Log in

View Full Version : What A Sensible Move


rubicon
12-10-2017, 10:51 AM
There is a moratorium on building in Osceola County in order to provide government leaders an opportunity to review the impact and to make changes to the pattern of future building. The county recognizes that its infrastructure is insufficient to maintain its present rate of growth.

Florida voters were given an opportunity to vote on such moratoriums in 2010 but the lobby for realtors and developers kicked into high gear and side tracked the initiative.

Sumter county is governed by Sumter One. Sumter One lives to serve the Developer. Sumter One repeal was on the ballot in 2010. the developer kicked into high gear and derailed the initiative.

When the population growth finally settles it will require massive changes in infrastructure, maintenance etc and with that will come ever increasing taxes.

So enjoy the ride now but as the guy on television said "you can pay me now or you can pay me later."

This is not a complaint its an observational fact

graciegirl
12-10-2017, 10:56 AM
There is a moratorium on building in Osceola County in order to provide government leaders an opportunity to review the impact and to make changes to the pattern of future building. The county recognizes that its infrastructure is insufficient to maintain its present rate of growth.

Florida voters were given an opportunity to vote on such moratoriums in 2010 but the lobby for realtors and developers kicked into high gear and side tracked the initiative.

Sumter county is governed by Sumter One. Sumter One lives to serve the Developer. Sumter One repeal was on the ballot in 2010. the developer kicked into high gear and derailed the initiative.

When the population growth finally settles it will require massive changes in infrastructure, maintenance etc and with that will come ever increasing taxes.

So enjoy the ride now but as the guy on television said "you can pay me now or you can pay me later."

This is not a complaint its an observational fact

When the population growth finally settles, after all the Boomers have retired at ten thousand a day for the next 13 years, most of us will be in The Village of Heavenly. (MOST of us)

rubicon
12-10-2017, 11:02 AM
I disagree about your evaluation.

In all due respect, that was a given. Some of us moved away in part because we wanted to get way from big city living, crowds, traffic, etc. It seems however big city living is being foisted upon us and we don't even get to vote on it.

Cést' la vie

graciegirl
12-10-2017, 11:06 AM
In all due respect, that was a given. some of us moved away in part because we wanted to get way from big city living, crowds, traffic, etc. It seems however big city living is being foisted upon us.

cést'la vie

And some of us think that what is happening is very good here. Except the gorging of population that occurs all over Florida at this time of the year until the end of March,with people who visit who don't own here or have ties to The Villages.

Disclaimer. I am not speaking of property owners known as snowbirds, snowflakes or Fruitflies. (Those who own in Fruitland park area)

rubicon
12-10-2017, 11:27 AM
And some of us think that what is happening is very good here. Except the gorging of population that occurs all over Florida at this time of the year until the end of March,with people who visit who don't own here or have ties to The Villages.

Disclaimer. I am not speaking of property owners known as snowbirds, snowflakes or Fruitflies. (Those who own in Fruitland park area)

Perhaps we can at least agree that about the year 2007 the adjective "quaint" loss all of its attractive meaning as respects The Villages?

Personal Best Regards:

kaseydog
12-10-2017, 11:29 AM
There is a moratorium on building in Osceola County in order to provide government leaders an opportunity to review the impact and to make changes to the pattern of future building. The county recognizes that its infrastructure is insufficient to maintain its present rate of growth.

Florida voters were given an opportunity to vote on such moratoriums in 2010 but the lobby for realtors and developers kicked into high gear and side tracked the initiative.

Sumter county is governed by Sumter One. Sumter One lives to serve the Developer. Sumter One repeal was on the ballot in 2010. the developer kicked into high gear and derailed the initiative.

When the population growth finally settles it will require massive changes in infrastructure, maintenance etc and with that will come ever increasing taxes.

So enjoy the ride now but as the guy on television said "you can pay me now or you can pay me later."

This is not a complaint its an observational fact
What is Sumter One?

rubicon
12-10-2017, 11:48 AM
What is Sumter One?

Sumter One essentially kept all 5 County Commissioner reporting /meeting here in The Villages . The concern- fear- allegation is that all 5 county commissioners would act on behalf of the developer first vis a vis their respective territory within the county.

Indeed the Developer campaigned aggressively in 2010 to have Sumter One vote on repeal failed.

My view at the time was to ensure that each county commissioner have not even the mere appearance of conflict of interest with their duties to the residents residing in their respective county territory . And that everyone was assured that each commissioner was working on behalf of the needs in their respective corners of the county and meeting the needs of the people residing there.

Personal Best Regards:

CFrance
12-10-2017, 11:51 AM
And this?: One Sumter: let the games begin (https://www.ccfj.net/CDDVilledit1Sumter.html)

kaseydog
12-10-2017, 01:11 PM
Thank you for your quick reply.

graciegirl
12-10-2017, 01:12 PM
And this?: One Sumter: let the games begin (https://www.ccfj.net/CDDVilledit1Sumter.html)

Please let it be noted that the above is an opinion piece.

My opinion is that The Villages is run far better as a CDD than it would with input from all of the people who would like to run it who have never been involved in Civic Government. Then we would all be using the word "MESS" a lot.

CDD forever as far as I am concerned. I don't want the inmates running the asylum. We have seen how that works by just looking at other areas the same size run in the "ordinary" way.

angiefox10
12-10-2017, 01:44 PM
There is a moratorium on building in Osceola County in order to provide government leaders an opportunity to review the impact and to make changes to the pattern of future building. The county recognizes that its infrastructure is insufficient to maintain its present rate of growth.

Florida voters were given an opportunity to vote on such moratoriums in 2010 but the lobby for realtors and developers kicked into high gear and side tracked the initiative.

Sumter county is governed by Sumter One. Sumter One lives to serve the Developer. Sumter One repeal was on the ballot in 2010. the developer kicked into high gear and derailed the initiative.

When the population growth finally settles it will require massive changes in infrastructure, maintenance etc and with that will come ever increasing taxes.

So enjoy the ride now but as the guy on television said "you can pay me now or you can pay me later."

This is not a complaint its an observational fact

It also means that people who do not live in The Villages, but live in Sumter County, have no say in what goes on in Sumter County .

We live in a "bubble" and all we see is what we are allowed to see. So if there is a need outside our bubble, it will not get addressed because.... well.... we live in a bubble and One Sumter.

But some people are content to put their heads in the sand, and who cares about anyone else in the county...


Right????

kaseydog
12-10-2017, 02:02 PM
Agree 100%.

graciegirl
12-10-2017, 02:14 PM
It also means that people who do not live in The Villages, but live in Sumter County, have no say in what goes on in Sumter County .

We live in a "bubble" and all we see is what we are allowed to see. So if there is a need outside our bubble, it will not get addressed because.... well.... we live in a bubble and One Sumter.

But some people are content to put their heads in the sand, and who cares about anyone else in the county...


Right????

Well before the Morses arrived here Sumter was one of the three poorest counties in Florida with the comparable low employment.

It all depends on what a person WANTS from a county.

Like..changing the animal shelter.

Florida Poverty Rate by County (http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/united-states/quick-facts/florida/percent-of-people-of-all-ages-in-poverty#map)

CFrance
12-10-2017, 02:27 PM
Please let it be noted that the above is an opinion piece.

