing people, and calling them names because they have integrity is a reflection on the accuser

-----------------------------

"The Fox Report with Shepard Smith was a top-rated newscast in cable news and has been ranked third in the top programs in U.S. cable news.[5] Smith tied for second (along with Dan Rather and Peter Jennings) as the most trusted news anchor on both network and cable news in a 2003 TV Guide poll.[6] In addition to anchoring Fox News Channel's flagship news program, Smith also anchors most prime time news presentations provided by Fox News for the Fox television network.[7]

On November 19, 2007, The New York Times reported that Smith had signed a three-year contract giving him between US$7 million and US$8 million per year. This contract places Smith into the same pay league as anchor Brian Williams of NBC and former anchor Charles Gibson of ABC.[8] Smith renewed his contract with Fox on October 26, 2010, for another three years.[9]

On September 12, 2013, Smith and Fox News announced that, along with another multiyear renewal of his contract, his role in Fox News would shift. He would become the managing editor of Fox News' new breaking news division and the host of Shepard Smith Reporting.[10] Both Studio B and The Fox Report were phased out, and in October 2013 Shepard Smith Reporting began airing in the 3 p.m. ET time slot."

Shepard Smith - Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shepard_Smith)

Why do you feel that calling Smith what he is, to be a slur? Are you suggesting that calling someone gay is a bad thing? Are you a bigot? Smith IS gay and he is a liberal. What part do you disagree with? Of course, maybe you feel that anything anyone says is a slur if you do not agree with it. I apologize to my gay friends on here if I am not up on the latest terminology when describing a homosexual. A while back, if I was to call him a queer, it would offend someone. If I called him a fag, it would offend, and many folks would confuse it with the term used for a cigarette. Sorry if I upset you Rocky. Perhaps if I said, a non-straight sexual participant, liberal that would be OK? Perhaps it is not me that has bad mouthed someone, but you?

[Rockyrd]

Why do you feel that calling Smith what he is, to be a slur? Are you suggesting that calling someone gay is a bad thing? Are you a bigot? Smith IS gay and he is a liberal. What part do you disagree with? Of course, maybe you feel that anything anyone says is a slur if you do not agree with it. I apologize to my gay friends on here if I am not up on the latest terminology when describing a homosexual. A while back, if I was to call him a queer, it would offend someone. If I called him a fag, it would offend, and many folks would confuse it with the term used for a cigarette. Sorry if I upset you Rocky. Perhaps if I said, a non-straight sexual participant, liberal that would be OK? Perhaps it is not me that has bad mouthed someone, but you?

Wow,...so much there.

Why would you feel it necessary to mention any sexual tendencies in your post ?

Why would you attack me as I mentioned I or cared ? I QUOTED YOU ?

I ask the same question if you......why is it necessary to refer to a respected newsman as you did ?

You are a great lover of Trump, acting immature like him. You are quoted and then attempt to turn it into an attack.

You have completely and totally ran away from the question...why you attack a respected newsman ?

[Chi-Town]

54 is the top age of key demographics. Fox viewers are mostly above that..... loyal older conservatives. Advertisers want younger viewers to develop brand loyalty.



Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

[wjboyer1]

68220

68221

68222

[rubicon]

Why do you feel that calling Smith what he is, to be a slur? Are you suggesting that calling someone gay is a bad thing? Are you a bigot? Smith IS gay and he is a liberal. What part do you disagree with? Of course, maybe you feel that anything anyone says is a slur if you do not agree with it. I apologize to my gay friends on here if I am not up on the latest terminology when describing a homosexual. A while back, if I was to call him a queer, it would offend someone. If I called him a fag, it would offend, and many folks would confuse it with the term used for a cigarette. Sorry if I upset you Rocky. Perhaps if I said, a non-straight sexual participant, liberal that would be OK? Perhaps it is not me that has bad mouthed someone, but you?

The answer to your question is its a matter of the right to passage. A black dude such as a rapper can use the "n"word but if a white person uses it even watch out for the Al Sharpton brigade because its coming after you.

Same applies to gay if it comes from a conservative be ready for the backlash. such is the state of our union.

Personal Best Regards:

[Rockyrd]

I just wonder if certain posters simply hate each and every person who is non white, not of obvious American born parents, of a religion they have not been exposed to, and maybe not of their particular sexual preference.

And do they apply that label to all these people in every case ?

Must be so great to be so special. I mean a white, straight, 2 generation American, of certain selected religions, who is a far right conservative is obviously well above everyone else and has the innate right to label and accuse anyone who does not fit in.

Poor Shep Smith....educated, American born, award winning newsman is ripped on TOTV political forum.

Makes sense that you folks look down on him. You are the special ones

[MDLNB]

Wow,...so much there.

Why would you feel it necessary to mention any sexual tendencies in your post ?

Why would you attack me as I mentioned I or cared ? I QUOTED YOU ?

I ask the same question if you......why is it necessary to refer to a respected newsman as you did ?

You are a great lover of Trump, acting immature like him. You are quoted and then attempt to turn it into an attack.

You have completely and totally ran away from the question...why you attack a respected newsman ?

Funny how sensitive you are. I don't care if you are gay. I am not going to defend myself for something I did not do. I simply stated fact and you assumed that I was attacking. Look, what you do in privacy is no concern to me.

The subject was whether not FOX is moving to the left. Smith is an example of FOX moving left. Is that simplistic enough for you? Does that offend you? Not that I really care.

[MDLNB]

I just wonder if certain posters simply hate each and every person who is non white, not of obvious American born parents, of a religion they have not been exposed to, and maybe not of their particular sexual preference.

And do they apply that label to all these people in every case ?

Must be so great to be so special. I mean a white, straight, 2 generation American, of certain selected religions, who is a far right conservative is obviously well above everyone else and has the innate right to label and accuse anyone who does not fit in.

Poor Shep Smith....educated, American born, award winning newsman is ripped on TOTV political forum.

Makes sense that you folks look down on him. You are the special ones

Look, no one cares what you do in privacy. If I say that Smith is a liberal, is that also a slur? Try not to be so sensitive and girly. Unless that is your thing, of course.

