PDA

View Full Version : Men’s 4x400 relay


Rainger99
08-11-2024, 10:12 AM
Anyone catch the race last night??

USA v Botswana. USA has a population of about 330 million. Botswana has a population of about 2.6 million. USA won by .1 - that is point 1 - seconds.

Bogie Shooter
08-11-2024, 11:32 AM
And……..?

Arctic Fox
08-11-2024, 11:36 AM
And……..?

he didn't even mention the 4x100m - although that has become something of a tradition

Kenswing
08-11-2024, 12:20 PM
And……..?

And…. China and India have well over a billion people. Where were they? They should have won by at least a half a second. lol

Rainger99
08-11-2024, 03:16 PM
And……..?

In my experience, the larger the population pool, the better chance you have of getting better athletes. That is the reason that most states have separate divisions for sports. The large schools play large schools and the small schools play small schools.

There are exceptions which is why Hoosiers was such a great story. It was based on Milan High School winning the 1954 Indiana state championship against Muncie Central High School, a school ten times its size. If Muncie had won, it would not have been a great story.

The story of the runner from St. Lucia (with a population of under 200,000 - a little bigger than the Villages) beating Sha'Carri Richardson in the 100 was an amazing story.

As to the 4x400, the fact that a country with a population less than half the population of the Miami metro area can come within a tenth of a second of beating the USA is a story.

Marathon Man
08-11-2024, 06:26 PM
In my experience, the larger the population pool, the better chance you have of getting better athletes. That is the reason that most states have separate divisions for sports. The large schools play large schools and the small schools play small schools.

There are exceptions which is why Hoosiers was such a great story. It was based on Milan High School winning the 1954 Indiana state championship against Muncie Central High School, a school ten times its size. If Muncie had won, it would not have been a great story.

The story of the runner from St. Lucia (with a population of under 200,000 - a little bigger than the Villages) beating Sha'Carri Richardson in the 100 was an amazing story.

As to the 4x400, the fact that a country with a population less than half the population of the Miami metro area can come within a tenth of a second of beating the USA is a story.

This doesn't hold with sports. For a number of years Jamaica had the best sprinters in the world. Trinidad and Tobago have had some great athletes also.

Stu from NYC
08-11-2024, 06:35 PM
Anyone catch the race last night??

USA v Botswana. USA has a population of about 330 million. Botswana has a population of about 2.6 million. USA won by .1 - that is point 1 - seconds.

Than you have places like Kenya whose athletes do very well in long distance racing

Rainger99
08-11-2024, 07:33 PM
This doesn't hold with sports. For a number of years Jamaica had the best sprinters in the world. Trinidad and Tobago have had some great athletes also.

The three most populous countries are India, China, and USA. I didn’t realize India just passed China.

The two countries that dominated in the Olympics were USA and China. India, despite its huge population, is a third world country so I would not expect them to do very well at the Olympics.

Countries with smaller populations such as Canada or Australia are far more developed in sports which explains their success. African countries do very well in track but they didn’t do well in swimming, kayaking, or equestrian.

I agree that Jamaica has fantastic sprinters. But overall, the US dominates Jamaica. Didn’t see many Jamaicans surfing, playing water polo, or basketball.

There are exceptions to population predicting the results which is what makes the Olympics so exciting. The little country upsetting the larger country makes for great television. Serbia almost beat an NBA all star team! Norway winning the decathlon and Netherlands beating the USA in mixed 4x400, are not something you expect to see.

La lamy
08-12-2024, 04:55 AM
The three most populous countries are India, China, and USA. I didn’t realize India just passed China.

The two countries that dominated in the Olympics were USA and China. India, despite its huge population, is a third world country so I would not expect them to do very well at the Olympics.

Countries with smaller populations such as Canada or Australia are far more developed in sports which explains their success. African countries do very well in track but they didn’t do well in swimming, kayaking, or equestrian.

I agree that Jamaica has fantastic sprinters. But overall, the US dominates Jamaica. Didn’t see many Jamaicans surfing, playing water polo, or basketball.

There are exceptions to population predicting the results which is what makes the Olympics so exciting. The little country upsetting the larger country makes for great television. Serbia almost beat an NBA all star team! Norway winning the decathlon and Netherlands beating the USA in mixed 4x400, are not something you expect to see.

Agreed that what is exciting are the athletes we don't expect to win come out ahead. I've always thought if you're caucasian you have NO CHANCE to win running races against black people, but this year Norway and Netherlands were freakishly ahead in some instances. Call me jaded but I kept thinking they must have figured a way to cheat. 100 meters ahead and not out of breath?!! If it's just great training, good for them!!!

Road Apple
08-12-2024, 07:00 AM
The 100M winning sprinter won by .8 seconds over the winner…wait for it…100 years ago. You’d think with modern training, equipment, diet, etc., that gap would be greater.

GATORBILL66
08-12-2024, 07:25 AM
Anyone catch the race last night??

USA v Botswana. USA has a population of about 330 million. Botswana has a population of about 2.6 million. USA won by .1 - that is point 1 - seconds.
Why would anyone watch these anti christian olympics?