My opinion is that The Villages is run far better as a CDD than it would with input from all of the people who would like to run it who have never been involved in Civic Government. Then we would all be using the word "MESS" a lot.

CDD forever as far as I am concerned. I don't want the inmates running the asylum. We have seen how that works by just looking at other areas the same size run in the "ordinary" way.
I provided the link because it contains information explaining what One Sumter is. I don't really care what anyone's opinion is. I was providing an answer to a question.

manaboutown
12-10-2017, 04:42 PM
This is an interesting article on the history of One Sumter, at least until August 2004. ONE SUMTER ONE HOT ISSUE - News - Ocala.com - Ocala, FL (http://www.ocala.com/news/20040819/one-sumter-one-hot-issue)

Andrew Blechman, if I recall correctly, also addressed this issue in his book "Leisureville".

Sumter County was indeed not only a financially very poor county prior to The Villages being developed, it was sparsely populated and mostly rural.

I view the current population disbursement as somewhat akin to NYC and the rest of New York State. Would the whole of New York State like to be run solely by candidates dedicated primarily to benefitting NYC?

Of course one could argue NYC is not controlled by a single large real estate development business; perhaps Wall Street, though...anyway, it now is what it is.

Bogie Shooter
12-10-2017, 04:59 PM
It also means that people who do not live in The Villages, but live in Sumter County, have no say in what goes on in Sumter County .

We live in a "bubble" and all we see is what we are allowed to see. So if there is a need outside our bubble, it will not get addressed because.... well.... we live in a bubble and One Sumter.

But some people are content to put their heads in the sand, and who cares about anyone else in the county...


Right????

I disagree. You make some very general statements.
If you take a look at the adopted Sumter County Budget, there are projects all over the county being addressed. Not just as you say "in the bubble".
Would like to hear from you after you have read all of the budget document.
Budget Resources | Sumter County, FL - Official Website (http://sumtercountyfl.gov/111/Budget-Resources)

billethkid
12-10-2017, 05:11 PM
It also means that people who do not live in The Villages, but live in Sumter County, have no say in what goes on in Sumter County .

We live in a "bubble" and all we see is what we are allowed to see. So if there is a need outside our bubble, it will not get addressed because.... well.... we live in a bubble and One Sumter.

But some people are content to put their heads in the sand, and who cares about anyone else in the county...


Right????

We may live in a bubble....but that is and has been for all of us a choice.

"...see what we are allowed to see..." ? There is no such environment here or anywhere else in the free world where people only "...see what they are allowed to see...".

It just so happens the majority are content with what they bought into and what it is and has become.

Perfect? No. Better than most? Yes.

The minority will always have something to complain about or profess what is not to their liking. And that is fine. That is what freedom is all about...eh!

twoplanekid
12-10-2017, 05:24 PM
I don’t believe that the Florida legislators never envisioned a city the size of the Villages when they created the concept of CDDs to help local developers. I believe we are approaching a size that will require changes in governance and what the city can and can’t do. Not for us to decide as it will require changes made by the State of Florida legislators to CDD rules and regulations.

As an example, current CDD regulations call for local counties to provide disaster service to The Villages. The Villages is not allowed to control this and several other services that are commonly handled by a city government. It's not the growth, it's the structure of government and what is allowed that I believe may need to be changed because of size.

We are unique as no other CDD/CDDS comes close to our current or projected size. A few adjustments have been made such as allowing the towing of cars in some instances. Will our future size demand more changes? I am very interested to hear our Fl State Rep Don Hahnfeldt speak at the VHA general meeting this coming Wednesday, December 13th at Lake Miona Rec Center 7 PM.

Topspinmo
12-10-2017, 06:23 PM
I'm just glad the IRS didn't get more of our money from the law suit that got shelved. The next big money grab will be the removal of the evasive non native weeds in the preserve area. Dud how can it be non native? Somebody sneak in and plant the weeds. Otherwise if nature dropped them, they are now native IMO. Then, there the never ending study by that law firm that seems to be on village welfare.? :ohdear:

Topspinmo
12-10-2017, 06:45 PM
Please let it be noted that the above is an opinion piece.

My opinion is that The Villages is run far better as a CDD than it would with input from all of the people who would like to run it who have never been involved in Civic Government. Then we would all be using the word "MESS" a lot.

CDD forever as far as I am concerned. I don't want the inmates running the asylum. We have seen how that works by just looking at other areas the same size run in the "ordinary" way.

Not to worry you probably live in one of the CDD safe zones that exempt from district (like the Chatham oaks house farms will be, use all of districts facilities, but contributes nothing to district. I would think anything north of 466a would be CDD due to the recent 1/2 billion sale so to CDDs?

mtdjed
12-10-2017, 07:12 PM
This is not a complaint its an observational fact

Not an observational fact but "an opinion".

graciegirl
12-10-2017, 08:19 PM
This is an interesting article on the history of One Sumter, at least until August 2004. ONE SUMTER ONE HOT ISSUE - News - Ocala.com - Ocala, FL (http://www.ocala.com/news/20040819/one-sumter-one-hot-issue)

Andrew Blechman, if I recall correctly, also addressed this issue in his book "Leisureville".

Sumter County was indeed not only a financially very poor county prior to The Villages being developed, it was sparsely populated and mostly rural.

I view the current population disbursement as somewhat akin to NYC and the rest of New York State. Would the whole of New York State like to be run solely by candidates dedicated primarily to benefitting NYC?

Of course one could argue NYC is not controlled by a single large real estate development business; perhaps Wall Street, though...anyway, it now is what it is.

Fortunately those who have not moved here still have the option to buy somewhere else.

Jayhawk
12-10-2017, 08:25 PM
In all due respect, that was a given. Some of us moved away in part because we wanted to get way from big city living, crowds, traffic, etc. It seems however big city living is being foisted upon us and we don't even get to vote on it.

Cést' la vie

In all due respect, what other businesses allow you to vote on their plans?

manaboutown
12-10-2017, 08:37 PM
Fortunately those who have not moved here still have the option to buy somewhere else.

Which obviously keeps me objective since I have not overly imbibed in the Kool-Aid nor am I pandering on behalf of the developer.

Jayhawk
12-10-2017, 08:44 PM
Which obviously keeps me objective since I have not overly imbibed in the Kool-Aid nor am I pandering on behalf of the developer.

I think not.

ob·jec·tiv·i·ty
ˌäbjekˈtivədē/
the quality of being objective.
"the piece lacked any objectivity"
synonyms: impartiality, absence/lack of bias, absence/lack of prejudice, fairness, fair-mindedness, neutrality, evenhandedness, justice, open-mindedness, disinterest, detachment, dispassion, neutrality

mtdjed
12-10-2017, 09:24 PM
I actually think that if you don't like where you are , you should obviously be somewhere else. I was, I am.

manaboutown
12-10-2017, 09:27 PM
Please let it be noted that the above is an opinion piece.

My opinion is that The Villages is run far better as a CDD than it would with input from all of the people who would like to run it who have never been involved in Civic Government. Then we would all be using the word "MESS" a lot.