[Rockyrd]

Look, no one cares what you do in privacy. If I say that Smith is a liberal, is that also a slur? Try not to be so sensitive and girly. Unless that is your thing, of course.

You are truely a very clueless and mean spirited man.

YOU, AND ONLY YOU MENTIONED HIS SEXUAL PREFERENCE.

AS YOU KNOW I SIMPLY QUOTED...AS A QUOTE...IN BOLD CAPS, and yet you continue your little personal attacks.

This is YOUR post #3 from YOU onthis thread.

"Yep, it appears that the left has influence on FOX. Shepherd Smith is an example of gay liberalism. But, I have a feeling that it may not be a total change in trend. I think they just did not ever really accept Trump as a serious contender for president. Just an opinion."

IT WAS HE FIRST AND ONLY REFERNCE MADE, EXCEPT FOR YOUR post being quoted.

Now please, if you want to discuss politics, do some reading and post. If you want to play your little girl games, which by the way is your reputation, let me know....the ignore works well. Right now, you are that little kid who is a pain in the a$$

[MDLNB]

You are truely a very clueless and mean spirited man.

YOU, AND ONLY YOU MENTIONED HIS SEXUAL PREFERENCE.

AS YOU KNOW I SIMPLY QUOTED...AS A QUOTE...IN BOLD CAPS, and yet you continue your little personal attacks.

This is YOUR post #3 from YOU onthis thread.

"Yep, it appears that the left has influence on FOX. Shepherd Smith is an example of gay liberalism. But, I have a feeling that it may not be a total change in trend. I think they just did not ever really accept Trump as a serious contender for president. Just an opinion."

IT WAS HE FIRST AND ONLY REFERNCE MADE, EXCEPT FOR YOUR post being quoted.

Now please, if you want to discuss politics, do some reading and post. If you want to play your little girl games, which by the way is your reputation, let me know....the ignore works well. Right now, you are that little kid who is a pain in the a$$

Mean spirited to mention his sexual preference? Isn't that your thing today? You know Catlyn Jenner, and others coming out? They have no problem with it. Apparently, you have something to hide, and I inadvertently outed you some how. Sorry, and I really mean that. If gays were so sensitive about being called gay, they shouldn't have gay pride parades showing everyone what their sexual preference is.

But, if this bothers you and you really need to vent, I am here for you. I made a simple statement of fact in answer to a question. You became enraged by it. Perhaps you need to see someone about that issue.

Funny how none of you on here from the left had any problem with that idiot making a holocaust joke at the press cluster the other night. Now, if I was to right call you out as a hypocrite, that would be nasty and spiteful.

Never mind, moving on............Oh, and by the way....this not personal. This is ONLY my response to your childish cries for attention. I attacked no one. If anything, it is you that attacked me for having an opinion. I believe you owe me an apology. I answered the first post, you attacked me, I responded and you attacked me again. Not that I am sensitive to care, but really? You want to trade slaps with a MAN?

[Rockyrd]

Mean spirited to mention his sexual preference? Isn't that your thing today? You know Catlyn Jenner, and others coming out? They have no problem with it. Apparently, you have something to hide, and I inadvertently outed you some how. Sorry, and I really mean that. If gays were so sensitive about being called gay, they shouldn't have gay pride parades showing everyone what their sexual preference is.

But, if this bothers you and you really need to vent, I am here for you. I made a simple statement of fact in answer to a question. You became enraged by it. Perhaps you need to see someone about that issue.

Funny how none of you on here from the left had any problem with that idiot making a holocaust joke at the press cluster the other night. Now, if I was to right call you out as a hypocrite, that would be nasty and spiteful.

Never mind, moving on............Oh, and by the way....this not personal. This is ONLY my response to your childish cries for attention. I attacked no one. If anything, it is you that attacked me for having an opinion. I believe you owe me an apology. I answered the first post, you attacked me, I responded and you attacked me again. Not that I am sensitive to care, but really? You want to trade slaps with a MAN?

I feel compelled before placing you on ignore, to share some advice with you.

Twisting lies do not equal truth, and you are not even good at it.

Take care

[MDLNB]

I feel compelled before placing you on ignore, to share some advice with you.

Twisting lies do not equal truth, and you are not even good at it.

Take care

Please put me on ignore, girl. I am tired of listening to your bawling.

Compelled......:1rotfl: Thank you for the laugh. You and TAL should get together. You sound like girly cousins.

[TexaninVA]

Fox is apparently, under the two younger Murdochs, boldly going down the same path as ESPN.

As soon as a new Conservative News Channel is started up, I will bolt from Fox along with millions of others.

[Chi-Town]

Fox is apparently, under the two younger Murdochs, boldly going down the same path as ESPN.

As soon as a new Conservative News Channel is started up, I will bolt from Fox along with millions of others.
Millions on a podcast. Perfect.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

[Chi-Town]

I feel compelled before placing you on ignore, to share some advice with you.

Twisting lies do not equal truth, and you are not even good at it.

Take care
Putting MDCPD on the ignore list? Good for you. In Tapatalk there is no such option. But I'm not sure if I would want to give up the entertainment of that country mouse's ramblings.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

[Rockyrd]

Putting MDCPD on the ignore list? Good for you. In Tapatalk there is no such option. But I'm not sure if I would want to give up the entertainment of that country mouse's ramblings.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

I was entertained by him for a bit, but he is simply so stupid and out of touch....not to mention just annoying enough that I was unable to resist going back and forth, but he is not even a good person to engage with in anyway.

I do understand that he does grace many ignore lists on here

[Don Baldwin]

I just wonder if certain posters simply hate each and every person who is non white, not of obvious American born parents, of a religion they have not been exposed to, and maybe not of their particular sexual preference.

And do they apply that label to all these people in every case ?

Must be so great to be so special. I mean a white, straight, 2 generation American, of certain selected religions, who is a far right conservative is obviously well above everyone else and has the innate right to label and accuse anyone who does not fit in.

Poor Shep Smith....educated, American born, award winning newsman is ripped on TOTV political forum.

