Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Current Events and News (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/)
-   -   Deer in US have COVID antibodies (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/deer-us-have-covid-antibodies-322386/)

Buckeye Bleau 08-04-2021 10:52 AM

Oh my gosh, so deer, dogs and cats can get immunity, how could that be since the CDC never gave them the vaccine!
It’s a miracle, oh wait those only happen with God and scientists don’t believe in God, we are doomed.

coffeebean 08-04-2021 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1983305)
As a consideration to that statement, consider this: it is 100% WRONG Not even close.

A single, two week sampling in a single county with multiple large gatherings showed that 74% of the positive COVID tests (and "cases" if you consider a test=a case) were among the vaccinated. That was a blurb and then repeated by Walensky from the CDC. However, what percentage of the crowd was vaccinated? If it was 100% then 100% of the "cases" would have been vaccinated. If it was 0%, then 0% of the "cases" would have been vaccinated. So without knowing that percentage, the statement is meaningless and I'm surprised the CDC even mentioned it much less make a big deal out of it and change recommendations.
What is more important is that out of all the hospitalizations during that time, only 4 people were vaccinated. And on this mornings local news, out of 1060 hospitalized COVID patients in the Orlando Advent Health System, 96% were UNvaccinated.

This pandemic, at this point in time, is clearly a pandemic of the un-vaccianted. There can be no disputing this information if those stats are, in fact, correct.

midiwiz 08-04-2021 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrumpyOldMan (Post 1983325)
I am not sure what point you are trying to make. You point out a comparison of two other causes of death, neither of which are contagious.

Would you feel the same if someone sneezed on your and a couple of days later you had a heart attack?

Minimalizing a half million deaths like this that are preventable is not acceptable to me. Heart attacks and other non-contagious causes of death are bad and most preventable to some degree, but you cannot kill me with a heart attack by simply sneezing on me. The treatment for heart attacks does not have to change because there is a breakout of a new variant of heart attacks in other countries.

It is like comparing crayons and cream soda.

did you care about getting the Flu? a cold? they are both coronas.... no where does it state that if your get C19 you die. you can't factually state that any of this was preventable - you can prevent disease - you can't stop a virus, but if you really think you can then go for it I'll wait..... but I'll be waiting a very very long time.

Let me put it in simpler terms.... you're scared to death of C19, you go get vaccinated , you came out and BAM run over by a semi..... think about it. If you don't get that one then I can't help that it's pretty clear as day.

The POINT of the response was that it really doesn't matter how many people died form C19. nobody cares about the other numbers, nobody used to care about the flu deaths either.

GrumpyOldMan 08-04-2021 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1983344)
You are protected from the virus by the vaccine, so doesn’t that remove the “contagious” aspect, or are you beginning to doubt the effectiveness of the vaccine? Are you worried that if someone sneezes on you, you will die?
As far as preventable deaths, 440,000 deaths every year are smoking related. 44,000 are from second hand smoke… For only one year has Covid outpaced smoking related deaths. Where is the outrage? Are those deaths “minimalized”?

Are you suggesting that vaccines have to be 100% effective or there is no use in getting them?

I said in my post, you apparently ignored, that there are preventable causes of death.
That is sad, and I am in favor of government funding of research into how to prevent preventable deaths.

That on the other hand has NOTHING to do with COVID. Your choice to not be vaccinated puts my health/life at risk. That takes the decisions OUT of your hands and puts them into the governments' hands as a matter of public safety.

I am not obsessively worried about being sneezed on and dying, I acknowledge it is possible with the DELTA variant. Do you drive through neighborhoods are 120 mph? Why not, are you afraid of dying?

Being concerned, aware, and taking reasonable precautions is not the same as being "afraid" or in a panic - as so many insult me by saying.

GrumpyOldMan 08-04-2021 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by midiwiz (Post 1983584)
did you care about getting the Flu? a cold? they are both coronas.... no where does it state that if your get C19 you die. you can't factually state that any of this was preventable - you can prevent disease - you can't stop a virus, but if you really think you can then go for it I'll wait..... but I'll be waiting a very very long time.

Let me put it in simpler terms.... you're scared to death of C19, you go get vaccinated , you came out and BAM run over by a semi..... think about it. If you don't get that one then I can't help that it's pretty clear as day.

The POINT of the response was that it really doesn't matter how many people died form C19. nobody cares about the other numbers, nobody used to care about the flu deaths either.

I look both ways when I walk out. But, a truck could still run off the road and kill me - there are approximately 500 deaths in parking lots each year. I wonder what percentage of people that go into stores are killed each year - I expect more than 500?