CDD forever as far as I am concerned. I don't want the inmates running the asylum. We have seen how that works by just looking at other areas the same size run in the "ordinary" way.

Please note the above is an opinion piece.

Jayhawk
12-10-2017, 09:52 PM
Please note the above is an opinion piece.

As is yours.

manaboutown
12-10-2017, 10:23 PM
As is yours.

and yours...

manaboutown
12-10-2017, 10:33 PM
I think not.

ob·jec·tiv·i·ty
ˌäbjekˈtivədē/
the quality of being objective.
"the piece lacked any objectivity"
synonyms: impartiality, absence/lack of bias, absence/lack of prejudice, fairness, fair-mindedness, neutrality, evenhandedness, justice, open-mindedness, disinterest, detachment, dispassion, neutrality

I think yes! I have no dog in this fight...and remain objective, especially in contrast to those who have a vested interest of one kind or another.

rubicon
12-11-2017, 05:02 AM
I don’t believe that the Florida legislators never envisioned a city the size of the Villages when they created the concept of CDDs to help local developers. I believe we are approaching a size that will require changes in governance and what the city can and can’t do. Not for us to decide as it will require changes made by the State of Florida legislators to CDD rules and regulations.

As an example, current CDD regulations call for local counties to provide disaster service to The Villages. The Villages is not allowed to control this and several other services that are commonly handled by a city government. It's not the growth, it's the structure of government and what is allowed that I believe may need to be changed because of size.

We are unique as no other CDD/CDDS comes close to our current or projected size. A few adjustments have been made such as allowing the towing of cars in some instances. Will our future size demand more changes? I am very interested to hear our Fl State Rep Don Hahnfeldt speak at the VHA general meeting this coming Wednesday, December 13th at Lake Miona Rec Center 7 PM.

Don Hahnfeldt is a Morse sycophant... look back at his history starting as the VHA president to the Villages Healthcare.

rubicon
12-11-2017, 05:22 AM
And this?: One Sumter: let the games begin (https://www.ccfj.net/CDDVilledit1Sumter.html)

CFrance when this issue came up for possible repeal it was promoted as Sumter One. a no vote meant you wanted a separation of commissioners so that there was not even an appearance of.................. In that my views leaned egalitarian.

the Developer's presence was overwhelming and well placed outside polling stations and across TV.

rubicon
12-11-2017, 05:46 AM
Well before the Morses arrived here Sumter was one of the three poorest counties in Florida with the comparable low employment.

It all depends on what a person WANTS from a county.

Like..changing the animal shelter.

Florida Poverty Rate by County (http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/united-states/quick-facts/florida/percent-of-people-of-all-ages-in-poverty#map)

GG in all due respect the Morses and their sycophants benefited most and like all corporations the cost of doing business was transferred to customers (homeowners).
The IRS bond issue revealed clearly that the Developer made extraordinary profits by selling back to District facilities and amenity fee income based on the Developer's appraisers, accountants, etc. and the Developer made it clear what % of profit would be had from each home unit they built and if my sources are correct it was enormous

In a manner of speaking residents ought to pat themselves on the back for what The Villages is today

But my original post was not about the Developer it was about responsible government. They keep building and yet claim that we need to conserve on water, etc. Yet we have no voice short of TOTV and the other local internet publication to express our concern.

Eventually the highway systems here will need to be expanded and beside cost the inconvenience is going to be enormous. some of us didn't want to live along Highway 19. Once the population stops growing then taxes income will level off but expenses increase and with this means tax increases

People are already living a top one another and yet they continue to build. I can't imagine anyway saying "oh how great" the store, restaurant golf courses is overcrowded.

Osceola at least had the decency to pause and consider how this was affecting county residents.

you speak of what the county wants....checkout the arrangement between the Sumter County School District and the Charter Schools and you will get an answer as to what county wants

Personal Best Regards:

Mrs. Robinson
12-11-2017, 06:39 AM
In all due respect, that was a given. Some of us moved away in part because we wanted to get way from big city living, crowds, traffic, etc. It seems however big city living is being foisted upon us and we don't even get to vote on it.

Cést' la vie

I cannot agree with you that living in TV or even the general area, is tantamount to "big city living."
Big city living offers many educational and cultural opportunities. Need I say more?

Many TV residents moved here because of what the "crowds" offer, i.e., the squares. golf, pools, clubs, etc.
The traffic is only heavy during season and within TV itself.

Other than the above, which certainly could never be classified as "big city living," living here is more like living among the country bumpkins of central Florida.

pooh
12-11-2017, 07:31 AM
I cannot agree with you that living in TV or even the general area, is tantamount to "big city living."
Big city living offers many educational and cultural opportunities. Need I say more?

Many TV residents moved here because of what the "crowds" offer, i.e., the squares. golf, pools, clubs, etc.
The traffic is only heavy during season and within TV itself.

Other than the above, which certainly could never be classified as "big city living," living here is more like living among the country bumpkins of central Florida.

Remember this, none of us here have been forced to live here....choices were made and those choices brought people here. Country bumpkins? Well, some might just find that phrase insulting, implying the person saying it, is an elitist. As individuals, we are no better than another and another is no better than we are. No one here is a tree, they can pick up and move. Whether we like it or not, life moves forward, more want what many of us here enjoy. Communities are going to grow. As they grow, more and more becomes available....shops, restaurants, educational opportunities, entertainment.

I chose to live here, I love it. Moved from southern CA where many of what you imply is missing here, was plentiful. Funny, I don’t feel deprived...lots of the same things available nearby.

angiefox10
12-11-2017, 07:34 AM
I just came back to view the conversation.

It seems my post was VERY misunderstood.

Since my comment wasn't important, I am not going to try to explain.

I just find it interesting that everyone read it from their own "perspective". From where their mind was. I probably did the same when I read the first post.

Interesting take on the original post.

And... Maybe, I don't understand One Sumter. It's possible.

Everyone have a GREAT day!

graciegirl
12-11-2017, 08:07 AM
GG in all due respect the Morses and their sycophants benefited most and like all corporations the cost of doing business was transferred to customers (homeowners).
The IRS bond issue revealed clearly that the Developer made extraordinary profits by selling back to District facilities and amenity fee income based on the Developer's appraisers, accountants, etc. and the Developer made it clear what % of profit would be had from each home unit they built and if my sources are correct it was enormous

In a manner of speaking residents ought to pat themselves on the back for what The Villages is today

But my original post was not about the Developer it was about responsible government. They keep building and yet claim that we need to conserve on water, etc. Yet we have no voice short of TOTV and the other local internet publication to express our concern.

Eventually the highway systems here will need to be expanded and beside cost the inconvenience is going to be enormous. some of us didn't want to live along Highway 19. Once the population stops growing then taxes income will level off but expenses increase and with this means tax increases

People are already living a top one another and yet they continue to build. I can't imagine anyway saying "oh how great" the store, restaurant golf courses is overcrowded.