Kells
08-12-2024, 07:35 AM
Why would anyone watch these anti christian olympics?

Light it up much? Why would anyone barf this? Goal?

Cause they can...cause it's interesting...cause these athletes are the best in the world and their skills are incredible..cause we appreciate the athletes and the world coming together under sport. Cause we are human.

LeRoySmith
08-12-2024, 07:37 AM
Why would anyone watch these anti christian olympics?

In my opinion the Olympics are about bringing the world together through athleticism and excellence, not divisiveness. They don't hold any religious meaning to me either way. If they were heavily religious based/biased I think that would drive away more than it would attract.

coleprice
08-12-2024, 08:15 AM
Botswana put together a great team that made a fantastic showing in several track events. Good for them!

Charsaunt
08-12-2024, 08:15 AM
And……..?

One thing never ceases to amaze me about Talk of The Villages. No matter how innocuous or innocent an original post might be, there is always someone who can find a way to make a snarky comment about it. Really Boogie, if you and other like minded individuals are that jaded or unhappy with your life, please don't invite the rest of us to share your misery.

Regorp
08-12-2024, 08:30 AM
Anyone catch the race last night??

USA v Botswana. USA has a population of about 330 million. Botswana has a population of about 2.6 million. USA won by .1 - that is point 1 - seconds.

Tiny country just north of South Africa is amazing. Consider they run through the jungle in bare feet, wearing running shoes they should have won. Go Botswana!!

mtdjed
08-12-2024, 08:51 AM
In my experience, the larger the population pool, the better chance you have of getting better athletes. That is the reason that most states have separate divisions for sports. The large schools play large schools and the small schools play small schools.

There are exceptions which is why Hoosiers was such a great story. It was based on Milan High School winning the 1954 Indiana state championship against Muncie .Central High School, a school ten times its size. If Muncie had won, it would not have been a great story.

The story of the runner from St. Lucia (with a population of under 200,000 - a little bigger than the Villages) beating Sha'Carri Richardson in the 100 was an amazing story.

As to the 4x400, the fact that a country with a population less than half the population of the Miami metro area can come within a tenth of a second of beating the USA is a story.

There is a lot more than population pool size involved. To name a few: genetics, opportunity, religion, environment, health, wealth, discipline, devotion, training, tradition, family, government, etc.

Consider how close Serbia came to defeating the USA Men's Basketball team. They have something beyond a population pool providing their talent. Perhaps it was their haircuts and fewer tattoos. Who knows?

LeRoySmith
08-12-2024, 09:00 AM
One thing never ceases to amaze me about Talk of The Villages. No matter how innocuous or innocent an original post might be, there is always someone who can find a way to make a snarky comment about it. Really Boogie, if you and other like minded individuals are that jaded or unhappy with your life, please don't invite the rest of us to share your misery.

I think this should be the post of the day. Good on you Char's aunt.

Arctic Fox
08-12-2024, 09:15 AM
Why would anyone watch these anti christian olympics?

Because most of the World's population is not Christian...

...and most of those who are do not over-react to imagined slights.

Stu from NYC
08-12-2024, 09:39 AM
One thing never ceases to amaze me about Talk of The Villages. No matter how innocuous or innocent an original post might be, there is always someone who can find a way to make a snarky comment about it. Really Boogie, if you and other like minded individuals are that jaded or unhappy with your life, please don't invite the rest of us to share your misery.

Well said. Other than certain comments almost anything open for discussion

Stu from NYC
08-12-2024, 09:39 AM
Because most of the World's population is not Christian...

...and most of those who are do not over-react to imagined slights.

Well said

greg.turay
08-12-2024, 10:15 AM
Because they have to outrun the lions and wilderbesst

Rainger99
08-12-2024, 11:59 AM
I just came across this website.


OlympicNationalRankings (https://www.olympicnationalrankings.com/)

It says that the top 5 countries were
1. Australia
2. France
3. Great Britain
4. Netherlands
5. USA

It uses probability rankings to determine which country performed the best at the Olympics. It is based on a mathematical formula that appears to be quite complicated. It takes a 24 page article to explain it. I just went to the results!

It does this by ranking according to the Probability Index U, which has a simple meaning: U measures the improbability that a country of a given population would win as many medals as it has, or more medals, if all people in competitive countries worldwide had equal medal-winning capabilities.

Rainger99
08-15-2024, 08:22 AM
The two countries that dominated in the Olympics were USA and China. India, despite its huge population, is a third world country so I would not expect them to do very well at the Olympics.

Just found this article on why India performs so miserably at the Olympics.
I guess when you don't have enough to eat, you don't have much time to spend at the golf course, swimming pool, track, or gymnasium.

No golds for India: Why the world’s most populous country punches below its weight at the Olympics - Yahoo Sports (https://www.yahoo.com/sports/no-golds-india-why-world-013342675.html)

“When people say 1.4 billion people and only (six) medals, that is a totally wrong headline, because … 1.39 billion people don’t have access to sports facilities,” said Boria Majumdar, sports analyst and author of “Dreams of a Billion: India and the Olympic Games.”