Global Warming is the Forecast

[sounding]

Here's the NOAA Dec 2024 forecast for Jan 2025. Love the January heat wave.

[Bay Kid]

Maybe the last week?

[sounding]

Here's the NOAA Dec 2024 forecast for Jan 2025. Love the January heat wave.

NOAA forecasts are scrambling to decided what excuse to use for forecasting global warming in January ... https://x.com/Electroversenet/status/1881267710765793730

[Normal]

Maybe the last week?

Lol…hope so. It’s cold. There is snow forecasted for northern Florida.
(Note to Moderator….please don’t give me an infraction for using the “S N O W” word)

[fdpaq0580]

Lol…hope so. It’s cold. There is snow forecasted for northern Florida.


This is pretty normal. Nothing to be concerned about.

[Normal]

This is pretty normal. Nothing to be concerned about.

Just pointing out that our monthly climate report for January will be below normal here in Florida. I’ve seen plenty of cold weather.

[Lottoguy]

They haven’t called it Global Warming in 15 years. Climate Change is what is actually going on.

[sounding]

They haven’t called it Global Warming in 15 years. Climate Change is what is actually going on.

Ditto. Find out more at The Weather Club ... The Villages Weather Club (https://www.theweatherclubvillages.com/)

[Bay Kid]

They haven’t called it Global Warming in 15 years. Climate Change is what is actually going on.

'Climate change' makes it easier to use for their special needs.

[sounding]

'Climate change' makes it easier to use for their special needs.

Correct -- and there's a special need to explain how global warming is forecast to snow in the Gulf of America

[kkingston57]

As cold as it has been, TV still has not had any actual freezing temps(except for some local places) and temps have not come close to the record lows(24-25) Weather is still weather

[Normal]

As cold as it has been, TV still has not had any actual freezing temps(except for some local places) and temps have not come close to the record lows(24-25) Weather is still weather

It’s actually not weather, a monthly time period is termed “climate”. Still record cold won’t be like February 13, 1899, the all-time coldest temperature of -2°F was recorded in Tallahassee.

[fdpaq0580]

They haven’t called it Global Warming in 15 years. Climate Change is what is actually going on.

I call it that, cause that's what it is. It is part of the warming and cooling cycles.

[fdpaq0580]

As cold as it has been, TV still has not had any actual freezing temps(except for some local places) and temps have not come close to the record lows(24-25) Weather is still weather

TV Warming is caused by excessive hot air from Villagers.

[Bassdeer]

'Climate change' makes it easier to use for their special needs.

Spot on.

[bopat]

I remember elementary school back in the early 70s, we had coloring books about the impending ice age and peak oil. Guess that might be coming back now that we're all done with global warming. Maybe throw in some fresh water shortages too, that's also fun.

[sounding]

I remember elementary school back in the early 70s, we had coloring books about the impending ice age and peak oil. Guess that might be coming back now that we're all done with global warming. Maybe throw in some fresh water shortages too, that's also fun.

It snowed in Miami in 1977 when the AMO was coldest ... and the AMO, now in its warm phase (ala global warming), is due to begin its next cooling phase.

[MrFlorida]

TV Warming is caused by excessive hot air from Villagers.

And also around Washington DC......

[Two Bills]

The term Climate Change is correct.
Climate has definitely changed over my 85 years, and has always been changing over millions of years.
It's the man made bit I am very skeptical about.

[MikeVillages]

Go to a weather club meeting. They often talk about how fake the warming of the planet is.

[Normal]

They haven’t called it Global Warming in 15 years. Climate Change is what is actually going on.

Yes, the title was changed to fit the agenda. As Einstein once said, “If the facts don’t fit the theory, then change the facts.”

[Lottoguy]

A foot of snow on Bourbon Street in New Orleans is normal then?

[sounding]

A foot of snow on Bourbon Street in New Orleans is normal then?

It will be the new normal as we continue to cool into the next ice age glaciation period. Notice the curved purple line -- it is trending down. It is the Milankovitch Cycle's "Obliquity cycle" which is the most significant cycle regarding ice ages.

[fdpaq0580]

The term Climate Change is correct.
Climate has definitely changed over my 85 years, and has always been changing over millions of years.
It's the man made bit I am very skeptical about.

I'm not. The evidence is there for those who look.

[OrangeBlossomBaby]

The term Climate Change is correct.
Climate has definitely changed over my 85 years, and has always been changing over millions of years.
It's the man made bit I am very skeptical about.

This appears to be the most genuine post in the thread so far.

Would you consider "human-participation" as fair? That - we have probably not caused climate change OR global warming OR whatever else (some claim the government created the hurricanes...) - but rather, the Agricultural and Industrial ages have *contributed* to the changes?

Things like deforestation, building skyscrapers and roads on shorelines, which contributes to erosion, which contributes to shifts in tides and the patterns of marinelife, drilling holes in the ground and sucking out the oil to burn into the atmosphere, which can have SOME kind of impact, even if it's not significant, on the planet's ability to insulate itself from the sun?

I'm not judging these things that we've done in this post. I'm just stating that - we have done these things. I'm asking if you feel that what we've done MIGHT have contributed to - rather than caused - the recent changes in climate.

Whether that contribution has resulted in faster change, or more extreme change, or more frequency of the same extremes, or changing locations of those changes... just in general. Do you agree or disagree that we, the human race, have in fact contributed to change in some way?

I think we have.

[fdpaq0580]

It will be the new normal as we continue to cool into the next ice age glaciation period. Notice the curved purple line -- it is trending down. It is the Milankovitch Cycle's "Obliquity cycle" which is the most significant cycle regarding ice ages.

Yes. Normally. But the earth isn't cooling, it's warming, way faster than than it normally would per the Milankovitch cycles. Even with the poles receiving less solar radiation (per Milankovitch) the earth is warming.
What drives the warming at a rate the Milankovitch cycles would/could never match? That is the result of the one variable that some just can't (or won't) credit. That variable is human intervention, interference, manipulation, industrialization, pollution, destruction, construction,, etc, etc, and on. Here is hardly a place on the planet that hasn't been affected by human activity of one sort or another. Hardly an ecosystem that hasn't been altered. Yep, we, modern humans with our big brains and opposeble thumbs. We are the one variable. Not volcanoes, dinosaurs, ore even asteroids. Humans.
Now, for the big question. Do you care? If you love your family, friends, country, planet, then, in my opinion, you should if you are sufficiently evolved. 🫥🫥🙈🙉🫥

[fdpaq0580]

This appears to be the most genuine post in the thread so far.

Would you consider "human-participation" as fair? That - we have probably not caused climate change OR global warming OR whatever else (some claim the government created the hurricanes...) - but rather, the Agricultural and Industrial ages have *contributed* to the changes?

Things like deforestation, building skyscrapers and roads on shorelines, which contributes to erosion, which contributes to shifts in tides and the patterns of marinelife, drilling holes in the ground and sucking out the oil to burn into the atmosphere, which can have SOME kind of impact, even if it's not significant, on the planet's ability to insulate itself from the sun?

I'm not judging these things that we've done in this post. I'm just stating that - we have done these things. I'm asking if you feel that what we've done MIGHT have contributed to - rather than caused - the recent changes in climate.

Whether that contribution has resulted in faster change, or more extreme change, or more frequency of the same extremes, or changing locations of those changes... just in general. Do you agree or disagree that we, the human race, have in fact contributed to change in some way?

I think we have.

And you are correct. With out a doubt.

[sounding]

This appears to be the most genuine post in the thread so far.

Would you consider "human-participation" as fair? That - we have probably not caused climate change OR global warming OR whatever else (some claim the government created the hurricanes...) - but rather, the Agricultural and Industrial ages have *contributed* to the changes?

Things like deforestation, building skyscrapers and roads on shorelines, which contributes to erosion, which contributes to shifts in tides and the patterns of marinelife, drilling holes in the ground and sucking out the oil to burn into the atmosphere, which can have SOME kind of impact, even if it's not significant, on the planet's ability to insulate itself from the sun?

I'm not judging these things that we've done in this post. I'm just stating that - we have done these things. I'm asking if you feel that what we've done MIGHT have contributed to - rather than caused - the recent changes in climate.

Whether that contribution has resulted in faster change, or more extreme change, or more frequency of the same extremes, or changing locations of those changes... just in general. Do you agree or disagree that we, the human race, have in fact contributed to change in some way?

I think we have.

There is no proof man-made CO2 harms our climate -- otherwise there would be a report saying so.

[Bill14564]

There is no proof man-made CO2 harms our climate -- otherwise there would be a report saying so.

I’m sure I’m going to be sorry, but….

Okay, if the reports linking climate change to increased CO2 caused by human activity do not say that man-made CO2 is harming the environment, then what *do* they say?

Or is this that part where you acknowledge climate change, acknowledge increasing CO2, acknowledge man’s contribution to that CO2, and even acknowledge that the CO2 contributes to the climate change, but assert that the climate change is good?

[sounding]

I’m sure I’m going to be sorry, but….

Okay, if the reports linking climate change to increased CO2 caused by human activity do not say that man-made CO2 is harming the environment, then what *do* they say?

Or is this that part where you acknowledge climate change, acknowledge increasing CO2, acknowledge man’s contribution to that CO2, and even acknowledge that the CO2 contributes to the climate change, but assert that the climate change is good?

This 3-minute video by Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, reflects my opinions ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzVMSxszudo