Log in

View Full Version : What would you do?


ducati1974
12-11-2012, 04:48 PM
We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

billethkid
12-11-2012, 05:15 PM
play the odds!
Do you have lightning rods on your home?
NO? In the lightning capital of the world?
Are lightning rods sorta/kinda like insurance, against lightning that is not likely to hit your house. If you have decided to play the odds about lightning and do not have them....then why not the same play for sink holes?
How many homes in TV have been affected by sink holes?
How many houses have been hit by lightning?

Me, I do not see a difference. I do not have lightning rods and do not have sink hole insurance......and both were conscious decions to NOT do either. This is also true for over 90% of our neighbors.

Gather the info...make an informed decision. Good luck.

btk

Harleyman
12-11-2012, 07:31 PM
I think the real question you need to ask yourself is, if you go without the coverage and have a sinkhole appear on your property, and it destroys your home, can you not only afford to walk away from a total loss, plus I expect, be responsible for the cleanup and fixing the hole.


To me, there is no question what you should do for the sake of 200 per year. Keep the coverage. There are 1000's of sinkholes every year in Fla. Just because there have not been that many in TV does not mean that it is not going to start to be one of the problem areas.

Think of the things you waste 200 per year on and drop one of them to protect what you have worked all of your life for. Its a no brainer.

Barefoot
12-11-2012, 07:48 PM
We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

We have sinkhole insurance and wouldn't be without it. Presumably your home in Virginia Trace is one of your major assets. Why take a risk?

OldDave
12-11-2012, 07:58 PM
See if I understand this correctly. If a sink hole eats your house or damages it to the point you cannot live in it, any homeowners insurance will cover it. You only need sinkhole insurance for cracking, minor damage or damage to the property not involving the dwelling. Do I have this right? I think I do from reading the laws in Florida but that doesn't seem to be what most people think.

If I'm correct, your exposure isn't as great if you drop it because you're still covered for catastrophy. Of course, I only think I understand this. If it was my house I'd never listen to an idiot like me, :$: Good luck.

janmcn
12-11-2012, 08:24 PM
See if I understand this correctly. If a sink hole eats your house or damages it to the point you cannot live in it, any homeowners insurance will cover it. You only need sinkhole insurance for cracking, minor damage or damage to the property not involving the dwelling. Do I have this right? I think I do from reading the laws in Florida but that doesn't seem to be what most people think.

If I'm correct, your exposure isn't as great if you drop it because you're still covered for catastrophy. Of course, I only think I understand this. If it was my house I'd never listen to an idiot like me, :$: Good luck.

A sinkhole on your property that doesn't effect the home itself could cost tens of thousands of dollars to fill. This happened within the past year in Sunset Point.

If the increase were $5000 per year you might think about self-insuring, but for less than $20 per month it would be foolish to lose the insurance.

Bill-n-Brillo
12-11-2012, 08:32 PM
ducati, you've gotta do what lets you sleep well at night. $200 saved is $200 in your pocket. But it's a small price to have paid if a problem should turn up.

It's like any other type of insurance - a complete and utter waste of money............until you need the coverage.

Do what seems right to you. JMHO......

Bill :)

BobnBev
12-11-2012, 10:00 PM
I think the real question you need to ask yourself is, if you go without the coverage and have a sinkhole appear on your property, and it destroys your home, can you not only afford to walk away from a total loss, plus I expect, be responsible for the cleanup and fixing the hole.


To me, there is no question what you should do for the sake of 200 per year. Keep the coverage. There are 1000's of sinkholes every year in Fla. Just because there have not been that many in TV does not mean that it is not going to start to be one of the problem areas.

Think of the things you waste 200 per year on and drop one of them to protect what you have worked all of your life for. Its a no brainer.
:agree:

tommy steam
12-12-2012, 12:20 AM
We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

I just bought a new designer this month. I went to the insurance office in Brownwood and got homeowners ins. The sink hole part was 500 extra a year. While I was not happy about spending that extra money on it, I felt it was needed when living in this area. you know, an ounce of prevention....

2BNTV
12-12-2012, 10:04 AM
ducati, you've gotta do what lets you sleep well at night. $200 saved is $200 in your pocket. But it's a small price to have paid if a problem should turn up.

It's like any other type of insurance - a complete and utter waste of money............until you need the coverage.

Do what seems right to you. JMHO......

Bill :)

:agree:

I personally would be able to sleep at night if I stll had the coverage. To me, that is priceless.

Cedwards38
12-12-2012, 10:39 AM
Less than $17.00 a month seems like a pretty cheap price to pay for peace of mind. I'd keep it.

BarryRX
12-12-2012, 11:06 AM
We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

it's really dependent on your personality. Some people would buy meteorite insurance if it was available. I believe that sinkholes are a very real possibility in central Florida. I went out with friends the other night and spent $200 on sushi. I think it is quite reasonable to spend $200 on sinkhole insurance.

hook line sinker
12-27-2012, 02:14 PM
Sink hole insurance....darn glad I had it. Last April cracks and wall separation were forming in our six year new designer home. Our insurance adjuster suspected sink hole damage. He contacted a engineering firm. We finally received the complete engineers report this mid November. Unusual as it may sound, the report advised against attempting to repair (pier/grout) the structure as the cost would most likely exceed the value of the house. The insurance company quickly made the settled. Despite my effort, TV was not interested in taking back the house. Citizens got the check. I found an investor, he got a deal. Citizens got the best part of that check. Too! Six years ago The Villages caught me by hook, line, and now sinker. I would be much worse off had it not been for the insurance.

perrjojo
12-28-2012, 11:50 AM
Sink hole insurance....darn glad I had it. Last April cracks and wall separation were forming in our six year new designer home. Our insurance adjuster suspected sink hole damage. He contacted a engineering firm. We finally received the complete engineers report this mid November. Unusual as it may sound, the report advised against attempting to repair (pier/grout) the structure as the cost would most likely exceed the value of the house. The insurance company quickly made the settled. Despite my effort, TV was not interested in taking back the house. Citizens got the check. I found an investor, he got a deal. Citizens got the best part of that check. Too! Six years ago The Villages caught me by hook, line, and now sinker. I would be much worse off had it not been for the insurance.

Curious as to what area your house was located

janmcn
12-28-2012, 03:04 PM
Sink hole insurance....darn glad I had it. Last April cracks and wall separation were forming in our six year new designer home. Our insurance adjuster suspected sink hole damage. He contacted a engineering firm. We finally received the complete engineers report this mid November. Unusual as it may sound, the report advised against attempting to repair (pier/grout) the structure as the cost would most likely exceed the value of the house. The insurance company quickly made the settled. Despite my effort, TV was not interested in taking back the house. Citizens got the check. I found an investor, he got a deal. Citizens got the best part of that check. Too! Six years ago The Villages caught me by hook, line, and now sinker. I would be much worse off had it not been for the insurance.

If you had not had sink hole insurance, you would be on the hook for the total cost of repairs since the house was never condemned, meaning your property insurance would not pay for the damage...correct?

What's to prevent the investor who bought the house from turning around and selling it to some unsuspecting buyer?

perrjojo
12-28-2012, 03:46 PM
If you had not had sink hole insurance, you would be on the hook for the total cost of repairs since the house was never condemned, meaning your property insurance would not pay for the damage...correct?

What's to prevent the investor who bought the house from turning around and selling it to some unsuspecting buyer?

Same thing I was wondering...just passing on the problem to the next unsuspecting guy?

BAILYBOOHOO
12-28-2012, 04:29 PM
Penny wise pound foolish !!!!! Choice is yours

PaPaLarry
12-28-2012, 04:44 PM
We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?
So it really comes down to 17.00 a month? If you do one less time eating out a month, you have it beat??????

Cantwaittoarrive
12-28-2012, 04:48 PM
If you had not had sink hole insurance, you would be on the hook for the total cost of repairs since the house was never condemned, meaning your property insurance would not pay for the damage...correct?

What's to prevent the investor who bought the house from turning around and selling it to some unsuspecting buyer?

That's why you should make sure an inspection is part of the contract before you purchase a house

784caroline
12-28-2012, 09:04 PM
The investors are more likely than not the Sink hole repair companies. This is how we (Florida) got into this mess to begin with. The investors bought the house for the cost of the land. Say the house was valued at $300K..investors paid no more than $25-30k. the seller walks away with an insurance check for the insurable value of the property lets say $270...investor then pay the seller $30..seller is made whole. The new buyer then makes minimal or cosmetic fixups to the property and sells it under market value for lets say $250K or an immediate gain of more than $200K. Accoding to disclosure laws only the seller only has to make issues with the property known to the first buyer, so the investor has no legal requirement to "disclose " the problem to the 3rd buyer. ITS a mess but this is how we got into the situation we are in today!!

