The first and second amendment

[Plowboy]

I find it scary that Christians want to replace the first Amendment with the Bible yet they want to fight to the death to overprotect the second amendment. If you love the 2nd, then please respect the 1st.:shrug:

[Bog99]

I find it scary that Christians want to replace the first Amendment with the Bible yet they want to fight to the death to overprotect the second amendment. If you love the 2nd, then please respect the 1st.:shrug:


This sounds like p*ssy logic.


.

[Don Baldwin]

I find it scary that Christians want to replace the first Amendment with the Bible yet they want to fight to the death to overprotect the second amendment. If you love the 2nd, then please respect the 1st.:shrug:

Freedom of speech? Freedom of association?

We lost those rights a long long time ago...at least since the 1960s.

TRY to speak the TRUTH about minorities or women and see where it gets you.

TRY to go to school with ONLY those you CHOOSE to associated with...you can't. Try to HIRE only those you CHOOSE to hire...you can't. Try to keep your neighborhood full of ONLY those you WISH to live among...you can't.

We've already LOST two of the the most important "rights" we had.

[Taltarzac725]

I find it scary that Christians want to replace the first Amendment with the Bible yet they want to fight to the death to overprotect the second amendment. If you love the 2nd, then please respect the 1st.:shrug:

Many Christians do not believe Donald Trump speaks for them so both the First and Second Amendment are very much alive.

[billethkid]

I find it scary that Christians want to replace the first Amendment with the Bible yet they want to fight to the death to overprotect the second amendment. If you love the 2nd, then please respect the 1st.:shrug:

Would you mind sharing with us a specific reference to each of the claims in your opening sentence.

My guess it is more one's own opinion and conclusion based on their politics and bias than any real undertaking by any groups in particular.

And there is the ever present broad brush generalization referring to "...Christians want to..." which is just not realistic.

[dirtbanker]

I find it scary that Christians want to replace the first Amendment with the Bible yet they want to fight to the death to overprotect the second amendment. If you love the 2nd, then please respect the 1st.:shrug:Is that a fag dog as your avatar??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[Kenswing]

Bring on National Reciprocity..

[Allegiance]

Bring on National Reciprocity..Amen. God bless America

[Chi-Town]

Is that a fag dog as your avatar??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using TapatalkC'mon Dirt, time for an avatar.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

[dirtbanker]

C'mon Dirt, time for an avatar.

Sent from my VS995 using TapatalkThat is for you professionals...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[Chi-Town]

That is for you professionals...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using TapatalkProbably can't do it on Tapatalk; mine was done on the desktop before I found Tapatalk. TOTV hates Tapatalk but has no mobile replacement that works.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

[rubicon]

I find it scary that Christians want to replace the first Amendment with the Bible yet they want to fight to the death to overprotect the second amendment. If you love the 2nd, then please respect the 1st.:shrug:

I find it scary that progressive rant about inclusiveness unless of course your Christian, white, pro-life, conservative, believe in a hand up but not a hand out, application of the rule of law to everyone, the historic definition of marriage, the nuclear family, traditions, patriotism, practiced reticence. All of which are being removed, diminished ignored by the radical left leaving many to understand that that possibility is ever present and hence the 2nd amendment never tampered with.

Personal Best Regards:

[Don Baldwin]

I find it scary that progressive rant about inclusiveness unless of course your Christian, white, pro-life, conservative, believe in a hand up but not a hand out, application of the rule of law to everyone, the historic definition of marriage, the nuclear family, traditions, patriotism, practiced reticence. All of which are being removed, diminished ignored by the radical left leaving many to understand that that possibility is ever present and hence the 2nd amendment never tampered with.

Personal Best Regards:

They ONLY demand inclusiveness from US...they don't have to practice it...just us.

Women treat real life just like they treat games they play with men. The rules must be tweaked in their favor...so they CAN have a chance. That is why we HAVE affirmative action and quotas. It's like spotting them points...or playing with your opposite hand...to "give them a chance" since they'd be destroyed if we didn't...if we competed "full strength" against them. Same as in business...it's NOT sexism...it's their inferiority.