Osceola at least had the decency to pause and consider how this was affecting county residents.

you speak of what the county wants....checkout the arrangement between the Sumter County School District and the Charter Schools and you will get an answer as to what county wants

Personal Best Regards:


I personally like that a private business can achieve what big government cannot. I personally like that a charter school can offer what most school systems in Florida cannot. I have noted that the builder continues to add rec centers and golf courses as they build. And new businesses are attracted to this area now more than they were before because we are bigger and demographers are finally noticing that we are here. The tax payers will become a bigger bunch too and will share the burden of any repairs and additions. Making a profit is how business works and it also allows business to employ people which to me is a very good thing.

SOMEONE is going to build here. I would prefer it is of the quality and have the regulations we now enjoy and that it continues to be an age restricted area.

Check again the map I posted that shows we have the lowest unemployment of any county in the state. Before the Morses came, Sumter was one of the poorest counties with the lowest employment.

A rising tide lifts all ships.

spring_chicken
12-11-2017, 08:35 AM
Remember this, none of us here have been forced to live here....choices were made and those choices brought people here. Country bumpkins? Well, some might just find that phrase insulting, implying the person saying it, is an elitist. As individuals, we are no better than another and another is no better than we are. No one here is a tree, they can pick up and move. Whether we like it or not, life moves forward, more want what many of us here enjoy. Communities are going to grow. As they grow, more and more becomes available....shops, restaurants, educational opportunities, entertainment.

I chose to live here, I love it. Moved from southern CA where many of what you imply is missing here, was plentiful. Funny, I don’t feel deprived...lots of the same things available nearby.

And for many people, that choice was based on a lie about "buildout".

pooh
12-11-2017, 08:56 AM
And for many people, that choice was based on a lie about "buildout".

Things change....always, no matter where you live. The community is set up like littlemtowns, your village isn’t generally congested. Your home, though not surrounded by acres of unspoiled land, is quiet.

There is vacant land...and someone is going to build. Personally I’ve seen what happens to developments built, not maintained. developer has grand ideas, BUT they never quite worked out and suddenly, an eyesore and nothing can be done about it. Where I lived, multiple developers went gun ho building and building....the hodge podge became a living nightmare...inadequate roads, especially for firefighters...CA is prone to horrific fires....lack of necessary schools, and so on. Personally, I’d prefer a known developer with an outstanding history of experience.

Looking for a small, picturesque little community, may no longer be something many will find. More and more are retiring, moving from where they lived to where the climate may be easier for them. They’re going to come and they need a place to live.

Mrs. Robinson
12-11-2017, 09:03 AM
I cannot agree with you that living in TV or even the general area, is tantamount to "big city living."
Big city living offers many educational and cultural opportunities. Need I say more?

Many TV residents moved here because of what the "crowds" offer, i.e., the squares. golf, pools, clubs, etc.
The traffic is only heavy during season and within TV itself.

Other than the above, which certainly could never be classified as "big city living," living here is more like living among the country bumpkins of central Florida.

Remember this, none of us here have been forced to live here....choices were made and those choices brought people here. Country bumpkins? Well, some might just find that phrase insulting, implying the person saying it, is an elitist. As individuals, we are no better than another and another is no better than we are. No one here is a tree, they can pick up and move. Whether we like it or not, life moves forward, more want what many of us here enjoy. Communities are going to grow. As they grow, more and more becomes available....shops, restaurants, educational opportunities, entertainment.

I chose to live here, I love it. Moved from southern CA where many of what you imply is missing here, was plentiful. Funny, I don’t feel deprived...lots of the same things available nearby.

Are you responding to my post (above yours right here)?
If so, it's obvious you either misread what I wrote or missed my point, or ???

I didn't say that anyone was forced to live here or anything even close to that.
I didn't say that anyone was "deprived."
What I did say was that TV "ain't no big city!"
Country bumpkins? Just an expression and not derogatory, but one would have to admit that TV is located smack dab in the middle of a country area.
Even the outlying roads indicate this (narrow roads, most of which are in need of repaving and without shoulders).

I mentioned nothing about being "deprived" so where did that come from?
I did not put down TV in any of my verbiage.

What I did say was that to compare TV to "big city living" is simply absurd, under any circumstances.

spring_chicken
12-11-2017, 09:12 AM
Things change....always, no matter where you live. The community is set up like littlemtowns, your village isn’t generally congested. Your home, though not surrounded by acres of unspoiled land, is quiet.

There is vacant land...and someone is going to build. Personally I’ve seen what happens to developments built, not maintained. developer has grand ideas, BUT they never quite worked out and suddenly, an eyesore and nothing can be done about it. Where I lived, multiple developers went gun ho building and building....the hodge podge became a living nightmare...inadequate roads, especially for firefighters...CA is prone to horrific fires....lack of necessary schools, and so on. Personally, I’d prefer a known developer with an outstanding history of experience.

Looking for a small, picturesque little community, may no longer be something many will find. More and more are retiring, moving from where they lived to where the climate may be easier for them. They’re going to come and they need a place to live.

Yes, things change. That's what made it such an egregious lie, every time things changed. They knew after the first time they said it, and it "changed" into a lie that they shouldn't have kept on repeating the lie for years. Since things "change", and all.

graciegirl
12-11-2017, 09:28 AM
Are you responding to my post (above yours right here)?
If so, it's obvious you either misread what I wrote or missed my point, or ???

I didn't say that anyone was forced to live here or anything even close to that.
I didn't say that anyone was "deprived."
What I did say was that TV "ain't no big city!"
Country bumpkins? Just an expression and not derogatory, but one would have to admit that TV is located smack dab in the middle of a country area.
Even the outlying roads indicate this (narrow roads, most of which are in need of repaving and without shoulders).

I mentioned nothing about being "deprived" so where did that come from?
I did not put down TV in any of my verbiage.

What I did say was that to compare TV to "big city living" is simply absurd, under any circumstances.

Urban Dictionary: country bumpkin (https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=country%20bumpkin)

Bogie Shooter
12-11-2017, 09:52 AM
I think yes! I have no dog in this fight...and remain objective, especially in contrast to those who have a vested interest of one kind or another.

He who has not tasted the water, should not comment on its taste..............................

pooh
12-11-2017, 10:59 AM
Yes, things change. That's what made it such an egregious lie, every time things changed. They knew after the first time they said it, and it "changed" into a lie that they shouldn't have kept on repeating the lie for years. Since things "change", and all.

At one point, could be it was going to be completed....BUT more land became available and why should an opportunity be missed. If it is STILL being parroted then it should stop. People managed to have a career, trade, run a business and made it this far....they should know that what was/might be still said, isn’t necessarily how it will be.

Personally, I prefer the developer continue on...you might not, others might not, but I do.

TheWarriors
12-11-2017, 11:47 AM
in my humble opinion, unless you moved here to Orange Blossom Hills and purchased your mobile home directly from Mr. Morse, you have no authority to claim The Villages have gotten too large. After all, you would be considered part of that problem from the original Villagers' perspective. Perhaps they wanted the door closed before you arrived?

spring_chicken
12-11-2017, 12:55 PM
in my humble opinion, unless you moved here to Orange Blossom Hills and purchased your mobile home directly from Mr. Morse, you have no authority to claim The Villages have gotten too large. After all, you would be considered part of that problem from the original Villagers' perspective. Perhaps they wanted the door closed before you arrived?

