Donald planned it this way, of course.

[Taltarzac725]

http://b3ta.com/blog/who-knew-that-if-you-turned-donald-duck-upside-down-you-get-the-other-donald/


:wave::a20:


Seems only fitting!

[Allegiance]

Funny, except he is better looking, smarter than you and is not destined to die alone.

[Taltarzac725]

Funny, except he is better looking, smarter than you and is not destined to die alone.

You know you are such an *******!!! Little Jack (******* scene from Meet The Fockers) - YouTube (https://youtu.be/OXRBELZpKak)

[Allegiance]

You know you are such an *******!!! Little Jack (******* scene from Meet The Fockers) - YouTube (https://youtu.be/OXRBELZpKak)

"Kids that live with their parents even if the kid is anywhere from 22 to 72 and above. Most of us here in the Villages you never hear about unless it is on TOTV like with me. I would probably be homeless without the safety net of my family. My 224 613 fight over the past 26 years has required considerable sacrifice on my family's part and has been extremely difficult at times."

People with dignity get a job, even if it's at McDonalds.

I admire those special workers.

You are a spoiled leach.

[Taltarzac725]

"Kids that live with their parents even if the kid is anywhere from 22 to 72 and above. Most of us here in the Villages you never hear about unless it is on TOTV like with me. I would probably be homeless without the safety net of my family. My 224 613 fight over the past 26 years has required considerable sacrifice on my family's part and has been extremely difficult at times."

People with dignity get a job, even if it's at McDonalds.

I admire those special workers.

You are a spoiled leach.

Making a note of this. I hope Graciegirl and others see this. Allegiance is such a nasty person. I hope Graciegirl does not allow this creep on her Facebook page. I will not go on hers if this jerk is on there. I have told her as much.

[Allegiance]

Making a note of this. I hope Graciegirl and others see this. Allegiance is such a nasty person. I hope Graciegirl does not allow this creep on her Facebook page. I will not go on hers if this jerk is on there. I have told her as much.
Too late. Who is the ass hole?

[Rockyrd]

Making a note of this. I hope Graciegirl and others see this. Allegiance is such a nasty person. I hope Graciegirl does not allow this creep on her Facebook page. I will not go on hers if this jerk is on there. I have told her as much.

She will. He supports Trump and mocks anyone on here that tries to talk reality.

She has chastised me and others on here, but NEVER, NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY, will she ever call out someone who uses profanity, sex talk, or whatever to show disdain for an opponent of Trump.

Facebook with only invited guests sounds like a bunch who want to ignore the real world and make themselves feel good. But to each his own

[Rockyrd]

You wonder why the President has trouble with his ban (and it is a ban to those who have advised me I was wrong..the President said so)......

First, it covers the minority of terrorist countries

Second, he just keeps talking.....so Kellyanne Conways husband took him to task this morning on his tweets.

Now she says, we should ignore his tweets.....hmmm....ignore what the President of the United States says ? Interesting thought.

[Taltarzac725]

You wonder why the President has trouble with his ban (and it is a ban to those who have advised me I was wrong..the President said so)......

First, it covers the minority of terrorist countries

Second, he just keeps talking.....so Kellyanne Conways husband took him to task this morning on his tweets.

Now she says, we should ignore his tweets.....hmmm....ignore what the President of the United States says ? Interesting thought.

Link for this???

[Rockyrd]

Link for this???

Kellyanne Conway's husband tweets for first time in two years to criticise Trump | The Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-kellyanne-conway-husband-criticism-travel-ban-supreme-court-tweets-george-a7774196.html)

"George Conway, the husband of Kellyanne Conway, said Mr Trump’s tweets regarding his Muslim travel ban and the way a revised version was taken to the Supreme Court, may make some people feel better.

However, he said they would not help the Office of the Solicitor General get get five votes on the Supreme Court."

You do recall I mentioned how his tweets and statements were actually part of the 9th court decision. His tweets ARE the President of the United States speaking to the world.

[ColdNoMore]

She will. He supports Trump and mocks anyone on here that tries to talk reality.

