Where's Pence?

[mellincf]

Over the course of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, Mike Pence has perfected a disappearing act that is almost incomprehensible in its precision.

The vice president has said he did not know about Michael Flynn’s foreign lobbying or his conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. He had no comment when Flynn pleaded guilty to lying—to him, among others—about these conversations. And his office has repeatedly noted that, at crucial points in the Russia timeline, Pence was back in Indiana serving soup to the homeless or attending his son’s wedding.

Despite his efforts to shield himself from the scandal, however, Mike Pence’s knowledge—or lack thereof—has emerged as a critical piece in Mueller’s Russia puzzle.

Who sought to obstruct justice by burying the full knowledge that Mike Flynn was a traitor to the United States? Trump? Pence? Trump AND Pence?

Mueller’s Obstruction Case Could Rest on Two Simple Questions | Vanity Fair (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/12/muellers-obstruction-case-could-rest-on-two-simple-questions?mbid=social_facebook)

[Allegiance]

Over the course of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, Mike Pence has perfected a disappearing act that is almost incomprehensible in its precision.

The vice president has said he did not know about Michael Flynn’s foreign lobbying or his conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. He had no comment when Flynn pleaded guilty to lying—to him, among others—about these conversations. And his office has repeatedly noted that, at crucial points in the Russia timeline, Pence was back in Indiana serving soup to the homeless or attending his son’s wedding.

Despite his efforts to shield himself from the scandal, however, Mike Pence’s knowledge—or lack thereof—has emerged as a critical piece in Mueller’s Russia puzzle.

Who sought to obstruct justice by burying the full knowledge that Mike Flynn was a traitor to the United States? Trump? Pence? Trump AND Pence?

Mueller’s Obstruction Case Could Rest on Two Simple Questions | Vanity Fair (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/12/muellers-obstruction-case-could-rest-on-two-simple-questions?mbid=social_facebook)That's all you got today.


No more #metoo


Lol

[Ron_Ski]

Me thinks you are gasping at straws.

"...Pence was back in Indiana serving soup to the homeless or attending his son’s wedding..."

How prescient. He planned his sons wedding several months in advance kowing he would need that excuse to be out of DC.

[mellincf]

Me thinks you are gasping at straws.

"...Pence was back in Indiana serving soup to the homeless or attending his son’s wedding..."

How prescient. He planned his sons wedding several months in advance kowing he would need that excuse to be out of DC.

Pence was the man in charge of vetting people to work in Trump's administration.

There can be only one President at a time. Flynn was negotiating with the Russians BEFORE Trump was inaugurated, to undermine the sitting President.

In addition, Flynn was taking money from undisclosed foreign sources. Trump was warned about this six times. The Assistant Attorney General warned both Trump and Pence after the inauguration, but THEY STILL KEPT FLYNN ON, able to listen to our national security reports and our most secret intelligence information.

They fired the person who brought them the story, but they did not fire Flynn until after the newspapers broke the story. So, bottom line: obstruction of justice. Got it?

[Taltarzac725]

Pence was the man in charge of vetting people to work in Trump's administration.

There can be only one President at a time. Flynn was negotiating with the Russians BEFORE Trump was inaugurated, to undermine the sitting President.

In addition, Flynn was taking money from undisclosed foreign sources. Trump was warned about this six times. The Assistant Attorney General warned both Trump and Pence after the inauguration, but THEY STILL KEPT FLYNN ON, able to listen to our national security reports and our most secret intelligence information.

They fired the person who brought them the story, but they did not fire Flynn until after the newspapers broke the story. So, bottom line: obstruction of justice. Got it?

And what would the Republicans be saying if Hillary Clinton had done the same thing???

[Ron_Ski]

Just another "nothing burger".