Guest
05-10-2010, 07:46 AM
I've been trying to encourage everyone to seek as much information as possible--from both political sides--before forming opinions on important issues. It's hard, I know, because even the media sources have become almost as polarized as our politicans. Then there's the 24-hour news cycle and the huge reliance people have on the carefully-crafted soundbites from people attempting to be opinion makers.
But yesterday's edition of the New York Times had an extensive article on the MSNBC morning program, "The Morning Joe". The hosts are Joe Scarborough, former Republican Congressman from Florida and Mika Brzezinski, daughter of Zbigniew Brzezinski, foreign policy advisor to many Presidents. The article also described the format of the show, legitimate experts from both political ideologies, who are permitted to have long, uninterrupted discussions on issues of the day.
I guess I knew about Joe Scarborough and liked hm each time I saw him on TV--a thoughtful but strong-opinioned man capable of expressing his beliefs intelligently. I didn't know much about his co-host. I really didn't know the quality and experience of many of the "satellite" people around The Morning Joe table who participate in the daily discussions.
I watched it today and have concluded that the show is worthy of a recommendation. It's a whole lot better than watching the inane non-news of the Today Show, Regis & Kelly, or even any of the aggravatingly repetitive and shallow news channels like CNN. In a few minutes I got some very different perspectives on the pending nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, as an example.
Try "The Morning Joe" on MSNBC, I think you'll like it.
But yesterday's edition of the New York Times had an extensive article on the MSNBC morning program, "The Morning Joe". The hosts are Joe Scarborough, former Republican Congressman from Florida and Mika Brzezinski, daughter of Zbigniew Brzezinski, foreign policy advisor to many Presidents. The article also described the format of the show, legitimate experts from both political ideologies, who are permitted to have long, uninterrupted discussions on issues of the day.
I guess I knew about Joe Scarborough and liked hm each time I saw him on TV--a thoughtful but strong-opinioned man capable of expressing his beliefs intelligently. I didn't know much about his co-host. I really didn't know the quality and experience of many of the "satellite" people around The Morning Joe table who participate in the daily discussions.
I watched it today and have concluded that the show is worthy of a recommendation. It's a whole lot better than watching the inane non-news of the Today Show, Regis & Kelly, or even any of the aggravatingly repetitive and shallow news channels like CNN. In a few minutes I got some very different perspectives on the pending nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, as an example.
Try "The Morning Joe" on MSNBC, I think you'll like it.