Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Current Events and News (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/)
-   -   Logic of Leaving Behind (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/logic-leaving-behind-323482/)

dewilson58 08-30-2021 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papa_lecki (Post 1996738)
I grew up in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Liberia - father was CIA.

Thanks for the non-political information.

Thank your dad & mom (she was right there) for their service.

tvbound 08-30-2021 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wyseguy (Post 1996697)
It is either incompetence, or uncaring disregard for the lives of US Citizens and Allies who are being abandoned. Regrettably it seems a cold uncaring disregard. When asked about the people falling to their death from planes as they tried to escape the Taliban, Biden said "C'mon man, that was four or five days ago". I can not be too hard on him, as I believe he has a mental issue. Those who defend him on the other hand... Just terrible people. So desperate to make it seem like they have accomplished something that they turn their backs on men, women and children.

"It is either incompetence, or uncaring disregard for the lives of US Citizens and Allies"

Is it safe to assume you feel the same about our Kurdish allies, that we simply abandoned/left - without even an attempt at evacuating?

dewilson58 08-30-2021 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrumpyOldMan (Post 1996755)
Yup, lots of conditions and requirements. And they were mostly living up to them, not all but mostly.

As to why we left now, I was not at the meeting you apparently attended where the decision was made, since you KNOW it had nothing to do with the treaty... Please share what was said.

Let's not get childish.

I hear one said say.........well it's because of the agreement by the prior president. When has the current president kept to anything the prior did or signed?? and if we stuck to the agreement, we would have been out by May.

Kenswing 08-30-2021 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papa_lecki (Post 1996738)
I grew up in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Liberia - father was CIA. he sept his career in the Middle East. We (and other Americans) were evacuated form Pakistan, to Afghanistan and from Liberia to US.



In both cases, state department (it’s not the military, its the state department with the CIA who knows) knew EXACTLY what and where things were happening. you don’t provide billions of assistance and not get that information.
Dad still knows a thing or two. This is from him..
State Department knows where and who every American is, don’t kid yourself. They could have gotten everyone out if they wanted. Maybe not the spouse of an Afghan living in a village who doesn’t want to leave. Most did not want to get left behind. The Afghans who provided support to the US certainly didn’t think the Taliban was ever coming back in control - do you think they would have supported us?
The whole pull out of Afghanistan was not supposed to happen, it was a political talking point. Neither president (the R or the D) would have pulled the troops out.
We had fairly low troop numbers, generally staying on the airbase. Afghan’s were providing security, we were providing air support. It was expensive, we were paying the afghan troops and bribing the village leaders.
We have 3.5 million troops in South Korea, 60,000 in Germany, 50,000 in Japan.
China put pressure on the US to get out of Afghanistan and we (someone) caved to the pressure.

Not even close. We have about 30,000 troops in South Korea. We don't even have 3.5 million active duty military.

As far as Afghanistan, wars aren't won there. They are just perpetuated. Simple fact is we got caught with our pants down. The Taliban mowed over the Afghan security forces much faster than the U.S. wanted to believe possible. Now we're paying for that mistake. Yes, it is easy to Monday morning quarterback. Hopefully we can get out the people that need to get out without any further loss of life.

GrumpyOldMan 08-30-2021 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 1996761)
Let's not get childish.

I hear one said say.........well it's because of the agreement by the prior president. When has the current president kept to anything the prior did or signed?? and if we stuck to the agreement, we would have been out by May.

Actually, it is very rare for a President to unilaterally pull out of a Treaty a previous administration had sign on behalf of the US. Well, until recently it has been rare. America's word used to be sacred around the world. Now, not so much. And this "botched" withdrawal is not helping repair the damage to our reputation.

jimjamuser 08-30-2021 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tvbound (Post 1996671)
"I guess we could have just evacuated like we did with the Kurds and left everyone behind."

THAT is a 'stain of shame,' that can never be washed away.

I agree with the contents of that post. The Kurds were good fighters and good allies and we left them to die. We keep doing stunts like that and Britain, Germany, and Australia will never trust us enough to be allies again.

jimjamuser 08-30-2021 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrumpyOldMan (Post 1996686)
Thank you, and to add to your excellent reply, we TOLD them we were getting out in May. That was the agreement we made. Then for whatever reason, we delayed the departure until now. That would emphasize your point of people hearing but not believing. I expect (I do not know) that the pull-out was delayed to better prepare for the exit.