Makes sense that you folks look down on him. You are the special ones

I don't "hate" them...just don't want them around. What GOOD do they bring? What school, neighborhood, town, city, country did they improve? You like MLK Blvd?

Islam is dangerous for non-Islams. It's right there...in their book...conversion and dominance is their credo.

I don't like gay men...WHY would I want to be friendly with a man who is checking me out and wants to stick his pen!s up my butt...as a sign of affection?

The many outnumber the few...for every "decent" black person...there are literally thousands who are the complete opposite. To see the REAL black population...the 99%...you need to go to MLK Blvd. Because THAT is where the 99% live. 99% of blacks live in the inner cities of in the black part of town. That dirty, nasty, dangerous part of town that everyone avoids.

It IS great to be lucky enough to be born a white male. You got second best if you were born a white female. Blacks, Hispanics...they were NOT do lucky. And it's NOT my fault they're inferior and I shouldn't have to pay to artificially prop them up. Merit based...and if they CAN'T succeed enough to support themselves...then maybe they should just die out as another one of the billions of failed species. IF they were successful ANYWHERE on the entire planet...I could believe they were the same as us...but they're not, they're ALWAYS the bottom of the barrel. They're below, inferior to EVERY other race.

He's a queer...normal men don't like queers...or what they represent. What they do...as$ screwing is inconceivable to me. It's the LAST thing on earth I'd want to try. And yet it's completely normal...not even in the DSM.


Mean spirited to mention his sexual preference? Isn't that your thing today? You know Catlyn Jenner, and others coming out? They have no problem with it. Apparently, you have something to hide, and I inadvertently outed you some how. Sorry, and I really mean that. If gays were so sensitive about being called gay, they shouldn't have gay pride parades showing everyone what their sexual preference is.

But, if this bothers you and you really need to vent, I am here for you. I made a simple statement of fact in answer to a question. You became enraged by it. Perhaps you need to see someone about that issue.

Funny how none of you on here from the left had any problem with that idiot making a holocaust joke at the press cluster the other night. Now, if I was to right call you out as a hypocrite, that would be nasty and spiteful.

Never mind, moving on............Oh, and by the way....this not personal. This is ONLY my response to your childish cries for attention. I attacked no one. If anything, it is you that attacked me for having an opinion. I believe you owe me an apology. I answered the first post, you attacked me, I responded and you attacked me again. Not that I am sensitive to care, but really? You want to trade slaps with a MAN?

Their birth defect...lets call it what it is...a congenital birth defect...NOT their fault. But neither is being born a sociopath or a psychopath. We don't allow THEM to run around willy nilly, doing whatever they want...what THEY feel is normal.

Liberals are enraged by the facts so thoroughly that they live in delusion refusing to admit truths.

Tell me about it...they wish the most vile things upon us all for being right and trying to SAVE them from themselves. They STILL deny that America changes completely within 30 years when the Hispanics become the absolute majority.

[Chi-Town]

I was entertained by him for a bit, but he is simply so stupid and out of touch....not to mention just annoying enough that I was unable to resist going back and forth, but he is not even a good person to engage with in anyway.

I do understand that he does grace many ignore lists on here
You're right, there is no relevant back and forth with him. He is a one way street....a dead end. CNM seems to deal with him the best. MDCPD is no match for him, and the fun thing is that he doesn't know it.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

[Don Baldwin]

You're right, there is no relevant back and forth with him. He is a one way street....a dead end. CNM seems to deal with him the best. MDCPD is no match for him, and the fun thing is that he doesn't know it.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

You liberals...SO delusional...such refusal to see/admit the truth.

Tell me WHY Chicago has such a problem with black violence? Two areas have a real murder problem...the west and south side...BLACK "communities"...WHY is it so violent there CHI? Is it white people's fault again? We're MAKING them act that way? Why is it so disgustingly dirty there too? Nobody works...why can't they clean up? Is THAT my fault too?

[MDLNB]

I was entertained by him for a bit, but he is simply so stupid and out of touch....not to mention just annoying enough that I was unable to resist going back and forth, but he is not even a good person to engage with in anyway.

I do understand that he does grace many ignore lists on here

And yet, you liberals just keep coming back for more. So sad. I believe in your ignore list, like I believed Obama when he promised us that we could keep our doctors and that health care costs would come down.
Please do not go away mad, but feel free to go away. I will not be too awfully despondent.

[MDLNB]

You're right, there is no relevant back and forth with him. He is a one way street....a dead end. CNM seems to deal with him the best. MDCPD is no match for him, and the fun thing is that he doesn't know it.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

Well chi, you started out with one liners, that were almost cute. Then you jumped on CNM's little red wagon and started getting snarky. Then, when that was not enough, you thought you would attempt to dig up some personal information to put on here. You got it wrong, but I could see where that was going so I decided to show you how a pro does it. I gave you a bit of a taste of your own medicine and you backed off. It was you that did not wish a civil discourse. Do not act all wounded. I am always open for a decent discussion. But, if you wish to start every thread with some stupid disparagement of the president, then expect someone to be equally snarky with you. If you can't take it, feel free to go join the YWCA with the other girls. Take you little sister Tal and big sister CNM with you.

On the other hand, do what you wish. This is a free country, regardless of the efforts of Obama, Killary and the puppet master, Soros. I've got no beef with you. You all take this too personal.

If you do not wish to have a discussion with the guys, that's up to you. Please do put me on your "ignore" list.....:1rotfl:

[MDLNB]

You liberals...SO delusional...such refusal to see/admit the truth.

Tell me WHY Chicago has such a problem with black violence? Two areas have a real murder problem...the west and south side...BLACK "communities"...WHY is it so violent there CHI? Is it white people's fault again? We're MAKING them act that way? Why is it so disgustingly dirty there too? Nobody works...why can't they clean up? Is THAT my fault too?

Chicago would be better suited as a nuclear test site. Nothing else of value comes from there. Proof was the last 8 years. :boom:

[Rockyrd]

"Fox News on Monday removed one of its most powerful executives, Bill Shine, another seismic shake-up at a network that remains in crisis mode as its owner, Rupert Murdoch, moves to steer it past the sexual harassment scandal that first engulfed it last summer.

