Guest
07-31-2011, 08:13 PM
There appears to be a deal that's been agreed to. Not approved by the wingnut fringes of both parties yet, but negotiated by the "leaders" who have been hanging around the Congress for years.
The Congress kicked the can down the road once more, a part of the deal being that a committee of twelve members from the House and the Senate will spend the next few months trying to reach agreement on what federal spending will be cut, to be submitted to the two houses for up-or-down votes. Let's try to forget the fact that the Congress has spent months and couldn't reach any agreement or any compromise, which resulted in this "committee idea".
It does leave me with a question though--who will be appointed to this committee? How long will it take the 535 members of Congress to agree on which 12 of them will be on the committee? Does anyone think that Congress can agree on which twelve of their members will be so chosen?
I'd almost go so far as to say that they'll still be disagreeing on the committee membership in November, when the report from the committee is due for a vote by both houses of Congress.
After watching this kabuki dance by the members of Congress who will never agree on anything--who have no intention of compromising on anything--if there are countries out there who might be considering democracy as a form of government they should consider, my guess is they've moved on to some other plan. How'd you like to be the person who is trying to convince the Iraqis or Afghanistan that they really should choose this wonderful system that we have, the system where government is elected by the people and those elected officials govern in the best interests of the people? If it wasn't so tragic it would be the highest form of comedy.
The Congress kicked the can down the road once more, a part of the deal being that a committee of twelve members from the House and the Senate will spend the next few months trying to reach agreement on what federal spending will be cut, to be submitted to the two houses for up-or-down votes. Let's try to forget the fact that the Congress has spent months and couldn't reach any agreement or any compromise, which resulted in this "committee idea".
It does leave me with a question though--who will be appointed to this committee? How long will it take the 535 members of Congress to agree on which 12 of them will be on the committee? Does anyone think that Congress can agree on which twelve of their members will be so chosen?
I'd almost go so far as to say that they'll still be disagreeing on the committee membership in November, when the report from the committee is due for a vote by both houses of Congress.
After watching this kabuki dance by the members of Congress who will never agree on anything--who have no intention of compromising on anything--if there are countries out there who might be considering democracy as a form of government they should consider, my guess is they've moved on to some other plan. How'd you like to be the person who is trying to convince the Iraqis or Afghanistan that they really should choose this wonderful system that we have, the system where government is elected by the people and those elected officials govern in the best interests of the people? If it wasn't so tragic it would be the highest form of comedy.