Debt reduction

[Guest]

Today the president is going to talk of a tax increase to the wealthy. Well listen that is the beginning of equalizing wealth which is a socialism which we know did not work in Russia. Every thing the politictions do is short term.I agree we need to change tax laws but not this way. He created another crisis by not demanding a budget and we all (know never waste a good crisis). When in the h--l are the people of the U.S going to learn and push for impeachment this guy is absolutly no good for this country. His agenda is to destroy this country. Could you imagine if we still had a democratic house. We would really be in deep s---. Wheather any one wants to agree it is a good thing the tea party is as strong as it is. Yes our current situation is not the best but what the preident is trying to do will be worse its time to face facts. This is just MO S---

[Guest]

Today the president is going to talk of a tax increase to the wealthy. Well listen that is the beginning of equalizing wealth which is a socialism which we know did not work in Russia. Every thing the politictions do is short term.I agree we need to change tax laws but not this way. He created another crisis by not demanding a budget and we all (know never waste a good crisis). When in the h--l are the people of the U.S going to learn and push for impeachment this guy is absolutly no good for this country. His agenda is to destroy this country. Could you imagine if we still had a democratic house. We would really be in deep s---. Wheather any one wants to agree it is a good thing the tea party is as strong as it is. Yes our current situation is not the best but what the preident is trying to do will be worse its time to face facts. This is just MO S---


:BigApplause::BigApplause::BigApplause:

[Guest]

This plan is nothing more than restoring the tax rates that were in place prior to gw taking office...That would be the last time the budget was actually balanced...Time for the uber rich and their corp lackeys,that have lived off the labor of the middle class, pay up their fair share..No more subsidies for our god, Exon and his supporters, the uber rich...there are thieves in the henhouse...guarding the chickens...Thanks congress for your great job...See you in the "help wanted" line in the next election...

[Guest]

This plan is nothing more than restoring the tax rates that were in place prior to gw taking office...That would be the last time the budget was actually balanced...Time for the uber rich and their corp lackeys,that have lived off the labor of the middle class, pay up their fair share..No more subsidies for our god, Exon and his supporters, the uber rich...there are thieves in the henhouse...guarding the chickens...Thanks congress for your great job...See you in the "help wanted" line in the next election...

true- we were in the black under clinton...GW reduced the taxes on his buddies in big busines and made some other splendid decisions that had us in the red when he left office. going back to old tax rates is NOT socialism. You folks are throwing around that word in very uninformed ways....

[Guest]

The rich are always going to be rich. What have you got against them? Are you jealous. Is this the class envy thing? See how class envy is working out in England. I have never worked for a poor man. I have met some delightful rich people and some not so delightful rich people, but of course I can say the same thing about poor or middle class people.
Businesses always plan ahead for capital purchases and expansion. Sometime years ahead. When they knew that Mr. Wealth Redistributer Obama was going to get in office, they stopped plans for expansion and held onto their money and stopped hiring. Sometimes, it really is that simple.

:pepper2: VOTE NOBAMA 2012

[Guest]

Class warfare is not a new thing....it was declared on the middle class by gw and that's a fact...what's new is the attack on seniors using the word entitlement to describe social security.

[Guest]

The rich are always going to be rich. What have you got against them? Are you jealous. Is this the class envy thing? See how class envy is working out in England. I have never worked for a poor man. I have met some delightful rich people and some not so delightful rich people, but of course I can say the same thing about poor or middle class people.
Businesses always plan ahead for capital purchases and expansion. Sometime years ahead. When they knew that Mr. Wealth Redistributer Obama was going to get in office, they stopped plans for expansion and held onto their money and stopped hiring. Sometimes, it really is that simple.

:pepper2: VOTE NOBAMA 2012

I understand what your saying, but your wrong.

[Guest]

Can you imagine if we hadn't spent billions and billions looking for imaginary WMD's in Iraq?

[Guest]

You sure got that right, coralway. It also took the lives of over 4,400 American lives.

[Guest]

You sure got that right, coralway. It also took the lives of over 4,400 American lives.

Yea, but we killed a few truck loads of terrorists and made this country more safe.

:pepper2:

[Guest]

Can you imagine if we hadn't spent billions and billions looking for imaginary WMD's in Iraq?

Thank you for the reminder. They forget how bad Bush was...or never realized it....