Not necessarily. If you bought pre-owned, then you aren't a part of the problem by creating a demand for new homes.

rubicon
12-11-2017, 01:01 PM
In all due respect, what other businesses allow you to vote on their plans?

In all due respect, first we are not talking about a business we are talking about county/community issues. but, perhaps that is the problem because we have a business that also doubles as government; albeit they do so arms length to avoid notice or accusations of conflicts.

Secondly, in many states one is allowed to vote on the school budget and to introduce referendums or attend (real not staged) town hall meetings to discuss issues of truly relevant importance to residents such as continued building, etc.

However, the bigger issue is that the big and only player here is the Developer (this business as you term it) and has the attention, etc of of state and local politicians.

How do you think an ostensible private school could get charter status without the working/personal/business/political relationship between Jeb Bush and the Morse family. A school that is supported by taxes paid exclusively by RESIDENTS OF THE VILLAGES THAT LIVE IN SUMTER COUNTY and where student enrollment last time I checked was 75% outside the county.

It is a puzzlement that so many residents view the Developer as some sort of benevolent benefactor when in actuality its a very aggressive corporation that has decimated many competitors in allied lines who attempt to make a living.

I am not making judgment here I understand capitalism. However I don't condone crony capitalism

Personal Best Regards:

billethkid
12-11-2017, 01:20 PM
If TV never crossed 466 headed for 466A there would not have been the recognition by national retailers that TV was worthy of their establishment(s).

As TV critical mass continued to grow all the more of these national establishments have chosen to open a business here.

When all gets said and done there is more traffic. A reality at any location/establishment/venue worth while or of interest to the masses.
The rest of TV is pretty a fairly distributed entity....new pools, golf courses, rec centers, common grounds, etc are put in to accommodate the increasing number of villages and residents..

As a result most of us conduct our lives in a rather tight
geographical diameter.
We get to meet more of each other when we go to areas like rolling acres shopping area, Sams Club or favorite restaurants.

If we did not have the attractive size/population there would not have been the shopping we have today. And many of us...about half of us....decided to buy into the lifestyle BEFORE many of what we have today were not even a rumor yet.

In my opinion as long as the developer continues with the plan and logistics of evolution to date....it will continue to get better and better.

The number of being over 100,000 is not really comparable to other "cities" because that is not what we are....THANK GOD.

I believe the majority who decided to locate here for the reasons they, did are still happy and content with the lifestyle. We are. And we have been here long enough to experience what was before and what has come along since quadrupling in size.

Definitely, overall..... continuous improvement.

rubicon
12-11-2017, 01:23 PM
I personally like that a private business can achieve what big government cannot. I personally like that a charter school can offer what most school systems in Florida cannot. I have noted that the builder continues to add rec centers and golf courses as they build. And new businesses are attracted to this area now more than they were before because we are bigger and demographers are finally noticing that we are here. The tax payers will become a bigger bunch too and will share the burden of any repairs and additions. Making a profit is how business works and it also allows business to employ people which to me is a very good thing.

SOMEONE is going to build here. I would prefer it is of the quality and have the regulations we now enjoy and that it continues to be an age restricted area.

Check again the map I posted that shows we have the lowest unemployment of any county in the state. Before the Morses came, Sumter was one of the poorest counties with the lowest employment.

A rising tide lifts all ships.

GG: do you believe this private business is building rec centers, etc out of the goodness of its heart? Have you checked to see what 5 of profit this private business makes when it sells said facility to the District?

I like that rising tide lift all ships too. However I do not like when too many built ships begin colliding with one another:D

I am not pro or anti-developer. I am concerned with the affect this private business running as my government has on my quality of life and I have a right as a taxpayer amenity payer to speak up

Personal Best Regards:

graciegirl
12-11-2017, 01:35 PM
GG: do you believe this private business is building rec centers, etc out of the goodness of its heart? Have you checked to see what 5 of profit this private business makes when it sells said facility to the District?

I like that rising tide lift all ships too. However I do not like when too many built ships begin colliding with one another:D

I am not pro or anti-developer. I am concerned with the affect this private business running as my government has on my quality of life and I have a right as a taxpayer amenity payer to speak up

Personal Best Regards:

No. I do not. I understand margins and profit and loss.

I understand that you would still be in the far North if you were choosing what would make you happy but your wife likes it here..

I don't know whether Mark Morse is Mother Teresa or Atilla the Hun, but I do know that the organization has fulfilled what I personally expected for the last ten years and then some.

You don't have to love them to see that they are doing a good job.

rubicon
12-11-2017, 01:48 PM
Remember this, none of us here have been forced to live here....choices were made and those choices brought people here. Country bumpkins? Well, some might just find that phrase insulting, implying the person saying it, is an elitist. As individuals, we are no better than another and another is no better than we are. No one here is a tree, they can pick up and move. Whether we like it or not, life moves forward, more want what many of us here enjoy. Communities are going to grow. As they grow, more and more becomes available....shops, restaurants, educational opportunities, entertainment.

I chose to live here, I love it. Moved from southern CA where many of what you imply is missing here, was plentiful. Funny, I don’t feel deprived...lots of the same things available nearby.

There were areas here where people paid $10,000+ for a so call view and a few years later up comes a building etc blocking that view.

many people bought with the understanding that build out was on the horizon. would you suggest that they do not have a right to express an opinion. We all adjust

There isn't a right or wrong here. We are individuals with different points of views and expectations. One may disagree without being disagreeable.

Personal Best Regards:





To my way of thinking telling someone "don't like it move' is like calling a person a racist, etc as a method of shutting down conversation

rubicon
12-11-2017, 02:01 PM
in my humble opinion, unless you moved here to Orange Blossom Hills and purchased your mobile home directly from Mr. Morse, you have no authority to claim The Villages have gotten too large. After all, you would be considered part of that problem from the original Villagers' perspective. Perhaps they wanted the door closed before you arrived?

Well we could take that discussion back to if the Pilgrims didn't cross the big pond......

For every stage of development of TV you will find a legitimate concern about growth. and of course it comes down to expectations

Personal Best Regards:

rubicon
12-11-2017, 02:17 PM
No. I do not. I understand margins and profit and loss.

I understand that you would still be in the far North if you were choosing what would make you happy but your wife likes it here..

I don't know whether Mark Morse is Mother Teresa or Atilla the Hun, but I do know that the organization has fulfilled what I personally expected for the last ten years and then some.

You don't have to love them to see that they are doing a good job.

GG:

you can bet that the Morse family is really good at margins, profit and loss.

And I view and have always stated that I viewed the Morse family as I would any other enterprise because its business and not personal . As such what they do or do not do has an affect on my lifestyle.

while I knew TV was going to continue building I did not envision it approaching this sort of congestion, congestion that is exacerbated by expansion in the surrounding towns.

the issue of taxes was my prime motivator and thus far based on other locations that interested me that consideration still holds tight.

some posters seem to equate raising issues such as this as if its needless complaining. Yet concerned citizens are actually the watchdogs for a community. Name one outlet that really has residents interest to heart.

don't mean to ruffle feathers or to hurt feelings but I was struck by the sensible move by Osceola County

I remain a good neighbor

Personal Best Regards:

dotti105
12-11-2017, 07:43 PM
Gosh, so much disagreement about growth in The Villages. There seems to be a lot of the "I'm here now, so close the gates" mentality.

