No his post was saying 12 employees were needed to do the work that two efficient workers could be doing.

And eventually we get to pay the pensions for lots of people who stood around doing very little.

Why did not the Justice department sue to break up Abbot’s trust? One company supplying 40 percent of an essential product? Managed by arrogant idiots who would not fix a leaky roof in their only factory, nor would they maintain sanitation? And still they cannot clean it up to sanitary standards! But they crank out PR bull$%@# denying that their documented sanitation problems killed the babies sickened by their mistakes.

In my opinion more EFFECTIVE government will lead to proper oversight. It seems to be a distressing tendency for governments--all levels--to get so bloated over time that they get in their own way more often than not. Best way to slim down the government is to get rid of the inefficient fat, which would mean a smaller, more efficient government.

Of course that will never happen. No entity on the planet is better at justifying its existence than government.

Hope you fell better now.

Except for 40%, 100% opinion..............no facts.

Perfect assessment!!

You seem to think that you have all of the answers - why don't you tell us "what percentage of cases out of the entire spectrum of infants needing bottle/breast feeding is this true?".

And as far as "And if we were a bit more proactive and resourceful I am sure it would be more than enough to cover those cases." - just what would your idea of 'proactive and resourceful' be?

How many women in your family are currently feeding their infants?

Oh, they knew...

Agreed but apparently sat on their hands.