And, also, I EXPECT/THINK the plan was to trust the Afgan military to hold for at least a few weeks or months so we could transfer security to them as we pulled out. What appears to have happened is the Taliban told the Afgan military, stand down and accept a bribe or die. And they chose to stand down. At least that is what appears to have happened. If so, yes, it was a serious mistake to trust them - I don't know what we did, if we did. It is just conjecture on my part.

I question why we did NOT wait until the WINTER to start to pull out. For some reason (?) the Taliban likes to go back home (to outlying areas, I suppose) for the winter and prefers to fight in the summer. It could be because the mountain passes and roads are not functional in WINTER? I do not KNOW for sure and would like some Afghanistan veteran to straighten me out on this score.

dewilson58 08-30-2021 04:20 PM

Congrats on the thread lasting more than 5 minutes!!!


:coolsmiley:

Toymeister 08-30-2021 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 1996805)
The fact that Biden has been able to get thousands of our people and refugees out safely is pretty impressive. It could have gone more smoothly, sure. It also could've been disastrous. There were victims of this war throughout the last 20 years. Over 2400 US troops were already killed in Afghanistan during the conflict, before Biden was even elected President.

As someone who was there I can assure you that no President deserves credit for this evacuation. That goes to the Airmen and Soliders and the untold thousands of federal employees, logisticians, DoD contractors, not the president, not by a long shot.

jimjamuser 08-30-2021 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neils (Post 1996725)
No politics here

Wonder why we could maintain a very large base in Germany for about 75 years after we defeated the Nazi and help ensure a stable government. Same for Japan. Same for Manila.

But now a relatively small force left in Afghanistan that mostly operated air power and intelligence services for the remote locations from a secure base at Bagram was deemed urgent to close.

I question why our leaders are making these decisions.

Germany and Japan had an HONORABLE military and governments that SIGNED a SURRENDER agreement with the US. The Afghanistan Taliban were a loose coalition of about 15 stone-age tribes that never stopped fighting because they knew that eventually, we would leave. 20 years ago no top country wanted to stay there because Afghanistan had NOTHING worth trading for. Today, it is a little different because Afghanistan has lithium. But, it is in remote mountains and roads are a problem.

John Mayes 08-30-2021 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 1996820)
congrats on the thread lasting more than 5 minutes!!!


:coolsmiley:

lol!!

jimjamuser 08-30-2021 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papa_lecki (Post 1996738)
I grew up in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Liberia - father was CIA. he sept his career in the Middle East. We (and other Americans) were evacuated form Pakistan, to Afghanistan and from Liberia to US.



In both cases, state department (it’s not the military, its the state department with the CIA who knows) knew EXACTLY what and where things were happening. you don’t provide billions of assistance and not get that information.
Dad still knows a thing or two. This is from him..
State Department knows where and who every American is, don’t kid yourself. They could have gotten everyone out if they wanted. Maybe not the spouse of an Afghan living in a village who doesn’t want to leave. Most did not want to get left behind. The Afghans who provided support to the US certainly didn’t think the Taliban was ever coming back in control - do you think they would have supported us?
The whole pull out of Afghanistan was not supposed to happen, it was a political talking point. Neither president (the R or the D) would have pulled the troops out.
We had fairly low troop numbers, generally staying on the airbase. Afghan’s were providing security, we were providing air support. It was expensive, we were paying the afghan troops and bribing the village leaders.
We have 3.5 million troops in South Korea, 60,000 in Germany, 50,000 in Japan.
China put pressure on the US to get out of Afghanistan and we (someone) caved to the pressure.

Some (?) country that doesn't like us probably put pressure on to get us out of Afghanistan. It may have been for Lithium? It could have been to prevent the US from controlling a country like Afghanistan which has a strategic location? It could be a country that wants to see the heroin trade continue?

jimjamuser 08-30-2021 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toymeister (Post 1996821)
As someone who was there I can assure you that no President deserves credit for this evacuation. That goes to the Airmen and Soliders and the untold thousands of federal employees, logisticians, DoD contractors, not the president, not by a long shot.

