PDA

View Full Version : County Budget, Firefighters, am I missing something


Papa_lecki
09-14-2023, 03:25 AM
Saw in local online news site - the county austerity measures. In a time where the cost of food is up 19%, we are not giving our firefighters a raise, we are reducing training and reducing staffing on trucks?

And before anyone complains that a 8.7 COLA increase is too much, what was last year’s social security COLA increase? 8.7%, I think.

I don’t recall anything handled as poorly as this AMR ambulance transition.


“To save jobs, Hanson said firefighters have agreed to forego an 8.7 percent cost-of-living increase for county employees as well as some training stipends.

The fire chief also said he will reduce staffing to two or three firefighters per vehicle, down from three or four.”

cjrjck
09-14-2023, 04:54 AM
From what I can tell, many Sumter County homeowners were concerned that the proposed fire assessment fee would have risen from $124 per year to about $323. Also, it looks like Sumter County is planning to create a dependent fire district for the Villages Public Safety Department (VPSD). A dependent district would offer the VPSD greater control over its finances while remaining under county authority. The rest of Sumter County is served by a separate Sumter County Fire Department.

kansasr
09-14-2023, 05:55 AM
We all balked when it was finally revealed what it would actually cost to get the fire and ambulance services we asked for. Home owners didn’t like the 100% increase in our fire fee and business were up in arms about the huge increases proposed for basing their fee upon their size.

So we are back to paying for our fire & ambulance under the old system of a set fee per property and money from our ad volarem taxes. And there isn’t enough to pay for all we wanted.

Welcome to the real world of The Villages where there is a cost associated with all that we enjoy and maintaining these services is only going to keep getting more and more expensive.

We have a choice. We can pay for it, or not.

golfing eagles
09-14-2023, 06:00 AM
We all balked when it was finally revealed what it would actually cost to get the fire and ambulance services we asked for. Home owners didn’t like the 100% increase in our fire fee and business were up in arms about the huge increases proposed for basing their fee upon their size.

So we are back to paying for our fire & ambulance under the old system of a set fee per property and money from our ad volarem taxes. And there isn’t enough to pay for all we wanted.

Welcome to the real world of The Villages where there is a cost associated with all that we enjoy and maintaining these services is only going to keep getting more and more expensive.

We have a choice. We can pay for it, or not.

Maybe the next time the independent fire district is on the ballot, people will learn the facts rather than succumb to anti-developer hype.

Bill14564
09-14-2023, 06:02 AM
The Villagers demanded improved ambulance response which required increased staffing. They got what they asked for.

The Villagers argued against an independent district with a stable funding stream. They got what they asked for.

Many in Sumter County (Villagers included) argued against increasing the fire protection fee to fund the fire departments. They got what they asked for.

But that puts us where we are today: the fire departments have to figure out how to do more with less.

Going without a pay raise will hurt. Seeing your co-workers let go because of funding cuts would hurt too. Lesser of two evils I guess.

golfing eagles
09-14-2023, 06:05 AM
The Villagers demanded improved ambulance response which required increased staffing. They got what they asked for.

The Villagers argued against an independent district with a stable funding stream. They got what they asked for.

Many in Sumter County (Villagers included) argued against increasing the fire protection fee to fund the fire departments. They got what they asked for.

But that puts us where we are today: the fire departments have to figure out how to do more with less.

Going without a pay raise will hurt. Seeing your co-workers let go because of funding cuts would hurt too. Lesser of two evils I guess.

But you forgot one key ingredient: Many did not understand or bother to find out what "they" were asking (and voting) for.

Altavia
09-14-2023, 06:26 AM
So at this point, who would be ok with a $0.50 a day tax increase to support our firefighters while this is getting sorted out?

(Probably gross over simplification...)

bruce213
09-14-2023, 07:59 AM
So people are bucking over $16.00/Month ($0.50/day) to have top quality Fire and EMS services. But we'll quickly run down to a country club order appetizers and a couple beers (around $16.00) to discuss it. Penny wise, pound foolish.

JGibson
09-14-2023, 08:00 AM
I think the pandemic made AMR look worst than they really were. So folks had a knee jerk reaction not keeping in mind we were in the middle of a pandemic hence the slower response times.

After the pandemic calmed down response times got better but of course this whole VSPD vote was already on the table.

Now you lost AMR all together and will have slower response times with less staff.

Great job by the neurotic super paranoid we have to do something immediately crowd.

C4Boston
09-14-2023, 08:17 AM
Saw in local online news site - the county austerity measures. In a time where the cost of food is up 19%, we are not giving our firefighters a raise, we are reducing training and reducing staffing on trucks?

And before anyone complains that a 8.7 COLA increase is too much, what was last year’s social security COLA increase? 8.7%, I think.

I don’t recall anything handled as poorly as this AMR ambulance transition.


“To save jobs, Hanson said firefighters have agreed to forego an 8.7 percent cost-of-living increase for county employees as well as some training stipends.

The fire chief also said he will reduce staffing to two or three firefighters per vehicle, down from three or four.”

Not privy to all the details but from what I have read there seems to be acres of room for negotiations. Appears both sides have dug in their heels and said you need to choose this or that.

mtdjed
09-14-2023, 09:02 AM
Saw in local online news site - the county austerity measures. In a time where the cost of food is up 19%, we are not giving our firefighters a raise, we are reducing training and reducing staffing on trucks?

And before anyone complains that a 8.7 COLA increase is too much, what was last year’s social security COLA increase? 8.7%, I think.

I don’t recall anything handled as poorly as this AMR ambulance transition.