So, you go into a grocery store, and bam someone sneezes and you die from COVID. We KNOW that happens. People are being admitted into hospitals every day and rapidly (exponentially) growing numbers. Because they were infected by someone else sneezing on them (or the equivalent) and the one being sneezed on was not vaccinated.

If you can't see a difference here. Then you are right no point in chatting.

GrumpyOldMan 08-04-2021 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by midiwiz (Post 1983584)
did you care about getting the Flu? a cold? they are both coronas.... .

What? Seriously!

Did you know that you can die from breathing oxygen?

You can.

Oxygen is a deadly poison.

Why are you breathing it?

Drawing common-sense conclusions about things you do not understand is not just futile it is dangerous.

And yes, Oxygen is toxic, and if you breathe pure oxygen it can kill you.

Swoop 08-04-2021 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrumpyOldMan (Post 1983587)
Are you suggesting that vaccines have to be 100% effective or there is no use in getting them?

I said in my post, you apparently ignored, that there are preventable causes of death.
That is sad, and I am in favor of government funding of research into how to prevent preventable deaths.

That on the other hand has NOTHING to do with COVID. Your choice to not be vaccinated puts my health/life at risk. That takes the decisions OUT of your hands and puts them into the governments' hands as a matter of public safety.

I am not obsessively worried about being sneezed on and dying, I acknowledge it is possible with the DELTA variant. Do you drive through neighborhoods are 120 mph? Why not, are you afraid of dying?

Being concerned, aware, and taking reasonable precautions is not the same as being "afraid" or in a panic - as so many insult me by saying.

I never suggested that vaccines need to be 100% effective, but you’re the one who has been vaccinated and apparently doesn’t believe in it effectiveness...
Otherwise how am I putting your life at risk…
I have chosen not to get a vaccine with a new and unproven track record. I’m not suggesting people not get the vaccine, but you and others are demanding that I must get it. But not for my benefit, but to protect you…

GrumpyOldMan 08-04-2021 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1983646)
I never suggested that vaccines need to be 100% effective, but you’re the one who has been vaccinated and apparently doesn’t believe in it effectiveness...
Otherwise how am I putting your life at risk…
I have chosen not to get a vaccine with a new and unproven track record. I’m not suggesting people not get the vaccine, but you and others are demanding that I must get it. But not for my benefit, but to protect you…

You are purring my life at risk because the vaccine is NOT 100% effective, as you just said.

And even more importantly, those who are not vaccinated contribute to the mutations by allowing the virus to spread. The next variant (Lamda?) maybe well ignore the vaccination.

If everyone (enough) were vaccinated the virus would be controlled and unable to mutate.

Wearing a mask, getting vaccinated, and other measures all contribute to containing and stopping the virus. Those who don't participate are making it worse and leading to more preventable deaths than are necessary. Some of those dying are vaccinated.

coffeebean 08-04-2021 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1983646)
I never suggested that vaccines need to be 100% effective, but you’re the one who has been vaccinated and apparently doesn’t believe in it effectiveness...
Otherwise how am I putting your life at risk…
I have chosen not to get a vaccine with a new and unproven track record. I’m not suggesting people not get the vaccine, but you and others are demanding that I must get it. But not for my benefit, but to protect you…

Actually, the need for everyone who CAN be vaccinated is to protect those who CANNOT be vaccinated. Vaccinated folks have protection but those who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons are at our mercy as a population to protect them. Herd immunity is what will protect those who CANNOT be vaccinated or are not eligible at this time to be vaccinated (children). We have been asked to protect our children. How can anyone say "no" to that?

golfing eagles 08-04-2021 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1983646)
I never suggested that vaccines need to be 100% effective, but you’re the one who has been vaccinated and apparently doesn’t believe in it effectiveness...
Otherwise how am I putting your life at risk…
I have chosen not to get a vaccine with a new and unproven track record. I’m not suggesting people not get the vaccine, but you and others are demanding that I must get it. But not for my benefit, but to protect you

You would not be protecting me, I've been vaccinated and despite all the misinformation on this site, the breakthrough rate is EXTREMELY low (for now). Will that vaccine protect against all variants---I doubt it, but so far so good and we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
Meanwhile....... I'm happy to wear a mask to protect those that have a medical reason not to get vaccinated. I'm happy to wear a mask to protect children who are unvaccinated. And I'd happy to wear a mask to protect patients if I got drafted back into service. BUT..... I really don't want to wear a mask to protect those who CHOOSE to not get vaccinated because they are misinformed, or are making a political statement, or are simply more afraid of the vaccine than the disease. But that is what it is coming to, and I'm really not happy that the hundreds of millions that did the right thing and got vaccinated will now have to go back to wearing a mask, or possibly enduring another round of shut-downs and restrictions, because of those that THINK they know better than the experts and avoid vaccination. So, you see, your decision not to get vaccinated does affect the rest of us.

