Republican party

[Guest]

I can't understand why the republican party is so hot on getting Romney in he can't beat obama or maybe that is the reason

[Guest]

Check out the latest polling date on the swing states. Romney is the only candidate that can beat Obama.

Swing States poll: Romney and Obama tied; Gingrich trails (http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-01-27/swing-states-poll/52871890/1)

[Guest]

Romney is the best hope to beat Obama.

[Guest]

There is no difference between Romney and BHO. He is a radical, pro-abortion, Northeastern Liberal like Nelson Rockerfeller. He won't get rid or Obamacare, he made is own socialized medicine in Mass. before BHO.

[Guest]

There is no difference between Romney and BHO. He is a radical, pro-abortion, Northeastern Liberal like Nelson Rockerfeller. He won't get rid or Obamacare, he made is own socialized medicine in Mass. before BHO.

Not sure what Romney has to do with radical and abortion should not be a part of the political discussion.

[Guest]

Not sure what Romney has to do with radical and abortion should not be a part of the political discussion.

Being Pro-life is the number one reason to choose a candidate and is therefor part of politics!

Soros AKA Spooky Dude, has said there is on difference between Romney and BHO. That alone is reason to support Santorum or Gingrich.

[Guest]

There is no difference between Romney and BHO. He is a radical, pro-abortion, Northeastern Liberal like Nelson Rockerfeller. He won't get rid or Obamacare, he made is own socialized medicine in Mass. before BHO.

Oh. This would be why......

"Jan. 19, 2012 - Massachusetts Citizens for Life President Anne Fox made the following statement on what she said are false attacks on Romney’s record:

“Since being elected governor, Mitt Romney has had a consistent commitment to the culture of life. As governor, he worked closely with Massachusetts Citizens for Life. Misguided attempts to blame Mitt Romney for the fact that state-funded health care in Massachusetts funds abortion ignore the facts. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in 1981 that the Massachusetts Constitution requires the funding of abortion. This decision forces Massachusetts to fund abortion to the same extent it funds other medical procedures. A 1986 attempt to overturn the court ruling with a Constitutional Amendment failed. Obviously, in providing health coverage, the governor and the legislature were bound by this decision.”

Fox’s comments mirror those from David French, Senior Counsel at American Center for Law and Justice and former attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund:

Let’s make one thing perfectly clear, any abortion coverage contained in Massachusetts insurance plans is required by Massachusetts legal precedent that Mitt could not alter.......

Mitt Romney is "Consistently" Pro-Life, Mass Activist Says | LifeNews.com (http://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/19/mitt-romney-is-consistently-pro-life-mass-activist-says/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lifenews%2Fnewsfeed+%28LifeNe ws.com%29)

[Guest]

Oh. This would be why......

"Jan. 19, 2012 - Massachusetts Citizens for Life President Anne Fox made the following statement on what she said are false attacks on Romney’s record:

“Since being elected governor, Mitt Romney has had a consistent commitment to the culture of life. As governor, he worked closely with Massachusetts Citizens for Life. Misguided attempts to blame Mitt Romney for the fact that state-funded health care in Massachusetts funds abortion ignore the facts. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in 1981 that the Massachusetts Constitution requires the funding of abortion. This decision forces Massachusetts to fund abortion to the same extent it funds other medical procedures. A 1986 attempt to overturn the court ruling with a Constitutional Amendment failed. Obviously, in providing health coverage, the governor and the legislature were bound by this decision.”

Fox’s comments mirror those from David French, Senior Counsel at American Center for Law and Justice and former attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund:

Let’s make one thing perfectly clear, any abortion coverage contained in Massachusetts insurance plans is required by Massachusetts legal precedent that Mitt could not alter.......

Mitt Romney is "Consistently" Pro-Life, Mass Activist Says | LifeNews.com (http://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/19/mitt-romney-is-consistently-pro-life-mass-activist-says/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lifenews%2Fnewsfeed+%28LifeNe ws.com%29)

Then how do you explain Rommney saying he was pro-abortion when he ran for Senate against Teddy Kennedy. His changes makes me very uncomfortable.