If ANY President gets the blame whenever something goes badly, why can't that President get credit when something goes right?

OrangeBlossomBaby 08-30-2021 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toymeister (Post 1996821)
As someone who was there I can assure you that no President deserves credit for this evacuation. That goes to the Airmen and Soliders and the untold thousands of federal employees, logisticians, DoD contractors, not the president, not by a long shot.

Yes they all get the credit for doing all the legwork, the physical work, the strategic planning, logistics, arrangements.

But they wouldn't have done any of it if the President hadn't said "okay let's do that." He could've said no. He made the tough decision to say yes. He's being lambasted for it.

So if you want to give all those people the "credit" for doing it, then you need to accept that certain of the American citizenry are blaming Biden for all the things that went wrong - when - according to you, he didn't do anything at all. It was all those other people who did it all.

ureout 08-30-2021 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 1996820)
Congrats on the thread lasting more than 5 minutes!!!


:coolsmiley:


I agree... especially 1 of your threads :a040::a040:

billethkid 08-30-2021 06:05 PM

the last plane has left and "....we are out...".

Discussion about who may still be there?

Topspinmo 08-30-2021 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tvbound (Post 1996667)
Had we just been smart enough to include the Afghani government in the withdrawal talks, instead of ONLY the Taliban, more than likely the whole country wouldn't have fallen to the Taliban in a record time - that no one could predict. At least smarter heads eventually prevailed, when the asinine idea of inviting the Taliban to Camp David on 9/11 was floated, to 'celebrate' the original May withdrawal. Let's hope we learned a big lesson here.

The Afghan leaders didn’t have problem getting out. So, they most had likely fly on the wall?

DARFAP 08-30-2021 06:11 PM

There is no logic

Topspinmo 08-30-2021 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 1996845)
If ANY President gets the blame whenever something goes badly, why can't that President get credit when something goes right?

I guess you don’t understand the ( ) system of us against them?

Koapaka 08-30-2021 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billethkid (Post 1996854)
the last plane has left and "....we are out...".

Discussion about who may still be there?


According to a tweet there were 7 busloads of American women that were blocked from being able to access the airport and are now in taliban hands....for starters Emily Miller tweeted "We’re dealing with Kabul. There’s 7 buses of female American citizens. The CG refused to open the gate. We have a congressman with us and he had the state department reach out. MG Donahue refused. 10 minutes ago the females were taken by the Taliban. They are likely dead now."

John Mayes 08-30-2021 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 1996850)
Yes they all get the credit for doing all the legwork, the physical work, the strategic planning, logistics, arrangements.

But they wouldn't have done any of it if the President hadn't said "okay let's do that." He could've said no. He made the tough decision to say yes. He's being lambasted for it.

So if you want to give all those people the "credit" for doing it, then you need to accept that certain of the American citizenry are blaming Biden for all the things that went wrong - when - according to you, he didn't do anything at all. It was all those other people who did it all.

He’s being lambasted and rightfully so. Read the WP Editorial Opinion piece from today. This isn’t about R or D. This is about the global perception of America’s incompetence.

Papa_lecki 08-31-2021 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koapaka (Post 1996904)
According to a tweet there were 7 busloads of American women that were blocked from being able to access the airport and are now in taliban hands....for starters Emily Miller tweeted "We’re dealing with Kabul. There’s 7 buses of female American citizens. The CG refused to open the gate. We have a congressman with us and he had the state department reach out. MG Donahue refused. 10 minutes ago the females were taken by the Taliban. They are likely dead now."

Here’s the article inThe NY Times. They were students at the American University. Most were women.

American University of Kabul Students Trying to Flee Were Sent Home - The New York Times

Eg_cruz 08-31-2021 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toymeister (Post 1996664)
I've been to Afghanistan, four tours

First you need to grasp the size of Afg, next you need to think how you get around Afg. Essentially, there is one road, the ring road, to get from many bases (FOBs) to another. This is not interstate level pavement, or pavement at all.

This one will be hard to grasp for many:

The US has said repeatedly that we are leaving, sometimes we even close a base only to reopen it again. Obama did something similar in 2015 when announcing a certain troop level only to step back from that number (this is a fact not a political statement).