If you were here when Schwartz had his mobile home park and a few holes of golf, then I guess your complaints would be better understood by me. But those of us who came "after" came because of the amenities, the lifestyle, the cleanliness, the entertainment, the clubs, the golf, etc.

The fact that The Villages continues to grow does not concern me one iota. The growth is spread out, well designed and will only draw more diverse restaurants, shopping etc.

Each land acquisition is "the last Village". If it upsets you, living near Spanish Springs", that they are building south of 44, you need a hobby. It is a 30 minute drive, in a car, from you. Why is that a concern? The are building, new softball fields, Executive and Championship Golf course, new Rec centers, pools, etc, etc, etc. those future Villagers will have not need to crowd "your roads" or your amenities.

The planning here has been amazing! Convenience and ambiance is everywhere. The Morse family, for 3 generations now have provided a fabulous place to retire that most of us realize is very special and unique. Their vision and talent is very special. Name any other place that can compare......Now what are you complaining about? If you don't like it, put your home on the market and in 60 days you can be on your way.

We are just thankful that we found this great place and were fortunate enough to grab a place here. This conversation makes "Friendliest Home Town" sound like it belongs as the theme somewhere other than here.

Dr Winston O Boogie jr
12-11-2017, 07:46 PM
In all due respect, that was a given. Some of us moved away in part because we wanted to get way from big city living, crowds, traffic, etc. It seems however big city living is being foisted upon us and we don't even get to vote on it.

Cést' la vie

Of course, you get to vote on it. You can vote by moving out to the countryside. I see plenty of places around The Villages where the neighbors are a mile apart.

Dr Winston O Boogie jr
12-11-2017, 07:47 PM
Gosh, so much disagreement about growth in The Villages. There seems to be a lot of the "I'm here now, so close the gates" mentality.

If you were here when Schwartz had his mobile home park and a few holes of golf, then I guess your complaints would be better understood by me. But those of us who came "after" came because of the amenities, the lifestyle, the cleanliness, the entertainment, the clubs, the golf, etc.

The fact that The Villages continues to grow does not concern me one iota. The growth is spread out, well designed and will only draw more diverse restaurants, shopping etc.

Each land acquisition is "the last Village". If it upsets you, living near Spanish Springs", that they are building south of 44, you need a hobby. It is a 30 minute drive, in a car, from you. Why is that a concern? The are building, new softball fields, Executive and Championship Golf course, new Rec centers, pools, etc, etc, etc. those future Villagers will have not need to crowd "your roads" or your amenities.

The planning here has been amazing! Convenience and ambiance is everywhere. The Morse family, for 3 generations now have provided a fabulous place to retire that most of us realize is very special and unique. Their vision and talent is very special. Name any other place that can compare......Now what are you complaining about? If you don't like it, put your home on the market and in 60 days you can be on your way.

We are just thankful that we found this great place and were fortunate enough to grab a place here. This conversation makes "Friendliest Home Town" sound like it belongs as the theme somewhere other than here.

My feelings exactly. And as far this being like a big city, I've lived in many cities, large and small and this is nothing like city life.

rubicon
12-12-2017, 06:28 AM
Of course, you get to vote on it. You can vote by moving out to the countryside. I see plenty of places around The Villages where the neighbors are a mile apart.

My friend ,your rejoinder of "if you don't like it move" is an emotional and unfair response and a short sighted one. And it would suggest that a resident has no right to speak up.

This is not a debate of" I got mine and you can't have yours." Its about sensible planning and sensible growth
My initial post was to point out the sensibility of a moratorium to ascertain what effect rapid growth was having on the community. I should have known that this was going to turn into a pro -anti developer one I care not to rehash again and frankly have never understood.

Osceola county made clear that additional road building will be necessary and many of the roads will be toll roads.

My prediction is that unchecked village residents gate passes will become SUNPASS

My prediction is that the tax burden will grow exponentially as population growth ceases and infrastructure maintenance cost rise. Amenity fees continue to rise not only because they are tied to the consumer Index but because of the pressures placed on facilities will demand that they be increased to meet new obligations. and as amenity fees are growing the availability of suitable amenities times ,etc is quickly fading.

Rising cost vis a vis fixed incomes is a problem for retirees. And a resident does not have the right to say I am not using any of the amenities so I want to opt out

This fixed retirement income is also why your" if you don't like it move option "is seldom the answer. I don't make my investment/financial decisions based on emotion. However I did mistakenly believe that speaking rationally about the growth in the community could be productive.

I'm not speaking against anything or anyone but I do believe residents ought to have a vote on how they will spend the remainder of their lives especially since they paid a high premium for their investment. I also believe that a discussion should result in reasonable compromises. However today, people simply do not discuss they rant.

Personal Best Regards:

Madelaine Amee
12-12-2017, 06:45 AM
I'm not speaking against anything or anyone but I do believe residents ought to have a vote on how they will spend the remainder of their lives especially since they paid a high premium for their investment. I also believe that a discussion should result in reasonable compromises. However today, people simply do not discuss they rant.

Personal Best Regards:

My post is simply a fact and is not meant to offend

You have no right to a vote - you, like the rest of us, purchased a home on a piece of land. That did not give you the right to vote on anything pertaining to TV. It gave you the right to live in your home on your piece of land until such time as you chose not to do so. As far as I know, The Villages is privately owned and is not resident owned which gives us no vote on anything.

twoplanekid
12-12-2017, 08:03 AM
My post is simply a fact and is not meant to offend

You have no right to a vote - you, like the rest of us, purchased a home on a piece of land. That did not give you the right to vote on anything pertaining to TV. It gave you the right to live in your home on your piece of land until such time as you chose not to do so. As far as I know, The Villages is privately owned and is not resident owned which gives us no vote on anything.

As I live In Community Development District 10, I believe we do get to vote as stated on The Villages web site and I quote:“ The Board of Supervisors is currently comprised of three landowner seats and two qualified seats, which means that three supervisors were elected by landowner votes (one vote per acre or part thereof). In 2016, two landowner seats will transition to qualified, and in 2018 the final land owner seat will transition to qualified. From that point forward, all supervisors in District No. 10 will be elected by 'qualified electors' (registered voters) residing in the District. They are elected on a non-partisan basis on the general election ballot.

As a governmental entity in the State of Florida, Village Community Development District No. 10 is held to the same high standards as cities and counties as it pertains to Sunshine Law, Public Records Law, Financial Reporting and Financial Disclosure Laws. Additionally, the Board of Supervisors adheres to Florida Statute Chapter 112, Part III- Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees."

graciegirl
12-12-2017, 11:44 AM
My friend ,your rejoinder of "if you don't like it move" is an emotional and unfair response and a short sighted one. And it would suggest that a resident has no right to speak up.

This is not a debate of" I got mine and you can't have yours." Its about sensible planning and sensible growth
My initial post was to point out the sensibility of a moratorium to ascertain what effect rapid growth was having on the community. I should have known that this was going to turn into a pro -anti developer one I care not to rehash again and frankly have never understood.

Osceola county made clear that additional road building will be necessary and many of the roads will be toll roads.

My prediction is that unchecked village residents gate passes will become SUNPASS

My prediction is that the tax burden will grow exponentially as population growth ceases and infrastructure maintenance cost rise. Amenity fees continue to rise not only because they are tied to the consumer Index but because of the pressures placed on facilities will demand that they be increased to meet new obligations. and as amenity fees are growing the availability of suitable amenities times ,etc is quickly fading.

Rising cost vis a vis fixed incomes is a problem for retirees. And a resident does not have the right to say I am not using any of the amenities so I want to opt out

This fixed retirement income is also why your" if you don't like it move option "is seldom the answer. I don't make my investment/financial decisions based on emotion. However I did mistakenly believe that speaking rationally about the growth in the community could be productive.

I'm not speaking against anything or anyone but I do believe residents ought to have a vote on how they will spend the remainder of their lives especially since they paid a high premium for their investment. I also believe that a discussion should result in reasonable compromises. However today, people simply do not discuss they rant.

Personal Best Regards:

I cringe at the residents "getting to vote" on every small issue when so many half truths, rumors and misinformation is passed in this place. So much is offered as gospel and it is just garbage on this forum and in many printed venues as well. There are so many agendas, so many people who would like The Villages to fail because of jealousy, competition and plain mean spiritedness.

There are many who are gullible to tales told out of school and in today's climate of public opinion being passed around as fact it is very hard to find the truth.

Goldwingnut
12-12-2017, 02:46 PM
As I live In Community Development District 10, I believe we do get to vote as stated on The Villages web site and I quote:“ The Board of Supervisors is currently comprised of three landowner seats and two qualified seats, which means that three supervisors were elected by landowner votes (one vote per acre or part thereof). In 2016, two landowner seats will transition to qualified, and in 2018 the final land owner seat will transition to qualified. From that point forward, all supervisors in District No. 10 will be elected by 'qualified electors' (registered voters) residing in the District. They are elected on a non-partisan basis on the general election ballot.

As a governmental entity in the State of Florida, Village Community Development District No. 10 is held to the same high standards as cities and counties as it pertains to Sunshine Law, Public Records Law, Financial Reporting and Financial Disclosure Laws. Additionally, the Board of Supervisors adheres to Florida Statute Chapter 112, Part III- Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees."

Twoplanekid, just a short clarification on your nearly correct statement, four of the current Supervisors in District 10 were elected by qualified electors (or ran unopposed) and the fifth, Mr. Rebecky, while being landowner elected is also a resident of CDD10. So yes, you do get a vote and three of the Supervisor seats are up for election/re-election in 2018.

rubicon
12-12-2017, 03:21 PM
As I live In Community Development District 10, I believe we do get to vote as stated on The Villages web site and I quote:“ The Board of Supervisors is currently comprised of three landowner seats and two qualified seats, which means that three supervisors were elected by landowner votes (one vote per acre or part thereof). In 2016, two landowner seats will transition to qualified, and in 2018 the final land owner seat will transition to qualified. From that point forward, all supervisors in District No. 10 will be elected by 'qualified electors' (registered voters) residing in the District. They are elected on a non-partisan basis on the general election ballot.

As a governmental entity in the State of Florida, Village Community Development District No. 10 is held to the same high standards as cities and counties as it pertains to Sunshine Law, Public Records Law, Financial Reporting and Financial Disclosure Laws. Additionally, the Board of Supervisors adheres to Florida Statute Chapter 112, Part III- Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees."

The board of supervisors you speak of are all associates of the Developer.

I had written more to say below about a private conversation I had with a reliable source that ,if true, would blunt much of what you share. but to what avail.

You can never prove a negative and in that people who speak up are at a distinct disadvantage.

Personal Best Regards:

twoplanekid
12-12-2017, 03:23 PM
Twoplanekid, just a short clarification on your nearly correct statement, four of the current Supervisors in District 10 were elected by qualified electors (or ran unopposed) and the fifth, Mr. Rebecky, while being landowner elected is also a resident of CDD10. So yes, you do get a vote and three of the Supervisor seats are up for election/re-election in 2018.

Thanks for the clarification of the information I found on the Districtgov web site. To help those that might be inclined to run for a seat on the board of Supervisors, what factor determines the one year of current residency? Are Supervisor elections held in November or May?

I have since learned that a Supervisor must be residents of the State of Florida and a citizen of the United States with no (one year) time requirements. Elections of Supervisors are held in November.

Goldwingnut
12-12-2017, 04:57 PM
The board of supervisors you speak of are all associates of the Developer.

I had written more to say below about a private conversation I had with a reliable source that ,if true, would blunt much of what you share. but to what avail.

You can never prove a negative and in that people who speak up are at a distinct disadvantage.

Personal Best Regards:

Rubicon, actually in this case you are wrong. I can tell you from first hand knowledge that ALL of the supervisors are NOT associates of the Developer. I can say this in 100% confidence as I am one of the CDD-10 Supervisors. I can tell you that as of this minute I have never met, spoke to, exchanged emails or text messages with, or to the best of my knowledge even been in the same room as any member of the Morse family or any officer of the development company. Your passive aggressive comments do a great disservice to the many men and wonen of this community that expend a great deal of their time and energy in being CDD Supervisors serving and looking out for the best interest of all the residents of The Villages.

Since moving to The Villages I have heard and read a great deal of castigation and rebuke of District Supervisors with a strong inference that many or all are little more than stooges for the development company. Nothing could be farther from the truth. While I have not spoke to or met all of the supervisors in all the CDDs, the ones I have met have all been individuals who dedicated to making The Villages the best possible place they can to live in retirement, for all the residents. Are any of these people associates or friends of "the developer", I cannot say and would not speculate in any case. What I can say is that all are intelligent people who try to make informed and unbiased decisions that they believe are in the best interests of their respective districts regardless of any perceived desires or influence of "the developer".

Is the CCD form of government the best choice for The Villages? I can't say for sure, but it seems to be working well for now. Odds are that it may some day change to a different form of government but it will be a very difficult transition as the community extends across three counties and a large number of inter-local government agreements exist that would have to be taken into account. One nice thing to consider with our current structure is there is very little of the bloat, bureaucracy, and political infighting that most governments have which keeps the taxes and costs to a low level by comparison.

Don Wiley
CDD-10 Supervisor

golf2140
12-12-2017, 06:57 PM
Sumter one was started because the good old boy's did not like the folks in The Villages but loved their money. They had all the good old boys on the payroll. Taxes kept going up without controls.

Barefoot
12-12-2017, 08:00 PM
Perhaps we can at least agree that about the year 2007 the adjective "quaint" loss all of its attractive meaning as respects The Villages?
I think we can all agree that The Villages is no longer "quaint". But apparently we can't agree on much else. :evil6:

billethkid
12-12-2017, 11:03 PM
Based on the following:

Quaint | Definition of Quaint by Merriam-Webster (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quaint)

TV can continue to be called quaint.

I would not agree that "...we can agree TV is no longer quaint..."

Tis all in the eye of the beholder....eh?