[Guest]

Then how do you explain Rommney saying he was pro-abortion when he ran for Senate against Teddy Kennedy. His changes makes me very uncomfortable.

He changed his mind. That happens. Ask Newt about individual mandates. You can ignore "Massachusetts Citizens for Life" if that makes you feel better. I would quote Ann Coulteer here, but then someone would complain that I am not thinking for myself.

[Guest]

Then how do you explain Rommney saying he was pro-abortion when he ran for Senate against Teddy Kennedy. His changes makes me very uncomfortable.

As Romney has said repeatedly, and in one of the last two debates, there is a big difference between having a personal belief that abortion itself is wrong, while at the same time, the law of the land by way of the U.S. Supreme Court permits an individual person to choose abortion...or NOT choose it.

Just like you and all other pro-life advocates: it's abhorrent to you, and you have a legal right to choose NOT to have one.

If and until Roe v. Wade is finally overturned, personal, independent convictions and decisions are what will prevail.....and hopefully more and more people will be convinced that the birth of a baby is not the worst thing that could possibly happen to a person!

I'd venture to say that fewer people will come to an anti-legal-abortion position and adapt it for themselves, as long as pro-life advocates call them "murderers" and "criminals" in the meantime while they are deciding within the law of the land.

People tend to tune out when stereotyped and called hideous names while knowing they themselves personally would NEVER have an abortion.

Once again, extremism and stereotyping are not what most thinking people listen to.

[Guest]

Abortion stops a beating heart. It is not right for a person to die because of the actions or whimms of its parents.

The baby can be put up for adoption. Not killed. We treat people on death row better. They have legal appeals to save their lives. Abortion involves an unborn person, that is what makes it different. The reason Margaret Sanger pushed abortion was to wipe out "undisireable" races.

The companion decision, Doe vs Bolton is the one that allows killing babies at any age, even while they are being born.

[Guest]

The difference between Romney and Newt is not only abortion. The establishment of the Republican party wants Romney because just like him they talk a good conservative show and never do anything. They are afraid that Newt will do what he did in the 90s, the public will not accept the cuts that are necessary to save the nation from financial disaster, and they will lose the ability to protect the fat cats.
Look at the Republican party record on conservative values. They yak yak about abortion, balancing the budget, etc, then we give them a majority in the house (where spending bills originate), they fund planned parenthood and pass record setting deficit budgets, lie to us about how much they have cut... and slyly claim the devil dems made them do it by threatening to shut the gov down.
I say all conservatives should dump the repub party, and vote libertarian this year. We will lose the presidency but at least we will have a chance in the next one of actually getting something done, by forcing the Repub party to either nominate a conservative or LOSE for sure.

[Guest]

Look at who is supporting Romney and then who is not. The GOP establishment Karl rove (1% ers) , George Soros and every other hedge fund managere in the country. Why? Rush Limbaugh Sara Palin, Rev Wildmon of America Family Association, Herman Cain are some upporting Gingrich Why?

Because this GOP fight is about who will continue to control the GOP and the fight is among Establsihment, Tea Party and Evangeical Christians

The three overriding issues in this campaign are the economy, defense/offense (foreign policy) and Repeal of ObamaCare. Gingrich as an historian and his previous years in government can get results with all three issues. romney may be a good businessman but the government doesn't run itself like a business. You need someone like gingrich that knows how to apply pressure. As an historian he understand the importance of a strong military and will out perform romney and finally romney won't repeal ObamaCare in fact his plan is no different than Obama's and ergo one reason soros claims there is no difference between these two (Obama and Romney)

[Guest]

Look at who is supporting Romney and then who is not. The GOP establishment Karl rove (1% ers) , George Soros and every other hedge fund managere in the country. Why? Rush Limbaugh Sara Palin, Rev Wildmon of America Family Association, Herman Cain are some upporting Gingrich Why?

Because this GOP fight is about who will continue to control the GOP and the fight is among Establsihment, Tea Party and Evangeical Christians

The three overriding issues in this campaign are the economy, defense/offense (foreign policy) and Repeal of ObamaCare. Gingrich as an historian and his previous years in government can get results with all three issues. romney may be a good businessman but the government doesn't run itself like a business. You need someone like gingrich that knows how to apply pressure. As an historian he understand the importance of a strong military and will out perform romney and finally romney won't repeal ObamaCare in fact his plan is no different than Obama's and ergo one reason soros claims there is no difference between these two (Obama and Romney)

There is an enormous difference between Obama and Romney. It is the difference in motives and long-term goals for what the USA ought to be.

It is about whether one wants to destroy what's left of the America we knew so the Marxists can enter like Santa Claus and tell all the "little people" they can live in the Big House for FREE (using other people's money and property confiscated from them), and lock in their vote forever.....

.....or whether the other one wants to PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND the America we knew, so that his children and grandchildren can live the rest of their lives in the America We Knew, where the goal was to preserve the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness....NOT a lifelong "free lunch" in tyranny.

[Guest]

It is about whether one wants to destroy what's left of the America we knew so the Marxists can enter like Santa Claus and tell all the "little people" they can live in the Big House for FREE (using other people's money and property confiscated from them), and lock in their vote forever.....


This is the straw man that Republicans put up to run against because the real Obama is nothing of the sort.

You know - the guy who got bin Laden, bailed out his CORPORATE buddies in the banks (ironically making the government a $12.5B profit on the Citigroup stock), bailed out GM, handed health care over to the "job creators" in the insurance industry, maintained tax breaks, etc.

You may not like the policies - and there are several that I don't. But the GOP today is running against a fictional Obama because, truth be told, the alternative is to run against the REAL Obama with their policies that match the Bush administration - and that "lack of change" helped doom McCain's candidacy.

[Guest]

There is an enormous difference between Obama and Romney. It is the difference in motives and long-term goals for what the USA ought to be.

It is about whether one wants to destroy what's left of the America we knew so the Marxists can enter like Santa Claus and tell all the "little people" they can live in the Big House for FREE (using other people's money and property confiscated from them), and lock in their vote forever.....

.....or whether the other one wants to PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND the America we knew, so that his children and grandchildren can live the rest of their lives in the America We Knew, where the goal was to preserve the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness....NOT a lifelong "free lunch" in tyranny.

OMG.....this is dire indeed. :ohdear:

[Guest]

The circular firing squad that calls itself the Republican Party might have already rendered their candidate's chances of beating Barack Obama a fatal blow.

[Guest]

The circular firing squad that calls itself the Republican Party might have already rendered their candidate's chances of beating Barack Obama a fatal blow.

??????????????????????

[Guest]

There is no difference between Romney and BHO. He is a radical, pro-abortion, Northeastern Liberal like Nelson Rockerfeller. He won't get rid or Obamacare, he made is own socialized medicine in Mass. before BHO.

WELCOME to the FORUM Bavarian!!! I have already said the EXACT same things in this forum.
I seriously doubt that "president" Romney will give any time to overturning either abortion (he has already stated it is the law of the land, even though he believes it to be morally wrong) or Obamacare (spawn or big brother of Romneycare)...

[Guest]

OMG.....this is dire indeed. :ohdear:

OMG= OBAMA MUST GO!...so YES, it is dire indeed!:a040:

[Guest]

OMG= OBAMA MUST GO!...so YES, it is dire indeed!:a040:

I thought it was Obama's My Guy=OMG :a040:

[Guest]

I thought it was Obama's My Guy=OMG :a040:
Guess you thought wrong.:a040:

[Guest]

Guess you thought wrong.:a040:




So did Osama Bin Laden

[Guest]

Guess you thought wrong.:a040:

Nope.....I re-thought my thinking....OMG= Obama's My Guy. :a040: