Guest
05-21-2012, 09:41 AM
Here's a couple of excerpts from a New York Times article today on how super PAC's will effect both elections as well as how elected representatives actually govern...
Decisions about attack ads and negative campaigning that once weighed on candidates are now made by consultants and donors with little or no accountability to the public...."at the end of the day it has to do with money," said a consultant who works with a super PAC set to spend $20 million on political advertising this year. "If you’re a top consultant today, you’d much rather have a presidential super PAC than a presidential campaign.”
Kind of says it all, doesn't it? After the smoke clears and the votes are counted, how important do you think your vote will be to those elected to those sweet jobs in Washington?
Decisions about attack ads and negative campaigning that once weighed on candidates are now made by consultants and donors with little or no accountability to the public...."at the end of the day it has to do with money," said a consultant who works with a super PAC set to spend $20 million on political advertising this year. "If you’re a top consultant today, you’d much rather have a presidential super PAC than a presidential campaign.”
Kind of says it all, doesn't it? After the smoke clears and the votes are counted, how important do you think your vote will be to those elected to those sweet jobs in Washington?