Mr. Shine, a network co-president and a longtime lieutenant to its disgraced former chairman, Roger Ailes, was viewed by some employees as a symbol of Fox News’s old-guard leadership even as its parent, 21st Century Fox, pledged reforms to the company culture and a new era of civility in the newsroom."

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/01/business/media/fox-news-bill-shine.html?_r=0

Word is that Hannity will be history, as he has a clause in his contract that he can just leave if Shine goes, and they were very good friends.

[rubicon]

The closest thing to nirvana on TOTV Political Talk is the ignore list:D

Why subject yourself to the angry and illogical noise and taunts of posters. Block out their rants and personal attacks and your board returns to calm, civil and a sharing of ideas and opinions...nirvana

Personal Best Regards:

[affald]

The rubble of Chicago will always be there as a tribute to Obama.

[Chi-Town]

Well chi, you started out with one liners, that were almost cute. Then you jumped on CNM's little red wagon and started getting snarky. Then, when that was not enough, you thought you would attempt to dig up some personal information to put on here. You got it wrong, but I could see where that was going so I decided to show you how a pro does it. I gave you a bit of a taste of your own medicine and you backed off. It was you that did not wish a civil discourse. Do not act all wounded. I am always open for a decent discussion. But, if you wish to start every thread with some stupid disparagement of the president, then expect someone to be equally snarky with you. If you can't take it, feel free to go join the YWCA with the other girls. Take you little sister Tal and big sister CNM with you.

On the other hand, do what you wish. This is a free country, regardless of the efforts of Obama, Killary and the puppet master, Soros. I've got no beef with you. You all take this too personal.

If you do not wish to have a discussion with the guys, that's up to you. Please do put me on your "ignore" list.....:1rotfl:
MDCPD, I wouldn't put you on an ignore list even if I could. Your post is exactly why..... scattered thoughts, incoherent, and deluded. You never disappoint. Dave would be proud of you.

Sent from my SM-T310 using Tapatalk

[MDLNB]

MDCPD, I wouldn't put you on an ignore list even if I could. Your post is exactly why..... scattered thoughts, incoherent, and deluded. You never disappoint. Dave would be proud of you.

Sent from my SM-T310 using Tapatalk

Thanks Connie, give David my regards.

[Taltarzac725]

The closest thing to nirvana on TOTV Political Talk is the ignore list:D

Why subject yourself to the angry and illogical noise and taunts of posters. Block out their rants and personal attacks and your board returns to calm, civil and a sharing of ideas and opinions...nirvana

Personal Best Regards:

Love the Ignore List but do peak once in a while with the Review Post feature.

[rubicon]

Love the Ignore List but do peak once in a while with the Review Post feature.

I hear you. Still it serves its intended purpose.

Personal Best Regards:

[ColdNoMore]

MDCPD, I wouldn't put you on an ignore list even if I could. Your post is exactly why..... scattered thoughts, incoherent, and deluded. You never disappoint. Dave would be proud of you.


I know...right? :1rotfl:

[Chi-Town]

Love the Ignore List but do peak once in a while with the Review Post feature.
No peeking. It's like saying you quit smoking and then sneak cigarettes. Be strong.


Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

[rubicon]

Watching FOX NEWS closely to see if they make any substantial political changes.

Was pleased that The Five which moved to the 9:00PM slot had a worthy replacement with the Fox News Specialists.

Personal Best Regards:

[Joe De Vito]

The answer to your question is its a matter of the right to passage. A black dude such as a rapper can use the "n"word but if a white person uses it even watch out for the Al Sharpton brigade because its coming after you.

Same applies to gay if it comes from a conservative be ready for the backlash. such is the state of our union.

Personal Best Regards:

It is all in the spelling.
Nigga - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigga)

[MDLNB]

Watching FOX NEWS closely to see if they make any substantial political changes.

Was pleased that The Five which moved to the 9:00PM slot had a worthy replacement with the Fox News Specialists.

Personal Best Regards:

Other than interesting guests, I don't see a whole lot of difference. Was glad to see that they replaced one dumb blonde from the Five with another one on The Specialists. Both seem equally dumb. The black Democrat "Specialist" actually seems intelligent and not as radical as many of the liberal examples they usually have on FOX. I can listen to her without automatically tuning out. Eric is almost conservative, motivated mostly by money, and is more libertarian socially. But the blonde..............

[rubicon]

Perhaps, but my view is that Timpf is dumb like a fox. (double entendre) intended. Eboni Williams does hold up well. Eric Bolling has done well financially. this show will hold if they focus on whom they invite as guests.

Personal Best Regards:

[rubicon]

Noticed, and find it acceptable as balanced news, that Shepard Smith is leaning more and more to the left. I make this observation because it may underscores the reporting of James & Kathryn Murdock push to make FOX News another liberal bastion.

Bill O'Reilly is making claim that George Soros played a large pat in his departure. I do not care much for O'Reilly and his termination may have been for legitimate reasons. but all that amounts to is that O'Reilly made it easier for George Soros.

My interest is not in personalities but in the possibility of power plays

Personal Best Regards:

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

I think what this shows is exactly ho biased the media is. Fox has had a conservative ownership for decades and now more liberal people are taking over so they will present the news and issues of the day with a slightly more liberal bias.
Now imagine all of the other networks and understand that their ownership is very liberal.

They don't necessarily believe that they are presenting a liberal view, they believe that they are fair and unbiased. But the truth is that their bias is there.

[Rockyrd]

I think what this shows is exactly ho biased the media is. Fox has had a conservative ownership for decades and now more liberal people are taking over so they will present the news and issues of the day with a slightly more liberal bias.
Now imagine all of the other networks and understand that their ownership is very liberal.

They don't necessarily believe that they are presenting a liberal view, they believe that they are fair and unbiased. But the truth is that their bias is there.

Are you looking for NEWS or are you looking for a comfort spot to be spoon fed ????

Never mind actually as your comments indicate you have already been spoon fed, but of course YOU have no bias...it is everybody else.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

Are you looking for NEWS or are you looking for a comfort spot to be spoon fed ????