[Guest]

Thank you for the reminder. They forget how bad Bush was...or never realized it....

Actually after over 2 1/2 years of Obama we are just now realizing how good Bush was. Don't you miss President Bush?

:pepper2:

[Guest]

Thank you for the reminder. They forget how bad Bush was...or never realized it....

You assume we were all supporters of Bush. At least when he was in office, my place of business was thriving. Since Obama has been in office, it has had to close. My new position has required me to lay-off at least 7 of the 40+ that work(ed) under me, in the short 2 years that I have been there! Will be even worse when Obamacare really kicks in...:sad:

[Guest]

katz,maybe the reason your buisness is so bad is you are always on a computer....Bush will be forever remembered as absolutely the worst president in our history...I do miss him though as I had a lot of laughs at his expense..No one can be as stupid as him...Karl Rove saved his bacon...

[Guest]

katz,maybe the reason your buisness is so bad is you are always on a computer....Bush will be forever remembered as absolutely the worst president in our history...I do miss him though as I had a lot of laughs at his expense..No one can be as stupid as him...Karl Rove saved his bacon...

HA, that's pretty funny! I laughed out loud. I'm just on vacation and it happens to have been raining alot. Wasn't my business anyway, I just worked there, as I work for my current employer.

[Guest]

George W. Bush definitely was the worst president in history of the USA.

[Guest]

George W. Bush definitely was the worst president in history of the USA.

Maybe, maybe not. Think that I will reserve judgement until the end of the O period and see who we get next.

[Guest]

I just dont understand the trust you folks have for O bamy but will admitt I didnt like what Bush did with 911. You can say I still beleive that was put on at the expence of 3000 people. You want to go back to Clinton he is the one that told Binladin to stop using satilite phones to set up his attacks. So I guess no president is safe. My concern is what Obama is doing and how he is going about it. It smells like 3 day fish

[Guest]

George W. Bush definitely was the worst president in history of the USA.

Time will tell, long after we are all gone.

[Guest]

katz,maybe the reason your buisness is so bad is you are always on a computer....Bush will be forever remembered as absolutely the worst president in our history...I do miss him though as I had a lot of laughs at his expense..No one can be as stupid as him...Karl Rove saved his bacon...

No one? How many colleges did you go to? He had better grades then Al Gore and John Kerry. He was a jet pilot. When you say statements like that, who do you think your convincing? If no one could be as stupid as him, I'm willing to bet that you cannot prove that you are smarter then him. Up for the challenge?

[Guest]

of course not my tea party friend...I'm not the President....And bushisms are famous...BTW he was almost kicked out of the military for partying, his gf was just a little "under the weather', and he had substance abuse problems...Fine upstanding citizen..Good to have the right daddy...My god he had the same lawyers Richard Nixon had....

[Guest]

I do not recall George Walker Bush's college transcripts being made public.

If I am mistaken, please tell me what sites on the Internet have them.

Thank you.

[Guest]

http://2004.georgewbush.org/bios/yale-transcript.asp

Here is one link...now you can start to change the point of your post.

[Guest]

of course not my tea party friend...I'm not the President....And bushisms are famous...BTW he was almost kicked out of the military for partying, his gf was just a little "under the weather', and he had substance abuse problems...Fine upstanding citizen..Good to have the right daddy...My god he had the same lawyers Richard Nixon had....

Your man Obama has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep his records sealed. He has admitted to doing drugs and he still smokes cigarettes and drinks alcohol. His Obamarisms are famous also, what is your point? Until Obama came around Jimmy Carter was considered the worst President ever. Jimmy Carter is finally relieved.

VOTE NOBAMA 2012:pepper2:

[Guest]

Let me see if I understand this correctly.

George Bush was in their opinion the worst president ever in America.

George Bush was president.

The tea party is racist.

Republicans are racist.

Look what President Bush did.

Bush was president.

Rich people are evil.

I could go on and on but I understand correctly the trolls, read liberal moonbats find that the above reasons are all of the reasons to vote for Barack Obama 2012.

Is there anything that Barack Obama has done to deserve a little from the American people? The trolls never mentioned it.

Vote Republican in 2012. Vote for any Republican. Do not vote for an independent or third-party as that would be a vote for Barack Obama.

If you have some reasons why we should vote for Barack Obama had loved to hear them. What has he done?

This is where the trolls will enter all of the information about former President Bush the tea party and Republicans. I doubt very much if I will see anything mentioned that Barack Obama did that turned out positive. Unless, you want to include destroying our economy as a positive.

Just some thoughts.

[Guest]

Good post.

My thoughts,

George Bush received most of his votes for President because he was running against mediocre democrat rival.

The boorish Gore lost it for the democrats. A much better candidate would have sealed it for their party.
With America at war, and not likely to switch Presidents, again the democrats ran the even more boorish, fake war hero, Kerry. Kerry tried to run as a man who could command our forces overseas. When it was revealed he was a fake, of course Bush got voted in again. Democrats will not admit that they picked the wrong candidates to run for president. Period.
Now comes 2008 and the Republicans did not learn a thing. They pick a boring RINO to run against an inexperienced community organizer with no track record and a sealed history which the media refused to investigate.
Now we are stuck with an inexperienced chief executive who is way over his head. This guy has no clue what so ever.
Our only hope for the USA to kick this Great Depression is to start over and vote for someone who has real experience in the private sector.

Our only hope is to vote Republican. Period.

[Guest]

since the mode of thinking by some is to always, consistently snap back or flash back and measure everything by comparing to the Bush-dids or Bush-didnots....hypothetically speaking...I wonder what the future of their mode of think-back would be if Hillary somehow got nominated and elected...at every bump in the road or when something does not go quite right will there be a plethora of Obama-did and Obama-didnots to blame?
Just wondering...and amusing myself:laugh:

btk

[Guest]

Katz,

Thank you for the "transcript" link. Personally, I would not take it as any proof of being a real transcript. The Disclaimer of the site is self-explanatory:

"GeorgeWBush.org is a digital parody of the Official 2004 Campaign Website of President George W. Bush. GeorgeWBush.org uses the names and images of public figures for purposes of satire. Any other names are invented. The content of this web site should in no way be construed as factual. GeorgeWBush.org is intended for mature audiences, and should not be accessed by persons under 18 years of age"

It states that the content in no way should be construed as factual.

'Nuff said.

[Guest]

George W. Bush definitely was the worst president in history of the USA.

There's a VERY interesting chart on Wikipedia (at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_Presidents_of_the_United_St ates )

What's really interesting is that it show NUMEROUS rankings of the President - starting with the Schlesinger 1948 poll and then adds a column for the 'aggregate' ranking.

In the aggregate - the averaging of the polls, the following Presidents are rated 'in red', as in the 'least best' ranking (Lincoln, FDR and Washington are ranked 1-2-3):

33 - Benjamin Harrison
34 - George W. Bush (GHWB came in at 22nd, tied with Taft)
35 - Taylor
36 - Tyler
37 - Grant
38 - William Henry Harrison & Fillmore (tie)
40 - Pierce
41 - Andrew Johnson
42 - Buchanan
43 - Harding

Interestingly, Nixon was consistently "in the red group" as worst ever until recently and now his average ranked 32nd.

Carter came in at 27th.

[Guest]

DJPlong has a very interesting table to consider.

Jimmy Carter is ranked 7 places ABOVE George W. Bush.

Richard Nixon is ranked 2 places ABOVE George W. Bush.

While the table does not show Bush as the last ranked president, it sure shows him favored a lot worse than Jimmy Carter. That is really somethng for the G'Nopers to think about.

[Guest]

The longer a president is removed from office the more time to evaluate. Many Presidents left office with unfavorable ratings and as time proceeded the ratings improved.

To judge a President out of office for less then three years is folly and irresponsible to say the least. Besides, everybody knows that Jimmy Carter was the worst president ever until Barack Hussein Obama came along.

VOTE NOBAMA 2012:pepper2:

[Guest]

to be fair....yea right....one needs to know the basis on which these rankings were formulated...and by whom?

On the internet one can find anything to fit their purpose...we just need to know what that might be....other than the old R and D pigeon holes that so many seem to only have.

btk

[Guest]

Once again with the bigotry of the 3 names of YOUR President. Pathetic, to say the least.

[Guest]

Once again with the bigotry of the 3 names of YOUR President. Pathetic, to say the least.

How does using a man's full name equal bigotry? It is his name and he doesn't seem embarrassed by it, why are you?