She has chastised me and others on here, but NEVER, NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY, will she ever call out someone who uses profanity, sex talk, or whatever to show disdain for an opponent of Trump.

Facebook with only invited guests sounds like a bunch who want to ignore the real world and make themselves feel good. But to each his own

And then because of her massive insecurity, and in spite of initiating more than 600 friend requests on this site alone, she starts a thread...trolling for more friends? :22yikes:

I mean cripes...how pathetic is that? :1rotfl:

Kudos to the moderators for recognizing how ridiculous and sad it was and that her cries for help...should be dealt with in PM's. :thumbup:

[MDLNB]

Facebook and Twitter is for teenieboppers and Celebrity fans. Maybe Trump likes to get his thoughts out to all of them, but I do neither because it's just juvenile. I support Trump but he can have his Twitter. Obama set the standard for using the Internet to get his thoughts out to the kids. Trump used it to beat him, via beating Killary. And the left ROARED, how dare he? Trump may be a clutch with his words but he is a better manager than we have seen in a couple of decades. You sissy liberals are all limp wristed guppies that fall for slight of hand. With Obama it was smoke and mirrors. He would say transparency while blowing smoke up your @ss. He was ALL smoke and mirrors. Trump is kind of slight of hand. While you listen to his words and watch his left hand, he is building a better future with his right hand. Right under your noses. And you wonder why his crazy wording makes me laugh while you all are in ultra panic mode?

Trump is doing a great job. He is living up to his campaign promises. That in itself is a major accomplishment considering all the adversity he has received from both party elites. When the Refs. eventually get everyone off of the pile on top of him, and he ends up with the ball in the end zone, he will be the winner. Sure the liberal media is against him. It's a given, considering they practically carried Hilary to the White House, only to see her stumble and fall at the gate. But, the voters love him and still back him,. They are not concerned about what he tweets. This is America and no one wants to live in Europe of the West. Obama was a traitor to American ideals. Americans still remember fighting the socialists and communist and do not wish to surrender to them now.

So to the other countries and to the leftards, either sit down or get off the bus.

[rubicon]

Who knew that if you turned Donald Duck upside down you get the other Donald? | B3ta (http://b3ta.com/blog/who-knew-that-if-you-turned-donald-duck-upside-down-you-get-the-other-donald/)


:wave::a20:


Seems only fitting!

Speaking of " as seemingly only fitting" in actuality the only people who see the upside down Donald Duck as the other Donald are those progressives that can't distinguish themselves from a human toon characters
( Who Framed Roger Rabbit) as they all seem to run together. Jessica Rabbit and Hillary Clinton are like sister, well to some progressives. and some of these same progressives also act as manic. "Trump killed the Paris Accord now were going to choke to death on carbon ............"

Yep to a looney tune progressive an upside down Donald Duck looks just like the Donald:D

Personal Best Regards:

[ColdNoMore]

Facebook and Twitter is for teenieboppers and Celebrity fans. Maybe Trump likes to get his thoughts out to all of them, but I do neither because it's just juvenile. I support Trump but he can have his Twitter. Obama set the standard for using the Internet to get his thoughts out to the kids. Trump used it to beat him, via beating Killary. And the left ROARED, how dare he? Trump may be a clutch with his words but he is a better manager than we have seen in a couple of decades. You sissy liberals are all limp wristed guppies that fall for slight of hand. With Obama it was smoke and mirrors. He would say transparency while blowing smoke up your @ss. He was ALL smoke and mirrors. Trump is kind of slight of hand. While you listen to his words and watch his left hand, he is building a better future with his right hand. Right under your noses. And you wonder why his crazy wording makes me laugh while you all are in ultra panic mode?

Trump is doing a great job. He is living up to his campaign promises. That in itself is a major accomplishment considering all the adversity he has received from both party elites. When the Refs. eventually get everyone off of the pile on top of him, and he ends up with the ball in the end zone, he will be the winner. Sure the liberal media is against him. It's a given, considering they practically carried Hilary to the White House, only to see her stumble and fall at the gate. But, the voters love him and still back him,. They are not concerned about what he tweets. This is America and no one wants to live in Europe of the West. Obama was a traitor to American ideals. Americans still remember fighting the socialists and communist and do not wish to surrender to them now.