Never mind actually as your comments indicate you have already been spoon fed, but of course YOU have no bias...it is everybody else.

I have a bias. As you said, everyone does.

My point is that all news organizations have a bias and because of the ownership, the vast majority of them have a liberal bias. FoxNews has been one of the very few that had a conservative slant. Now that appears to be changing.

In a perfect world, news media would simply present facts ands not give their spin on things.

[Rockyrd]

I have a bias. As you said, everyone does.

My point is that all news organizations have a bias and because of the ownership, the vast majority of them have a liberal bias. FoxNews has been one of the very few that had a conservative slant. Now that appears to be changing.

In a perfect world, news media would simply present facts ands not give their spin on things.

Try Reuters, AP or any wire service.

Fox is biased so much, you miss a lot of real news. Cable NEWS is not news on ANY of them. It is discussion of what "they" consider worthy of discussing that day...done by a producer that you do not know of and will never meet.

If you think you get more NEWS on Fox than on CNN or MSNBC, you are sadly mistaken. You get a conservative does of commentary such as listening to Rush Limbaugh.

We are lazy....you cannot....it is impossible....to be informed watching tv. Reading, as it used to be, is required.

[MDLNB]

Try Reuters, AP or any wire service.

Fox is biased so much, you miss a lot of real news. Cable NEWS is not news on ANY of them. It is discussion of what "they" consider worthy of discussing that day...done by a producer that you do not know of and will never meet.

If you think you get more NEWS on Fox than on CNN or MSNBC, you are sadly mistaken. You get a conservative does of commentary such as listening to Rush Limbaugh.

We are lazy....you cannot....it is impossible....to be informed watching tv. Reading, as it used to be, is required.

Hate to burst your liberal bubble, but FOX gets most of their news from AP and Reuters.

Yes, there is more news broadcast on FOX, generally speaking. There are many instances where the other networks air zero seconds on an item of news. Even you must know that, even if you wish to deny it.

[Don Baldwin]

I have a bias. As you said, everyone does.

My point is that all news organizations have a bias and because of the ownership, the vast majority of them have a liberal bias. FoxNews has been one of the very few that had a conservative slant. Now that appears to be changing.

In a perfect world, news media would simply present facts ands not give their spin on things.

Yes...we all do...based on life experience.

They're ALL politically correct...that's a BIG problem...there is no truth any more. That's the main agenda...offend none...include everyone.

Conservative "slant"? It was tipped completely to the right...sickeningly so.

In a perfect world...but we don't live in a perfect world and ALL the "news" is biased and propagandized.

Try Reuters, AP or any wire service.

Fox is biased so much, you miss a lot of real news. Cable NEWS is not news on ANY of them. It is discussion of what "they" consider worthy of discussing that day...done by a producer that you do not know of and will never meet.

If you think you get more NEWS on Fox than on CNN or MSNBC, you are sadly mistaken. You get a conservative does of commentary such as listening to Rush Limbaugh.

We are lazy....you cannot....it is impossible....to be informed watching tv. Reading, as it used to be, is required.

They ALL have a slant...trust none of them. Trust NO source.

Exactly...the "news" is there to draw eyes for the commercials and to promote someones agenda.

If you think you're getting REAL and UNBIASED news from ANY mainstream source...you are sadly mistaken.

All good points Rocky...it IS impossible to get real news from TV. And you have to be REAL careful with print too. I'd guess the truth often comes from you tube uploads.

It's very sad how the people are deliberately lied to.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

Try Reuters, AP or any wire service.

Fox is biased so much, you miss a lot of real news. Cable NEWS is not news on ANY of them. It is discussion of what "they" consider worthy of discussing that day...done by a producer that you do not know of and will never meet.

If you think you get more NEWS on Fox than on CNN or MSNBC, you are sadly mistaken. You get a conservative does of commentary such as listening to Rush Limbaugh.

We are lazy....you cannot....it is impossible....to be informed watching tv. Reading, as it used to be, is required.
And CNN and MSNBC do not broadcast discussion of what they consider to be worthy of discussing that day?

CNN and MSNBC are nothing more than extreme left wings of the democratic party. The other networks, while not as bad as CNN or MSNBC all present the news with a liberal slant as do most of the newspapers today.

I don't think that most of them do it on purpose. The people that work for those publication and media outlets tend to be liberals. They hire more liberals. They don't look at their viewpoints as liberal, they just see them as the truth.

I am reminded of the story of when President Nixon was elected in one of largest landslides in US history. A seasoned Washington newspaper writer made the statement this statement to a friend at a cocktail party. "I don't understand how Nixon was elected. I don't know a single person that voted for him."

If a person on that position doesn't know one person from the other side of the political spectrum, is there an possibility that they can be objective?

That person is a liberal and every one she knows is a liberal and they all agree. As far as they are concerned, their positions on issues are simply given.

[Don Baldwin]

And CNN and MSNBC do not broadcast discussion of what they consider to be worthy of discussing that day?

CNN and MSNBC are nothing more than extreme left wings of the democratic party. The other networks, while not as bad as CNN or MSNBC all present the news with a liberal slant as do most of the newspapers today.

I don't think that most of them do it on purpose. The people that work for those publication and media outlets tend to be liberals. They hire more liberals. They don't look at their viewpoints as liberal, they just see them as the truth.

I am reminded of the story of when President Nixon was elected in one of largest landslides in US history. A seasoned Washington newspaper writer made the statement this statement to a friend at a cocktail party. "I don't understand how Nixon was elected. I don't know a single person that voted for him."

If a person on that position doesn't know one person from the other side of the political spectrum, is there an possibility that they can be objective?

That person is a liberal and every one she knows is a liberal and they all agree. As far as they are concerned, their positions on issues are simply given.

Because there are more and more women and minorities running things. Women and minorities are increasingly in positions of power. Because their numbers are growing.

They don't realize it...they see it as the truth...because they're delusional women and minorities...who seem to be unable to think/act logically. That's why they have FAILED countries and white men have successful countries.

Women and minorities...living their deluded lives...slowly destroying America.

[Taltarzac725]

And CNN and MSNBC do not broadcast discussion of what they consider to be worthy of discussing that day?

CNN and MSNBC are nothing more than extreme left wings of the democratic party. The other networks, while not as bad as CNN or MSNBC all present the news with a liberal slant as do most of the newspapers today.

I don't think that most of them do it on purpose. The people that work for those publication and media outlets tend to be liberals. They hire more liberals. They don't look at their viewpoints as liberal, they just see them as the truth.

I am reminded of the story of when President Nixon was elected in one of largest landslides in US history. A seasoned Washington newspaper writer made the statement this statement to a friend at a cocktail party. "I don't understand how Nixon was elected. I don't know a single person that voted for him."

If a person on that position doesn't know one person from the other side of the political spectrum, is there an possibility that they can be objective?

That person is a liberal and every one she knows is a liberal and they all agree. As far as they are concerned, their positions on issues are simply given.

Richard Nixon is a very far cry from Donald John Trump. One was a talented politician the other is a consummate liar, demagogue and con man.

[Topspinmo]

Let's begin with what we know.

Roger Aisles is out there and is salivating for another network, so to question 3, yes there will be a new conservative station, but timing is something else. There are a lot of approvals needed, etc., and this will take time.

I do not think Fox will "go left" whatever that means. They have lost and are losing credibility because they tied themselves so closely to Trump. They have a lot of quality people there that are very frustrated, and want to report NEWS, and have the other radical folks that will support whatever lie or conspiracy theory is the newest. So, no to whatever going left means, but trying to become a more conservative answer with NEWS, yes. Thus, the door will open for Aisles to put together the extremists for a new network, while Fox can concentrate on news rather than what they have turned into.

If a new station is created in Aisles image with folks, the ratings will mirror the hard right extremists that support Trump no matter what he does or says. The extreme alt right has been looking for a voice, and they found him.

If what I am saying happens, the viewing numbers for conservative viewers will get split, as Fox would then be trying to compete with CNN and MSNBC.

I abhor cable news channels in general, and haveing "NEWS" be referred to as LEFT or RIGHT is very disconcerting. News is news.

Of course, producers who decide what is presented will oft times as human beings lean one way or another.

I detest cable news. Does not mean I do not watch. I like selected people on each channel. I also hate the demeaning of these channels by the President, posters, etc. I much prefer to read ALL sides, which allows me not to be distracted by personalities, and to verify what I am hearing.

CNN is not news network, they are cheating liberal propaganda outlet for DNC and liberalize When they got caught giving debate questions to DNC they stopped being news Network. DNC, CNN, and Hillary are KNOWN cheaters and lair's. anybody that condones that are Party sheep.

[MDLNB]

CNN is not news network, they are cheating liberal propaganda outlet for DNC and liberalize When they got caught giving debate questions to DNC they stopped being news Network. DNC, CNN, and Hillary are KNOWN cheaters and lair's. anybody that condones that are Party sheep.


:agree:

[earlehancock]

Liberal, conservative, who cares. I want the news. Accurate news. News you can trust.

[Don Baldwin]

Liberal, conservative, who cares. I want the news. Accurate news. News you can trust.

You WON'T get it from ANY mainstream source...

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

Richard Nixon is a very far cry from Donald John Trump. One was a talented politician the other is a consummate liar, demagogue and con man.

Nice try at changing the narrative, but you obviously know that your opinions of those two men nothing to do with the point of my post.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

Hate to burst your liberal bubble, but FOX gets most of their news from AP and Reuters.

Yes, there is more news broadcast on FOX, generally speaking. There are many instances where the other networks air zero seconds on an item of news. Even you must know that, even if you wish to deny it.

They all get their news from these sources. Part of the bias is in which stories they decide to broadcast.

[billethkid]

Liberal, conservative, who cares. I want the news. Accurate news. News you can trust.

Try various non USA news sources. While biased in domestic related news some are more factual with USA news than ANY USA news source.

[bigrig353]

Amen brother I am with you. And this matters HOW? Man work on the things you can have a affect on .. Your Family . Your Community Etc.. These other people could give a RATS ASS about you.

I love the Givea**** meter!!

[maureenod]

While CNN is talking about important information regarding Trump giving classified information to the Russians, Fox is talking about Miss Universe contest and " rompers" for men (one piece outfit) .

[ColdNoMore]

While CNN is talking about important information regarding Trump giving classified information to the Russians, Fox is talking about Miss Universe contest and " rompers" for men (one piece outfit) .

Just the fact that they aren't actively supporting and making excuses for Trump, as usual...is pretty revealing in itself.

Add to that a staunch Republican like Senator Bob Corker stating; "The Trump White House has got to do something soon to bring itself under control and order"...even dummies should be able to figure out something is really wrong. :ohdear:



Donald Trump 'revealed highly classified intelligence' to Sergey Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/15/donald-trump-revealed-highly-classified-intelligence-sergey/)

Some Republicans expressed shock at the development, with Senator Bob Corker stating that the Trump White House "has got to do something soon to bring itself under control and order".

[rubicon]

Because there are more and more women and minorities running things. Women and minorities are increasingly in positions of power. Because their numbers are growing.

They don't realize it...they see it as the truth...because they're delusional women and minorities...who seem to be unable to think/act logically. That's why they have FAILED countries and white men have successful countries.

Women and minorities...living their deluded lives...slowly destroying America.

What you and i can agree on is that whoever is running the movie/television industry believes their is gold in pushing the homosexual agenda. It seems every television series or movie is not complete without a push for the homosexual agenda.

My remote control batteries wear down quickly because I fast forward over this crap.

there have been a number of show that I simply deleted from my DVR. I could not get passed the first 20 minutes of American Gods before I deleted it from my DVR.

And I will say that it was was true I am disappointed to have had FOX ownership allow such a adverse environment to thrive.

FOX news is still the only news station i care to watch because all of the alphabet can spend as much news time talking about the kardashians as they can trade deals with china

Personal Best Regards:

[MDLNB]

What you and i can agree on is that whoever is running the movie/television industry believes their is gold in pushing the homosexual agenda. It seems every television series or movie is not complete without a push for the homosexual agenda.