“To save jobs, Hanson said firefighters have agreed to forego an 8.7 percent cost-of-living increase for county employees as well as some training stipends.

The fire chief also said he will reduce staffing to two or three firefighters per vehicle, down from three or four.”

To put things in perspective, I have seen articles that refute the severity of the above as follows.
"All these adjustments have been made to save the jobs," Hanson said.
The fire chief said they will not make staff cuts, but they will have to cut current job openings and future growth, as well as reduce operations including in rural areas and The Villages.
"Some of those services may take a little bit more time to get too, or maybe less people go to those types of calls," Hanson said.

I have not seen the agreement that Firefighters have given up a raise of 8.7%. However, I can confirm that their two-year agreement with the county does have an article 45.1 which states that there would be a COLA based upon 2023 Indices.

Reference to the 8.7% Social Security raise that most of us got for CY 2023 is correct, but do not plan on that for 2024. Rate not established yet, but some estimates say 3.2% and that is only against a much smaller base equaling ~ $750/year.

Think of all the retired folks living on a pension and SS. Some have not seen any increase in 20 years.

Labor contracts are something that every party has interests in. In this case, taxpayers, County Commissioners and Firefighters. Sometimes everyone must be apart of the solution. Note the attached agreement. Firefighters are not limited to COLA. There are promotions and incentives also available.


https://www.sumtercountyfl.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/20968?fileID=51421

Stu from NYC
09-14-2023, 10:42 AM
Maybe the next time the independent fire district is on the ballot, people will learn the facts rather than succumb to anti-developer hype.

True, but business here should be paying a lot more than they are currently paying for fire protection. All I have ever heard was that a huge percentage fee was proposed but never saw a dollar amount attached to that.

Expect a $ 200 yearly increase for fire and ambulance and am ok with it but all parties covered should be paying for it.

Bill14564
09-14-2023, 11:20 AM
True, but business here should be paying a lot more than they are currently paying for fire protection. All I have ever heard was that a huge percentage fee was proposed but never saw a dollar amount attached to that.

Expect a $ 200 yearly increase for fire and ambulance and am ok with it but all parties covered should be paying for it.

You would have to look at the tax bill to see what the increase was for a business. Some would have been small(ish) and others not so small.

A $500 fire fee for everyone would have come close to collecting the same money. However, with all the citizens that complained about a $200 increase, is there any reason to believe a $375 increase will be palatable?

Altavia
09-14-2023, 11:37 AM
You would have to look at the tax bill to see what the increase was for a business. Some would have been small(ish) and others not so small.

A $500 fire fee for everyone would have come close to collecting the same money. However, with all the citizens that complained about a $200 increase, is there any reason to believe a $375 increase will be palatable?

I thought the incremental increase was more like $124?

But in any case, the ambulance service near me is vastly improved since the change and well worth an extra dollar day.

Altavia
09-14-2023, 11:44 AM
Duplicate post deleted...

Stu from NYC
09-14-2023, 11:48 AM
You would have to look at the tax bill to see what the increase was for a business. Some would have been small(ish) and others not so small.

A $500 fire fee for everyone would have come close to collecting the same money. However, with all the citizens that complained about a $200 increase, is there any reason to believe a $375 increase will be palatable?

The Sun manipulated everything by only referencing the increases for business on percentage terms without giving actual numbers and than finding people who kept saying they would be forced to move if fire protection went up by 200.

Bill14564
09-14-2023, 11:48 AM
I thought the incremental increase was more like $124?

But in any case, the ambulance service near me is vastly improved since the change and well worth an extra dollar day.

The previous/current fee is $124. This will probably be increased to $125. This fee was assessed to rooftops or sometimes consolidated properties. The lofts at Brownwood may have been assessed $620 for five buildings or possibly only $124 for one property. I believe Grand Traverse plaza also was assessed $124 total.

The new fee would have increased from $124 to $323.63 for residential properties but also had a new structure for commercial properties. Some, like apartment buildings, would have been assessed $323.63 per apartment while others would be assessed some amount (I don't remember exactly what) per square foot. Both the lofts and Grand Traverse plaza would have paid significantly more under this structure.

But none of that matters now. The fee will likely be $125 for you, me, the plaza, and the lofts.

Altavia
09-14-2023, 01:29 PM
The previous/current fee is $124. This will probably be increased to $125. This fee was assessed to rooftops or sometimes consolidated properties. The lofts at Brownwood may have been assessed $620 for five buildings or possibly only $124 for one property. I believe Grand Traverse plaza also was assessed $124 total.

The new fee would have increased from $124 to $323.63 for residential properties but also had a new structure for commercial properties. Some, like apartment buildings, would have been assessed $323.63 per apartment while others would be assessed some amount (I don't remember exactly what) per square foot. Both the lofts and Grand Traverse plaza would have paid significantly more under this structure.

But none of that matters now. The fee will likely be $125 for you, me, the plaza, and the lofts.

Thanks!

Complex situation, will be interesting to see how this turns out.

Papa_lecki
09-14-2023, 01:36 PM
The previous/current fee is $124. This will probably be increased to $125. This fee was assessed to rooftops or sometimes consolidated properties. The lofts at Brownwood may have been assessed $620 for five buildings or possibly only $124 for one property. I believe Grand Traverse plaza also was assessed $124 total.

The new fee would have increased from $124 to $323.63 for residential properties but also had a new structure for commercial properties. Some, like apartment buildings, would have been assessed $323.63 per apartment while others would be assessed some amount (I don't remember exactly what) per square foot. Both the lofts and Grand Traverse plaza would have paid significantly more under this structure.