So to the other countries and to the leftards, either sit down or get off the bus.

Abby10, Oh Abby10...calling Abby10. :D

Since you said you and him are "on the same side," I'm guessing you won't try to lecture him (like you falsely do to Rocky & myself)...about generalizations? :oops:

Now, prove you're not a flaming hypocrite. :ho:



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[Abby10]

Abby10, Oh Abby10...calling Abby10. :D

Since you said you and him are "on the same side," I'm guessing you won't try to lecture him (like you falsely do to Rocky & myself)...about generalizations? :oops:

Now, prove you're not a flaming hypocrite. :ho:



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

Now look who's the hypocrite, liar, or any one of your other favorite words. I did direct a post to the 2 of you, but not for the same reason. In fact, I specifically spelled out to each one of you why, and now you're trying to to say I was accusing Rocky of generalizing like you.....NO, I was not! I'm beginning to realize your only purpose on this forum is to create chaos. Having a 2 way conversation is virtually impossible. I was hoping that was not true by trying to engage with you, but all you do is pick out one line in a post and go off on it. You don't seem to have any desire to converse, just fingerpoint.

I don't like generalizing no matter what kind or who does it, but we were specifically talking about racism and I think that is a much more serious matter. My opinion on any generalizations is that it stifles communication and understanding between the parties involved. In other words it's a conversation stopper, so if that's what one is looking to do than go for it. I'm just not interested.

[ColdNoMore]

Now look who's the hypocrite, liar, or any one of your other favorite words. I did direct a post to the 2 of you, but not for the same reason. In fact, I specifically spelled out to each one of you why, and now you're trying to to say I was accusing Rocky of generalizing like you.....NO, I was not! I'm beginning to realize your only purpose on this forum is to create chaos. Having a 2 way conversation is virtually impossible. I was hoping that was not true by trying to engage with you, but all you do is pick out one line in a post and go off on it. You don't seem to have any desire to converse, just fingerpoint.

I don't like generalizing no matter what kind or who does it, but we were specifically talking about racism and I think that is a much more serious matter. My opinion on any generalizations is that it stifles communication and understanding between the parties involved. In other words it's a conversation stopper, so if that's what one is looking to do than go for it. I'm just not interested.

As expected, you totally went off on a rant and didn't address your hypocrisy...regarding avoiding you lecturing MDLNB's on his 'generalizations.' :oops:

Thank you for proving me correct. :thumbup:

And yes, I understand that I can really pizz people off when I point out their hypocrisy, racism, bigotry, misogyny... and attempts to misdirect.

But hey, it's a burden that I've learned to carry. :D



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[Abby10]

As expected, you totally went off on a rant and didn't address your hypocrisy...regarding avoiding you lecturing MDLNB's on his 'generalizations.' :oops:

Thank you for proving me correct. :thumbup:

And yes, I understand that I can really pizz people off when I point out their hypocrisy, racism, bigotry, misogyny... and attempts to misdirect.

But hey, it's a burden that I've learned to carry. :D



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

While we're all showing gratitude here, I should thank you as well for proving me correct with your repsonse. :thumbup:

[ColdNoMore]

While we're all showing gratitude here, I should thank you as well for proving me correct with your repsonse. :thumbup:

:1rotfl:

Ahh c'mon now, you're lowering my opinion of you.

While I know that you spout a lot of things that you don't really believe or follow, ie: hypocrisy, over-generalizations, ethical discourse in presenting a viewpoint, a (albeit loose) set of guiding principles...I at least was giving you the benefit of the doubt for some originality. :oops:

And now ya done went and copied me...due to a (hopefully, just momentarily) lapse of originality. :ohdear:

Now listen up, I expect a lot better from you in the future. :ho:

And yes, once again I admit to and realize...how damned annoying I can be. :thumbup:

But hey, ya gotta give me a couple of brownie points for having a great sense of humor...right? :D



Oh yeah, where's that lecture to MDLNB...for his nasty and denigrating generalization? :popcorn:



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

[Rockyrd]

As expected, you totally went off on a rant and didn't address your hypocrisy...regarding avoiding you lecturing MDLNB's on his 'generalizations.' :oops:

Thank you for proving me correct. :thumbup:

And yes, I understand that I can really pizz people off when I point out their hypocrisy, racism, bigotry, misogyny... and attempts to misdirect.