[Guest]

You know very well it is bigotry. Did you constantly refer to George W. Bush by all 3 names, Jimmy Carter as James Earl Carter, or John F. Kennedy as John Fitzgerald Kennedy? The answer is NO, you did not. Just because YOUR President is a minority and has a name that is not mainstream white, bigots constantly refer to the full name - maybe just to try and remind others that this man is not one of them.

I have heard some say "He used his full name in the oath of office." All the presidents do that.

Grow up. This is the leader of America. Have respect for him - and yourself.

'Nuff said.

[Guest]

How does using a man's full name equal bigotry? It is his name and he doesn't seem embarrassed by it, why are you?

Good question. The media and his campaign machine totally avoided the middle name during the election, but he seemed very proud to have it included during his swearing in. TBug is way off base, but his drinking water might be responsible?

VOTE NOBAMA 2012:pepper2:

[Guest]

You know very well it is bigotry. Did you constantly refer to George W. Bush by all 3 names, Jimmy Carter as James Earl Carter, or John F. Kennedy as John Fitzgerald Kennedy? The answer is NO, you did not. Just because YOUR President is a minority and has a name that is not mainstream white, bigots constantly refer to the full name - maybe just to try and remind others that this man is not one of them.

I have heard some say "He used his full name in the oath of office." All the presidents do that.

Grow up. This is the leader of America. Have respect for him - and yourself.

'Nuff said.

How do you dare to make a such a comment as-"you know very well such and such". No, I DO NOT THINK IT IS BIGOTRY! BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS THE MAN'S NAME! He has a WHITE MOTHER AND A BLACK FATHER AND AN ARABIC NAME!!!! To which group of people is it bigotrous to? The guy is his own melting pot and that spells out what it means to be an AMERICAN! Not sure I am the one who needs to grow up and/or get a grip on reality.
SHOW RESPECT?!? That is the name he chose to be used as he was inagurated as the President of the United States of America! He apparently is proud of his whole name, as I would be of my entire name if I were to be sworn into that office. What is your deal? Maybe you are the one who has a problem with him...? Your reaction does nothing more than pervert his name in order for you to use it as some kind of ax to grind with those who are not too happy with him. Too bad! Makes it difficult to have a GROWN UP discussion with you.

[Guest]

You know very well it is bigotry. Did you constantly refer to George W. Bush by all 3 names, Jimmy Carter as James Earl Carter, or John F. Kennedy as John Fitzgerald Kennedy? The answer is NO, you did not. Just because YOUR President is a minority and has a name that is not mainstream white, bigots constantly refer to the full name - maybe just to try and remind others that this man is not one of them.

I have heard some say "He used his full name in the oath of office." All the presidents do that.

Grow up. This is the leader of America. Have respect for him - and yourself.

'Nuff said.

Whole house water filter? Man, get ahold of yourself or we are going to take your Man Card away.:ohdear:

[Guest]

........ That is the name he chose to be used as he was inagurated as the President of the United States of America! ........

Here are videos of the two Bush's and Clinton being sworn in, in all cases they use their middle names. Can you tell us when there middle names were used in describing them when they were in office, other than to distinguish the two Bush's on occasion. The only reason Hussein is being used is to irritate and incite people, it serves no other purpose. If it does serve a legitimate purpose, please enlighten the masses.

Bush Swearing In

http://wwwIn.youtube.com/watch?v=QfmEwFwWnrU&feature=related

Clinton Swearing In

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM3AAyWfRgE&feature=related

Bush I swearing in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVGK8THLXxk&feature=related

[Guest]

Here are videos of the two Bush's and Clinton being sworn in, in all cases they use their middle names. Can you tell us when there middle names were used in describing them when they were in office, other than to distinguish the two Bush's on occasion. The only reason Hussein is being used is to irritate and incite people, it serves no other purpose. If it does serve a legitimate purpose, please enlighten the masses.

How does the man's middle name irritate and incite people? I still contend it is only bothersome to those who see the world thru their racially tinted glasses. Those of us who see people as people haven't got a clue what your point might be. Beauty is often in the eye of the beholder...dare I say the same for racial biases?

[Guest]

I do not understand. Barack Hussein Obama took the oath under that name. What is the beef? Is he not proud of his own name? This is getting ridiculous.

