Ann Coulter 1-1-12

[Guest]

Ann Coulter actually wrote a column in the Daily Sun today that was coherent and well put together. Coulter said that 2012 is not the time for a Republican extremist or a nut bar or an experimental candidate but time for a person that has a good chance of winning the general election - Mitt Romney.

[Guest]

I get an advanced copy of her columns and anticipated that the left of left would agree since it is a direct slap to many Republicans.

So I am sorry to say my wordsmith babe has left me feeling cold and rejected.

It will take me a long few seonds to forget and forgive her:)

[Guest]

And many Conservatives think she is right as well. The number one priority for the 2012 election is to defeat the incumbent. Also, Romeny IS a conservative.

[Guest]

Wasn't she the one that said "If Romney's the candidate, we will lose"?

[Guest]

That is the same argument we were given for McCain.. we need a moderate.. to beat the liberal.. ya right..
and even if we win.. what do we win? the same Repub bologna.. war, debt,.. boehner deals.. broken promises.. American wins nothing..

[Guest]

That is the same argument we were given for McCain.. we need a moderate.. to beat the liberal.. ya right..
and even if we win.. what do we win? the same Repub bologna.. war, debt,.. boehner deals.. broken promises.. American wins nothing..

Sad but True! :sad:

[Guest]

JimJoe,

I hate to disagree with you but I believe the reason the Republicans lost in 2008 was the addition of Sarah Palin to the ticket. Too many voters thought she was too extreme and either did not vote at all or crossed over to the Democrat side.

That beagle in your avatar is sure a good looking dog. Beagles really are great dogs.

[Guest]

Ann Coulter's exact quote was "If Chris Christie doesn't run, Mitt Romney will be the nominee and we will lose". My, how quickly she turns on a dime.
Apparently she wants to lose, since she's now supporting Mitt Romney. Maybe she's a closet Obama supporter.

[Guest]

Ann Coulter's exact quote was "If Chris Christie doesn't run, Mitt Romney will be the nominee and we will lose". My, how quickly she turns on a dime.
Apparently she wants to lose, since she's now supporting Mitt Romney. Maybe she's a closet Obama supporter.

Ms. Coulter has tossed a huge chunk of her credibility in the political crapper with her recent columns. She's now trying to predict the political ebbs and flows and adjusting her political thinking to reflect these winds of change instead of sticking to her supposed core beliefs as she's articulated them in the not so distant past.

Of course she's now endeared herself to liberals by casting aspersions on Republicans. It brings to mind how Sarah Palin was the darling of the liberal media when she was kicking Republicans in Alaska, before her Vice Presidential nomination caused them to turn a 180 and condemn her.

It's foolish to think she would be anything close to supporting Obama, but undoubtedly she's now been convinced that a conservative cannot win the general election. She's now ignoring historical precedent and acting as foolish as a pundit can be.

[Guest]

Was Coultergeist ever credible? :cus:

[Guest]

the ONLY reason Obama won was he sold a lot of gullible people on his promises of hope and change and, unfortunately, they believed him.

The good news is he ONLY won by 2 % and I understand a win is a win by only one vote.

But this time around he will not have the same number of gullibles buying into his rhetoric...he will not have the same number of blacks buying into his unfilled promises to them...and the young that bought his pied piper tune will not be there again....so I figure if he maintains all the faithful, no matter what partisan loyals, he could very well be in jeopardy as the groups mentioned will no doubt easily be more than a 2 % swing.

It isn't going to matter who the republican candidate is to those who have been jilted or let down by the Obama rhetoric only courses of action.

btk

[Guest]

President Obama received about 96% of the Black vote. Even if this goes down to 80%, that does not mean that many Blacks will vote Republican with the Republican attack on social programs. Hispanic votes will still go to Obama for the main part; the youth vote will go to Obama for the main part; and the intelligent vote will all go to Obama.

Thus, President Obama wins again and this time by around a 5 or 6% margin.

[Guest]

I hope you're right BTK, but with 47% of the people not paying federal income taxes it is going to be a hard fight. You know who they are going to vote for. Not to mention the media, academia and Hollywierd will all be in Obama's corner. I'm not holding my breath that any republican can win.

[Guest]

President Obama received about 96% of the Black vote. Even if this goes down to 80%, that does not mean that many Blacks will vote Republican with the Republican attack on social programs. Hispanic votes will still go to Obama for the main part; the youth vote will go to Obama for the main part; and the intelligent vote will all go to Obama.

Thus, President Obama wins again and this time by around a 5 or 6% margin.

"and the intelligent vote will all go to Obama."

That is just about as arrogant and demeaning a comment as I ever seen on here.

[Guest]

the ONLY reason Obama won was he sold a lot of gullible people on his promises of hope and change and, unfortunately, they believed him.
The good news is he ONLY
won by 2 % and I understand a win is a win by only one vote.

But this time around he will not have the same number of gullibles buying into his rhetoric...he will not have the same number of blacks buying into his unfilled promises to them...and the young that bought his pied piper tune will not be there again....so I figure if he maintains all the faithful, no matter what partisan loyals, he could very well be in jeopardy as the groups mentioned will no doubt easily be more than a 2 % swing.

It isn't going to matter who the republican candidate is to those who have been jilted or let down by the Obama rhetoric only courses of action.

btk

I take issue with your statement "he ONLY won by 2%". The final electoral college vote was Obama 365 to McCain 173, and the popular vote was 52.9 to 45.7. I don't see any figure that equals 2%. Explain please.

[Guest]

in other words the loyalists believe the same folks who voted for Obama last time will again this time and the few who do not vote for him will not be enough to make a difference.

The order of the day is to keep telling others why there is absolutely nothing Obama can do wrong....nothing he can do to discourage those who voted for him...and that it is OK with all who voted for him there is nothing he can do to make the promises he asked them to buy into the first time....and they will buy into again....

yup, just keep telling yourself that it doesn't matter.

What loyalists to Obama have not been able to do is explain what it is he means when he says he needs 4 more years to finish the job he started. To me that implies he started...OK so he was inaugurated and he moved into the WH. Just what is it he has started and needs 4 more years to complete?
Make the hole this country is in deeper than ever. If the country is no better off after spending trillions of dollars.....does anybody think he needs 4 more years to spend trillions more with the same end result.

Please enlighten us what it is he needs to complete.

btk

[Guest]

As soon as you tell me where you got the 2% figure, I will enlighten you.

[Guest]

Good catch...my error I slipped a digit.
Now enlighten me.

btk

[Guest]

Good catch...my error I slipped a digit.
Now enlighten me.

btk

You slipped a digit? According to my calculator, 52.9 minus 45.7 equals 7.2%.
You slipped five digits.

President Obama needs four more years to:

Implement the Affordable Care Act

End the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy

Fight for the middle class

Keep medicare, medicaid and social security solvent

Bring all the troops home from Afghanistan

Keep us out of war with Iran

Bring unemployment down to an acceptable level

Protect a woman's right to choose, and much, much more

[Guest]

President Obama received about 96% of the Black vote. Even if this goes down to 80%, that does not mean that many Blacks will vote Republican with the Republican attack on social programs. Hispanic votes will still go to Obama for the main part; the youth vote will go to Obama for the main part; and the intelligent vote will all go to Obama.

Thus, President Obama wins again and this time by around a 5 or 6% margin.

I don't know why any woman would vote for a republican with all their personhood initiatives, which couldn't even pass in conservative Mississippi.
I doubt any gay or lesbians would vote repub after Ron Paul's supporter said they should be executed. No African-American votes after Gingrich said poor black kids should be janitors and he would abolish all child labor laws. And
Romney said he would do away with the Dream Act . Obama leads with 70% of the hispanic vote.


I wouldn't think that anyone on or near medicare would vote republican, since they plan on ending medicare as we know it and replacing it with a voucher system.

So who does that leave us with voting for republicans? Angry old white men.
Obama won't even have to campaign this year. He can just keep playing their words back over and over and stand by and watch the republican party implode.

[Guest]

Thanks for the nice comments on my beagle. She really is man's best friend.... Snuggling next to me at this moment.. and constantly at my side at home and on long walks.
I respect your opinion about palin but I respectfully disagree. I think we will find out this year because the Repubs are going to go moderate again, and I predict they will lose, again. We shall see.
JJ


JimJoe,

I hate to disagree with you but I believe the reason the Republicans lost in 2008 was the addition of Sarah Palin to the ticket. Too many voters thought she was too extreme and either did not vote at all or crossed over to the Democrat side.

That beagle in your avatar is sure a good looking dog. Beagles really are great dogs.

[Guest]

Ann's upcoming column in sunday's Daily sun is a continuation of her fawning over Mitt. I am surprised that my wordsmith babe is being so obvious. Perhaps se is just trying to get me jealous;)