But none of that matters now. The fee will likely be $125 for you, me, the plaza, and the lofts.

Dont the lofts and grand traverse plaza also pay into the “fire fund” via their county taxes, based on assessed value - so they are paying much more than $124 each.

Papa_lecki
09-14-2023, 01:38 PM
The Sun manipulated everything by only referencing the increases for business on percentage terms without giving actual numbers and than finding people who kept saying they would be forced to move if fire protection went up by 200.

The sun also didn’t talk about the resident who passed away because the ambulance took 45 minutes to arrive.

How many people can’t afford another $200 a year?

Bill14564
09-14-2023, 01:48 PM
Dont the lofts and grand traverse plaza also pay into the “fire fund” via their county taxes, based on assessed value - so they are paying much more than $124 each.

And so are you and I. They and we would still be paying through property taxes if the new fees had been put in place.

What is being discussed is the only thing that was proposed to be changed and that was the new fee structure.

Stu from NYC
09-14-2023, 03:26 PM
The sun also didn’t talk about the resident who passed away because the ambulance took 45 minutes to arrive.

How many people can’t afford another $200 a year?

Very true. They only print what they are told to print.

Bilyclub
09-14-2023, 07:58 PM
But you forgot one key ingredient: Many did not understand or bother to find out what "they" were asking (and voting) for.

Since we're going down that road. Sumter County officials would not comment before the vote on whether or not residents inside the proposed TVFD independent fire district would also continue paying for the SCFD. As it turns out that is what is exactly going to continue to happen. 80% of the taxpayers are paying for the other 20%.

Bill14564
09-14-2023, 08:41 PM
///

vbsheriff
09-14-2023, 08:56 PM
Since purchasing our first home in the Villages in 2007 I have attempted to do far more reading on this site than posting. By way of background, I retired after 35 years in law enforcement. The last ten years I served as the elected Sheriff of Virginia Beach Virginia, a community of a half million people. In addition, I served a four-year term on the Virginia Beach City Council, a two-year term on the Virginia Beach School Board, a ten-year term as Chairman and member of the Virginia Lottery Board, and eight years on a city board managing a several hundred-million-dollar deferred compensation plan. My expertise in governmental finance allowed me to teach governmental budgeting throughout the State of Virginia.

My first-hand observations have led me to believe that the vast majority of elected County Commissioners / City Council members do not have the fiscal acumen to fully understand the nuances of the local budget for which they are responsible. This leaves the power of the purse with the County / City Administrators and their staff. Typically, when staff faces push back against their recommendations they will respond with a “poison pill”. The “poison pill” usually starts with a service cut so draconian that it elicits pressure on the elected officials to accept the staff position.

I fully accept that I do not know if the above general observations apply to Sumter County specifically. I have been derelict in keeping up with our local officials and their positions. This is not intended to call into question their expertise or motives.
I would offer some alternatives based on my belief that tax dollars should be kept at a minimum to provide for the greater good of the majority of citizens and a greater reliance should be placed on user fees.

In example – if an irresponsible drunk driver causes a traffic crash the law-abiding community as a whole should not bear the cost of the emergency response of police, fire and rescue. That is why I proposed and enacted the “Emergency Response Cost Recovery” law while in Virginia Beach. That law imposes a civil penalty for the cost of such response which is in addition to any criminal fines and fees imposed.

The greatest potential for tax savings comes from the annual budget itself. If you have ever worked under a local, state, or federal governmental budget you know how inefficient it can be. Governmental budget managers and employees have learned long ago if they don’t spend all the appropriated funds this fiscal year, they won’t get that money back next fiscal year. This leads to wasteful and unnecessary expenditures.

While on the City Council, I proposed and enacted an employee “Gainsharing” plan. This plan started with implementing a performance-based budget to ensure services were provided in an effective and timely manner. The employees were then encouraged to complete their tasks in the most efficient and effective way possible. The reward for this modified behavior came at the end of the fiscal year when they received a bonus of a portion of every dollar saved. In today's work environment I would change the bonus plan to a secondary retirement plan with a vesting timeline to encourage retention.

Finally, as an EMT for our SWAT team I know firsthand the importance of the “Platinum Ten Minutes”. Getting a patient to the hospital as quickly and safely as possible greatly increases their survival rates. Our community is no longer “Mayberry”. We are a substantial and growing community that needs to implement modern technology to better serve our citizens. One such technology uses a traffic signal preemptor system to allow emergency vehicles to turn their upcoming signal to green for safer, quicker passage for them and reduces collisions with routine traffic. These systems began nearly thirty years age and are becoming more and more economical.

Whether we agree with all our elected officials and staff members on all issues I believe we owe them our gratitude for providing a service that allows us to live in a great community.

Good luck as I go back into hibernation.

cjrjck
09-14-2023, 11:52 PM
How many people can’t afford another $200 a year?

We often forget that not everyone in Sumter County lives inside a literal bubble. I have been told that many people are struggling to make ends meet.

Romad
09-15-2023, 04:45 AM
Lost in the discussion is total revenue. Sumter County revenue will increase by over $6 million without any tax increases or fire assessments.

They are trying to segment discussion about one part of the budget instead of it in entirety. The BOCC should be explaining why a $6 million a year increase isn’t enough.

Stu from NYC
09-15-2023, 04:50 AM
We often forget that not everyone in Sumter County lives inside a literal bubble. I have been told that many people are struggling to make ends meet.

True bit if we want better ambulance service we have to pay for it.