[Guest]

You know very well it is bigotry. Did you constantly refer to George W. Bush by all 3 names, Jimmy Carter as James Earl Carter, or John F. Kennedy as John Fitzgerald Kennedy? The answer is NO, you did not. Just because YOUR President is a minority and has a name that is not mainstream white, bigots constantly refer to the full name - maybe just to try and remind others that this man is not one of them.

I have heard some say "He used his full name in the oath of office." All the presidents do that.

Grow up. This is the leader of America. Have respect for him - and yourself.

'Nuff said.

Sorry to say I agree with this post. I come from a middle class, midwest background that to this day holds fast to the prejudices of white over all others. I joined the Army in 1966 and have never looked back. My travels and jobs have broken the bond of prejudice for me, but it is alive and well in most of this country today. If you are Caucasian and don't witness prejudice against minorities, you either live in a very small bubble or your blind to the truth. It is so much better today than when I was young, but as God is my witness, it is still here with us. We have made better strides in the treatment of women than minorities, but work still needs to be done there also. We can not fix problems if we continue to say they do not exist.

[Guest]

How does the man's middle name irritate and incite people? I still contend it is only bothersome to those who see the world thru their racially tinted glasses. Those of us who see people as people haven't got a clue what your point might be. Beauty is often in the eye of the beholder...dare I say the same for racial biases?

I contend it is only used by those who see the world thru their racially tinted glasses or are trying to cause a distraction. Read what real republicans have to say about this:

http://articles.cnn.com/2008-02-28/politics/tennessee.gop_1_barack-obama-release-tennessee-republican-party?_s=PM:POLITICS

Of course there is an easy way to stop talking about this and concentrate on the issues.

[Guest]

vg...too late you showed it all when on a previous post you used "muslims" in vain..Don't try to hide from it, my tea party friend...Bigotry is RAMPANT as is tacid approval by the party in general!

[Guest]

vg...too late you showed it all when on a previous post you used "muslims" in vain..Don't try to hide from it, my tea party friend...Bigotry is RAMPANT as is tacid approval by the party in general!

Are you attempting to bully me? You keep this harassing up you will just get yourself in trouble with the powers that be.

[Guest]

vg...too late you showed it all when on a previous post you used "muslims" in vain..Don't try to hide from it, my tea party friend...Bigotry is RAMPANT as is tacid approval by the party in general!

Ditto

[Guest]

A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigotry

Who are the bigots on this forum? Certain posters continue to make blanket statements about certain groups with which I associate myself. When truth's are explained to them they exhibit an incredible amount of vehement and nasty intolerance and animosity. Sounds like bigotry to me...

[Guest]

Name calling is when there is no intelligent rebuttal. They know they are backing the losing horse and are desperate. Standing in the school yard yelling "bigot" and "racist" is actually a sad and pathetic reaction to the despair that they are failing to convince anybody that the democrats are going to turn this Great Depression around.
A solid vote for republican candidates in 2012 will restore this once great country and put people back to work and restore the pride that is sorely missing this last 3 years.

[Guest]

Actually after over 2 1/2 years of Obama we are just now realizing how good Bush was. Don't you miss President Bush?

:pepper2:

Why is it President Bush and not George Walker Bush???????/

[Guest]

Why is it President Bush and not George Walker Bush???????/

Take a ride to yesteryear of 2008 and you will find some unflattering names for President Bush. Bushy, Shrub, Herr Bush etc. Why is it the lefties can dish it out for 8 years but start whining after only a couple of years? :boxing2::ohdear:

[Guest]

Acorn still receiving money form HUD. As we know Acorn was Obama's place of employment.

http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2011/09/21/obamas-hud-has-given-730000-to-acorn-this-year-alone-whats-another-15-billion-more-for-alinsky-groups/#more-335012

[Guest]

and I do so love when they re bashing a post or poster they do not agree with they continually use the phraseology such as "my white friend..." or my "tea party friend..." to be sure to get the talking point categorization goal(s) accomplished.

It is my favorite annoyance, among the many I have, and an annoyance to many participants that EVERYTHING/EVERYBODY has to be labeled...R or D or white or black or muslim or christian or what ever pigeon hole they are directed to work today, this week or month. How about just addressing the person, as you would in a public forum? Or the subject as one would in a public forum without all the partisan, race or religious qualifiers. It is just not the way most people communicate no matter the party, race or religion...they just don't.