My remote control batteries wear down quickly because I fast forward over this crap.

there have been a number of show that I simply deleted from my DVR. I could not get passed the first 20 minutes of American Gods before I deleted it from my DVR.

And I will say that it was was true I am disappointed to have had FOX ownership allow such a adverse environment to thrive.

FOX news is still the only news station i care to watch because all of the alphabet can spend as much news time talking about the kardashians as they can trade deals with china

Personal Best Regards:

Not to change or continue to pursue your subject, but I find the TV networks to be amazingly ludicrous too. Even on prime time TV, there is overt showings of Homosexuality like it is common everyday nature. They act like one out of three teenagers as well as adults are in gay relationships. Maybe that is true in Hollywood. Then, to add to the incredible, there is a white and black marriage or relationship in every show, like this is common practice also. We get it, America accepts these unusual relationships, but they are not as common as TV portrays them.

Ok, back to the subject of FOX news. It appears that many do not know the difference between NEWS and Commentary. Most of us would prefer to get the news without the extra commentary inserted. There are plenty of talk shows if one wishes commentary. I flip channels to get my news. I do not listen to commentary, except occasionally a FOX commentary show. I do find that there is more actual NEWS broadcast on FOX than the local channels, but since returning to America, I no longer watch CNN.

[Don Baldwin]

What you and i can agree on is that whoever is running the movie/television industry believes their is gold in pushing the homosexual agenda. It seems every television series or movie is not complete without a push for the homosexual agenda.

My remote control batteries wear down quickly because I fast forward over this crap.

there have been a number of show that I simply deleted from my DVR. I could not get passed the first 20 minutes of American Gods before I deleted it from my DVR.

And I will say that it was was true I am disappointed to have had FOX ownership allow such a adverse environment to thrive.

FOX news is still the only news station i care to watch because all of the alphabet can spend as much news time talking about the kardashians as they can trade deals with china

Personal Best Regards:

Not just queers...they are ALWAYS showing women and minorities in positions of leadership and power. Which ALSO isn't true or normal. We are being led astray.

I won't watch ANYTHING on TV...it's ALL crap full of propaganda.

Not to change or continue to pursue your subject, but I find the TV networks to be amazingly ludicrous too. Even on prime time TV, there is overt showings of Homosexuality like it is common everyday nature. They act like one out of three teenagers as well as adults are in gay relationships. Maybe that is true in Hollywood. Then, to add to the incredible, there is a white and black marriage or relationship in every show, like this is common practice also. We get it, America accepts these unusual relationships, but they are not as common as TV portrays them.

Ok, back to the subject of FOX news. It appears that many do not know the difference between NEWS and Commentary. Most of us would prefer to get the news without the extra commentary inserted. There are plenty of talk shows if one wishes commentary. I flip channels to get my news. I do not listen to commentary, except occasionally a FOX commentary show. I do find that there is more actual NEWS broadcast on FOX than the local channels, but since returning to America, I no longer watch CNN.

They are normalizing it...showing it over and over until you accept it as fact. It's the SAME with showing women and minorities in charge, as the big boss. Movies where the woman or minority is the take charge, go getter, hero.

No we do NOT "accept" these things...we've been CONVINCED, we've been TOLD, to accept them.

These are inter-species relationships...as unnatural as could be. Might as well date a dog or a horse, you're not dating a human.

[autumnspring]

Let's begin with what we know.

Roger Aisles is out there and is salivating for another network, so to question 3, yes there will be a new conservative station, but timing is something else. There are a lot of approvals needed, etc., and this will take time.

I do not think Fox will "go left" whatever that means. They have lost and are losing credibility because they tied themselves so closely to Trump. They have a lot of quality people there that are very frustrated, and want to report NEWS, and have the other radical folks that will support whatever lie or conspiracy theory is the newest. So, no to whatever going left means, but trying to become a more conservative answer with NEWS, yes. Thus, the door will open for Aisles to put together the extremists for a new network, while Fox can concentrate on news rather than what they have turned into.

If a new station is created in Aisles image with folks, the ratings will mirror the hard right extremists that support Trump no matter what he does or says. The extreme alt right has been looking for a voice, and they found him.

If what I am saying happens, the viewing numbers for conservative viewers will get split, as Fox would then be trying to compete with CNN and MSNBC.

I abhor cable news channels in general, and haveing "NEWS" be referred to as LEFT or RIGHT is very disconcerting. News is news.

Of course, producers who decide what is presented will oft times as human beings lean one way or another.

I detest cable news. Does not mean I do not watch. I like selected people on each channel. I also hate the demeaning of these channels by the President, posters, etc. I much prefer to read ALL sides, which allows me not to be distracted by personalities, and to verify what I am hearing.

Sadly, the people who own our media sources is shrinking.
THAT SHOULD NOT BE.

I expect TYPICALLY on this website someone-the same someone will request a link. An easy way to discredit anyone they do not agree with so PBS.ORG/INDEPENDENTLENS/DEMOCRACYONDEADLINE/MEDIAOWNERSHIP.
There are many others saying the same thing.
In 1983 ther were 50 corporaations owning most of the mass media today it is 5.
////////////////////////////////////////
FROM ME- It is spooky when you discover how many of them are owned by DISNEY. You can claim, choose to beleive, whatever you want but people who work for these
SUPPOSEDLY balanced news sources quickly find any story
not in keeping with the owners view will not be run and if you insist on continuing with what you consider VALID REPORTING you will find yourself to use Trumps line-FIRED.
Of the five remaining owners only Murdock-FOX NEWS-leans Right.
I do often wonder-on almost all of the Fox shows they have a sacrificial left winger. For example on the FIVE
it is 4 left to 1 right.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
FOR ALL OF YOU-FREEDOM OF SPEECH WHILE IT IS TWISTED I MANY PEOPLE'S MINDS IS NOT FREEDOM FOR ALL THAT AGREE WITH YOU AND DENIED TO ALL THAT DO NOT.
SADLY-our population seems to be moving to both ends.
The left moves further left and the right moves further right. Hillary is actually left of Obama-if that is possible.
Trump has been declared by his own supporter to be not far right enough. FOR ME, I VOTED FOR TRUMP AND HE HAS BEEN FOUND TO ME TO BE RIGHT ENOUGH.

