Where is this trend headed?

[alwann]

Apartments planned in former restaurant. Katie Belle's upstairs might become apartments. Daily News reports:

Ryan McCabe, The Villages operations manager. “That sort of small-town, walk-to-everything convenience really appeals to some retirees; and, with the positive response we’ve had at Brownwood, we wanted to offer that same option to folks who love Spanish Springs.”

Oh, go ahead and make it an Airbnb and find some vacant space for RV hook-ups while you're at it. How about Section 8 housing? Good money it that too.

[Stu from NYC]

If they can make money at it they will keep doing it and nothing any of us can do to stop it apparently.

[Arctic Fox]

Apartments planned in former restaurant. Katie Belle's upstairs might become apartments.

I have plans in with the Architectural Review Committee to turn my attic into three apartments to rent out.

I'll let you know how things progress, but I don't foresee any problems.

I shall, of course, charge them all the full amenity fee, and may even pass some of it on.

[retiredguy123]

Apartments planned in former restaurant. Katie Belle's upstairs might become apartments. Daily News reports:

Ryan McCabe, The Villages operations manager. “That sort of small-town, walk-to-everything convenience really appeals to some retirees; and, with the positive response we’ve had at Brownwood, we wanted to offer that same option to folks who love Spanish Springs.”

Oh, go ahead and make it an Airbnb and find some vacant space for RV hook-ups while you're at it. How about Section 8 housing? Good money it that too.
I would welcome a "walk to everything" living option in The Villages. But, to me, an essential part of that would be a grocery store and drug store within a few steps. Crystal City in Washington, DC has condos where you can get on an elevator, and have access to grocery stores, drug stores, doctor's offices, restaurants, a movie theater, and many other things. I would consider a condo, townhouse, or apartment that had that kind of convenience. But, if I have to drive a half mile to Publix, I may as well drive 4 miles.

[Stu from NYC]

I would welcome a "walk to everything" living option in The Villages. But, to me, an essential part of that would be a grocery store and drug store within a few steps. Crystal City in Washington, DC has condos where you can get on an elevator, and have access to grocery stores, drug stores, doctor's offices, restaurants, a movie theater, and many other things. I would consider a condo, townhouse, or apartment that had that kind of convenience. But, if I have to drive a half mile to Publix, I may as well drive 4 miles.

Agreed and that is why this would have no appeal to us.

[charlieo1126@gmail.com]

I would welcome a "walk to everything" living option in The Villages. But, to me, an essential part of that would be a grocery store and drug store within a few steps. Crystal City in Washington, DC has condos where you can get on an elevator, and have access to grocery stores, drug stores, doctor's offices, restaurants, a movie theater, and many other things. I would consider a condo, townhouse, or apartment that had that kind of convenience. But, if I have to drive a half mile to Publix, I may as well drive 4 miles. maybe assisted living would be better option then apartments lol

[perrjojo]

I would love living above Katie Belle’s and listening to the Spanish Springs square 365 days and nights a year. My TV has a really loud volume.

[Stu from NYC]

maybe assisted living would be better option then apartments lol

But that would not work when there are only a few apartments that could be made in one location.

[Jayhawk]

If they have no appeal, they will sit vacant. If they do have appeal, they will be leased. No harm, no foul to anyone so no big deal. Other than from those who are just anti-developer and anything they propose.

Personally I think they will go fast.

[bargee]

Whats next.the Polo Field

[graciegirl]

If they can make money at it they will keep doing it and nothing any of us can do to stop it apparently.

That is an exaggeration of the facts.

The Villages. Inc. are very successful financially and people who have lived here for awhile dislike to hear unwarranted criticism of the developer.

[Jayhawk]

Whats next.the Polo Field

Where did you get this information? Surely you wouldn't post just to get a rise.

[tophcfa]

Unlike the large scale high density apartment complex planned at HH, I have no problem with the Katie Belles plan. Katie Belles is an existing building in a commercial area and converting the building to 10 apartment units will have no negative effect on existing single family residential homeowners. I doubt anyone going to Spanish Springs will notice any difference between an empty Katie Belles versus the same building with 10 apartment units. The Katie Belles conversion is in no way the "bait and switch" that is being pulled on the homeowners in the HH area. There is still the fact that the area already has bad traffic congestion and over utilized amenities, but 10 or so apartments won't make any noticeable difference. As I have stated in other threads, I don't have a problem with apartments, as long as they are put in the right place so they do not negatively effect single family homeowners who had no reasonable cause to think they would ever be plopped down in an inappropriate area.

[Jayhawk]

The Katie Belles conversion is in no way the "bait and switch" that is being pulled on the homeowners in the HH area.

You must be right. I'll bet 20-some years ago the developer said "Let's build a country club, let it draw cheap villagers who won't spend much money, run-it-down to a dump, then tear it down around 2020 to pull a fast one".

Bait and Switch. Good thinking.

:pray:

[tophcfa]

You must be right. I'll bet 20-some years ago the developer said "Let's build a country club, let it draw cheap villagers who won't spend much money, run-it-down to a dump, then tear it down around 2020 to pull a fast one".

Bait and Switch. Good thinking.

:pray:

////////

[graciegirl]

Unlike the large scale high density apartment complex planned at HH, I have no problem with the Katie Belles plan. Katie Belles is an existing building in a commercial area and converting the building to 10 apartment units will have no negative effect on existing single family residential homeowners. I doubt anyone going to Spanish Springs will notice any difference between an empty Katie Belles versus the same building with 10 apartment units. The Katie Belles conversion is in no way the "bait and switch" that is being pulled on the homeowners in the HH area. There is still the fact that the area already has bad traffic congestion and over utilized amenities, but 10 or so apartments won't make any noticeable difference. As I have stated in other threads, I don't have a problem with apartments, as long as they are put in the right place so they do not negatively effect single family homeowners who had no reasonable cause to think they would ever be plopped down in an inappropriate area.

I hope that this post proves to be wrong. So far apartments have not been tested in The Villages and I really can't see this as a "bait and switch" but rather the use of an area that had lost purpose due to a lot of real factors. I see the real factors as; the folks who rent the buildings made for restaurants fail to make a success of said restaurants and that may be that the restauranteurs are sub par or that the area is aging and don't go out to eat as much or that the building was SO noisy it wasn't pleasant even for people like me who can turn my device down to eat there.

I am hoping that the apartments are not going to cause problems in the same way people who live here generally do not cause problems with higher crime and lack of care of their surroundings. I hope that the parking lot is not crowded. The one on 466 never appears to be when we drive by the back on our way to Bob Evans. (When we did, not eating out now)

I hope that the people who rent the apartments will find a good fit to a less active lifestyle and a good place to eat at the restaurant. (I did read there would be a restaurant, didn't I?)

I hope I will not find anything to disagree with Tophcfa about in the future as it has been in the past. We usually saw eye to eye.

[Bucco]

I hope that this post proves to be wrong. So far apartments have not been tested in The Villages and I really can't see this as a "bait and switch" but rather the use of an area that had lost purpose due to a lot of real factors. I see the real factors as; the folks who rent the buildings made for restaurants fail to make a success of said restaurants and that may be that the restauranteurs are sub par or that the area is aging and don't go out to eat as much or that the building was SO noisy it wasn't pleasant even for people like me who can turn my device down to eat there.

I am hoping that the apartments are not going to cause problems in the same way people who live here generally do not cause problems with higher crime and lack of care of their surroundings. I hope that the parking lot is not crowded. The one on 466 never appears to be when we drive by the back on our way to Bob Evans. (When we did, not eating out now)

I hope that the people who rent the apartments will find a good fit to a less active lifestyle and a good place to eat at the restaurant. (I did read there would be a restaurant, didn't I?)

I hope I will not find anything to disagree with Tophcfa about in the future as it has been in the past. We usually saw eye to eye.

I do not understand why renters are questioned..character, law abiding, etc, and not homeowners.

Rentals are a viable and missing part of a comprehensive retirement community.

Why some homeowners speak "down" aboutthe concept. There are new Lofts renters I know that could buy and sell most homeowners, both financia, AND in the measurement of character.

[Stu from NYC]

That is an exaggeration of the facts.

The Villages. Inc. are very successful financially and people who have lived here for awhile dislike to hear unwarranted criticism of the developer.

Not meant as criticism of anyone.

The Morse family is in business to make money and nothing wrong with that. I own my own business and in a much more limited way tried different things.

It would appear to me they are investigating different ways to grow their business and will do what all successful business do, get proof of concept and move accordingly.

Feel free to disagree with anything I say but not going to stop putting out my thoughts.

[OrangeBlossomBaby]

I would welcome a "walk to everything" living option in The Villages. But, to me, an essential part of that would be a grocery store and drug store within a few steps. Crystal City in Washington, DC has condos where you can get on an elevator, and have access to grocery stores, drug stores, doctor's offices, restaurants, a movie theater, and many other things. I would consider a condo, townhouse, or apartment that had that kind of convenience. But, if I have to drive a half mile to Publix, I may as well drive 4 miles.