Bill14564
09-15-2023, 05:21 AM
Lost in the discussion is total revenue. Sumter County revenue will increase by over $6 million without any tax increases or fire assessments.

They are trying to segment discussion about one part of the budget instead of it in entirety. The BOCC should be explaining why a $6 million a year increase isn’t enough.

Total revenue for the general fund is projected to DECREASE by $5.5M with the defeat of the restructured fee.

Property tax revenue is projected to increase by $6M and fire assessments are projected to increase by $480K but these are offset by decreases elsewhere.

Fire service transfers decrease as well: $38M transferred in 2022-23 but only $35M budgeted for this year.

huge-pigeons
09-15-2023, 06:07 AM
All of your info is wrong about these increases. Every villager would be happy to pay the $130 increase for firefighters/emu’s. The problems were that they were going to gouge every retailer here by many thousands of $$$ per year, which would have increased the cost of doing business here by quite a bit. From what I heard, a company like Galaxy would have their tax increase go from $1000 (+ or -) a year to over $12,000 a year. This was the area that people most complained about when it was dropped. We all pay the village tax if we use a company that operates in the villages, this new fee would have just made that tax go up for every villager.

JGibson
09-15-2023, 06:33 AM
True bit if we want better ambulance service we have to pay for it.

Who is "we" the older folks in TV that have one foot in the grave?

There's plenty of younger folks in Sumter who are struggling and faster ambulance service is not their highest priority.

Happydaz
09-15-2023, 06:35 AM
All of your info is wrong about these increases. Every villager would be happy to pay the $130 increase for firefighters/emu’s. The problems were that they were going to gouge every retailer here by many thousands of $$$ per year, which would have increased the cost of doing business here by quite a bit. From what I heard, a company like Galaxy would have their tax increase go from $1000 (+ or -) a year to over $12,000 a year. This was the area that people most complained about when it was dropped. We all pay the village tax if we use a company that operates in the villages, this new fee would have just made that tax go up for every villager.

Most counties charge a fire fee to businesses based on square footage. Lake County charges by the square foot. Look up their charges. Look up all the other metropolitan areas in Florida and you will see businesses all pay much more than they do here in Sumter County. They either charge fire impact fees and/or fire assessment fees on businesses. based on square footage. I don’t know why people post alarmist statements about “overcharging” businesses when Sumter County has a ridiculous system that favors business over residents. Look it up. $124 per rooftop and no fire impact fees for businesses is one of the lowest in Florida!

Bill14564
09-15-2023, 06:40 AM
All of your info is wrong about these increases. Every villager would be happy to pay the $130 increase for firefighters/emu’s. The problems were that they were going to gouge every retailer here by many thousands of $$$ per year, which would have increased the cost of doing business here by quite a bit. From what I heard, a company like Galaxy would have their tax increase go from $1000 (+ or -) a year to over $12,000 a year. This was the area that people most complained about when it was dropped. We all pay the village tax if we use a company that operates in the villages, this new fee would have just made that tax go up for every villager.

No, I'm pretty sure my information about these increases is absolutely correct as it came from budget documents, Benesch study documents, and Sumter County tax documents.

The impact to businesses is a complicated issue. Absolutely, the $124 assessment to a commercial rooftop or commercial property would have increased dramatically. But, what is the actual cost to providing fire protection service to the property and who would actually pay it?

Is $124 reasonable for the entirety of the lofts at Brownwood or Grand Traverse plaza? Try thinking about it this way. Let's say $124 is reasonable for my house, my neighbor's house, and the eight other houses on my cul-de-sac. Each of us receives the same services, those services have a cost, and so we each pay $124 (for a total of $1,240 for the street). Now imagine I win the lottery and decide I don't want any neighbors so I purchase all their homes. Further, I don't like the idea of receiving separate tax bills so I legally merge all those properties into one. Now I have a single property with ten rooftops - my own little compound. The fire assessment for that property would now be $124 total. Even though the ten homes still exist and even though they require the same fire protection services the fee is reduced because they are now a single property. That's legal, but is it reasonable?

The Benesch study attempted to calculate fire protection costs and come up with a fee structure that allocated those costs based on utilization. It attempted to fairly allocate the real costs rather than simply charge each property $124 regardless of the fire protection needs. Businesses didn't like the outcome of the study but I didn't read much (any?) criticism of the methodology of the study. Perhaps the study was correct and businesses have been getting a great deal for a long time.

Who would pay for the increased fees on businesses? That depends. If a business owned its land and property then the increases would fall on business profit and could be passed to the customers. There would be a tradeoff that would take into consideration how much profit the business needed to survive and how much cost the customer would be willing to pay. It might be that some businesses simply would not be able to afford the fees and would close. Others would pass the costs to customers who would then stop patronizing that business. It could get ugly.

Inside the Villages there is the same story but with a catch. Inside the Villages there is a landlord. We know prices inside the Villages are higher than outside for most things. We have heard that rents inside the Villages are high though we've been told the rents must not be excessive since businesses keep paying them. But now not only is there the business' profit that could be used to pay the increased fee there is also the landlord's profit. If fees were increased and business' profit decreased or the cost was passed to customers who stopped coming then some storefronts would become vacant. The landlord (the Villages) may determine that they should lower rents rather than see their rent income go to zero. In other words, the "Village tax" may decrease in order to keep businesses in the Villages.

But none of this matters now. The IFD was defeated and a fee restructuring was defeated. Next up - a dependent fire district with taxing authority.

