Log in

View Full Version : Another theroy


Guest
04-22-2012, 12:17 PM
If the health care bill is turned downed by the court and is in fact found unconstitutional most people that don't like Romney will then vote for obama thinking that they don't have to worry about the health care bill. But if it is upheld then anyone that doesn't trust obama will vote for Romney. I for one would vote for Romney even though I may not like him just to get obama out. So think about this. If the first happens and obama can some how get the economy going he will be reelected.

Guest
04-22-2012, 02:11 PM
If the health care bill is turned downed by the court and is in fact found unconstitutional most people that don't like Romney will then vote for obama thinking that they don't have to worry about the health care bill. But if it is upheld then anyone that doesn't trust obama will vote for Romney. I for one would vote for Romney even though I may not like him just to get obama out. So think about this. If the first happens and obama can some how get the economy going he will be reelected.

Was this theory posted during cocktail hour?

Guest
04-22-2012, 04:03 PM
Any comprehensive decision before election can be beneficial to Obama. It either validates his position or takes it off the table.

If it's a partial victory, it stills softens the impact for Obama, and he can just thank the court for straightening out the legalities of his landmark law.

Guest
04-22-2012, 04:06 PM
Yep, posting during Happy Hour does lead to rambling rants and confused
"theroy" by some.

Guest
04-22-2012, 04:13 PM
Yep, posting during Happy Hour does lead to rambling rants and confused
"theroy" by some.

What is it with you people correcting everyone and insuring that any error in typing or spelling is called to everyone's attention ? it is NOT funny if that is what you are going for

Guest
04-22-2012, 04:22 PM
The point could be made from that of checking your posting for both CONTENT and TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS before hitting the submit button.

Double-checking makes sure you want to post what you have written and that it will be taken seriously by readers.

Thank you for your kind attention, Bucco. The offer of joining us at the watering hole still stands.

Guest
04-22-2012, 04:28 PM
The point could be made from that of checking your posting for both CONTENT and TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS before hitting the submit button.

Double-checking makes sure you want to post what you have written and that it will be taken seriously by readers.

Thank you for your kind attention, Bucco. The offer of joining us at the watering hole still stands.

If you have the need to correct someone drop them a PM....no reason to spell it out in public

Guest
04-22-2012, 05:10 PM
Some folks are anal.

Guest
04-22-2012, 05:14 PM
Careful, Posh, that is getting close to words that can get you suspended from TOTV if reported to the Admin.

Guest
04-22-2012, 05:25 PM
And to think I passed spealing

Guest
04-22-2012, 05:26 PM
Careful, Posh, that is getting close to words that can get you suspended from TOTV if reported to the Admin.

Wow, I think that word is far from the line but if you think it hurt some thin skinned feelings then I heartily offer apologies and offer up my best attempt at Kumbuya.

Guest
04-22-2012, 05:57 PM
What is it with you people correcting everyone and insuring that any error in typing or spelling is called to everyone's attention ? it is NOT funny if that is what you are going for

The point could be made from that of checking your posting for both CONTENT and TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS before hitting the submit button.

Double-checking makes sure you want to post what you have written and that it will be taken seriously by readers.


The only ones who are rude enough to constantly "correct" another's spelling or grammar are the liberals on this forum. I've never seen it otherwise.

It's just one more of the liberals tedious examples of "divert and ridicule" whenever possible.

In many ways it just indicates the sparsity of intellectual thought, rather than the opposite.

Guest
04-22-2012, 06:04 PM
Or, Richie, it may be that the Liberals are the ones who think about what they post BEFORE it is posted. That way, we can check for both content and spelling - contrary to wubers who tend to go posting half-cocked.

Guest
04-22-2012, 06:06 PM
'half-cocked" Now there is a word that might get you reported. :1rotfl:

Guest
04-22-2012, 07:52 PM
Or, Richie, it may be that the Liberals are the ones who think about what they post BEFORE it is posted. That way, we can check for both content and spelling - contrary to wubers who tend to go posting half-cocked.

That's not it; it's that we're more social and polite. I could poke many on this forum for grammatical mistakes, absent punctuation and run on sentences, but I don't.

As long as I understand what it is you're trying to say, that's what matters.

You do it to put down the people you disagree with and not to help, and that's a bit despicable.

Guest
04-22-2012, 07:56 PM
So glad that I have a mentor like RichieLion to teach me the errors of my way, aren't I? :1rotfl:


Of course, Richie and the Wubers (oh, a new band for Lake Sumter Landing) like to accuse "It's just one more of the liberals tedious examples of "divert and ridicule" whenever possible." That, by the way, is one more of their FOX NOISE phrases of the day. It would be good to hear their original thought but when FOX NOISE is feeding the phrases to wubers, why should they use originality?

'Nuff said on this tired topic. Let's move on.

Guest
04-22-2012, 11:17 PM
So glad that I have a mentor like RichieLion to teach me the errors of my way, aren't I? :1rotfl:


Of course, Richie and the Wubers (oh, a new band for Lake Sumter Landing) like to accuse "It's just one more of the liberals tedious examples of "divert and ridicule" whenever possible." That, by the way, is one more of their FOX NOISE phrases of the day. It would be good to hear their original thought but when FOX NOISE is feeding the phrases to wubers, why should they use originality?

'Nuff said on this tired topic. Let's move on.

You are so full of it. You're doing it again. Diverting the topic to an imaginary FOX News reference.

Then you add is the bogus ridicule by accusing me of not having original thought.

You decry what I say about "divert and ridicule" by using the established liberal tactics of "divert and ridicule" as you do it.

You are so absent of shame, or you just can't help yourself as the tactic is so ingrained in your psyche.

But you are illustrating my conclusions in bold colors as no one else can.