It's 2/10 of a mile. You can walk it.

[OrangeBlossomBaby]

Regarding the topic itself - apartments replacing Katie Belle's.

I see the cottages within the "corner" of Lake Sumter Landing town square to be a similar concept. I think it'd be awesome to be able to have these with long-term rentals with no sub-letting allowed, as a Villages corporate-owned property, and the tenants' rental including amenity fees built into the rent, which is then paid into the amenities fund.

The tenants would have to abide by the same rules as renters of homes all over the Villages - no more than 2 ID cards. Their property maintenance would be the corporation's responsibility, AND they wouldn't be allowed to alter the interior or exterior of the property other than removable furnishings, roll-up rugs, etc. The corporation could even put paintings up on the walls, and if the tenant wants their own, they can use them as long as they don't add new holes to the walls - they can use the existing frame hangers.

I personally would get a kick out of living in an apartment over a shop. I've done that in the past, and it felt comfy and safe. In my case there was no elevator, and it was a two-floor walkup, but I was younger then.

I could imagine the entrance to the apartments being retrofitted with a series of ramps zigzagging upward to the second floor in addition to a small elevator. And on that second floor would be perhaps just 4 or 5 apartments total - 2 of which would have a ramp leading to a bedroom loft, and the rest modest 1-bedroom flats.

The entire project could be made wheelchair accessible, which is something you don't really see much of in Villages homes. Low kitchen counters and cabinet spaces, no stairs to climb, wide hallways, and those funky bathtubs with doors on them or even wheel-in showers with low removable showerheads.

100% independent living flats and lofts for folks who need to be fairly close to the hospital, are still able to walk or wheel around with no human assistance needed, and don't want to be isolated from necessary shopping and "human contact."

[Madelaine Amee]

They are going to be over the top pricey units, probably pure luxury, but what a nice way to spend the last years of your life when you can no longer drive to everything, other than in a golf cart. As for noise, the music goes off and everything shuts down at 9:00pm.

You have a Publix and hospital within easy golf cart drive; movie theater, The Sharon, easy access to 441. pool at Hacienda, Panera coffee shop, the list just goes on and on.

It must by now be quite obvious that profit is in selling homes and renting apartments, the homes are one and done, but the apartments are continually producing income.

We came here when Katie Belles was the place to be in the evening and we had so much fun, dining, drinking and dancing. I was sorry to see it go, but it was no longer getting the use it once did and it needed work and updating. I went several times to the dinner theater, but never really appreciated it as we had Katie Belles, so I have no problem in seeing it become high income apartments.

If you are a student of marketing, the Morse family have mastered it, and the finished product is excdellent.

[Madelaine Amee]

The entire project could be made wheelchair accessible, which is something you don't really see much of in Villages homes. Low kitchen counters and cabinet spaces, no stairs to climb, wide hallways, and those funky bathtubs with doors on them or even wheel-in showers with low removable showerheads.

100% independent living flats and lofts for folks who need to be fairly close to the hospital, are still able to walk or wheel around with no human assistance needed, and don't want to be isolated from necessary shopping and "human contact."

Katie Belles is already wheelchair accessible, they have an elevator and always did.

[Dond1959]

What the OP neglects to include is as Paul Harvey would say, is the rest of the story. In the remainder of the article McCabe continues:

“Contrary to the rumors that the amenity privileges recently acted on by the Amenity Authority Committee are all intended for Hacienda Hills, we’re looking strategically at several locations that could serve Villages residents who want this apartment-style option”. “We are very sensitive to the way redevelopment can impact the character of an existing neighborhood, and we are working hard to ensure that any multi-family living options will seamlessly assimilate into the surrounding areas. Whatever we create will be a great fit for that particular location, very Villages-sequel in its look and feel, while. Resting an additional way for retirees to enjoy Florida’s Friendliest Hometown.“

So all those worrying about HH can take a deep breath and wait for the number of units and the design. It may be a lot better than the old dump they tore down that was losing money. This is the bigger news of the story.

[tophcfa]

I do not understand why renters are questioned..character, law abiding, etc, and not homeowners.

Rentals are a viable and missing part of a comprehensive retirement community.

Why some homeowners speak "down" aboutthe concept. There are new Lofts renters I know that could buy and sell most homeowners, both financia, AND in the measurement of character.