Ptmcbriz
09-15-2023, 06:54 AM
Instead of voting an increase in service standards at around an extra $40 a month per residence, they voted it down and we no longer get the increase in firefighters need for the expand villages down south, and they are closing 3 fire stations and got rid of one whole hazmat department. Way to go! Cut off the nose despite the face. You want top notch services when your house is on fire, or you have a medical emergency but don’t want to pay for it. Geeeeze….

GATORBILL66
09-15-2023, 08:07 AM
I told people that we needed to be independent when it was on the ballot last year, but no, you people voted it down. Now we are all going to have to pay dearly!

Stu from NYC
09-15-2023, 08:32 AM
I told people that we needed to be independent when it was on the ballot last year, but no, you people voted it down. Now we are all going to have to pay dearly!

I think it was presented poorly and folks misunderstood situation. Hopefully this can be fixed

Papa_lecki
09-15-2023, 08:47 AM
I think it was presented poorly and folks misunderstood situation. Hopefully this can be fixed

I forget the timing of when the decision to leave AMR was made or considered. I do know AMR pre dates my time in the Villages.
How was fire and ambulance operated and paid for pre AMR? Was service acceptable? I wold guess the move to AMR was primarily to save money for the taxpayers. Did taxes go down - my guess NO.

Bill14564
09-15-2023, 09:32 AM
I forget the timing of when the decision to leave AMR was made or considered. I do know AMR pre dates my time in the Villages.
How was fire and ambulance operated and paid for pre AMR? Was service acceptable? I wold guess the move to AMR was primarily to save money for the taxpayers. Did taxes go down - my guess NO.

The decision to leave AMR was made around September 2021, prior to the IFD proposal. The decision was made because of perceived poor performance (long wait times) by AMR. The fire department was arriving on scene 15-20 minutes sooner than AMR. The solution, put EMS at the fire stations since they have good response times.

There was the accusation that AMR was costing the taxpayers a lot of money for mediocre service but I don't know that I ever saw any numbers on that. There was never a calculation that I saw for how much FD-based ambulance service would cost or what the budget difference would be.

So the BoCC voted to end AMR and allow VPSD and SCFD (renamed to SCFEMS) to provide ambulance service.

Fire service has been paid for by the $124 fee plus property taxes for at least the last five years. I heard somewhere that the $124 fee had not been changed since 2017 but I wasn't here at that time to see it. You could look at old Sumter County budget documents to see how much was spent on fire protection in previous years. I know the request this year was for significantly more than last year.

Justputt
09-15-2023, 09:47 AM
A couple hundred bucks spread over the year seems pretty trivial considering where we live and what we paid/pay to live in TV. IMO, EMS is worth it! Think about the state people are in when they arrive at an MVA or fire, sometimes stomach turning. So, skip a few nights out to dinner each year for those that come to aid us at our worst of times......

golfing eagles
09-15-2023, 10:09 AM
Who is "we" the older folks in TV that have one foot in the grave?

There's plenty of younger folks in Sumter who are struggling and faster ambulance service is not their highest priority.

Sure. Because people in their 40's and even 30's don't have cardiac arrests. Because 20 somethings don't get in serious car accidents. Because the only senior citizens in Sumter Co. live in TV. And those of us who live in TV have "one foot in the grave".

Nice post, not.:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Lancer
09-15-2023, 10:45 AM
Where is Don when you need him

golfing eagles
09-15-2023, 10:56 AM
Where is Don when you need him

Probably exercising good judgement by staying above the fray

kansasr
09-15-2023, 11:29 AM
Where is Don when you need him

He has already weighed in (and very well, I might add) on a previous thread.

Bilyclub
09-15-2023, 12:29 PM
I told people that we needed to be independent when it was on the ballot last year, but no, you people voted it down. Now we are all going to have to pay dearly!


Independent as in paying what the govenor's/developer's appointees wanted to tax us for TVFD. We were also going to be paying for the SCFD just like we were and still are. The powers that be are too afraid of the backlash of making the 20% of Sumter County residents outside TV pay for the SCFD.

Stu from NYC
09-15-2023, 12:32 PM
The decision to leave AMR was made around September 2021, prior to the IFD proposal. The decision was made because of perceived poor performance (long wait times) by AMR. The fire department was arriving on scene 15-20 minutes sooner than AMR. The solution, put EMS at the fire stations since they have good response times.

There was the accusation that AMR was costing the taxpayers a lot of money for mediocre service but I don't know that I ever saw any numbers on that. There was never a calculation that I saw for how much FD-based ambulance service would cost or what the budget difference would be.

So the BoCC voted to end AMR and allow VPSD and SCFD (renamed to SCFEMS) to provide ambulance service.

Fire service has been paid for by the $124 fee plus property taxes for at least the last five years. I heard somewhere that the $124 fee had not been changed since 2017 but I wasn't here at that time to see it. You could look at old Sumter County budget documents to see how much was spent on fire protection in previous years. I know the request this year was for significantly more than last year.

The other question papa asked was why did the villages go to AMR in the first place? That happened before our time here and we have no idea but it is an interesting question.

Bill14564
09-15-2023, 12:39 PM
Independent as in paying what the govenor's/developer's appointees wanted to tax us for TVFD. We were also going to be paying for the SCFD just like we were and still are. The powers that be are too afraid of the backlash of making the 20% of Sumter County residents outside TV pay for the SCFD.

Independent as in knowing what the VPSD taxes would be, not reliant on Sumter County for VPSD funding, not impacted by Sumter County budget shortfalls, and not in jeopardy of having the VPSD dissolved and its resources allocated to the SCFEMS. Whereas today we don't know what the taxes will be, we are waiting to find out what funding Sumter County will provide, it WILL be less than we need because of their shortfall, and there is still the possibility that the VPSD and SCFEMS will be merged into one.