Barkriver 08-04-2021 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrumpyOldMan (Post 1982609)

Yeah, but they still have the transmissible equivalent of mad cow disease.

golfing eagles 08-04-2021 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkriver (Post 1983675)
Yeah, but they still have the transmissible equivalent of mad cow disease.

Right. Don't hold your breath.

There are reports of deer , particularly in Missouri and Arkansas, that have CDW (Chronic Wasting Disease), which is a prion disease equivalent to BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) ---mad cow----in cattle and both Creutzfeldt-Jacob and Kuru in humans.
To date there have been exactly ZERO cases in humans.

The last time "mad cow" was transmitted to humans was in the 1960's in the UK, because a rancher chopped up unwanted "cow parts" and fed them to other cattle that then went to market. Out of tens of thousands of people exposed, only 200 came down with the disease---apparently you need a special kind of genetic make up to get it.

Kuru, on the other hand, is spread human to human by eating the brain of an infected human. This disease was confined to the highlands of New Guinea when cannibalism was still practiced (hopefully not any more)

Creutzfeldt-Jacob pops up sometimes after neurological tissue is disturbed, as in neurosurgery or even a root canal

So, if you are the least bit worried, just don't eat venison or elk. And get vaccinated since COVID is far bigger concern

Swoop 08-04-2021 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1983670)
You would not be protecting me, I've been vaccinated and despite all the misinformation on this site, the breakthrough rate is EXTREMELY low (for now). Will that vaccine protect against all variants---I doubt it, but so far so good and we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
Meanwhile....... I'm happy to wear a mask to protect those that have a medical reason not to get vaccinated. I'm happy to wear a mask to protect children who are unvaccinated. And I'd happy to wear a mask to protect patients if I got drafted back into service. BUT..... I really don't want to wear a mask to protect those who CHOOSE to not get vaccinated because they are misinformed, or are making a political statement, or are simply more afraid of the vaccine than the disease. But that is what it is coming to, and I'm really not happy that the hundreds of millions that did the right thing and got vaccinated will now have to go back to wearing a mask, or possibly enduring another round of shut-downs and restrictions, because of those that THINK they know better than the experts and avoid vaccination. So, you see, your decision not to get vaccinated does affect the rest of us.

I did not request, nor do I expect you to wear a mask for me.
If you will provide me with a study of the mRNA vaccines showing their long term safety, I will be more than happy to read it. In the absence of that, I will choose not to be part of the largest vaccine trial in history.
And before you throw out “protecting the children” since the start of Covid, just over 400 children 0-18 have died from Covid. In that same timeframe more than 70,000 children 0-18 died from other causes…

golfing eagles 08-04-2021 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1983717)
I did not request, nor do I expect you to wear a mask for me.
If you will provide me with a study of the mRNA vaccines showing their long term safety, I will be more than happy to read it. In the absence of that, I will choose not to be part of the largest vaccine trial in history.
And before you throw out “protecting the children” since the start of Covid, just over 400 children 0-18 have died from Covid. In that same timeframe more than 70,000 children 0-18 died from other causes…

Part 1: I agree. You, personally, have never asked me to wear a mask for you. HOWEVER, the powers that be are making me wear a mask BECAUSE of people like you

Part 2: Using that logic, did you participate in the massive vaccine trial called "polio vaccine"? Perhaps you participated in the large scale "trial" of Pertussis vaccine. How about tetanus, diphtheria, rubella, rubeola, mumps, smallpox?

100 years ago, 9 of the top 10 causes of death were infectious diseases. Now it is only 1---and guess what?---it is influenza and it occupies 9th place.

So, all I can say is I prefer to be vaccinated, even if you consider it a research project, because 100 years ago it was the human race as a giant petri dish instead.

OrangeBlossomBaby 08-04-2021 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by midiwiz (Post 1983584)
did you care about getting the Flu? a cold? they are both coronas.... no where does it state that if your get C19 you die.

We'll just stop the quote at the very beginning. If you create your opinion based on something so obviously fake that even a non-scientist in 4th grade knows this, then there's no point in even reading the rest of the post.

The flu is NOT a coronavirus. It is an influenza virus. That's why it's called the flu.

