Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 1823279)

That article is behind a paywall so I didn't read it. Instead, I went to the CDC website and read their actual guidelines.

People will not "be denied" a test if they are aware they were exposed to the virus. That is categorically false.

The guidelines suggest that certain people might not NEED to be tested. Not that it will be forbidden to them.

I recommend, always, reading the source of articles, when those articles are about facts that come from other sources.

Here are the actual guidelines:

Overview of Testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) | CDC

Originally Posted by Pamelah (Post 1823436)

Granted I just woke up but... can someone explain how reducing testing for Covid and colon cancer will reduce the number of cases and potential deaths?

Originally Posted by Windguy (Post 1823439)

I think (hope!) the posting was sarcastic. People really should use winky faces when appropriate...

Originally Posted by nick demis (Post 1823639)

The new guideline is that you are NOT required to take a test if you have come into contact with someone that May have the virus. And the only way you know if you are asymptomatic is to have had a test. Lets try to keep from spreading false rumors no matter what your political belief are.

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 1823107)

Th new guidelines do not make any sense to me, especially if you know you have been exposed to the virus. According to these new guidelines, a person who is asymptomatic will be denied a test even if they are aware they have been exposed to the virus. Can someone explain the rationale for this absurdity?

C.D.C. Now Says People Without Covid-19 Symptoms Do Not Need Testing - The New York Times

Originally Posted by Kilmacowen (Post 1823291)

This is dated Aug 24 new recommendations are Aug 26. No need for test even if exposed. Sounds fishy.

Originally Posted by vilger (Post 1823305)

There is too much testing in the U.S. for COVID 19. If we reduce the number of people being tested, we can reduce the number of positive tests, and thus reduce the incidence of COVID in the population.

Similarly, there is too much screening for colon cancer in the U.S. especially for people over 50. If we reduce the amount of screening, we can reduce the incidence of colon cancer in the population.

Originally Posted by Choro&Swing (Post 1823479)

Sources in the CDC revealed on Wednesday that the Director of the C.D.C. was under heavy pressure from the White House to make this change. The hope is that a lot of the positive tests would never show up if people weren’t being tested. However, the problem is that asymptomatic positives can still spread it to those they live with, kiss, hug, talk with face to face, eat with, drive with, even if they aren’t coughing. Meanwhile, evidence shows that people who are positive are most contagious BEFORE they have any symptoms. So, if they can be detected when they DO have the disease but BEFORE they show any symptoms at all, it might be possible to get them to quarantine instead of dropping by The Villages to eat that home-cooked dinner with Grandma and Grandpa. Thus, early testing now may decrease case later and save your life.

From the article you linked to: “Models suggest that about half of transmission events can be traced back to individuals still in this so-called pre-symptomatic stage, before they start to feel ill — if they ever feel sick at all.”
Top U.S. Officials Told C.D.C. to Soften Coronavirus Testing Guidelines - The New York Times

Originally Posted by Scorpyo (Post 1823486)

For those who were confused with this post think about it. Let’s say no tests for Covid even after a person dies. What would the death certificate say. Cause of death respiratory or heart failure probably. It wouldn’t be Covid because he wasn’t tested for that. So no tests for Covid and we’ve eliminated Covid as a disease and cause of death. See how brilliant we are we just cured Covid. I did my part so could somebody kindly come up with a cure for death.

Originally Posted by Kilmacowen (Post 1823291)

This is dated Aug 24 new recommendations are Aug 26. No need for test even if exposed. Sounds fishy.

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 1823107)

Th new guidelines do not make any sense to me, especially if you know you have been exposed to the virus. According to these new guidelines, a person who is asymptomatic will be denied a test even if they are aware they have been exposed to the virus. Can someone explain the rationale for this absurdity?

C.D.C. Now Says People Without Covid-19 Symptoms Do Not Need Testing - The New York Times

Originally Posted by Bertram00 (Post 1823836)

Easy explanation - pressure/orders from above.