Secret Life of Barack Hussein Obama

[Guest]

WHO IS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA?
2008, the left wing and the Corporate Mainstream Media (CMM) fell head over heels in love with a cool, charming, and attractive smooth talker. His social security number (one of several, incidentally) identified him as Barack Hussein Obama. Over the next four years, he would repeatedly lie to, cheat on, and deceive his liberal lovers as they closed their eyes and ears to the truth, refusing to recognize the shameless, deviously calculated, and treacherous propaganda seeping from the White House.



The review and book are here:

http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-Barack-Hussein-Obama/dp/1451633181/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1319561160&sr=1-1

Anyone with guts who tries to answer that question truthfully risks being routinely disparaged and condemned by the CMM as a Nazi, a racist, or a crazy conspiracy theorist. Mondo Frazier courageously turns a blind eye to those foolish generalizations to provide scrupulously researched, eye-opening answers in The Secret Life of Barack Hussein Obama. Frankly, they will astonish readers.

[Guest]

4 ways to tell if you are a poor judge of character:

If you believe Obama is not an American.

If you believe Obama is a Muslim.

If you think Perry would make a good president.

If you thought Palin would have been a good VP.

Now let me give some advice: If you do not throw your support behind Romney (like I said Months ago), you are giving away the election. Plain and simple.

I tried to give the 6 PAC a fair shot on here and now it turns out I was right all along, so wake up and vote for Romney and quit with the defense of nut cases like Perry and Bachman. Anyone that truly believes the likes of Perry or Palin would be good for this country needs some one on one with a counselor.

:crap2:

[Guest]

4 ways to tell if you are a poor judge of character:

If you believe Obama is not an American.

If you believe Obama is a Muslim.

If you think Perry would make a good president.

If you thought Palin would have been a good VP.

Now let me give some advice: If you do not throw your support behind Romney (like I said Months ago), you are giving away the election. Plain and simple.

I tried to give the 6 PAC a fair shot on here and now it turns out I was right all along, so wake up and vote for Romney and quit with the defense of nut cases like Perry and Bachman. Anyone that truly believes the likes of Perry or Palin would be good for this country needs some one on one with a counselor.

:crap2:

Yea, your criteria is cute but it is not on subject. The subject is the missing time that Obama does not want people to know about. The media made a big thing about President Bush may have skipped some National Guard times but don'r blink an eye about all the missing time Obama has hidden from the public.

[Guest]

I think he was in secret training in Afghanistan learning to be a socialist,communist,nazi,Kenyan radical so he could become President and destroy the U.S.A. Thank God for the repubs who vote no on everything he tries to do good or bad. It's quite obvious that Boehner,Perry,Bachman etc. are everything good about this country and the President is an evil man.

[Guest]

I think he was in secret training in Afghanistan learning to be a socialist,communist,nazi,Kenyan radical so he could become President and destroy the U.S.A. Thank God for the repubs who vote no on everything he tries to do good or bad. It's quite obvious that Boehner,Perry,Bachman etc. are everything good about this country and the President is an evil man.

By golly, I think you are finally seeing the light.:wave:

[Guest]

4 ways to tell if you are a poor judge of character:

If you believe Obama is not an American.

If you believe Obama is a Muslim.

If you think Perry would make a good president.

If you thought Palin would have been a good VP.

Now let me give some advice: If you do not throw your support behind Romney (like I said Months ago), you are giving away the election. Plain and simple.

I tried to give the 6 PAC a fair shot on here and now it turns out I was right all along, so wake up and vote for Romney and quit with the defense of nut cases like Perry and Bachman. Anyone that truly believes the likes of Perry or Palin would be good for this country needs some one on one with a counselor.

:crap2:

You list doesn't even define traits that would be deemed "character" traits. So you're premise is as flawed as your thinking. I'm not surprised.

[Guest]

You list doesn't even define traits that would be deemed "character" traits. So you're premise is as flawed as your thinking. I'm not surprised.

Well you were wrong and I was right about Perry, Bachman and Palin.

[Guest]

Well you were wrong and I was right about Perry, Bachman and Palin.

In what context? Your post says "would be good for this country". If that's your criteria, I say you're emphatically wrong, and I've a right to that opinion. But, it's only an opinion and you have yours and I have mine.

[Guest]

In what context? Your post says "would be good for this country". If that's your criteria, I say you're emphatically wrong, and I've a right to that opinion. But, it's only an opinion and you have yours and I have mine.

I have no idea how to explain to you, but when you were saying what a good man he was, I was saying when people find out what he is about, they will upchuck. I was right and you were wrong. Simple as that.

