Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
(Post 2273344)
Played Palmer Cherry to Laurel yesterday, the first day LV was open after months of renovation. Conditions were great, fairways had decent grass, greens were running about 10-10 1/2, bunkers were great. However, turned to LV at 11:20 and noticed the following:
15+ unrepaired ball marks on each green
Dozens of divots not filled in
Half the bunkers with unraked footprints
The edges of the cups were raggedy.
At most 22 foursomes came before us
So, unfortunately, I'll give it 3 weeks, maybe less, before the conditions deteriorate to the level of the rest of our courses.
So the question is: When will our golfers learn that taking care of the course is everyone's responsibility, that there is no "entitled" superclass that need not rake, fill or repair. And stop sticking your putter in the hole to retrieve the ball or yanking the flagstick out with the ball in the cup. I wish we had cameras on every hole and institute a system of fines or revocation of golfing privileges for the offenders.
|
I played LV to RG yesterday. I too was amazed at the number of un-repaired ball marks on the greens. I went off LV at 11:35. How many foursomes had been through there? 25? On Hole 1, I fixed 5 ball marks. It didn't improve after the 1st hole.
Considering yesterday was the 1st day it was opened after renovation, I was shocked by the abysmal quality of workmanship. I've been involved with golf course construction and renovation and the quality of the work done on Laurel Valley, should never have been accepted by the ownership.
I think the lack of professionalism by ownership, contributes to the lack of etiquette displayed by the golfers. If ownership doesn't care about quality, why should the players? I'm not saying I agree with that, just opining that's a contributing factor.
The renovation team laid about 3000 sq. ft. of new sod, to the left of the Tee Boxes on the 2nd hole. Looks great. When I got to the 3rd green, the green surrounds were atrocious. Why would they spend money for the "out of play" area next to the 2nd Tee box, yet not repair the area around the green on 3?
I was told that the 2nd green was "flattened". No way. That green is almost exactly the same as it was ... virtually unplayable.
The 5th green should have been flattened in the left rear ... no change.
I did Birdie 9 from the Blues, so I can't find anything to complain about, there.
I agree there's no excuse for not repairing ball marks and raking bunkers, but if ownership doesn't want to set an example, it's hard to enforce a policy of "do as I say, not as I do".
Riley Grove's greens are for the most part, awful. I'm no expert on Bermuda grass, but 4 or 5 holes looked like they have a fungus or disease. I could have lived with that, but when I got to the 7th hole and found there were 5 groups on the hole, I gave up and went home.
I haven't played Palmer since LV closed, as I don't like Cherry Hills. This was my first time back this year and I won't be back, unless I hear that conditions have dramatically changed.
On another note, as usually, Glenview is in excellent condition and TDS is in nearly private course condition. If you were to only consider the "playing areas" (leaving out areas around the paths & non-playing areas), TDS conditions were like you might expect at a moderately priced private club.
I've hear that OB is in great condition. It's a pretty weird golf course, but I might have to give it a try, considering conditions as most of the other courses.
[Yes, I know part of the issue, is GV, OB & TDS are under a different Water Withdrawal Permit and can use more water than the more southern courses.]