Swoop 08-04-2021 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1983728)
Part 1: I agree. You, personally, have never asked me to wear a mask for you. HOWEVER, the powers that be are making me wear a mask BECAUSE of people like you

Part 2: Using that logic, did you participate in the massive vaccine trial called "polio vaccine"? Perhaps you participated in the large scale "trial" of Pertussis vaccine. How about tetanus, diphtheria, rubella, rubeola, mumps, smallpox?

100 years ago, 9 of the top 10 causes of death were infectious diseases. Now it is only 1---and guess what?---it is influenza and it occupies 9th place.

So, all I can say is I prefer to be vaccinated, even if you consider it a research project, because 100 years ago it was the human race as a giant petri dish instead.

Those are all “traditional” vaccines. This is a new delivery system. There have been no long term mRNA studies.

I stand by my statement that this is the largest vaccine trial in history. Initially we were told that those who were vaccinated couldn’t be infected with Covid and couldn’t spread Covid. They didn’t know if it would be effective against mutations. They didn’t know if boosters would be required. And they still don’t know if there will be any long term side effects.

That said, if I was in the high risk group, I would be vaccinated.

golfing eagles 08-04-2021 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1983786)
Those are all “traditional” vaccines. This is a new delivery system. There have been no long term mRNA studies.

I stand by my statement that this is the largest vaccine trial in history. Initially we were told that those who were vaccinated couldn’t be infected with Covid and couldn’t spread Covid. They didn’t know if it would be effective against mutations. They didn’t know if boosters would be required. And they still don’t know if there will be any long term side effects.

That said, if I was in the high risk group, I would be vaccinated.

They were ALL new vaccines when they came out with no long term side effects known. This is no different

Swoop 08-04-2021 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1983790)
They were ALL new vaccines when they came out with no long term side effects known. This is no different

I guess time will tell. I truly hope there are none, but these are not just new vaccines, it is a new technology. One that has never had a long term study.

Bill14564 08-04-2021 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1983786)
Those are all “traditional” vaccines. This is a new delivery system. There have been no long term mRNA studies.

I stand by my statement that this is the largest vaccine trial in history. Initially we were told that those who were vaccinated couldn’t be infected with Covid and couldn’t spread Covid. They didn’t know if it would be effective against mutations. They didn’t know if boosters would be required. And they still don’t know if there will be any long term side effects.

That said, if I was in the high risk group, I would be vaccinated.

Too many news sources drawing conclusions rather than reporting the news. Don't know what you heard but I heard a vaccinated person was 20 times less likely to become sick with Covid. I never heard 100% or "couldn't catch Covid."

coffeebean 08-05-2021 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1983687)
Right. Don't hold your breath.

There are reports of deer , particularly in Missouri and Arkansas, that have CDW (Chronic Wasting Disease), which is a prion disease equivalent to BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) ---mad cow----in cattle and both Creutzfeldt-Jacob and Kuru in humans.
To date there have been exactly ZERO cases in humans.

The last time "mad cow" was transmitted to humans was in the 1960's in the UK, because a rancher chopped up unwanted "cow parts" and fed them to other cattle that then went to market. Out of tens of thousands of people exposed, only 200 came down with the disease---apparently you need a special kind of genetic make up to get it.

Kuru, on the other hand, is spread human to human by eating the brain of an infected human. This disease was confined to the highlands of New Guinea when cannibalism was still practiced (hopefully not any more)

Creutzfeldt-Jacob pops up sometimes after neurological tissue is disturbed, as in neurosurgery or even a root canal

So, if you are the least bit worried, just don't eat venison or elk. And get vaccinated since COVID is far bigger concern

I just threw up a little in my mouth. Thanks for that GE.

All kidding aside.......you are such a host of information on this site. I really appreciate your contributions.

coffeebean 08-05-2021 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swoop (Post 1983786)
Those are all “traditional” vaccines. This is a new delivery system. There have been no long term mRNA studies.

I stand by my statement that this is the largest vaccine trial in history. Initially we were told that those who were vaccinated couldn’t be infected with Covid and couldn’t spread Covid. They didn’t know if it would be effective against mutations. They didn’t know if boosters would be required. And they still don’t know if there will be any long term side effects.

That said, if I was in the high risk group, I would be vaccinated.


How Do We Know the COVID-19 Vaccine Won’t Have Long-Term Side Effects?

Swoop 08-05-2021 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 1984408)

To summarize; historically vaccines haven’t had long term side effects, so these shouldn’t either. Sure mRNA vaccines are new, but scientists have toyed with the technology for years, although never studied the long term effects…

So the title of the article is pretty misleading, since no one “knows” if there will be long term side effects…

MDLNB 08-06-2021 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrumpyOldMan (Post 1982609)


Oh Dear!!! :shocked:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.