So, let's say you are in Afg and another politician says 'we're out of here' do you believe it? Probably not. Let's say you are working at Bagram (BAF), now you have to dash over to Kabul, over the mountains. Just 70 miles, no problem right, just like a trip to Daytona! Eh, no.
US forces avoid that trip with MRAPs.

Suffice to say unless you caught a flight from a base you were screwed. Easy?, again no as the base shrinks more and more of the base perimeter becomes the responsibility of Afghan forces. Competency and the Afghan forces are two words which do not share the same sentence. If they don't let you in you're toast.

I could go on. Ask questions if you want more details.

One more thing, the State Dept might not know how many US citizens are in AFG but I will tell you 99% of the citizens are contractors and 99% of those are DoD contractors and with absolute certainty we do know who they are and if they left AFG. I personally supervised that program.

Thank you and your family for your service🙏🏻💙💙🙏🏻

Villages Kahuna 08-31-2021 05:35 AM

So much easier said than done. Once we began to withdraw our military and Afghan employees, the “government” we set up and the army we equipped and claimed we had trained began to quickly collapse as the result. Withdrawing before every single person who wanted to be removed from the country was impossible as soon as we lost control of the country and those desiring to leave couldn’t safely gain access to the airport.

The Taliban essentially won the conflict when the terms of our surrender were documented in the Doha Agreement agreed to by president Trump in 2020, then worsened when president Biden announced the specific date when we would leave.

Once our political leaders made those mistakes, the sequence of withdrawal you suggest became impossible. It was amazing that we were able to get as many people safely out of the country as we did. But our failure to fulfill the promises we made to the Afghans who were loyal to us for years won’t be forgotten by those with whom we attempt to make future agreements. Afghanistan will be another important reason why the reliability and consistency of U.S. foreign policy is mistrusted.

George Page 08-31-2021 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ureout (Post 1996716)
what I don't understand is that the treaty with the taliban was signed in Feb, of 2020... why didn't American citizens start leaving then?? also why were most of the armed forces removed before the evacuations were complete??

The Time to leave was the day after we killed Bin Laden.

MDLNB 08-31-2021 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billethkid (Post 1996854)
the last plane has left and "....we are out...".

Discussion about who may still be there?

OVER 300 Americans stranded, left behind. But, we got over a hundred thousand potential terrorists out.

Cindyd 08-31-2021 06:23 AM

Total incompetence! What rational person would pull out of a fortress like Bachram. With 2 runways & aircraft in middle of night, before evacuating people?

B-flat 08-31-2021 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by number 10 gi (Post 1996615)
there is no doubt that it is incompetence.

ditto!!!!

Bucco 08-31-2021 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PugMom (Post 1996961)
no logic here for some time now. that's why the whole thing is a c!us+er..@k. they avoided a plan in place that their predecessor built just because of who he is, imo.

Not being a wise guy, but could you link me to that plan that was avoided ?

Maybe the 5000 extra terrorists released screwed up the plan.

There is no way this retreat could have happened without the perils.

MandoMan 08-31-2021 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toymeister (Post 1996664)
I've been to Afghanistan, four tours

First you need to grasp the size of Afg, next you need to think how you get around Afg. Essentially, there is one road, the ring road, to get from many bases (FOBs) to another. This is not interstate level pavement, or pavement at all.

This one will be hard to grasp for many:

The US has said repeatedly that we are leaving, sometimes we even close a base only to reopen it again. Obama did something similar in 2015 when announcing a certain troop level only to step back from that number (this is a fact not a political statement).

So, let's say you are in Afg and another politician says 'we're out of here' do you believe it? Probably not. Let's say you are working at Bagram (BAF), now you have to dash over to Kabul, over the mountains. Just 70 miles, no problem right, just like a trip to Daytona! Eh, no.
US forces avoid that trip with MRAPs.

Suffice to say unless you caught a flight from a base you were screwed. Easy?, again no as the base shrinks more and more of the base perimeter becomes the responsibility of Afghan forces. Competency and the Afghan forces are two words which do not share the same sentence. If they don't let you in you're toast.

I could go on. Ask questions if you want more details.