And my general observation would be, it is either a partisan direction/objective or a lacking of depth of subject and or the language to be able to communicate adequately....my opinion. Why else would one continue to hammer mind numbingly away with verbiage that adds absolutely no value?

btk

[Guest]

and I do so love when they re bashing a post or poster they do not agree with they continually use the phraseology such as "my white friend..." or my "tea party friend..." to be sure to get the talking point categorization goal(s) accomplished.

It is my favorite annoyance, among the many I have, and an annoyance to many participants that EVERYTHING/EVERYBODY has to be labeled...R or D or white or black or muslim or christian or what ever pigeon hole they are directed to work today, this week or month. How about just addressing the person, as you would in a public forum? Or the subject as one would in a public forum without all the partisan, race or religious qualifiers. It is just not the way most people communicate no matter the party, race or religion...they just don't.

And my general observation would be, it is either a partisan direction/objective or a lacking of depth of subject and or the language to be able to communicate adequately....my opinion. Why else would one continue to hammer mind numbingly away with verbiage that adds absolutely no value?

btk

How about just addressing the person, as you would in a public forum? Or the subject as one would in a public forum without all the partisan, race or religious qualifiers...If I remember correctly, this is what drew me to this forum in the first place...Recently it has become more of a pie throwing contest instead of a place to discuss, learn, and thereby solve some meat and potato differences...

[Guest]

excellent description of a discussion on the political forum by a few....."a pie throwing contest"....mind you using the acceptable pies that is!!

btk

[Guest]

Y'all try to make it so complicated:

In the order of 1st, 2nd and 2rd most racist party.

3rd the Democrats.

2nd the Republicans.

1st place racists the Tea Party.

Lets say it a different way.

The Democrats have very few racists.

The Republicans have a small amount of racists.

The Tea Parts has more non-racists than racists.

Does ye gits it now.

So, we all have our racists, but not as bad as some try to make it and not as non-existent as some try to make it.

[Guest]

I really believe y'all do not know the meaning of a bigot!!!!

big·ot
   [big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

This definition gives you the benefit of the doubt that your narrow description of what you enjoy thinking others are is even acknowledged.

Bigots don't have to think. All they have to do is object/criticize/put down/make fun of anything they don't agree with from whom ever they please.
All of which is their right under the first amendment.

I do believe they subscribe to the notion that if you tell a lie often enough and loud enough you might get somebody to believe it....must be cause they certainly don't tire espousing the same old same old same old....eh?

btk

[Guest]

I really believe y'all do not know the meaning of a bigot!!!!

big·ot
   [big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

This definition gives you the benefit of the doubt that your narrow description of what you enjoy thinking others are is even acknowledged.

Bigots don't have to think. All they have to do is object/criticize/put down/make fun of anything they don't agree with from whom ever they please.
All of which is their right under the first amendment.

I do believe they subscribe to the notion that if you tell a lie often enough and loud enough you might get somebody to believe it....must be cause they certainly don't tire espousing the same old same old same old....eh?

btk

Very well stated and a perfect definition of the way I see Tea Party and Republican Extremists to include the 6 PAC on this political site. Thanks for the post. I hope they read and understand that when they address the liberals on this site, the above is exactly how they sound.

[Guest]

I really believe y'all do not know the meaning of a bigot!!!!

big·ot
   [big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

This definition gives you the benefit of the doubt that your narrow description of what you enjoy thinking others are is even acknowledged.

Bigots don't have to think. All they have to do is object/criticize/put down/make fun of anything they don't agree with from whom ever they please.
All of which is their right under the first amendment.

I do believe they subscribe to the notion that if you tell a lie often enough and loud enough you might get somebody to believe it....must be cause they certainly don't tire espousing the same old same old same old....eh?

btk
:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: I don't think some people have the sense that they were born with. LOL

[Guest]

they remind of those who shoot arrows into walls and then go about painting the bulls eye around the arrow and claiming their expertise at shooting....when in fact all they can do is....TALK.... oh and paint!!

btk

[Guest]

I really believe y'all do not know the meaning of a bigot!!!!

big·ot
   [big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

This definition gives you the benefit of the doubt that your narrow description of what you enjoy thinking others are is even acknowledged.

Bigots don't have to think. All they have to do is object/criticize/put down/make fun of anything they don't agree with from whom ever they please.
All of which is their right under the first amendment.