But hey, it's a burden that I've learned to carry. :D



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

Hey, both of you try hard.

Allow me to explain ABBEY, while Coldnomore is a bit sensitive to this issue.

He and I, while of different political ideology find Trump to be..well, we don't like him.

Now, as you know there are a few creations on here who simply troll and make wise ass remarks..not worth the space their username takes.

They ALWAYS generalize, then attack with no substance ever.

When certain folks lecture anyone on here, you know, those who know all and feel entitled and in charge give lectures, said lecture is ALWAYS directed at either him or me or sometimes another poster that does not care for Trump.

They ignore the language, hate, sexual innuendos of the other people because they spend their time trolling anyone who dares to criticize Mr Trump.

An example.....our President insulted England, not once but twice by attacking the mayor of London for no reason except perhaps his own personal hate, but there exists in the main area of TOTV an entire thread digesting and critiquing the choice of language used during the Orlando shooting...we are speaking of what medical terms were used.

This total sickening hypocrisy bothers me and surely Coldnomore.

So, I think you two could have good discussions, but thought would explain what I think is back ground.

Done.

I should not speak for anyone, but you are both liberal leaning and I think would like good conversation. You do get a hair nerve with all the children lurking

[Rockyrd]

Which reminds me....

DOES ANYONE UNDERSTAND WHY OUR PRESIDENT WOULD MOCK THE MAYOR OF LONDON, NOT ONCE BUT TWICE, WHILE THEY ARE TRYING TO KEEP THEIR COUNTRY TOGETHER ?

Seen around the world.

[Rockyrd]

Or even.....

DOES ANYONE KNOW WHY OUR PRESIDENT WHILE VISITING NATO, WOULD CHANGE HIS SPEECH TO DELIBERATELY REMOVE ANY ENDORSEMENT OF DEFENDING ARTICLE FIVE WHEN HIS SECURITY AND NATION ADVISORS SUGGESTED TO ALLUES HE WOULD, AND IT WAS IN HIS SPEECH ?

[ColdNoMore]

Hey, both of you try hard.

Allow me to explain ABBEY, while Coldnomore is a bit sensitive to this issue.

He and I, while of different political ideology find Trump to be..well, we don't like him.

Now, as you know there are a few creations on here who simply troll and make wise ass remarks..not worth the space their username takes.

They ALWAYS generalize, then attack with no substance ever.

When certain folks lecture anyone on here, you know, those who know all and feel entitled and in charge give lectures, said lecture is ALWAYS directed at either him or me or sometimes another poster that does not care for Trump.

They ignore the language, hate, sexual innuendos of the other people because they spend their time trolling anyone who dares to criticize Mr Trump.

An example.....our President insulted England, not once but twice by attacking the mayor of London for no reason except perhaps his own personal hate, but there exists in the main area of TOTV an entire thread digesting and critiquing the choice of language used during the Orlando shooting...we are speaking of what medical terms were used.

This total sickening hypocrisy bothers me and surely Coldnomore.

So, I think you two could have good discussions, but thought would explain what I think is back ground.

Done.

Good post, but one important thing I would like to add.

While you and I don't often agree on general issues, we are about the ONLY ones who provide links (even if they're sometimes simply op-ed's)...to help make our point.

Even when that extra effort draws out the ridicule of simpletons like DirtBag...it still at least shows an attempt at having a serious discussion. :thumbup:



And to Abbey10;

The primary right-wing extremist lecturer here (RubiTHECon), who has a totally unsupported high opinion of himself, loves to bloviate and spew downright ignorant proclamations from his bully pulpit...but has YET to provide even ONE link to back him up. :oops:

Not even at a minimum...some right-wing extremist fanatic.