One more thing, the State Dept might not know how many US citizens are in AFG but I will tell you 99% of the citizens are contractors and 99% of those are DoD contractors and with absolute certainty we do know who they are and if they left AFG. I personally supervised that program.

Thank you. Well said. There are also medical workers and charity workers who believe they are crucial to saving lives and decide to risk their own lives to save others. (Sort of like the military, but with differences.) There are a few who have developed local ties, perhaps through marriage, and decided they won’t leave until they can get their families our at the same time. There are a few who are running engineering projects that will fall to pieces if they leave.

I’ve been listening to Shelby Foote’s three volumes on the Civil War for the second time (100 hours). One thing those books make clear is that whatever plans were made, on either side, could be foiled by muddy roads, a river rising, tired horses, sick troops, not arriving somewhere on time, misunderstanding orders, or failure to carry out orders. A couple minutes one way or another could win or lose a battle. Plans could be leaked or intercepted. Lucky shots could change the course of battles. Information failures and logistics problems could be fatal. (In a way it’s a bit like how there are so many things on football fields that can change the course of events.)

I think that after a horrible muddle caused by the unexpected happening, our country—government, Pentagon, and those around the world working on this—did a pretty wonderful job ramping up the effort in just a few days to taking out thousands a day to somewhere else. I’m reminded of Dunkirk, and what a muddle that was, and how much less certain of success it seemed at the time, and how close it came to not working, and how many didn’t make it home, and how it was a desperate retreat recast as a victory, and how even civilians pitched in to help save lives.

Jeanette179 08-31-2021 07:15 AM

Logic
 
Billions of equipment left behind, thousands of terrorists released from prison, names and addresses of our contractors released, people falling from planes trying to escape.....
Glad we left, but GEEZZZ

GrumpyOldMan 08-31-2021 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George Page (Post 1996972)
The Time to leave was the day after we killed Bin Laden.

The right answer.

alemorkam 08-31-2021 07:23 AM

We left a busload of Americans there that wanted out. Decision of our president AND Joint Chief of Staff. If that bus had 50 marines would they have made the same decision to leave them there?

christine J Toft 08-31-2021 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tvbound (Post 1996667)
Had we just been smart enough to include the Afghani government in the withdrawal talks, instead of ONLY the Taliban, more than likely the whole country wouldn't have fallen to the Taliban in a record time - that no one could predict. At least smarter heads eventually prevailed, when the asinine idea of inviting the Taliban to Camp David on 9/11 was floated, to 'celebrate' the original May withdrawal. Let's hope we learned a big lesson here.

You mean the "Afghan Government" that cut and ran?????

christine J Toft 08-31-2021 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrumpyOldMan (Post 1996755)
Yup, lots of conditions and requirements. And they were mostly living up to them, not all but mostly.

As to why we left now, I was not at the meeting you apparently attended where the decision was made, since you KNOW it had nothing to do with the treaty... Please share what was said.

Isn't it amazing how many arm chair quarterbacks there are. All knowing... Must have been privy to so much classified information.

kenoc7 08-31-2021 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 10 GI (Post 1996615)
There is no doubt that it is incompetence.

There is no doubt. that it wasn't incompetence. It was the situation overtaking all reasonable contingency planning.

jfkilduff 08-31-2021 08:58 AM

Because an American family was trying to get out when we left and now has to be smuggled out!!!! According to a senator

John41 08-31-2021 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 1996528)
What is the logic of leaving Americans and Allies behind???

If it's political, just state "political" and let the thread live.

Otherwise, what is the logic???

People first, Equipment second, Troops last seem logical.

:posting:

There is no logic to it. A result of a poorly executed evacuation delayed from May to August for a 9/11 photo op.

Bellavita 08-31-2021 09:07 AM

Sacrifice more young men and women in an in winnable situation? I would make this decision and go back or use leverage to get Americans out. Let’s not forget what we did accomplish 125,000 out that is remarkable. Biden got out period sometimes that exit isn’t pretty.



Quote:

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 1996528)
What is the logic of leaving Americans and Allies behind???

If it's political, just state "political" and let the thread live.

Otherwise, what is the logic???

People first, Equipment second, Troops last seem logical.

:posting:


John41 08-31-2021 09:08 AM

///


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.