Hmmmm, I think you are missing the point and trying to put words in other peoples mouths. I have not read a single post saying anything bad about renters versus homeowners. The critical issue at hand is the location of the proposed high density Apartment complex and weather it is appropriate to locate it in a long standing single family residential neighborhood that already has traffic congestion and overused amenities. People who are familiar with zoning understand that one of the key criteria for re-zoning is that the proposed use will be in harmony with the existing neighborhood. It has absolutely nothing to do with the character of renters versus homeowners.

[tophcfa]

I hope that this post proves to be wrong. So far apartments have not been tested in The Villages and I really can't see this as a "bait and switch" but rather the use of an area that had lost purpose due to a lot of real factors. I see the real factors as; the folks who rent the buildings made for restaurants fail to make a success of said restaurants and that may be that the restauranteurs are sub par or that the area is aging and don't go out to eat as much or that the building was SO noisy it wasn't pleasant even for people like me who can turn my device down to eat there.

I am hoping that the apartments are not going to cause problems in the same way people who live here generally do not cause problems with higher crime and lack of care of their surroundings. I hope that the parking lot is not crowded. The one on 466 never appears to be when we drive by the back on our way to Bob Evans. (When we did, not eating out now)

I hope that the people who rent the apartments will find a good fit to a less active lifestyle and a good place to eat at the restaurant. (I did read there would be a restaurant, didn't I?)

I hope I will not find anything to disagree with Tophcfa about in the future as it has been in the past. We usually saw eye to eye.

Gracie, we used to agree on everything when we first bought our home in the Villages, which was coincidently about the time Gary Morse passed away. Back then I shared your almost unconditional trust in the developer. Over time, certain events have taken place that unfortunately have eroded my unconditional trust in the new generation of the family. Don't get me wrong, we absolutely LOVE the VILLAGES and the actions of the current generation of the Morse's has not ruined what Gary created (that is why we bought north of 466, we wanted to buy into the already built out and mature area that Gary built). I would be hard pressed to find anything we disagree on that does not involve the actions of the new generation of the family.

Stay safe and healthy my friend : )

[Marathon Man]

Something happens to some folks when the retire and get older. They begin to resent change. New ideas are seen as some kind of threat.

I think that the new generation is looking to keep our community evolving in ways that were never considered previously. Smaller gathering spots rather than a single large square. Luxury apartments close to restaurants and shopping. Get rid of what is not working, and replace it with something new. All great stuff.

[SIRE1]

I have a hard time understanding what is the big objection to having apartments in The Villages. First, we can't object to having non-permanent residents living and playing in our community because we probably already have a thousand homes that are being rented in The Villages today (and without any age or time restrictions). Second, we can't object to having living spaces close together because look at the existing row house units that are already around Spanish Springs and Glenview CC that are being enjoyed by their owners. Third, we can't object to having more people in The Villages who will support our local businesses and restaurants so they stay in business because The Villages is already building 100 new homes a month (I'm guessing on that amount). Fourth, we can't object to having large housing structures because look at all the assisted living facilities we have that are filled with residents who can still get out and enjoy The Villages lifestyle. So what is the concern about having apartments in our community? As a seasonal resident, I probably would have chosen that route instead of buying and maintaining the home that I bought. As long as The Villages continues to build recreation facilities that we all can use to go along with those apartments, I say great. After all, The Villages is no longer a small community like it was, but a town of 130,000 + people.

[graciegirl]

I would love living above Katie Belle’s and listening to the Spanish Springs square 365 days and nights a year. My TV has a really loud volume.


Nothing to worry about for those renters. Last call is at nine isn't it?

[OrangeBlossomBaby]

I have a hard time understanding what is the big objection to having apartments in The Villages. First, we can't object to having non-permanent residents living and playing in our community because we probably already have a thousand homes that are being rented in The Villages today (and without any age or time restrictions). Second, we can't object to having living spaces close together because look at the existing row house units that are already around Spanish Springs and Glenview CC that are being enjoyed by their owners. Third, we can't object to having more people in The Villages who will support our local businesses and restaurants so they stay in business because The Villages is already building 100 new homes a month (I'm guessing on that amount). Fourth, we can't object to having large housing structures because look at all the assisted living facilities we have that are filled with residents who can still get out and enjoy The Villages lifestyle. So what is the concern about having apartments in our community? As a seasonal resident, I probably would have chosen that route instead of buying and maintaining the home that I bought. As long as The Villages continues to build recreation facilities that we all can use to go along with those apartments, I say great. After all, The Villages is no longer a small community like it was, but a town of 130,000 + people.