I do believe they subscribe to the notion that if you tell a lie often enough and loud enough you might get somebody to believe it....must be cause they certainly don't tire espousing the same old same old same old....eh?

btk

This pretty much describes everyone on the board at one time or another..and you know this is true.

[Guest]

vg..To answer a previous post of yours, no, I'm not harasshing you..I'm trying to show you what YOUR words are, and how contradictory they are...Yes they are bigoted,by your own reference to muslims,and yes you still refuse to admit your party affiliation, which would just prove what I've been saying all along...You put this trash out there as the truth and you are open to rebuttal..When you don't like the answer you hang a name on the person (moonbat) and then whine about being harassed..Give me a break..If anyone has been harassed it's been me because I dared question the "Gang of 6"..Too bad...

[Guest]

Internet bullies are a dime a dozen just like trolls. I am not referring to anybody particular just saying that's all. Ya have to learn to weed them out.

You will be OK.:ohdear:

[Guest]

they remind of those who shoot arrows into walls and then go about painting the bulls eye around the arrow and claiming their expertise at shooting....when in fact all they can do is....TALK.... oh and paint!!

btk

FUNNIEST :1rotfl:, AND TRUEST :1rotfl:, POST I HAVE EVER SEEN ON THIS FORUM :1rotfl:! LMAO!
:1rotfl: :1rotfl: :1rotfl:

[Guest]

Y'all try to make it so complicated:

In the order of 1st, 2nd and 2rd most racist party.

3rd the Democrats.

2nd the Republicans.

1st place racists the Tea Party.

Lets say it a different way.

The Democrats have very few racists.

The Republicans have a small amount of racists.

The Tea Parts has more non-racists than racists.

Does ye gits it now.

So, we all have our racists, but not as bad as some try to make it and not as non-existent as some try to make it.

This is the most blatant lie I've ever read on this forum. Everybody knows what racism is and that is the viewing of a person solely by his race and not by his worth as a human being and an individual. That was what Martin Luther King fought for.

No party separates the races with more energy and with more laws that the Democrat Party. The Democrats look at everything about a person on the basis of their race. The Tea Party has more equality built in to its platform than the Democrats could ever claim or hope for.

Now take that in your hypocritical liberal pipe and smoke it.:spoken:

[Guest]

This is the most blatant lie I've ever read on this forum. Everybody knows what racism is and that is the viewing of a person solely by his race and not by his worth as a human being and an individual. That was what Martin Luther King fought for.

No party separates the races with more energy and with more laws that the Democrat Party. The Democrats look at everything about a person on the basis of their race. The Tea Party has more equality built in to its platform than the Democrats could ever claim or hope for.

Now take that in your hypocritical liberal pipe and smoke it.:spoken:

Richie Richie Richie you have outdone yourself with your most ridiculous post to date. Democrats are racist"""""""""""""" Richie, You need to stop with the bourbon for a few days and clear the haze. I mean, there are racists in every party, but the Democrats have the small % in this category. LOL Richie Please.

[Guest]

Richie Richie Richie you have outdone yourself with your most ridiculous post to date. Democrats are racist"""""""""""""" Richie, You need to stop with the bourbon for a few days and clear the haze. I mean, there are racists in every party, but the Democrats have the small % in this category. LOL Richie Please.

I stand by this and won't back down. The Democrats are the separators and hence the racists. DEMOCRATS ARE RACISTS!! There I've said it louder.

Democrats look at your race and put you in a class. Republicans only see you as another American.

DEMOCRATS ARE THE RACISTS!! How do you like it? Can't take it? :spoken:

[Guest]

I stand by this and won't back down. The Democrats are the separators and hence the racists. DEMOCRATS ARE RACISTS!! There I've said it louder.

Democrats look at your race and put you in a class. Republicans only see you as another American.
DEMOCRATS ARE THE RACISTS!! How do you like it? Can't take it? :spoken:

:bigbow::bigbow::bigbow::bigbow:

[Guest]

Richie,

You are my good buddy but I do have to quote Colonel Sherman T. Potter of M.A.S.H. on your last posting.

What describes your posting is "Meadow Muffins."

[Guest]

I still have not heard any of the opponents of President Obama say why they did not constantly refer to the previous presidents by their full names. Did they constantly refer to George Walker Bush, James Earl Carter, Richard Milhous Nixon, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Dwight David Eisenhower? My answer to that is NO, THEY DID NOT.