[Guest]

In what context? Your post says "would be good for this country". If that's your criteria, I say you're emphatically wrong, and I've a right to that opinion. But, it's only an opinion and you have yours and I have mine.

Your high opinion of this idiot is now at 6 %.

[Guest]

I think he was in secret training in Afghanistan learning to be a socialist,communist,nazi,Kenyan radical so he could become President and destroy the U.S.A. Thank God for the repubs who vote no on everything he tries to do good or bad. It's quite obvious that Boehner,Perry,Bachman etc. are everything good about this country and the President is an evil man.

You are kidding, right? This is a satrical post....???

[Guest]

This country has survived many other bad Presidents, both Democrat and Republican, and will survive the Obama Presidency. What America wont survive are those that believe Government is their parents and Obama is their daddy.

[Guest]

If we managed (though just barely) to survive 8 years of Junior, we can survive anything !!!

Little wonder that now most americans are in favor of abolishing the electoral college and electing our President based on the popular vote.

11 years too late.......

[Guest]

isn't if funny....no hilarious...how some folk's historical perspective on past POTUS only goes back 8 years?

Where were they before the Bush years? And please don't insult the majority by indicating there were no problems prior to Bush....PLEASE!!

Such a limited perspective on life. What a shame.

btk

[Guest]

isn't if funny....no hilarious...how some folk's historical perspective on past POTUS only goes back 8 years?

Where were they before the Bush years? And please don't insult the majority by indicating there were no problems prior to Bush....PLEASE!!

Such a limited perspective on life. What a shame.

btk

But yet, so very correct in their analysis.

[Guest]

This country has survived many other bad Presidents, both Democrat and Republican, and will survive the Obama Presidency. What America wont survive are those that believe Government is their parents and Obama is their daddy.

Yes, there are people so insecure of the ways of the world that they need big government to hug them and tell them that everything is fine and I will take care of you from cradle to grave. They are called progressive liberal democrats.

[Guest]

Yes, there are people so insecure of the ways of the world that they need big government to hug them and tell them that everything is fine and I will take care of you from cradle to grave. They are called progressive liberal democrats.

Also known as "Occupy Wall Street"

[Guest]

Also known as "Occupy Wall Street"

Maybe so, but I have a different name for those "people."

[Guest]

Maybe so, but I have a different name for those "people."

The only difference between them and the tea party is the tea party has jobs and can afford to stay in hotels when they protest.

[Guest]

VG, would that name be "poor misquided misfits?"

Every President since 1913 has not had the welfare of the American People first and foremost. No congrerss criminal has had the welfare of the United States nor the American People first and foremost since the passage of the 17th Amendment. Ever since it became law to directly elect by popular vote the state Senator to the US Congress, all they have done is pass laws that benefit themselves.

Before they were appointed by the Governor of each state and only held that office at the pleasure of the Governor. If the people got mad at the Governor, kicked him out of office, the new governor would appoint two new Senators, actually giving control over their actions and votes.

We need to go back to that system. No more "career politians." It's public service not a career.

[Guest]

Villager II, plus they crap in toilets, clean up after themselves and obey the law. But you are right, there is a big difference. The majority of the TEA party folks have JOBS.

[Guest]

4 ways to tell if you are a poor judge of character:

If you believe Obama is not an American.

If you believe Obama is a Muslim.

If you think Perry would make a good president.

If you thought Palin would have been a good VP.

Now let me give some advice: If you do not throw your support behind Romney (like I said Months ago), you are giving away the election. Plain and simple.

I tried to give the 6 PAC a fair shot on here and now it turns out I was right all along, so wake up and vote for Romney and quit with the defense of nut cases like Perry and Bachman. Anyone that truly believes the likes of Perry or Palin would be good for this country needs some one on one with a counselor.

:crap2:

VII, Let me ask you what you mean when you say that Perry Bachmann or Palin would not be good for this country? In what context? Haven't they already made a very large and positive contribution to this country? When you and others address contempt for these individuals its always on a personal level.

You may not personally like these individuals but they have clearly demonstrated they are law abiding Christians who practice what they preach and love America. The real concern here is that a liberal media, with political motives only, is allowed to continually demonize and otherwise represent people such as this as loonies. People thought Fred Smith of FedEx was a loon as hey did Steve Jobs, etc, etc etc.

I am not sold on romney because I believe his past record has made it clear he is a RINO and worse yet a flip flopper which means, like Obama, I can't trust him to do what he claims he will do. Having said that if it comes down to Romney or Obama I will vote Romney.

[Guest]

I have no idea how to explain to you, but when you were saying what a good man he was, I was saying when people find out what he is about, they will upchuck. I was right and you were wrong. Simple as that.

Still doesn't explain you last post, so again you dropped the ball. You're the only person in any context who's saying he isn't a "good man"; and now he's making people "upchuck"?

Some people might have some problems with some of his decisions, but you go way overboard. It's pretty sad and pathetic. You need a different hobby.

[Guest]

VII, Let me ask you what you mean when you say that Perry Bachmann or Palin would not be good for this country? In what context? Haven't they already made a very large and positive contribution to this country? When you and others address contempt for these individuals its always on a personal level.

You may not personally like these individuals but they have clearly demonstrated they are law abiding Christians who practice what they preach and love America. The real concern here is that a liberal media, with political motives only, is allowed to continually demonize and otherwise represent people such as this as loonies. People thought Fred Smith of FedEx was a loon as hey did Steve Jobs, etc, etc etc.

I am not sold on romney because I believe his past record has made it clear he is a RINO and worse yet a flip flopper which means, like Obama, I can't trust him to do what he claims he will do. Having said that if it comes down to Romney or Obama I will vote Romney.

Thank you :BigApplause:

[Guest]

I think that Palin could have done a good job, but what turned me off about her was when she quite as the Gov of AK. If she could not take the heat being gov what did she think was going to happen if she got elected Pres. Either take the heat from the kitchen or get out and stay out.

[Guest]

I think that Palin could have done a good job, but what turned me off about her was when she quite as the Gov of AK. If she could not take the heat being gov what did she think was going to happen if she got elected Pres. Either take the heat from the kitchen or get out and stay out.

I do not think her decision was based on taking the heat. She took alot of heat when she ran for Governor.

[Guest]

:agree:If we managed (though just barely) to survive 8 years of Junior, we can survive anything !!!

Little wonder that now most americans are in favor of abolishing the electoral college and electing our President based on the popular vote.

11 years too late.......

:agree:

[Guest]

If you treat people like they have a brain and explain exactly WHY we have an electoral college, you might be surprised with the results.

[Guest]

djplong, the electoral college was created due to the lag in communications way back when everyone was not connected to everyone else. Once states had voted, someone was picked to saddle up and ride all the way from Oregon,, California or some other distant place from foggy bottom and deliver the news of how that stated voted and for whom. Simple explanation but that is the reason for the electoral college in a nutshell.

With the instant communications we have now, the electoral college is no longer needed.

[Guest]

djplong, the electoral college was created due to the lag in communications way back when everyone was not connected to everyone else. Once states had voted, someone was picked to saddle up and ride all the way from Oregon,, California or some other distant place from foggy bottom and deliver the news of how that stated voted and for whom. Simple explanation but that is the reason for the electoral college in a nutshell.

With the instant communications we have now, the electoral college is no longer needed.

That's not quite true. The Electoral College was instituted to blunt the impact of the most populace states in deciding the outcome to the detriment of the smaller state's concerns.

Also it was feared a "tyrant" could manipulate public opinion in order to come into power and so the Electoral College, which would meet only once would be insulated from manipulation by foreign governments or others.

http://www.historycentral.com/elections/Electoralcollgewhy.html

[Guest]

If that was really the case then each state would only have 1 electoral vote. Each state gets so many votes according to population so the most populace states still get to pick the president.

[Guest]

That's not quite true. The Electoral College was instituted to blunt the impact of the most populace states in deciding the outcome to the detriment of the smaller state's concerns.

Also it was feared a "tyrant" could manipulate public opinion in order to come into power and so the Electoral College, which would meet only once would be insulated from manipulation by foreign governments or others.

http://www.historycentral.com/elections/Electoralcollgewhy.html

Exactly. To put it in modern terms, it prevents a candidate from promising the world to New York City, LA and Chicago to buy enough votes to win the popular vote. It still makes a nod to the more populous states with the way it's apportioned - but you can't win just NY & CA and win the election.

[Guest]

...The media made a big thing about President Bush may have skipped some National Guard times but don'r blink an eye about all the missing time Obama has hidden from the public.

I was never concerned about Bush missing National Guard time because I was pretty certain he had. What I wondered was how Bush got sworn into the Texas National Guard nine days after graduating from college when he was never on the waiting list. During Vietnam you could only imagine there must of been ten thousand or more names on that list and Bush just jumped to the top of the list in nine days.

Now I know Clinton did his share to avoid serving but you could never accuse him of being a chicken hawk. Don't republicans feel somewhat disappointed in their leaders like Cheney when he hid behind his wife to avoid the draft. A hardship deferment for being married, give me a break. Then when they took that away and said you needed a child, his wife gave birth nine months and 3 days later. If I had supported the man I certainly would have my doubts about his character.

[Guest]

I was never concerned about Bush missing National Guard time because I was pretty certain he had. What I wondered was how Bush got sworn into the Texas National Guard nine days after graduating from college when he was never on the waiting list. During Vietnam you could only imagine there must of been ten thousand or more names on that list and Bush just jumped to the top of the list in nine days.

Now I know Clinton did his share to avoid serving but you could never accuse him of being a chicken hawk. Don't republicans feel somewhat disappointed in their leaders like Cheney when he hid behind his wife to avoid the draft. A hardship deferment for being married, give me a break. Then when they took that away and said you needed a child, his wife gave birth nine months and 3 days later. If I had supported the man I certainly would have my doubts about his character.

John w I totally agree with you. In fact I wish voters would not consider a candidate for president who hasn't served and/or had a spuse that served

[Guest]

Then you just lost the following Presidents:

FDR, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding, Wilson, Taft (though he was Secretary of War), Cleveland, Arthur, Polk (inactive in militia), Van Buren, Quincy Adams, Madison (in militia, saw no action), Jefferson and Adams.

[Guest]

Then you just lost the following Presidents: FDR, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding, Wilson, Taft (though he was Secretary of War), Cleveland, Arthur, Polk (inactive in militia), Van Buren, Quincy Adams, Madison (in militia, saw no action), Jefferson and Adams.

How many of those would you label a Chicken Hawk? Bush and Cheney were in their twenties during Vietnam and yet they weren't to be found but when they got in power they couldn't wait to go to war. Most of the ones you mentioned did need a little prodding when in the White House and their past was sometimes a consequence of their times more than a consequence of their actions.

[Guest]

How many of those would you label a Chicken Hawk? Bush and Cheney were in their twenties during Vietnam and yet they weren't to be found but when they got in power they couldn't wait to go to war. Most of the ones you mentioned did need a little prodding when in the White House and their past was sometimes a consequence of their times more than a consequence of their actions.

more evidence of BDR

[Guest]

more evidence of BDR

BDR Basic Daily Routine
BDR Big Dumb Rocket
BDR Blood Donation Record (American Red Cross Biomedical Services)
BDR Baseline Design Review
BDR Battle Damage Report
BDR Bulk Dose Regimen
BDR Bomb Damage Repair
BDR Bells Don't Ring (telephony)
BDR Bad Dick Report
BDR Bayesian Decision Rule
BDR Build Design Review
BDR Best Depth Range
BDR Bulletin de Remise (French: Bulletin of the Depot)
BDR Back Door Receiving (store loading area)
BDR Business Decision Reporting
BDR Bone Densitometry Report
BDR Border
BDR Bangladesh Rifles (military forces in Bangladesh)
BDR Backup Designated Router (networking)
BDR Bill Draft Request
BDR Bombardier (artillery rank)
BDR Backup Disaster Recovery
BDR Battle Damage Repair
BDR Background Diabetic Retinopathy
BDR Bus Device Request
BDR Brazilian Depositary Receipt
BDR Battery Discharge Regulator
BDR Bridgeport, CT, USA - Sikorsky Memorial (Airport Code)
BDR Business Development Representatives
BDR Budget Data Request
BDR Bone Densitometry Report
BDR Bödabaden Dance Resort (Sweden)

[Guest]

BDR Basic Daily Routine
BDR Big Dumb Rocket
BDR Blood Donation Record (American Red Cross Biomedical Services)
BDR Baseline Design Review
BDR Battle Damage Report
BDR Bulk Dose Regimen
BDR Bomb Damage Repair
BDR Bells Don't Ring (telephony)
BDR Bad Dick Report
BDR Bayesian Decision Rule
BDR Build Design Review
BDR Best Depth Range
BDR Bulletin de Remise (French: Bulletin of the Depot)
BDR Back Door Receiving (store loading area)
BDR Business Decision Reporting
BDR Bone Densitometry Report
BDR Border
BDR Bangladesh Rifles (military forces in Bangladesh)
BDR Backup Designated Router (networking)
BDR Bill Draft Request
BDR Bombardier (artillery rank)
BDR Backup Disaster Recovery
BDR Battle Damage Repair
BDR Background Diabetic Retinopathy
BDR Bus Device Request
BDR Brazilian Depositary Receipt
BDR Battery Discharge Regulator
BDR Bridgeport, CT, USA - Sikorsky Memorial (Airport Code)
BDR Business Development Representatives
BDR Budget Data Request
BDR Bone Densitometry Report
BDR Bödabaden Dance Resort (Sweden)

Actually I misspelled. I meant BDS. Now we need a whole new set of possible acronym meanings.

[Guest]

bfd