In the Katie Belle situation, I can't think of anything to object about, as long as it is done on a small scale with long-term exclusive tenants (no sub-letting), and that amenity fees get paid PER UNIT rather than PER BUILDING.

In the situation of Hacienda CC, my concern is traffic. It's just way too close to the Paige Place roundabout and the hospital. In the summer time it's not bad, manageable. In the winter, traffic exiting to 441/27 from the roundabout can get really bad, and there are often accidents coming in FROM 441/27 TO that roundabout. Add another 300 units worth of traffic all condensed around a single building (or couple of buildings) spanning no more than the size of a single New York City block, and you have a nightmare.

[JoMar]

In the Katie Belle situation, I can't think of anything to object about, as long as it is done on a small scale with long-term exclusive tenants (no sub-letting), and that amenity fees get paid PER UNIT rather than PER BUILDING.

In the situation of Hacienda CC, my concern is traffic. It's just way too close to the Paige Place roundabout and the hospital. In the summer time it's not bad, manageable. In the winter, traffic exiting to 441/27 from the roundabout can get really bad, and there are often accidents coming in FROM 441/27 TO that roundabout. Add another 300 units worth of traffic all condensed around a single building (or couple of buildings) spanning no more than the size of a single New York City block, and you have a nightmare.

Maybe. You assume that everyone there will have a car and they will all be driving around at the same time. Of course all the business's on 441 have nothing to contribute to the traffic do they? Assume you don't want them to close but if they did all those folks south of 466 wouldn't be traveling up that way would they, and that would reduce traffic, right?

[OrangeBlossomBaby]

Nothing to worry about for those renters. Last call is at nine isn't it?

Er, not exactly, no.

Spanish Springs
City Fire = 11. Gator's Dockside = midnite. McCall's Tavern = 11. Ruby Tuesday closes at 10. World of Beer closes at 9. But it's the exception, not the rule.

Sumter Landing
R.J. Gator's = 9. Sonny's BBQ = 9 Chop House = 11 Cody's = 10. Lighthouse Point closes at 8. Redsauce = 9

Brownwood
Has Cody's, World of Beer, Gator's Dockside, City Fire, and Ricciardi's, which closes at 10.

The outside tiki bar kiosks, when they were open, closed at 9.

So - the squares are still noisy and populated into the late hours, even if the entertainment and tiki bars IN the square stops at 9. When I worked in a shop in Sumter Landing, I'd often get out at 9:30 and it was still pretty lively at the restaurants closest to the squares.

[OrangeBlossomBaby]

Maybe. You assume that everyone there will have a car and they will all be driving around at the same time. Of course all the business's on 441 have nothing to contribute to the traffic do they? Assume you don't want them to close but if they did all those folks south of 466 wouldn't be traveling up that way would they, and that would reduce traffic, right?

I'm not talking about the traffic ON rte 441/27. I'm talking about people living in the Villages entering and exiting that traffic circle. That includes golf carts - which can't go on 441/27 anyway. It's a pretty scary traffic circle when it's busy. Adding 300 units of apartments less than 2 blocks from that traffic circle means a LOT more traffic driving around that traffic circle, when it's busy.

[perrjojo]

Er, not exactly, no.

Spanish Springs
City Fire = 11. Gator's Dockside = midnite. McCall's Tavern = 11. Ruby Tuesday closes at 10. World of Beer closes at 9. But it's the exception, not the rule.

Sumter Landing
R.J. Gator's = 9. Sonny's BBQ = 9 Chop House = 11 Cody's = 10. Lighthouse Point closes at 8. Redsauce = 9

Brownwood
Has Cody's, World of Beer, Gator's Dockside, City Fire, and Ricciardi's, which closes at 10.

The outside tiki bar kiosks, when they were open, closed at 9.

So - the squares are still noisy and populated into the late hours, even if the entertainment and tiki bars IN the square stops at 9. When I worked in a shop in Sumter Landing, I'd often get out at 9:30 and it was still pretty lively at the restaurants closest to the squares.
Even if everything closes at nine I would still not want to hear the bands while I am trying to watch my favorite show on TV

[kcrazorbackfan]

That is an exaggeration of the facts.

The Villages. Inc. are very successful financially and people who have lived here for awhile dislike to hear unwarranted criticism of the developer.

GG, so true. I truly think the people that criticize The Developers are actually jealous of what they've built for all of us and continue to build for us and future generations.

[OrangeBlossomBaby]

Even if everything closes at nine I would still not want to hear the bands while I am trying to watch my favorite show on TV

Well then you definitely wouldn't want to rent an apartment there. Thankfully there are lots of other places to buy or rent in the Villages. Or you could buy some blue-tooth earbuds or a headset and watch your favorite show without any outside noise at all. Not even lawnmowers, or the garbage truck, or golf carts driving by, or a motorcycle revving up in the driveway next door. Or the lady singing off-key at full volume from her karaoke set-up in the driveway.

All these things can happen while you're watching your favorite TV show, no matter where you choose to live in the Villages.

[tophcfa]

In the Katie Belle situation, I can't think of anything to object about, as long as it is done on a small scale with long-term exclusive tenants (no sub-letting), and that amenity fees get paid PER UNIT rather than PER BUILDING.

In the situation of Hacienda CC, my concern is traffic. It's just way too close to the Paige Place roundabout and the hospital. In the summer time it's not bad, manageable. In the winter, traffic exiting to 441/27 from the roundabout can get really bad, and there are often accidents coming in FROM 441/27 TO that roundabout. Add another 300 units worth of traffic all condensed around a single building (or couple of buildings) spanning no more than the size of a single New York City block, and you have a nightmare.

I agree with the above post but would add that a high density apartment complex will put additional strain on already very overcrowded amenities. The particular amenities I am concerned about are the executive golf courses and sports pools north of 466. Getting a lane to swim laps in or a t-time at an executive golf course are already very difficult during the busy season, or for that matter just about anytime of the year. These amenities were built a long time ago and were not designed to be shared with high density living units. Although it does not effect us personally, I feel very bad for the residents who live in very close proximity to the proposed high density apartment complex. I suspect many of those residents would not have bought homes in that area had they known what was going to be in their future.

[FromNY]

Er, not exactly, no.

Spanish Springs
City Fire = 11. Gator's Dockside = midnite. McCall's Tavern = 11. Ruby Tuesday closes at 10. World of Beer closes at 9. But it's the exception, not the rule.

Sumter Landing
R.J. Gator's = 9. Sonny's BBQ = 9 Chop House = 11 Cody's = 10. Lighthouse Point closes at 8. Redsauce = 9

Brownwood
Has Cody's, World of Beer, Gator's Dockside, City Fire, and Ricciardi's, which closes at 10.

The outside tiki bar kiosks, when they were open, closed at 9.

So - the squares are still noisy and populated into the late hours, even if the entertainment and tiki bars IN the square stops at 9. When I worked in a shop in Sumter Landing, I'd often get out at 9:30 and it was still pretty lively at the restaurants closest to the squares.
No City Fire in Spanish Springs. And if you are renting in a Town Square you know there will be activity.

[kendi]

If they can make money at it they will keep doing it and nothing any of us can do to stop it apparently.

You expect them not to want to make money? That’s what businesses do, why would you want them to stop? As businesses go, I’m very impressed with the careful planning and quality of work they do.

[crash]

That is an exaggeration of the facts.

The Villages. Inc. are very successful financially and people who have lived here for awhile dislike to hear unwarranted criticism of the developer.

It comes down to density there is a reason that zones are established in a planned community. Homes 12 people per acre apartments 80 people If we believe that the 7 acres will hold 280 apartments.

If the developer stuck to the master plan people would not be complaining. If they build apartments in your neighborhood I am sure you would complain about that. I feel the way things are going there will be apartments on the polo died property someday, kind of defeats the idea of a master plan.

[billyb1950]

What a ridiculous proposal. What about 24/7 parking? Uncovered and unsecure? Parking is already at a premium there, especially in-season. Just a thought...maybe they'll consider eliminating the town square and building a garage there with a catwalk to the new apartments? :duck: Just sayin'...hey, the way things are going, nothing's off the table these days. :ohdear:

[NotFromAroundHere]

I'm not talking about the traffic ON rte 441/27. I'm talking about people living in the Villages entering and exiting that traffic circle. That includes golf carts - which can't go on 441/27 anyway. It's a pretty scary traffic circle when it's busy. Adding 300 units of apartments less than 2 blocks from that traffic circle means a LOT more traffic driving around that traffic circle, when it's busy.

It's about 1/2 mile. And according to the newspaper, maybe less than 300 units.

But your point is still valid. Traffic isn't great in that area, so adding more isn't ideal.

[Thetwisted2]

Apartments planned in former restaurant. Katie Belle's upstairs might become apartments. Daily News reports:

Ryan McCabe, The Villages operations manager. “That sort of small-town, walk-to-everything convenience really appeals to some retirees; and, with the positive response we’ve had at Brownwood, we wanted to offer that same option to folks who love Spanish Springs.”