What Sumter County would have done with the budget was unknown then, just as it is unknown today. We're now two weeks away from knowing what the 2023-24 budget will finally look like, at the time of the vote we were 11 months away from having any firm information. However, the information we did have was that the SCFEMS expenses had been removed from the projected 2023-24 budget - not a guarantee but a clear step in the direction of Villagers NOT paying for that service.

Bill14564
09-15-2023, 12:53 PM
The other question papa asked was why did the villages go to AMR in the first place? That happened before our time here and we have no idea but it is an interesting question.

Before my time too. Sumter County seems to privatize as much as possible. It appears that in 2010 or 2011 the County Administrator chose to privatize ambulance service. Rural Metro was chosen and later purchased by AMR.

I found an article on the local-news-site-that-shall-not-be-named. Try searching for "rural metro" or some part of this: 2021/05/01/for-profit-ambulance-service-keeping-villagers-waiting-for-up-to-an-hour/

Stu from NYC
09-15-2023, 02:05 PM
Before my time too. Sumter County seems to privatize as much as possible. It appears that in 2010 or 2011 the County Administrator chose to privatize ambulance service. Rural Metro was chosen and later purchased by AMR.

I found an article on the local-news-site-that-shall-not-be-named. Try searching for "rural metro" or some part of this: 2021/05/01/for-profit-ambulance-service-keeping-villagers-waiting-for-up-to-an-hour/

Given the poor response time for AMR think the right thing was done in dumping them. We will be paying more but as long as the service does it job efficiently, no complaints from me.

Bilyclub
09-15-2023, 07:34 PM
What Sumter County would have done with the budget was unknown then, just as it is unknown today. We're now two weeks away from knowing what the 2023-24 budget will finally look like, at the time of the vote we were 11 months away from having any firm information. However, the information we did have was that the SCFEMS expenses had been removed from the projected 2023-24 budget - not a guarantee but a clear step in the direction of Villagers NOT paying for that service.

But yet they would not comment or codify that TV residents would not be paying for SCFD. To me that meant they were leaving all options open.

Goldwingnut
09-15-2023, 09:35 PM
But yet they would not comment or codify that TV residents would not be paying for SCFD. To me that meant they were leaving all options open.

Prior to my election to the board the decision was made not to get involved but to let the District government sell it. When certain organizations/individuals started propagating false information (intentionally?) I made the recommendation at a county workshop that the county should put out a statement to counter the false information and that by being silent would be taken as validating the misinformation. My recommendation was quickly shot down and it was restated that the board had taken the position to not get involved.

To me, it appeared that there were additional agendas at play in the process.

While the budget process is a very complex one with many moving parts and multiple laws and regulations affecting it there were a few simple factors that could have been addressed. Move the FD cost out of the budget, costs go down and the required millage to support it goes down. Both FDs would have had to have separate funding vehicles and residents/businesses would have paid into or or the other but not both.

But this is all now ancient history and we have to deal with the here and now. The are several important items in the agendas for upcoming BOCC meeting that address the funding for FDs for the upcoming year. As this is pending action by the board I can’t and won’t comment further on these for fear of violating Florida’s open meetings law (sunshine law).

As for FY25’s budget and fire department funding options, the are several on the table that need to be reviewed. Each has its own pluses and minuses to be considered. All of these have to be evaluated very quickly to ensure adequate time to take whatever action will be required to implement whatever option is decided on. Here again, for the same reason, I’ll not make further comment.

Bilyclub
09-16-2023, 03:03 PM
Thanks for the update Don Wiley.

Papa_lecki
09-16-2023, 03:24 PM
Move the FD cost out of the budget, costs go down and the required millage to support it goes down. Both FDs would have had to have separate funding vehicles and residents/businesses would have paid into or or the other but not both.


This seems to be the most straightforward approach. At least you can see what’s going where.
Also, why have any funding come out of the Districts?
It’s set up to be too confusing, so people get frustrated and we land in the position we are in now.

Goldwingnut
09-16-2023, 06:25 PM
This seems to be the most straightforward approach. At least you can see what’s going where.
Also, why have any funding come out of the Districts?
It’s set up to be too confusing, so people get frustrated and we land in the position we are in now.

If you’re referring to the CDDs when you say district then nothing comes from the residential cdds. Only VCCDD has any money going to vpsd as its general fund acts similar to the country general fund where all designated/earmarked funds pass through to the designated operating fund.

BobnBev
09-16-2023, 09:31 PM
Is it true that Bradley Arnold, the head of the Sumter County Commissioners gets a $30,000 a year raise? Asking for a friend.:(

Goldwingnut
09-17-2023, 06:13 AM
Is it true that Bradley Arnold, the head of the Sumter County Commissioners gets a $30,000 a year raise? Asking for a friend.:(

Mr Arnold is not on the Sumter County Commission, he is the County Administrator, his job is to execute the policies and instructions of the Board of County Commissioner and is the overall manager for the day-to-day operations of the county staff. He wears a great many hats and has tremendous responsibilities here in Sumter County. Mr Arnold has a great deal of experience in public administration and opinions on how things should be administered in the county and frequency shares his insights and opinions with board members, however, these he puts aside once direction is provided by the BOCC. While I can only speak for myself and not the other board members, I can tell you that I don’t always agree with Mr Arnold and we have frequent discussions on county policy and direction where we are at odds. In the end, regardless of his own opinions, Mr Arnold has always carried out the direction given by the BOCC.