Not ONE.

Which is why, he has earned the moniker of... 'pseudo-intellectual.'

Now whether this is from the fact that he is ashamed of where he gets his info because even he knows it's mostly fake news, or it's because he isn't smart enough to know how to do something as simple as link to a post...you can quickly see why his moniker is so well deserved. :ho:

[ColdNoMore]

Or even.....

DOES ANYONE KNOW WHY OUR PRESIDENT WHILE VISITING NATO, WOULD CHANGE HIS SPEECH TO DELIBERATELY REMOVE ANY ENDORSEMENT OF DEFENDING ARTICLE FIVE WHEN HIS SECURITY AND NATION ADVISORS SUGGESTED TO ALLUES HE WOULD, AND IT WAS IN HIS SPEECH ?


My jaw dropped when I heard that today. :22yikes:

Especially given that even his own people, like McMaster/Tillerson/Mattis, were adamant that it be in the speech. :oops:

Donald Trump improvised Nato speech and shocked national security team by removing Article 5 support (https://uk.news.yahoo.com/donald-trump-improvised-nato-speech-180100332.html)

When Donald Trump failed to mention Article 5 – the Nato provision that binds all member countries to each other's defence – in his recent speech at the alliance’s new headquarters, world leaders were shocked.

They weren’t the only ones.

Key members of Mr Trump’s national security team, including national security adviser HR McMaster, Defence Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, all believed he would endorse the article.

It wasn’t until Mr Trump finished delivering his address that they realised he had left the endorsement out.

“They had the right speech and it was cleared through McMaster,” a source briefed by National Security Council officials told Politico. “As late as that same morning, it was the right one.”

Now for those who may not know, THERE HAS BEEN ONLY ONE TIME THAT ARTICLE 5 WAS INVOKED...AND THAT WAS AFTER WE WERE ATTACKED ON 9/11.

That's right you Trump cultists, he deliberately left out support of an article...that has ONLY EVER been used to show support for us.

I smell the slimy hands of Bannon all over this.

It's just sad, that we are being reduced to being the laughingstock of the world...by a POTUS who is probably mentally ill. :ohdear:

[Rockyrd]

Good post, but one important thing I would like to add.

While you and I don't often agree on general issues, we are about the ONLY ones who provide links (even if their sometimes simply op-ed's)...to help make our point.

Even when that extra effort draws out the ridicule of simpletons like DirtBag...it still at least shows an attempt at having a serious discussion. :thumbup:



And to Abbey10;

The primary right-wing extremist lecturer here (RubiTHECon), who has a totally unsupported high opinion of himself, loves to bloviate and spew downright ignorant proclamations from his bully pulpit...but has YET to provide even ONE link to back him up. :oops:

Not even at a minimum...some right-wing extremist fanatic.

Not ONE.

Which is why, he has earned the moniker of... 'pseudo-intellectual.'

Now whether this is from the fact that he is ashamed of where he gets his info because even he knows it's mostly fake news, or it's because he isn't smart enough to know how to do something as simple as link to a post...you can quickly see why his moniker is so well deserved. :ho:

I am a bit embarrassed, but I may have incorrectly, or certainly overstepped or surely was out of line in "labeling" Abby as a liberal.

I should have simply said..she is a poster who is able to have adult conversation.

[Rockyrd]

My jaw dropped when I heard that today. :22yikes:

Especially given that even his own people, like McMaster/Tillerson/Mattis, were adamant that it be in the speech. :oops:

Donald Trump improvised Nato speech and shocked national security team by removing Article 5 support (https://uk.news.yahoo.com/donald-trump-improvised-nato-speech-180100332.html)


Now for those who may not know, THERE HAS BEEN ONLY ONE TIME THAT ARTICLE 5 WAS INVOKED...AND THAT WAS AFTER WE WERE ATTACKED ON 9/11.

That's right you Trump cultists, he deliberately left out support of an article...that has ONLY EVER been used to show support for us.

I smell the slimy hands of Bannon all over this.

It's just sad, that we are being reduced to being the laughingstock of the world...by a POTUS who is probably mentally ill. :ohdear:

Well, at least they got those darn people straightened out on what words to use relative to the shooting in Orlando

That has definite precedent over the President speaking to the world and embarrassing our country.

And what's ironic....I really saw some good things in today's presentation on VA, and am curious on the traffic controller proposal.

But, as he needs to do, discussing policy is boring...if HE ISNT THE SHOW, then there is no show.

[ColdNoMore]

Well, at least they got those darn people straightened out on what words to use relative to the shooting in Orlando

That has definite precedent over the President speaking to the world and embarrassing our country.

And what's ironic....I really saw some good things in today's presentation on VA, and am curious on the traffic controller proposal.

But, as he needs to do, discussing policy is boring...if HE ISNT THE SHOW, then there is no show.

Yeah, it was good that the phrasing on the shooting was outed...for the liberal PC conspiracy that it was. :D

Oh wait, the proof of the assertion that it originated from some pro-abortion group...was deftly dodged. :oops:

[Abby10]

Hey, both of you try hard.

Allow me to explain ABBEY, while Coldnomore is a bit sensitive to this issue.

He and I, while of different political ideology find Trump to be..well, we don't like him.

Now, as you know there are a few creations on here who simply troll and make wise ass remarks..not worth the space their username takes.

They ALWAYS generalize, then attack with no substance ever.

When certain folks lecture anyone on here, you know, those who know all and feel entitled and in charge give lectures, said lecture is ALWAYS directed at either him or me or sometimes another poster that does not care for Trump.

They ignore the language, hate, sexual innuendos of the other people because they spend their time trolling anyone who dares to criticize Mr Trump.

An example.....our President insulted England, not once but twice by attacking the mayor of London for no reason except perhaps his own personal hate, but there exists in the main area of TOTV an entire thread digesting and critiquing the choice of language used during the Orlando shooting...we are speaking of what medical terms were used.

This total sickening hypocrisy bothers me and surely Coldnomore.

So, I think you two could have good discussions, but thought would explain what I think is back ground.

Done.

I should not speak for anyone, but you are both liberal leaning and I think would like good conversation. You do get a hair nerve with all the children lurking

Thanks for taking the time to give an explanation. But, where did I come off as liberal leaning? Just needed to make that correction........I'm probably as conservative as CNM is liberal. Anyway, that's neither here nor there to me as far as getting along. I have family members that I love that are liberal and we have some good political discussions.......well sometimes. :icon_wink:

[Abby10]

I am a bit embarrassed, but I may have incorrectly, or certainly overstepped or surely was out of line in "labeling" Abby as a liberal.

I should have simply said..she is a poster who is able to have adult conversation.

Didn't see this until after I just sent my post. I was in the middle of typing it earlier and got distracted here at home. No need to feel embarrassed or any of the above. Just don't ever insult me like that again! :D

[Abby10]

:1rotfl:

Ahh c'mon now, you're lowering my opinion of you.

While I know that you spout a lot of things that you don't really believe or follow, ie: hypocrisy, over-generalizations, ethical discourse in presenting a viewpoint, a (albeit loose) set of guiding principles...I at least was giving you the benefit of the doubt for some originality. :oops:

And now ya done went and copied me...due to a (hopefully, just momentarily) lapse of originality. :ohdear:

Now listen up, I expect a lot better from you in the future. :ho:

And yes, once again I admit to and realize...how damned annoying I can be. :thumbup:

But hey, ya gotta give me a couple of brownie points for having a great sense of humor...right? :D



Oh yeah, where's that lecture to MDLNB...for his nasty and denigrating generalization? :popcorn:



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

So, CNM, I'm gonna give you one more chance, but only because you made me laugh a little by your response. :). You and Rocky have a good night.....it's way past my bedtime so I'm outta here!

[ColdNoMore]

So, CNM, I'm gonna give you one more chance, but only because you made me laugh a little by your response. :). You and Rocky have a good night.....it's way past my bedtime so I'm outta here!

Oh c'mon, you're fibbing now. :boxing2:


I made you laugh more than... "a little." :D