Oh, go ahead and make it an Airbnb and find some vacant space for RV hook-ups while you're at it. How about Section 8 housing? Good money it that too.
Are the apartments going to have the same age restrictions as village home owners and will apartments have a yearly lease?

[LoriAnn]

It is about time! Younger retirees don’t want those awful dated vaulted ceilings and cheap floating cabinets they put in most of the homes. Downtown condo/apartment living that’s walkable to shops, restaurants and entertainment is a growing trend for new retirees. I hope this is just the beginning of downtown living development. I don’t think “the developers” are worried one bit about a portion of current residents grumbling about apartments. They recognize the growing trend of empty nesters moving toward more urban downtown living options. They’re just adapting and adding one more option.

[joeharing]

Good bye practice field.

[Madelaine Amee]

I have a hard time understanding what is the big objection to having apartments in The Villages. First, we can't object to having non-permanent residents living and playing in our community because we probably already have a thousand homes that are being rented in The Villages today (and without any age or time restrictions). Second, we can't object to having living spaces close together because look at the existing row house units that are already around Spanish Springs and Glenview CC that are being enjoyed by their owners. Third, we can't object to having more people in The Villages who will support our local businesses and restaurants so they stay in business because The Villages is already building 100 new homes a month (I'm guessing on that amount). Fourth, we can't object to having large housing structures because look at all the assisted living facilities we have that are filled with residents who can still get out and enjoy The Villages lifestyle. So what is the concern about having apartments in our community? As a seasonal resident, I probably would have chosen that route instead of buying and maintaining the home that I bought. As long as The Villages continues to build recreation facilities that we all can use to go along with those apartments, I say great. After all, The Villages is no longer a small community like it was, but a town of 130,000 + people.

Excellent post to which I would only add that we have been a rental community almost forever due to the number of snowbirds who RENT each year.

[daca55]

Sorry to hear about apartments at the old Katie Bells. I was hoping someone would take it over and a new Katie Bells would emerge. Guess those days are over. As someone said it appears everything is on the table. Who knows what’s next.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

Yup. The Villages is going to hell. That's why everyone is moving out and no one is moving in. :icon_wink::icon_wink::icon_wink::icon_wink:

[Villages Kahuna]

It’s now the fourth generation of The Morse family. They don’t embrace the same standards and there are lots more of them expecting to be enriched. The next step, although probably not imminent, is their sale of their ownership interests, probably to a private equity firm and then a few years later to a large public company or a REIT.

[bilcon]

Shhhhhh! Maybe they are going to tear down the entire Katie Bells block and build an apartment building. I thought 11 years ago, I was buying into a nice retirement community where one could go down to the squares and meet residents, enjoy the entertainment and not be wall to wall with people who don't live here. If I wanted that life style, I would have stayed in NY. Things are certainly changing, but not for the better. Be careful, you might get your Costco, right in the middle of your backyard. Only my humble opinion.

"I have never made a mistake in my life. I thought I did once, but I was wrong."

[theruizs]

We would prefer to see some condo options (own instead of rent). This is a retirement community. I can’t believe we are the only ones who would be interested in that. As we get older and maintaining the exterior and yard gets harder, a condo is looking better all the time. It would be too bad if we would have to move out of the TV to find something.

[Dgodin]

Unlike the large scale high density apartment complex planned at HH, I have no problem with the Katie Belles plan. Katie Belles is an existing building in a commercial area and converting the building to 10 apartment units will have no negative effect on existing single family residential homeowners. I doubt anyone going to Spanish Springs will notice any difference between an empty Katie Belles versus the same building with 10 apartment units. The Katie Belles conversion is in no way the "bait and switch" that is being pulled on the homeowners in the HH area. There is still the fact that the area already has bad traffic congestion and over utilized amenities, but 10 or so apartments won't make any noticeable difference. As I have stated in other threads, I don't have a problem with apartments, as long as they are put in the right place so they do not negatively effect single family homeowners who had no reasonable cause to think they would ever be plopped down in an inappropriate area.
I prefer they find someone to take over the space as a restaurant than add apartments.

[Sherry8bal]

Yeah and the article said they would be looking for more places for more apartments too, so watch out. If you have an open spot behind you or next to you, who knows? They'll be a high rise going in shortly if the apartments keep going up.

[tophcfa]

Yeah and the article said they would be looking for more places for more apartments too, so watch out. If you have an open spot behind you or next to you, who knows? They'll be a high rise going in shortly if the apartments keep going up.