There are some in Sumter County that don’t like Mr Arnold, it’s been my experience as a BOCC member and observer in the audience for the last few years at meetings, that this is due to Mr Arnold responding to their comments and opinions with facts, facts that they don’t like because it show their opinions or ideas to be in the wrong or misinformed.

Mr. Arnold’s annual salary, just like many other positions in the county administration and the BOCC’s salary are dictated by state statues and any annual pay rises are tied to the CPI, these salaries are all a matter of public record. His pay raise for the upcoming year is $0.00.

You “friend” appears to be an ill informed fear monger and pot stirrer looking to kick up controversy where none exist. As the expression goes, better to be thorough an idiot than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt. Your “friend” has removed all doubt, just saying…

Bill14564
09-17-2023, 06:55 AM
(EDIT: Had second thoughts about my initial response and removed it.)

The administrator deserves credit for not taking a salary increase this year.

Papa_lecki
09-17-2023, 07:10 AM
If you’re referring to the CDDs when you say district then nothing comes from the residential cdds. Only VCCDD has any money going to vpsd as its general fund acts similar to the country general fund where all designated/earmarked funds pass through to the designated operating fund.

Thanks GWN. I used the term district because I knew money came from someplace, but wasn’t sure exactly where.

The Villages governance structure is complicated. The one question I get asked by friends is around governance, who is elected, etc. Given all the interplay between county, city and the best interest of the residents of The Villages, it could not be a simple structure, especially given the growth.

Goldwingnut
09-17-2023, 12:07 PM
Thanks GWN. I used the term district because I knew money came from someplace, but wasn’t sure exactly where.

The Villages governance structure is complicated. The one question I get asked by friends is around governance, who is elected, etc. Given all the interplay between county, city and the best interest of the residents of The Villages, it could not be a simple structure, especially given the growth.

County Commissioners (5) area elected
City Councils - Wildwood, Lady Lake, Fruitland Park, Leesburg - are elected (5 each)
Residential/Numbered CDD boards are elected (5 each)
Commercial CDD boards are landowner elected (5 each)
AAC is landowner elected
PWAC is appointed by their respective CDD and are one of the elected supervisors on the CDD board

The growth really only affects the number of CDD boards that exist.

VCCDD receives the funding from the county for VPSD and $4.08/mo/home ($50/yr/home) from the Amenity fee paid, both are combined together and puts it into the VPSD operating fund - transfer in-transfer out, much the same as the county does with its general fund.

Papa_lecki
09-17-2023, 12:16 PM
VCCDD receives the funding from the county for VPSD and $4.08/mo/home ($50/yr/home) from the Amenity fee paid, both are combined together and puts it into the VPSD operating fund - transfer in-transfer out, much the same as the county does with its general fund.

So the VCCDD payment is really their payment to provide protection to their assets?

Goldwingnut
09-17-2023, 12:27 PM
So the VCCDD payment is really their payment to provide protection to their assets?

VCCDD is just another government body. Just like the tax collector transfers the ad valorum taxes collected to the county general fund and then the county transfers funds to the 182 and 183 funds (SCFEMS & VPSD); The 183 fund transfers funds to the VCCDD general fund and then VCCDD transfers it to the VPSD operating fund. VCCDD as well as other government assets (CDD, City, federal, and County) are not taxed, only privately owned and commercial owned assets are taxed.

fedcop2
09-17-2023, 01:17 PM
The Villagers demanded improved ambulance response which required increased staffing. They got what they asked for.

The Villagers argued against an independent district with a stable funding stream. They got what they asked for.

Many in Sumter County (Villagers included) argued against increasing the fire protection fee to fund the fire departments. They got what they asked for.

But that puts us where we are today: the fire departments have to figure out how to do more with less.


Going without a pay raise will hurt. Seeing your co-workers let go because of funding cuts would hurt too. Lesser of two evils I guess.


Once again public safety is the sacrificial lamb of local governments. I've seen it played out too many times.

JGibson
09-19-2023, 06:54 AM
So the County can approve the VSPD regardless of the resident's vote of no.

Except the county will appoint its own board where residents have no voting rights of the board.

Did TV residents know the county can just approve it anyway?

TV residents really screwed this up.

Bill14564
09-19-2023, 07:41 AM
So the County can approve the VSPD regardless of the resident's vote of no.
The VPSD exists today and has existed for some time now. It currently operates similar to a contracted service to Sumter County. The VCCDD/VPSD submits a funding request to the county and the county usually provides that funding. This action will not create the VPSD, it will create a new board to administer the VPSD.

I believe the point you are trying to make is the county can create a District even though the residents voted no. The residents voted no to an Independent Fire District that would operate independently of the county. What is being discussed now is a Dependent District that operates with the approval of the county.

While I am sure there are details that I don't understand, to me this appears to be a way of allowing a new tax that can't be directly blamed on the commissioners: the board will establish taxes, not the commissioners. The tax structure was described in detail in the proposal for the IFD but we'll have to see what it looks like for a dependent district. Ideally, a dependent district will also be created for the SCFEMS so that financing can be kept separated from each other and from the Sumter county budget.

Except the county will appoint its own board where residents have no voting rights of the board.

Yep, but at least it won't be appointed by the Developer, right?. On the other hand, it won't elected by the residents either.

Did TV residents know the county can just approve it anyway?

Not the same "it" being created. The information about creating districts is available in the Florida statutes but it is likely most TV residents had no idea what was possible.

TV residents really screwed this up.

Absolutely.