I almost wish I'd be around in 30 years when the women wake up one day and realize just what they've done...the horrors that await them...the destruction of civilization as the country becomes 80% minorities. Go watch BET and Univision for your future ladies...you're going back to being property...and it WILL be socially acceptable...especially for white girls who will be treated as second class people...used and abused. Talk to a white girl going to a black school...ask her what it's like. EVERY one of them has been deflowered by a black...willingly, by intimidation, or by rape. You don't report it when you know they WILL kill you if you say anything. Girls are raped by schoolboys all the time. And it's MOSTLY the blacks.

TALK to the school kids from black schools.

[Plowboy]

I find it scary that progressive rant about inclusiveness unless of course your Christian, white, pro-life, conservative, believe in a hand up but not a hand out, application of the rule of law to everyone, the historic definition of marriage, the nuclear family, traditions, patriotism, practiced reticence. All of which are being removed, diminished ignored by the radical left leaving many to understand that that possibility is ever present and hence the 2nd amendment never tampered with.

Personal Best Regards:

I read this same paragraph in my KKK Manual. You tell em brother. Long live the KKK and the southern Christians.

[dirtbanker]

I read this same paragraph in my KKK Manual. You tell em brother. Long live the KKK and the southern Christians.
I am sure your dad never accused you of being the sharpest tool in the shed...
How many of your Democrats are "southern Christians"?
Your definitely stupid enough to have the need to read the KKK manual...


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[Plowboy]

I am sure your dad never accused you of being the sharpest tool in the shed...
How many of your Democrats are "southern Christians"?
Your definitely stupid enough to have the need to read the KKK manual...


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

There are many southern Christians and democrat and they are wonderful Americans. It is when you add republican to a southern Christians, then it is racism on steroids. :22yikes:

[dirtbanker]

There are many southern Christians and democrat and they are wonderful Americans.

Glad I could correct you...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[mellincf]

The First Amendment is First for a reason. The Second Amendment is qualified by the beginning part: "In order to provide for a well regulated militia"...inferring that one must belong to a well regulated militia to own a gun.

[Kenswing]

The First Amendment is First for a reason. The Second Amendment is qualified by the beginning part: "In order to provide for a well regulated militia"...inferring that one must belong to a well regulated militia to own a gun.
Supreme court doesn't agree with you.

[mellincf]

Would you mind sharing with us a specific reference to each of the claims in your opening sentence.

My guess it is more one's own opinion and conclusion based on their politics and bias than any real undertaking by any groups in particular.

And there is the ever present broad brush generalization referring to "...Christians want to..." which is just not realistic.

Most people are unaware of the Everson vs. Board Supreme Court decision, which is critical to that part of the First Amendment regarding religion's place in the US. I've heard many Christians with a complete misunderstanding of this.

The Everson vs. Board (unanimous) decision makes it clear that there is, in fact, a "Wall of Separation" between church and state. Therefore, it is completely unlawful to lead prayer on public grounds, in public schools, in fact, any taxpayer facility. Roy Moore with his Ten Commandments statue at the courthouse, was in violation of the First Amendment and got bounced out of his job because of it.

I'm not exactly sure about those "prayer groups" that Trump and Pence were showing off at the White House, because that seems to be a private (ha, ha, with the press on site) gathering.

[dirtbanker]

The First Amendment is First for a reason. The Second Amendment is qualified by the beginning part: "In order to provide for a well regulated militia"...inferring that one must belong to a well regulated militia to own a gun.
Well I guess all us gun owners consider ourselves as a well regulated militia...



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[dirtbanker]

Supreme court doesn't agree with you.Tithead does not understand you are speaking toward the second admendment.

She claims to be hot, can suck a golf ball thru a 50' hose, and beats everyone on the tennis court.

I am guessing she is just another short, fat, loud mouth, duck footed, bitch from Jersey...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[cologal]

Would you mind sharing with us a specific reference to each of the claims in your opening sentence.

My guess it is more one's own opinion and conclusion based on their politics and bias than any real undertaking by any groups in particular.

And there is the ever present broad brush generalization referring to "...Christians want to..." which is just not realistic.


The First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

However, the Christian Right has held the belief that Christianity is the de facto religion in the US based on the numbers. The sad part is although they want to their religious beliefs to be respected, they turn around a try to impose their beliefs on the rest of us! We get slammed at the holiday time if we say Seasons Greeting!