Good point, and you really don’t need an open space next to you to have watch out! Until very recently there was no open space at Hacienda Hills. I think the real message is that if you live near any land owned by the developer you need to watch out.

[Madelaine Amee]

Good point, and you really don’t need an open space next to you to have watch out! Until very recently there was no open space at Hacienda Hills. I think the real message is that if you live near any land owned by the developer you need to watch out.

Well it did not take you too long to start spreading fear and panic amongst the population did it? Didn't you spread enough fear among the people living in the Hacienda CC area. :ohdear:

[Topspinmo]

I have plans in with the Architectural Review Committee to turn my attic into three apartments to rent out.

I'll let you know how things progress, but I don't foresee any problems.

I shall, of course, charge them all the full amenity fee, and may even pass some of it on.


So, you got Yes people on the committee Too?

[Topspinmo]

Sorry to hear about apartments at the old Katie Bells. I was hoping someone would take it over and a new Katie Bells would emerge. Guess those days are over. As someone said it appears everything is on the table. Who knows what’s next.


Bet there looking At Sumter Landing for apartments? Book store corner lot looking mighty good for 6 plus story apartments?

[tophcfa]

Well it did not take you too long to start spreading fear and panic amongst the population did it? Didn't you spread enough fear among the people living in the Hacienda CC area. :ohdear:

You'r talking to the wrong person, I did not spread any fear among the poor folks living in the Hacienda CC area? I whole heartedly sympathize for these people. I am not the one planning on building a high density apartment complex in their neighborhood.

[Barefoot]

.... The next step, although probably not imminent, is their sale of their ownership interests, probably to a private equity firm.:agree:

[JoMar]

Damn sky keeps falling :)

[Topspinmo]

Damn sky keeps falling :)


O it be all right at end of the year :icon_wink:

[doctorknow]

If they have no appeal, they will sit vacant. If they do have appeal, they will be leased. No harm, no foul to anyone so no big deal. Other than from those who are just anti-developer and anything they propose.

Personally I think they will go fast.

Hey I think making money is a good thing...keeps the local economy strong. Hoorah for the developer who has the ability and plans to do it. My issue is that apartments are "usually" for more of a transient population. Low income or working folks planning on moving or buying a house later. Why isn't the developer trying to sell condos instead. It would appeal to the older person who doesn't want the yard upkeep? Condos if priced right would still be an option for working class folks who work within the villages. Also condos also include a form of ownership or permanency to the resident which would give more of a sense of attachment to the villages community. A few apartments for the lower income workers in the villages may be fine but the trend is growing with more apartments being planned and built.
I have some concern... traffic is number one.

[tophcfa]

Hey I think making money is a good thing...keeps the local economy strong. Hoorah for the developer who has the ability and plans to do it. My issue is that apartments are "usually" for more of a transient population. Low income or working folks planning on moving or buying a house later. Why isn't the developer trying to sell condos instead. It would appeal to the older person who doesn't want the yard upkeep? Condos if priced right would still be an option for working class folks who work within the villages. Also condos also include a form of ownership or permanency to the resident which would give more of a sense of attachment to the villages community. A few apartments for the lower income workers in the villages may be fine but the trend is growing with more apartments being planned and built.
I have some concern... traffic is number one.

I have gone on record as not being in favor of apartments when they are put in an inappropriate place, like an already well established single family residential neighborhood with pre-existing traffic congestion and overused amenities. That being said, apartments are not a bad thing if they are put in the right place and don't negatively effect existing homeowners.

The apartments the developers are planning are not being built for transient people as you state. They have a one year minimum lease term and can not be sub-letted. They are also age restricted (at least as much as the rest of the Villages is) and would most likely attract older people, many who lost their spouses, who can no longer maintain a home and yard. Apartments are not bad, they just need to be located in new developments where they are designed to not conflict with single family residences and the amenities being built have the high density living in mind.

If you are really concerned about transient renters, you should be much more worried about people who live in their homes and rent out rooms to transient renters through AIRBNB.

[maryl]

You are taking the villages and trying to make it like a city no thanks

[Jayhawk]

My issue is that apartments are "usually" for more of a transient population. Low income or working folks planning on moving or buying a house later.

Like a smart poster wrote a day or so ago, most of the people renting at The Lofts could probably buy and sell most homeowners in The Villages. The 3 Bedroom apartments START at almost $3,200 per month, plus everything else (utilities, garages, etc). I don't think you need to worry about "low income working folks" but hey, if they can afford it, what's it to anyone?