[Chi-Town]

What you and i can agree on is that whoever is running the movie/television industry believes their is gold in pushing the homosexual agenda. It seems every television series or movie is not complete without a push for the homosexual agenda.

My remote control batteries wear down quickly because I fast forward over this crap.

there have been a number of show that I simply deleted from my DVR. I could not get passed the first 20 minutes of American Gods before I deleted it from my DVR.

And I will say that it was was true I am disappointed to have had FOX ownership allow such a adverse environment to thrive.

FOX news is still the only news station i care to watch because all of the alphabet can spend as much news time talking about the kardashians as they can trade deals with china

Personal Best Regards:
Good news....... Give it a chance. Back by popular demand.

Will & Grace - Back This Fall - YouTube (https://youtu.be/TY10pANm4eM)

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

[cologal]

Good news....... Give it a chance. Back by popular demand.

Will & Grace - Back This Fall - YouTube (https://youtu.be/TY10pANm4eM)

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

That was a really good and seriously funny show glad its coming back!

[rubicon]

Not to change or continue to pursue your subject, but I find the TV networks to be amazingly ludicrous too. Even on prime time TV, there is overt showings of Homosexuality like it is common everyday nature. They act like one out of three teenagers as well as adults are in gay relationships. Maybe that is true in Hollywood. Then, to add to the incredible, there is a white and black marriage or relationship in every show, like this is common practice also. We get it, America accepts these unusual relationships, but they are not as common as TV portrays them.

Ok, back to the subject of FOX news. It appears that many do not know the difference between NEWS and Commentary. Most of us would prefer to get the news without the extra commentary inserted. There are plenty of talk shows if one wishes commentary. I flip channels to get my news. I do not listen to commentary, except occasionally a FOX commentary show. I do find that there is more actual NEWS broadcast on FOX than the local channels, but since returning to America, I no longer watch CNN.

totally agree and that was the agenda as written back in 1987. show it socialize it and it will become normal. However most people are not entertained by homosexual loving making and so in that the more they show it the more heterosexuals will come to ignore it.

Personal Best Regards:

[rubicon]

Not just queers...they are ALWAYS showing women and minorities in positions of leadership and power. Which ALSO isn't true or normal. We are being led astray.

I won't watch ANYTHING on TV...it's ALL crap full of propaganda.



They are normalizing it...showing it over and over until you accept it as fact. It's the SAME with showing women and minorities in charge, as the big boss. Movies where the woman or minority is the take charge, go getter, hero.

No we do NOT "accept" these things...we've been CONVINCED, we've been TOLD, to accept them.

These are inter-species relationships...as unnatural as could be. Might as well date a dog or a horse, you're not dating a human.

Agree most people find it unnatural and I believe the homosexual agenda of pushing their lifestyle on people will only hurt their cause in the long term. Bill Clinton's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell was good policy for everyone.

Personal Best Regards:

[rubicon]

Sadly, the people who own our media sources is shrinking.
THAT SHOULD NOT BE.

I expect TYPICALLY on this website someone-the same someone will request a link. An easy way to discredit anyone they do not agree with so PBS.ORG/INDEPENDENTLENS/DEMOCRACYONDEADLINE/MEDIAOWNERSHIP.
There are many others saying the same thing.
In 1983 ther were 50 corporaations owning most of the mass media today it is 5.
////////////////////////////////////////
FROM ME- It is spooky when you discover how many of them are owned by DISNEY. You can claim, choose to beleive, whatever you want but people who work for these
SUPPOSEDLY balanced news sources quickly find any story
not in keeping with the owners view will not be run and if you insist on continuing with what you consider VALID REPORTING you will find yourself to use Trumps line-FIRED.
Of the five remaining owners only Murdock-FOX NEWS-leans Right.
I do often wonder-on almost all of the Fox shows they have a sacrificial left winger. For example on the FIVE
it is 4 left to 1 right.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
FOR ALL OF YOU-FREEDOM OF SPEECH WHILE IT IS TWISTED I MANY PEOPLE'S MINDS IS NOT FREEDOM FOR ALL THAT AGREE WITH YOU AND DENIED TO ALL THAT DO NOT.
SADLY-our population seems to be moving to both ends.
The left moves further left and the right moves further right. Hillary is actually left of Obama-if that is possible.
Trump has been declared by his own supporter to be not far right enough. FOR ME, I VOTED FOR TRUMP AND HE HAS BEEN FOUND TO ME TO BE RIGHT ENOUGH.

Sadly Disney ,Comcas ,HBO etc are huge promoters of the homosexual agenda. I find myself withdrawing from television more and more because it is so slanted toward a radical progressive agenda social justice warriors, climate change, denying a sexual binary, socialism, bad and evil white guys racist and corrupt cops .

I loved Pirate movies and loved Black Sails until the last scene when the protagonist ends up in prison and kissing his lovers. Pirates don't kiss other pirates. Pirates walk the plank. that last scene killed the entire series for me.

Personal Best Regards:

[cologal]

totally agree and that was the agenda as written back in 1987. show it socialize it and it will become normal. However most people are not entertained by homosexual loving making and so in that the more they show it the more heterosexuals will come to ignore it.

Personal Best Regards:

Are you sure about the homosexual love making? You must have been watching a movie on another type of channel!

No way the sensors would have allowed that!

[Allegiance]

Al Jazeera America was a good news station.

[cologal]

totally agree and that was the agenda as written back in 1987. show it socialize it and it will become normal. However most people are not entertained by homosexual loving making and so in that the more they show it the more heterosexuals will come to ignore it.

Personal Best Regards:

Yep you must have gotten lost cause Will and Grace showed NO SEX at all!

Read this:

‘Strong on the homo, weak on the sexual’: Will & Grace was made for straight people, make the reboot for gay people | National Post (http://news.nationalpost.com/arts/television/strong-on-the-homo-weak-on-the-sexual-will-grace-was-made-for-straight-people-make-the-reboot-for-gay-people)

COPUFF....