Cantwaittoarrive
12-29-2012, 09:03 AM
The investors are more likely than not the Sink hole repair companies. This is how we (Florida) got into this mess to begin with. The investors bought the house for the cost of the land. Say the house was valued at $300K..investors paid no more than $25-30k. the seller walks away with an insurance check for the insurable value of the property lets say $270...investor then pay the seller $30..seller is made whole. The new buyer then makes minimal or cosmetic fixups to the property and sells it under market value for lets say $250K or an immediate gain of more than $200K. Accoding to disclosure laws only the seller only has to make issues with the property known to the first buyer, so the investor has no legal requirement to "disclose " the problem to the 3rd buyer. ITS a mess but this is how we got into the situation we are in today!!

There is a Florida Supreme Court case called Johnson v. Davis directly on this issue. Under the Johnson case, where the seller knows of facts materially affecting the value or desirability of the property which are known or accessible only to him and also knows that such facts are not known to or within the reach of the diligent attention and observation of the buyer, the seller is under a duty to disclose them to the buyer

villages07
12-29-2012, 09:24 AM
Sink hole insurance....darn glad I had it. Last April cracks and wall separation were forming in our six year new designer home. Our insurance adjuster suspected sink hole damage. He contacted a engineering firm. We finally received the complete engineers report this mid November. Unusual as it may sound, the report advised against attempting to repair (pier/grout) the structure as the cost would most likely exceed the value of the house. The insurance company quickly made the settled. Despite my effort, TV was not interested in taking back the house. Citizens got the check. I found an investor, he got a deal. Citizens got the best part of that check. Too! Six years ago The Villages caught me by hook, line, and now sinker. I would be much worse off had it not been for the insurance.

Help me understand.... In the case described above, would the homeowner be using his add on sinkhole insurance or the "included" catastrophic ground collapse coverage? I'm still trying to figure out which coverage applies where.

Also, would be interested if this poster could supply any general cost figures.... Cost to repair, value of structure, what investor paid, and what can be done with the house from this point forward? Not being nosy, just curious.

Sure wish the POA or someone with an unbiased view of sinkhole risks could explain if the Villages is more, less, or as expected when it comes to sinkhole occurrences.

Cantwaittoarrive
12-29-2012, 01:58 PM
Help me understand.... In the case described above, would the homeowner be using his add on sinkhole insurance or the "included" catastrophic ground collapse coverage? I'm still trying to figure out which coverage applies where.

Also, would be interested if this poster could supply any general cost figures.... Cost to repair, value of structure, what investor paid, and what can be done with the house from this point forward? Not being nosy, just curious.

Sure wish the POA or someone with an unbiased view of sinkhole risks could explain if the Villages is more, less, or as expected when it comes to sinkhole occurrences.

One of the conditions to be covered under "catastrophic ground collapse" is the structure has to be condemed, which means you can't live in it. It sounds like from what the OP wrote he continued to live in the house so for the coverage to apply to this damage you would have to think it was under the add on "sinkhole insurance"

AeroEngRetired
01-25-2013, 10:38 AM
Check this link Sinkholes of Sumter County, Florida , 2008 (http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/maps/pages/11100/f11158/f11158z.htm), In the villages area, sinkholes are rare but for the extra 20 bucks I would probably go for it.

philnc
02-03-2013, 10:32 AM
Since this is a first I hope I am doing it correctly.

Sinkholes and lightening rods are like apples and oranges. Totally different. Unlike lightening strikes sinkholes have become such a major problem throughout the state of Florida that insurance companies treat coverage for them as they do for hurricanes. The general rules of the policy do not cover them. Separate deductables are applied and can be as high as 30% coinsurance.

Peope I know living on the west coast of Florida never had a sinkhole problem. Last November they woke up to discover 2 sinkleholes affecting their house. They were very lucky they were covered up to $260,000 for damage. The cost of fixing those 2 holes is $200,000. Neighbors of theirs were not so lucky and in some cases the homeowners only option was to take what they could get from the insurance company and walk away from their home. Insurance companies in Florida are trying very hard not to write sinkhole coverage so if you have it keep it especially for $200 and hope that you can get it again in the future without getting hit with a huge deductable.

tommy steam
02-08-2013, 05:46 PM
We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

I just bought a new home ...my sink hole ins is 500 a year..worth it I think..you
Never know...200 hundred a year is worth peace of mind.