Just keep trying to pound in the fact that YOUR President is a minority with a name that is not mainstream.

[Guest]

VillagerII, Don't forget it was the republicans who helped LBJ get his Civil Rights bills passed. Al Gore's father was a segregationist, among others.

[Guest]

buggy one, You won't either..As soon as they are cornered they run off and change the subject or build a case against the rest of the world to take the talk away from the current situation..Ritchi,if you say the tea party is not inundated with racism then that is the biggest LIE I've heard on this forum..
Stick that in YOUR PIPE..

[Guest]

HRPO1,

You are absolutely right. I posted a reply to one of their ridiculous links when I asked about George W. Bush's transcripts. They directed me to a parody of his official website. I noted this and did not hear any more.

Now, they do not respond as to why the did not constantly refer to the white presidents by all 3 names. Of course, they could not be saying all 3 names now because they are not mainstream white names. No, these are "fair and balanced" people.

[Guest]

HRPO1,

You are absolutely right. I posted a reply to one of their ridiculous links when I asked about George W. Bush's transcripts. They directed me to a parody of his official website. I noted this and did not hear any more.

Now, they do not respond as to why the did not constantly refer to the white presidents by all 3 names. Of course, they could not be saying all 3 names now because they are not mainstream white names. No, these are "fair and balanced" people.

1- You asked why no one could see George Walker Bush's transcripts. I directed you to a website. You then changed the issue into what kind of website it was. The link was from this site-http://www.eduinreview.com/blog/2008/10/college-transcripts-of-george-w-bush-show-c-average/

2-You have your opinion on why all 3 names are used and I have mine. Who are you to call me a liar when I honestly tell you my reason?

3- I am curious to know exactly how one can tell a white name from any other? I work with a physician whose name is William Davis. I also work with medical assistant whose name is Chantelle Robinson. I also work with another physician whose name is Todd Smith. Care to guess who is the Muslim, who is the AfricanAmerican, and who is the Caucasian? In the medical world where I have spent the last 30+ years, we know no race, color, ethnicity, religion. One is either there to heal or be healed and we are all humans both inside and out.

[Guest]

Ritchie has never even been to a meeting or rally...His own admission...He did google one though..lol..I've been to both and know first hand what the "truth" is...Other posters here have called them out with personal experiences,not googled,and they were called Liars..They try intimidation..what a joke coming from the all powerfull keyboard...They Pray to their god EXON daily....(free enterprise,what a joke)

[Guest]

Ritchie has never even been to a meeting or rally...His own admission...He did google one though..lol..I've been to both and know first hand what the "truth" is...Other posters here have called them out with personal experiences,not googled,and they were called Liars..They try intimidation..what a joke coming from the all powerfull keyboard...They Pray to their god EXON daily....(free enterprise,what a joke)

Wow, in the morning you should wake up and read your post from tonight. Unbelievable. You should have Doctor VillagerII diagnose you.

[Guest]

Katz told me to look at George W. Bush's transcript on the following site:

http://2004.georgewbush.org/bios/yale-transcript.asp

It is a parody site. Now she claims she did not. Read back on this thread for the truth.

As to the other things on the latest posting from her: Meadow Muffins! to quote Sherman Potter of M.A.S.H.

'Nuff said - Do not post any reply to me. Thank you very much.

[Guest]

Katz told me to look at George W. Bush's transcript on the following site:

http://2004.georgewbush.org/bios/yale-transcript.asp

It is a parody site. Now she claims she did not. Read back on this thread for the truth.

As to the other things on the latest posting from her: Meadow Muffins! to quote Sherman Potter of M.A.S.H.

'Nuff said - Do not post any reply to me. Thank you very much.

I said that I got that link from another website and I posted that website just tonight for you to view for yourself.

You claim that you never get responses. You did not answer my question as to who the Muslim, AfricanAmerican, and Caucasian were. That is OK, as I didn't think you could. The only way that I know is because I know them all as valuable team members.

And then you command me not to reply as though I were your subject. Do you have issues with women?

[Guest]

It seems to me that most liberals do have issues with women. You seen how the democratic party threw Hillary Clinton under the bus. Mention any women candidates for president and they are all over her like dogs on a meat wagon.
Liberals are very insecure individuals, in my experience.