They oppose abortion but don't want to prevent pregnancies by providing access to birth control options to their employees! In the recent past, they have been promoting the heartbeat test... If you can hear the heartbeat of the fetus then you cannot have an abortion. The heartbeat starts up pretty quick so this law would stop 90%ish abortions. They make the claim that they are pro-life but actually they are clearly only Pro-Birth. After the birth, they oppose the social safety nets these mothers need. We hear about welfare queens.....Not mention 2 Republican Senate candidates made these statements:

Todd Akin-

“It seems to be, first of all, from what I understand from doctors, it’s really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down.”


Indiana Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock said Tuesday that when a woman is impregnated during a rape “it’s something God intended.”

When is a rape legitimate?

Those are my examples---COPUFF

[mellincf]

Republicans, those "fiscal conservatives" balk at a $1 condom provided by Planned Parenthood and apparently enthusiastically accept the $240,000 it costs the taxpayers to raise one child on welfare put there by a woman who cannot afford a child. When a million babies are born every four days, that adds up to real money.

[Kenswing]

Republicans, those "fiscal conservatives" balk at a $1 condom provided by Planned Parenthood and apparently enthusiastically accept the $240,000 it costs the taxpayers to raise one child on welfare put there by a woman who cannot afford a child. When a million babies are born every four days, that adds up to real money.
Do you really think a hood rat puts enough thought into anything to don a condom before sex?

[Don Baldwin]

The First Amendment is First for a reason. The Second Amendment is qualified by the beginning part: "In order to provide for a well regulated militia"...inferring that one must belong to a well regulated militia to own a gun.

That's NOT even what it says...

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The people were to be the militia...there wasn't supposed to BE a standing army. That's why we had guns...to be the army. To stop those in government trying to steal from us. To stop a government that has gone too far.

Republicans, those "fiscal conservatives" balk at a $1 condom provided by Planned Parenthood and apparently enthusiastically accept the $240,000 it costs the taxpayers to raise one child on welfare put there by a woman who cannot afford a child. When a million babies are born every four days, that adds up to real money.

MORE than half of those babies are poor minorities...many are anchor babies...over a million a year. 50 million in total.

Welfare cost America over $1 trillion a year. Yes...it IS real money...more than we can afford.

Do you really think a hood rat puts enough thought into anything to don a condom before sex?

The hood sluts that all the boys f@ck...they always end up pregnant and it could be anybodies.

[Kenswing]

A victory for the Second Amendment.. House passes bill to allow concealed weapons across state lines (https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/dad2cf52-3a98-3213-8ab7-68882081b798/ss_house-passes-bill-to-allow.html)

Dec. 6 (UPI) -- The House passed a bill Wednesday that will allow concealed carry weapon permit holders to conceal their weapon in any other states.
The Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act passed 231-198 in the House with six Democrats voting for it and 14 Republicans opposed.

[rubicon]

I read this same paragraph in my KKK Manual. You tell em brother. Long live the KKK and the southern Christians.

Poster

Really your response is going to be an accusation that my comments reflect the KKK ideology? that is not even a clever head fake.

And I noticed you did not deny my comments about progressives twisted sense of inclusiveness.

By every measure and manner the radical progressive left have become fascist spewing hate and violence and now actually calling for anarchy .

Once again we witness another poor example of the interpretation of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Perhaps you should rethink your ideology and begin supporting America and all Americans again.

Personal Best Regards:

[Taltarzac725]

The First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

However, the Christian Right has held the belief that Christianity is the de facto religion in the US based on the numbers. The sad part is although they want to their religious beliefs to be respected, they turn around a try to impose their beliefs on the rest of us! We get slammed at the holiday time if we say Seasons Greeting!

They oppose abortion but don't want to prevent pregnancies by providing access to birth control options to their employees! In the recent past, they have been promoting the heartbeat test... If you can hear the heartbeat of the fetus then you cannot have an abortion. The heartbeat starts up pretty quick so this law would stop 90%ish abortions. They make the claim that they are pro-life but actually they are clearly only Pro-Birth. After the birth, they oppose the social safety nets these mothers need. We hear about welfare queens.....Not mention 2 Republican Senate candidates made these statements:

Todd Akin-

“It seems to be, first of all, from what I understand from doctors, it’s really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down.”


Indiana Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock said Tuesday that when a woman is impregnated during a rape “it’s something God intended.”

When is a rape legitimate?

Those are my examples---COPUFF

Good post copuff.