PDA

View Full Version : Rush Babes For America


Guest
05-09-2012, 10:47 PM
Limbaugh ‘Rush Babes for America’ Facebook page surpasses NOW in 24 hours | The Daily Caller (http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/09/limbaugh-rush-babes-for-america-facebook-page-surpasses-now-in-24-hours/)

.................................................. ..........................................http://i921.photobucket.com/albums/ad51/wakytimes/1233270615-haha_simpsons.jpg

Guest
05-10-2012, 03:14 AM
Limbaugh ‘Rush Babes for America’ Facebook page surpasses NOW in 24 hours | The Daily Caller (http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/09/limbaugh-rush-babes-for-america-facebook-page-surpasses-now-in-24-hours/)

.................................................. ..........................................http://i921.photobucket.com/albums/ad51/wakytimes/1233270615-haha_simpsons.jpg

He knows how to make a buck.

Guest
05-10-2012, 04:58 AM
He knows how to make a buck.

He would make a wonderful spokesman for the American Skinheads and the NAZI Pary.

Guest
05-10-2012, 06:14 AM
So?

Guest
05-10-2012, 06:35 AM
Howard Stern could probably surpass Rush if he did a similar stunt.

Guest
05-10-2012, 09:23 AM
the point is to show that the so called "war on women" is a political hoax and that conservative women are not buying it....go Rush!

Guest
05-10-2012, 09:30 AM
the point is to show that the so called "war on women" is a political hoax and that conservative women are not buying it....go Rush!

First intelligent post on this thread. It's amazing how often people cannot see the simple thing they're looking at without explanation.

I'm not a bit surprised that you were the one who got it.

N.O.W. has nowhere near the following that the media would have you think. N.O.W.'s influence is purely left-wing media driven.

Guest
05-10-2012, 09:31 AM
the point is to show that the so called "war on women" is a political hoax and that conservative women are not buying it....go Rush!

I give todays women credit for not buying into the "war". They are smarter than that without the help of Limbaugh.

Guest
05-10-2012, 10:24 AM
the point is to show that the so called "war on women" is a political hoax and that conservative women are not buying it....go Rush!

That depends on what your views are about women's rights to contraceptive devices and matters relating to abortion. The Right does seem to be stepping all over women's rights in this area. Contraception and women's rights -- it's still a man's world - latimes.com (http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2012/02/obama-compromise-birth-control-health-insurance.html)

Melinda Gates' New Crusade: Investing Billions in Women's Health - The Daily Beast (http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/05/06/melinda-gates-new-crusade-investing-billions-in-women-s-health.html)

Guest
05-10-2012, 10:44 AM
Rush's total disrespect for women is appalling as evidenced by "Rush Babes for America". Rush believes in the total sanctity of marriage so much so that he does it every few years.

Guest
05-10-2012, 11:15 AM
Due to the extensive drug problem he has had over his life, I am surprised he has not humiliated himself even more. Keep in mind, Rush Fanatics, like Skinheads, Nazi's and Religious Cults, are fortunately a small minority of the general population in this great country. His loud mouth is only believed by a few and laughed at by the vast majority of Americans.

:loco:

Guest
05-10-2012, 11:25 AM
One only has to look at the polls relative to women supporting either Obama or Romney to see which party has it right. :smiley:

Guest
05-10-2012, 11:41 AM
Rush's total disrespect for women is appalling as evidenced by "Rush Babes for America". Rush believes in the total sanctity of marriage so much so that he does it every few years.

That's funny.

Guest
05-10-2012, 11:49 AM
Shouldn't each woman be allowed to decide for herself if she wants to terminate a pregnancy?

It makes no sense whatsoever to have (basically) white men in Washington determine whether or not a woman has control over her own body. No right thinking woman could argue differently.

This is why thinking women are going to be big factor in Pres. Obama's re-election.

Guest
05-10-2012, 11:55 AM
Shouldn't each woman be allowed to decide for herself if she wants to terminate a pregnancy?

It makes no sense whatsoever to have (basically) white men in Washington determine whether or not a woman has control over her own body. No right thinking woman could argue differently.

This is why thinking women are going to be big factor in Pres. Obama's re-election.

ditto

Guest
05-10-2012, 01:28 PM
You guys crack me up. Cannot see the forest for the trees. You always make me smile.

Guest
05-10-2012, 04:37 PM
Limbaugh ‘Rush Babes for America’ Facebook page surpasses NOW in 24 hours | The Daily Caller (http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/09/limbaugh-rush-babes-for-america-facebook-page-surpasses-now-in-24-hours/)

.................................................. ..........................................http://i921.photobucket.com/albums/ad51/wakytimes/1233270615-haha_simpsons.jpg

'Has more friends than the National Organization of Women has mebers. Only up for < 48 hrs.

:a20:

Guest
05-10-2012, 05:10 PM
You guys crack me up. Cannot see the forest for the trees. You always make me smile.

Gee, RichieLion, what does your little comment have to do with anything pertinent that has been said? Answer: NOTHING.

Glad you are smiling today. You must have had a decent round of golf somewhere. I had a downright decent round at Roosevelt (obviously a course I shoot to the left on a consistent basis, though).

Guest
05-10-2012, 05:27 PM
Gee, RichieLion, what does your little comment have to do with anything pertinent that has been said? Answer: NOTHING.

Glad you are smiling today. You must have had a decent round of golf somewhere. I had a downright decent round at Roosevelt (obviously a course I shoot to the left on a consistent basis, though).

Guess you boys aren't getting together at the waterhole to chat up your golfing prowess.

Guest
05-10-2012, 05:55 PM
Romney has a decided disadvantage among women in current polling. Some political observers have opined that unless changed, it's a fatal disadvantage.

I'm guessing that the Romney campaign team didn't solicit Rush Limbaugh's assistance in turning around the "female problem". In fact I'd guess that they're trying to distance themselves from the Limbaugh approach as quickly as they can.

Can you think of anyone that you'd want less to assist your campaign efforts with women? Wow!

Guest
05-10-2012, 05:59 PM
Romney has a decided disadvantage among women in current polling. Some political observers have opined that unless changed, it's a fatal disadvantage.

I'm guessing that the Romney campaign team didn't solicit Rush Limbaugh's assistance in turning around the "female problem". In fact I'd guess that they're trying to distance themselves from the Limbaugh approach as quickly as they can.

Can you think of anyone that you'd want less to assist your campaign efforts with women? Wow!


Actually his disadvantage is with younger women. He, actually, has a pretty good lead with married older women. The DIS advantage, however is much greater with women in general.

Guest
05-10-2012, 06:07 PM
Actually his disadvantage is with younger women. He, actually, has a pretty good lead with married older women. The DIS advantage, however is much greater with women in general.

Not being disrespectful but how do you know that about the good lead with MOW?

Guest
05-10-2012, 06:10 PM
Not being disrespectful but how do you know that about the good lead with MOW?

"In the latest Gallup tracking polls, he is winning among married women by 9 points over President Obama. Married women like his policies, they like his values, and they seem to relate to the father of five and longtime married man.

But when unmarried women are polled, they go for Obama by a 28-point margin, "

Mitt Romney (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/02/mitt-romney-s-problem-with-unmarried-women-voters-could-sink-him.html)

Guest
05-10-2012, 06:17 PM
If I could go further on this.....right now, I would put very little stock in any polls...they are used at this time by professionals and since there has been little or no discussion of issues (seems we are still in high school years) they tend to be a bit skewed. There was a poll dated April 23...not that long ago that showed this...

"More women voters think Mitt Romney understands their issues than President Barack Obama does, according to a new poll from The Hill.

The survey shows that 46 percent of likely women voters think the presumptive GOP presidential nominee better understands their issues, while 41 percent think Obama better understands them."

The Hill Poll: Women Say Romney Understands Their Issues Better Than Obama (http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Hill/2012/04/23/id/436756)

So who knows.....

Guest
05-10-2012, 06:19 PM
"In the latest Gallup tracking polls, he is winning among married women by 9 points over President Obama. Married women like his policies, they like his values, and they seem to relate to the father of five and longtime married man.

But when unmarried women are polled, they go for Obama by a 28-point margin, "

Mitt Romney (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/02/mitt-romney-s-problem-with-unmarried-women-voters-could-sink-him.html)

Thank you.

Guest
05-10-2012, 08:40 PM
I asked a question and did not get an answer. So, I ask once again, "Shouldn't each woman be allowed to decide for herself if she wants to terminate a pregnancy?

It makes no sense whatsoever to have (basically) white men in Washington determine whether or not a woman has control over her own body. How could any right thinking woman could possibly argue differently?"

Guest
05-10-2012, 09:38 PM
the thread is about conservative women who have "liked" rush's site on facebook...it is not about abortion...but if you want an answer to your question, it is NO!

Guest
05-10-2012, 10:26 PM
Gee, RichieLion, what does your little comment have to do with anything pertinent that has been said? Answer: NOTHING.

Glad you are smiling today. You must have had a decent round of golf somewhere. I had a downright decent round at Roosevelt (obviously a course I shoot to the left on a consistent basis, though).

I just think all of the cranky ones are lost in the woods, is all. I'm sorry you don't see it, I wouldn't expect you to.

When you do though, you'll be speechless. Won't that be somethin' :)