Papa_lecki
09-19-2023, 08:39 AM
///

kkingston57
09-19-2023, 08:54 AM
The Villagers demanded improved ambulance response which required increased staffing. They got what they asked for.

The Villagers argued against an independent district with a stable funding stream. They got what they asked for.

Many in Sumter County (Villagers included) argued against increasing the fire protection fee to fund the fire departments. They got what they asked for.

But that puts us where we are today: the fire departments have to figure out how to do more with less.

Going without a pay raise will hurt. Seeing your co-workers let go because of funding cuts would hurt too. Lesser of two evils I guess.

Regarding last paragraph, both are evils. Inflation is high(no pay raise) and letting workers go(with an expanding populace) is not good. Workers will adapt and go to a place where they can get the most bang for their money. Need to have counties handle fire and EMS in each of the counties. We moved here to enjoy our retirement and not squabble over cost of an essential service.

kkingston57
09-19-2023, 08:56 AM
I think the pandemic made AMR look worst than they really were. So folks had a knee jerk reaction not keeping in mind we were in the middle of a pandemic hence the slower response times.

After the pandemic calmed down response times got better but of course this whole VSPD vote was already on the table.

Now you lost AMR all together and will have slower response times with less staff.

Great job by the neurotic super paranoid we have to do something immediately crowd.

Good thoughtful post!

JGibson
09-20-2023, 06:35 AM
The VPSD exists today and has existed for some time now. It currently operates similar to a contracted service to Sumter County. The VCCDD/VPSD submits a funding request to the county and the county usually provides that funding. This action will not create the VPSD, it will create a new board to administer the VPSD.

I believe the point you are trying to make is the county can create a District even though the residents voted no. The residents voted no to an Independent Fire District that would operate independently of the county. What is being discussed now is a Dependent District that operates with the approval of the county.

While I am sure there are details that I don't understand, to me this appears to be a way of allowing a new tax that can't be directly blamed on the commissioners: the board will establish taxes, not the commissioners. The tax structure was described in detail in the proposal for the IFD but we'll have to see what it looks like for a dependent district. Ideally, a dependent district will also be created for the SCFEMS so that financing can be kept separated from each other and from the Sumter county budget.



Yep, but at least it won't be appointed by the Developer, right?. On the other hand, it won't elected by the residents either.



Not the same "it" being created. The information about creating districts is available in the Florida statutes but it is likely most TV residents had no idea what was possible.



Absolutely.

Thanks for the high effort post.

After reading about yesterday's hearing it looks like the county commissioners are going to get their way.

Bill14564
09-20-2023, 07:17 AM
Thanks for the high effort post.

After reading about yesterday's hearing it looks like the county commissioners are going to get their way.

As always, the devil will be in the details.

The new fee structure would not have been proposed if the IFD had passed but certain groups encouraged residents to vote against it.

The dependent district would not have been proposed if the fee structure had passed but certain groups encouraged the BoCC to go against their earlier decision and vote against it.

There will be an ordinance proposed that will contain the taxing structure for the dependent district but if certain groups encourage residents and/or businesses to protest then the BoCC might vote against it.

On the positive side:
- I heard that the board will eventually be elected by the residents. I had previously thought it would always be appointed.
- The BoCC did not just accept the five names put forward by the District, they intend to advertise the positions and interview candidates.
- Limits on the funding/taxing structure will be written into the ordinance. This is better than no limits at all though not quite as good as the IFD that required a referendum to increase the limits.

Concerns I still have:
- No one wants to pay more taxes but more funding is still required. Twice the vote has been to do nothing rather than accept new taxes. The dependent district could suffer the same fate
- Ideally, there will be a dependent district for the SCFEMS as well. If not then the SCFEMS would be funded out of the general fund which means we would pay for the VPSD directly AND pay for the SCFEMS through our property taxes. But while there was great concern for the timeline to establish a district for the VPSD, there was little or no discussion of the work required for a SCFEMS district.

We'll see what happens in the next couple of months.

Stu from NYC
09-20-2023, 08:25 AM
The developer via their newspaper has now declared war on the county commissioners per editorial (not labeled as such) on the front page today.

twoplanekid
09-21-2023, 05:22 PM
I currently serve on the NSCUDD board which was created as a utility depended district board by the Sumter County Commissioners. I would hope that some of you might consider applying to run for a seat on a Sumter County Fire District board. I would be happy to discuss with you my thoughts about serving on a board.


PRESS RELEASE
Immediate Release:
September 21, 2023
Sumter County Seeks Applicants for
Potential Creation of The Villages Public
Safety Department District
Contact: Bradley Arnold
County Administrator
(352) 689-4400
bradley.arnold@sumtercountyfl.gov
Sumter County, FL – At the September 12, 2023 Tentative Budget Hearing, the Sumter County
Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) voted to proceed with the development of current
Village Center Community Development District service area to be governed by a dependent
fire district (Villages Public Safety Department District). The creation of this district will require
the initial appointment of individuals by name, with two serving an initial one-year term and three
serving three-year terms, so the positions will face the elections in November 2024 and
November 2026, respectively.
The BOCC will consider applicants that apply through the current boards and committees
application process. Residents that reside within the current Village Center Community
Development District fire service area, are Sumter County residents, and interested in serving
on The Villages Public Safety Department District can apply online at
Boards and Committee Vacancies | Sumter County, FL - Official Website (http://www.sumtercountyfl.gov/apply). Applications will be accepted only through October 31, 2023.
Sumter County, FL - Official Website | Official Website (http://www.sumtercountyfl.gov)