One Republican nominee with a side of Rice?

[Guest]

Reports are surfacing that Condi Rice is positioning herself to be available and ready to accept the V.P. slot of the eventual Republican Candidate which immediately lends her solid foreign policy credentials to the eventual nominee.

Insiders think her selection would be the "chess move" to counter the expected but confirmation deflected move of replacing Joe Biden with Sec. of State Hillary Clinton on the Democrat Presidential Ticket for 2012.

I think if Condi Rice is selected that the Obama team would be in a cold sweat about the prospects of Joe Biden and her in a one on one debate.

Very interesting story to prime the imagination.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/18/curl-one-president-please-with-a-side-of-rice/

[Guest]

Romney/Rice would be a likely winner.

[Guest]

Secretary Rice is too close to Pres George W Bush to ever be considered a viable candidate for anything.

[Guest]

Dems would like nothing better than to have a chance to debate a failed Bush administration member on foreign policy.

What about all those WMD's..........
Why couldn't they find OBL after 7 years?
Why didn't Iraqi oil pay for the war, like the VP claimed?

And on and on and on.........

[Guest]

how about a different approach than Bushslapping? Which adds no evaluation value what so ever.
How about her qualifications and her capabilities?

btk

[Guest]

how about a different approach than Bushslapping? Which adds no evaluation value what so ever.
How about her qualifications and her capabilities?

btk

You know she will not be able to avoid the association with Dubya. I actually think more highly of Rice than most of the current candidates and far more than the ill-advised administration she served in. :cus:

[Guest]

A ticket of Romney and Rice would most likely get my vote.

[Guest]

http://prorege-forum.com/forum_entry.php?id=6256

[Guest]

A ticket of Romney and Rice would most likely get my vote.

What the extreme right seem to have difficulty understanding is that their ideology is not compatible with the thinking of most moderates and independents. They seem bound and determined to come up with an alternative that will be unpalatable to the mainstream, and thus insure another Obama term.

[Guest]

What the extreme right seem to have difficulty understanding is that their ideology is not compatible with the thinking of most moderates and independents. They seem bound and determined to come up with an alternative that will be unpalatable to the mainstream, and thus insure another Obama term.

IMHO the idealogy of the extreme right tracks immensely closer to moderate and independents than does the extreme left. Point of fact the so called extreme right always end up governing as moderates due to our American culture.

I happen to be one of those agnostics who continues to say as respects the WMD situation that all we can say is we didn't find them. My guess they were moved over the border to Syria. Additonally if yoy look at the strategic gain by invading Iraq we benefit greatly. Now we have liberal Dems who place those gains in danger by removing all of our troops. this I beleive is a major mistake that will come back to bite us.

[Guest]

What the extreme right seem to have difficulty understanding is that their ideology is not compatible with the thinking of most moderates and independents. They seem bound and determined to come up with an alternative that will be unpalatable to the mainstream, and thus insure another Obama term.

Conservatism wins anytime it's tried.