Chi-Town
12-12-2017, 11:28 PM
First lifestyle preview was May, 2008. Quaint did not come into mind. What I saw was a Disneyland for adults. Spanish Springs with a feel of Seville Spain and Lake Sumter Landing looking like a Florida Key. The preview included meals, golf, tennis, bowling, a golf cart, and an LSL cottage. Even two bicycles. Walked to the Square where there was a Mustang show and live entertainment. Definitely cool but not quaint.





Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

Mrs. Robinson
12-13-2017, 01:46 AM
I personally like that a private business can achieve what big government cannot. I personally like that a charter school can offer what most school systems in Florida cannot. I have noted that the builder continues to add rec centers and golf courses as they build. And new businesses are attracted to this area now more than they were before because we are bigger and demographers are finally noticing that we are here. The tax payers will become a bigger bunch too and will share the burden of any repairs and additions. Making a profit is how business works and it also allows business to employ people which to me is a very good thing.

SOMEONE is going to build here. I would prefer it is of the quality and have the regulations we now enjoy and that it continues to be an age restricted area.

Check again the map I posted that shows we have the lowest unemployment of any county in the state. Before the Morses came, Sumter was one of the poorest counties with the lowest employment.

A rising tide lifts all ships.


I do not mean to pick your post apart, however, I see many cliff hangers.
Of course private business can achieve what the government cannot.
When one person can own a business versus a Congress, Senate, or what have you, it is no big surprise a business owner can do what he wants, when he wants to do it, etc., and be successful in a short amount of time.

What does TV's Charter School offer that most Florida schools do not?

Yes, there are some new businesses that have opened here, however no Costco (that is a definite barometer regarding demographics).
In addition, using Brownwood as an example, after about five years, many storefronts are still empty,
A huge amount of empty land is sitting there, waiting for the growth to which you refer that isn't here.

The quality of the houses in TV is average and nothing terrific. There are other builders in the area who frankly, build a better quality constructed home.
However, what we have here will certainly last long enough to go on to service other generations.

The problem with the regulations we currently have is that there are too many different ones.
Regulations throughout all of TV would make much more sense if everyone had to abide by the same ones and not by all the different districts or those north of this or south of that, etc.

I think there is plenty of room for a non-age restricted community that has their own recreational benefits. It would be nice to see something other than the thousands of Q-Tip heads that we have here!

I did not see a unemployment map that you said you posted, but Sumter County does not have the lowest unemployment rate in the state.
Wildwood still remains high in unemployment and many live in poverty.
Furthermore, before the Morse family came here, Sumter County had one of the highest amount of unemployed, not the lowest which you indicated.

Mrs. Robinson
12-13-2017, 02:53 AM
I think we can all agree that The Villages is no longer "quaint". But apparently we can't agree on much else. :evil6:

Was TV ever quaint? I think not.

When I think of quaint, I think of a well-established, old town, where everyone knows everyone else, and the residents go back generations.

TV never was quaint and never will be.

rubicon
12-13-2017, 05:37 AM
Rubicon, actually in this case you are wrong. I can tell you from first hand knowledge that ALL of the supervisors are NOT associates of the Developer. I can say this in 100% confidence as I am one of the CDD-10 Supervisors. I can tell you that as of this minute I have never met, spoke to, exchanged emails or text messages with, or to the best of my knowledge even been in the same room as any member of the Morse family or any officer of the development company. Your passive aggressive comments do a great disservice to the many men and wonen of this community that expend a great deal of their time and energy in being CDD Supervisors serving and looking out for the best interest of all the residents of The Villages.

Since moving to The Villages I have heard and read a great deal of castigation and rebuke of District Supervisors with a strong inference that many or all are little more than stooges for the development company. Nothing could be farther from the truth. While I have not spoke to or met all of the supervisors in all the CDDs, the ones I have met have all been individuals who dedicated to making The Villages the best possible place they can to live in retirement, for all the residents. Are any of these people associates or friends of "the developer", I cannot say and would not speculate in any case. What I can say is that all are intelligent people who try to make informed and unbiased decisions that they believe are in the best interests of their respective districts regardless of any perceived desires or influence of "the developer".

Is the CCD form of government the best choice for The Villages? I can't say for sure, but it seems to be working well for now. Odds are that it may some day change to a different form of government but it will be a very difficult transition as the community extends across three counties and a large number of inter-local government agreements exist that would have to be taken into account. One nice thing to consider with our current structure is there is very little of the bloat, bureaucracy, and political infighting that most governments have which keeps the taxes and costs to a low level by comparison.

Don Wiley
CDD-10 Supervisor

Au contraire I do not disparage anyone . And I consider my approach to be assertive and not aggressive and certainly not passive aggressive.

Mt importantly, we are talking about two different Board of Supervisors. I was addressing the Board of Supervisors ( 5 in all) that originally had control of the bond issue,etc , many of whom wield power and influence in this community today and actually continue to set future plans for The Villages.

You are addressing supervisors who have CDD responsibilities and their effect on CDD separately which is a completely different matter entirely.
and so what happens in Vegas (CDD10) stays in Vegas (CDD10).

Once again my only reason for starting this thread was to point out the sensibility of pausing to consider what future building will have on this community.

But we have some posters with circular thinking and it always ends up with them defending the Developer and The Villages, both of which have a large annual marketing and promotional budget to effect a positive image and as such both entities do well on their own.

This circular thinking prevents real discussion as to effective communication county commissioners, local state representatives etc as to concern for the impact of rapid growth, Essentially, I am talking about concerns for the preservation of the quality of living here.

I moved from an idyllic city rated the number one city to live in the nations for better than six consecutive years .
it was and is a great and beautiful place to live but I don't recall residents getting defensive when concerns were addressed rather they joined in to ensure the planning commission mayor, etc understood residents position

It seems we can never have any relevant discuss concerning this community because it always defaults to a defensive position vis a vis corroboration

Personal Best Regards:

rubicon
12-13-2017, 05:17 PM
Based on the following:

Quaint | Definition of Quaint by Merriam-Webster (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quaint)

TV can continue to be called quaint.

I would not agree that "...we can agree TV is no longer quaint..."

Tis all in the eye of the beholder....eh?

You might want to read the examples this definition cites as examples were quaint is applied. My meaning a small unique college town .

I agree that its all in the eye of the beholder .

I will never understand why people get so stirred up and take personal umbrage when the issue of The Villages ?

Personal Best Regards:

CFrance
12-13-2017, 05:28 PM
As my teenage son used to say way back when, "Mom. Acknowledge and move on." (Of course, that was usually related to something he was in the doghouse for...)

Mrs. Robinson
12-13-2017, 11:55 PM
As my teenage son used to say way back when, "Mom. Acknowledge and move on." (Of course, that was usually related to something he was in the doghouse for...)

Smart son.
We all should take that advice, present company included!

BTW -- is he still saying that to you??? :a040:

rubicon
12-14-2017, 05:14 AM
Is that like defaulting to "never mind":D

CFrance
12-14-2017, 07:30 AM
Smart son.
We all should take that advice, present company included!

BTW -- is he still saying that to you??? :a040:
They both are!

CFrance
12-14-2017, 07:31 AM
Is that like defaulting to "never mind":D
Yep!:wave: