This is a good biographical piece about Mitt Romney.

[Guest]

The Dark Side of Mitt Romney | Politics | Vanity Fair (http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/02/mitt-romney-201202)

[Guest]

The Dark Side of Mitt Romney | Politics | Vanity Fair (http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/02/mitt-romney-201202)

ignore time

[Guest]

The Dark Side of Mitt Romney | Politics | Vanity Fair (http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/02/mitt-romney-201202)

To be fair, I'm sure you will also be posting another article about "The Dark Side of Obama". :posting:

[Guest]

To be fair, I'm sure you will also be posting another article about "The Dark Side of Obama". :posting:

The Vanity Fair piece about Mitt Romney is very interesting as it goes into detail about what Romney's leadership style was like within his power grid within the Mormon Church as well as what he was like as a leveraged buyout expert. The Dark Side of Mitt Romney | Politics | Vanity Fair (http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/02/mitt-romney-201202)

It does gives glimpses as to what kind of President he might be.

[Guest]

Vanity Fair??.......I have to agree with Bucco on this.

This magazine, with it's liberal bias, has a long history of the expose' of Republicans. This is just one more.

[Guest]

To be fair, I'm sure you will also be posting another article about "The Dark Side of Obama". :posting:

You will be hard pressed...no, better yet....in the last two weeks or so, I have in fact presented posts based on responding to personal attacks on Romney....one on his high school days.....and one on a recent best seller. Other than that, I have never since 2008 ever attacked the MAN Obama.....NEVER.

The posts being generated now are attacking Romney, the MAN.

I post mucho negative on Obama and HIS POLICIES...he is the President, thus his policies are there. I have never ever discussed, other than what I just mentioned, the MAN Obama...his family.....nothing and there is a lot out there to say.

So, please if you are to take me to task, that is your right but please be honest.

[Guest]

You will be hard pressed...no, better yet....in the last two weeks or so, I have in fact presented posts based on responding to personal attacks on Romney....one on his high school days.....and one on a recent best seller. Other than that, I have never since 2008 ever attacked the MAN Obama.....NEVER.

The posts being generated now are attacking Romney, the MAN.

I post mucho negative on Obama and HIS POLICIES...he is the President, thus his policies are there. I have never ever discussed, other than what I just mentioned, the MAN Obama...his family.....nothing and there is a lot out there to say.

So, please if you are to take me to task, that is your right but please be honest.

Barefoot is probably not addressing you personally. I know that I cannot always keep straight which strong Republican poster has posted what about Obama's days in Chicago and other stuff which does go to Obama's biographical highlights.

[Guest]

You will be hard pressed...no, better yet....in the last two weeks or so, I have So, please if you are to take me to task, that is your right but please be honest.

Sorry Bucco, my comment wasn't meant for you (I referenced Tal's post). And I see now that Tal has posted another similar thread with an article about "The dark side of Obama". Thank you Tal!

[Guest]

The Vanity Fair piece about Mitt Romney is very interesting as it goes into detail about what Romney's leadership style was like within his power grid within the Mormon Church as well as what he was like as a leveraged buyout expert. The Dark Side of Mitt Romney | Politics | Vanity Fair (http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/02/mitt-romney-201202)

It does gives glimpses as to what kind of President he might be.

I was told QUITE LOUDLY, IN PRIVATE MESSAGES AS WELL AS ON THIS FORUM in 2008 that Obama's relationship with Rev Wright MEANT NOTHING AND I AM MEAN FOR MENTIONING IT....I was told that if he had a relationship with communists in his youth, THAT MEANT NOTHING AND I WAS,,,,,,WELL LOTS OF THINGS....FOR EVEN MENTIONING IT.

When did the rules change on that ? I was absolutely ridiculed on here in 2008 for mentioning anything that might show anything about Obama in the WH.


TODAY, I am being criticized basically for the same thing...WHEN DID THE RULES CHANGE ON THAT ?


You mention his religion AGAIN....I was told that OBAMA s relationship with Rev Wright MEANT NOTHING about President Obama and that I better stop mentioning it.

You seem to think it is fair to always bring up religion EXCEPT WHEN IT HAS TO WITH OBAMA..THEN IT IS NONE OF OUR BUSINESS !!!!

THIS, AND MOSTLY THIS...IS why I left the Democratic party. There are many in that party that I admire, but they actually TEACH this hateful way of discussing things (I actually posted a link to their training on race)

TELL ME WHY IT IS OK FOR YOU TO DO THIS IN "VETTING" ROMNEY, BUT IF YOU EVEN MENTIONED OR MENTION THE REV WRIGHT OR THE ASSOCIATION WITH FOLKS OF DUBIOUS CHARACTER IT IS WRONG ?

Tell me please...I want to learn from you.

[Guest]

Sorry Bucco, my comment wasn't meant for you ... it was for Tal. And I see now that Tal has posted another similar thread with an article about "The dark side of Obama".

That is a very funny little article about Barack Obama. The writer has a very odd sense of humor.

I would actually like to see some factual discussions on the "dark side of Obama". There has been no proof though that Obama is a communist nor even that he is a racist of any kind. I have heard these accusations though. Also that he was born in Kenya rather than Hawaii is another accusation with no proof. And that he is a Muslim. Many Americans actually believe he is a Muslim. One in six voters still think Obama’s a Muslim: Why? - The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/one-in-six-voters-still-think-obamas-a-muslim-why/2012/05/10/gIQA1XDlFU_story.html)

[Guest]

That is a very funny little article about Barack Obama. The writer has a very odd sense of humor.

I would actually like to see some factual discussions on the "dark side of Obama". There has been no proof though that Obama is a communist nor even that he is a racist of any kind. I have heard these accusations though.

You never ever heard those accusations from me ever. Anytime that FACTUAL stuff from his background is posted, we are called all kinds of names....told it means nothing...

HOWEVER

For you to post the tripe you post about Romney the MAN seems to be acceptable in what must be a twisted sort of rules somewhere.

If you want information as you say, I will be glad to oblige but YOU and others will then enjoy calling me on it and such....double standard is the nice way to put it.

AGAIN..WHY DO YOU FEEL IT IS OK TO POST WHAT YOU POST IN THE NAME OF SEEING HOW HE WILL BE AS PRESIDENT WHEN I AM CRITICIZED FOR POSTING ANYTHING ABOUT WRIGHT...BUT MORMON TALK IS FINE.....WHY CAN YOU MENTION ANYTHING YOU WISH BUT CRITICIZE ME FOR POSTING SUCH THINGS ON OBAMA ?

[Guest]

I read it. Pray tell, why do ya'll reject an all business mind when times demand a steady business mind at the helm?

[Guest]

That is a very funny little article about Barack Obama. The writer has a very odd sense of humor.

I would actually like to see some factual discussions on the "dark side of Obama". There has been no proof though that Obama is a communist nor even that he is a racist of any kind. I have heard these accusations though. Also that he was born in Kenya rather than Hawaii is another accusation with no proof. And that he is a Muslim. Many Americans actually believe he is a Muslim. One in six voters still think Obama’s a Muslim: Why? - The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/one-in-six-voters-still-think-obamas-a-muslim-why/2012/05/10/gIQA1XDlFU_story.html)

could it be that there is a dark side to obama because there is no proof available to dispute the accusations? could it be that there is a dark side because of the "characters" with whom he has been associated? could the dark side have deepened because of the enlightenment over the "compilations" that appear as real people in his writings? just sayin'.

[Guest]

could it be that there is a dark side to obama because there is no proof available to dispute the accusations? could it be that there is a dark side because of the "characters" with whom he has been associated? could the dark side have deepened because of the enlightenment over the "compilations" that appear as real people in his writings? just sayin'.

If Romney even said hello to one half of the folks that Obama has associated with he would be crucified.

If Romney even attended ONE service with Wright, he would be toast.

If Romney said hello to the folks that support Obama (farakhan, etc), he would be toast.

If Romney ever praised the polices of those that Obama has praised he would be toast.

If Romney lied in his autobiography, he would be toast.

And isnt it nice how Obama "evolved"....Romney flip flopped ?

[Guest]

The Dark Side of Mitt Romney left me saying and your point is?

Try this out for size: Some names personally associated with Obama and his political and surprising rise to president

Muhamad Hasan Chandoo & Whaid Hamid college roommates and radicals from Pakistan

Antonio Rezko from Aleppo, Syria mentor and financial supporter to Obama. Obama did legal work for Rezko corporation

Valeria Jarrett, Shiraz, Iran political advisor

Robert Mallory Obama advisory fired once it was learned he had continual contacts with Hamas

Radical Muslim Khalid Al-Monsour instrumental in Obama attending Harvard

Jeremiah Wright --speaks for itself

Bernardine Dohrn William ayers, radical weather underground long associates of Obama. Obama said to have launched his political career from Ayers home

Saul Mendelson Socialist Party USA

Communist poet Frank Marshall Davis

Radical harvard mentor Charles Olgetree

Democratic Socialis Quentin Young.

Talk about a dark side. Do birds of a feather flock together? Hmmmmmmmmmmm

[Guest]

I read it. Pray tell, why do ya'll reject an all business mind when times demand a steady business mind at the helm?

Exactly, we're all getting sidetracked on "smokescreen" issues. This election is about the economy and as Posh said, we need a president with a strong business mind.

[Guest]

I was told QUITE LOUDLY, IN PRIVATE MESSAGES AS WELL AS ON THIS FORUM in 2008 that Obama's relationship with Rev Wright MEANT NOTHING AND I AM MEAN FOR MENTIONING IT....I was told that if he had a relationship with communists in his youth, THAT MEANT NOTHING AND I WAS,,,,,,WELL LOTS OF THINGS....FOR EVEN MENTIONING IT.

When did the rules change on that ? I was absolutely ridiculed on here in 2008 for mentioning anything that might show anything about Obama in the WH.


TODAY, I am being criticized basically for the same thing...WHEN DID THE RULES CHANGE ON THAT ?


You mention his religion AGAIN....I was told that OBAMA s relationship with Rev Wright MEANT NOTHING about President Obama and that I better stop mentioning it.

You seem to think it is fair to always bring up religion EXCEPT WHEN IT HAS TO WITH OBAMA..THEN IT IS NONE OF OUR BUSINESS !!!!

THIS, AND MOSTLY THIS...IS why I left the Democratic party. There are many in that party that I admire, but they actually TEACH this hateful way of discussing things (I actually posted a link to their training on race)

TELL ME WHY IT IS OK FOR YOU TO DO THIS IN "VETTING" ROMNEY, BUT IF YOU EVEN MENTIONED OR MENTION THE REV WRIGHT OR THE ASSOCIATION WITH FOLKS OF DUBIOUS CHARACTER IT IS WRONG ?

Tell me please...I want to learn from you.

Don't expect the poster you're thinking about, or any other hypocritical leftist to address what you've written here. They know the hypocrisy of their posts and make no apologies for their ardent and treasured bias.