![]() |
Quote:
There is No doubt that a segment of our society want a theocracy, and theocracies never end will. |
Child in the womb
Well if SCOTUS has change R v W then all babies unborn should count as a tax deduct at conception now.
|
Well said.
Quote:
|
She should have a Baby On Board sign visible to increase the squirming.
|
bottom line Roe vs Wade should hve NEVER been reversed. If men got pregnant this
Quote:
|
This crap is what this country is coming to - pure nonsense and B.S. Every Veteran who died for this country has to be rolling over in their grave that they sacrificed their life for this stupidity and selfishness. It keeps getting worse everyday these idiots keep trying to beat the system instead of just obeying the laws.
|
Agreed.
Quote:
First, read the opinion. The Supremes put the decision back to the states. Judicial restraint was lost for many years. Second, we need to tread lightly here. No person should delineate what constitutes a life worthwhile. Elitism at work. |
Quote:
Can't have it both ways. |
Quote:
Since they have refused to do that, the only other possible intention of the law is to prevent pregnant women from driving. |
Quote:
See how messy it gets when you decide that an unborn fetus is legally a "person?" |
Opposing Argument
Quote:
|
Have any of you ever watched an abortion? Have you seen the fetus move away from the needle that is about to be inserted into the skull to drain the brain matter? One thing we definitely need to do is NOT celebrate abortions, it is always negative. Perhaps if one side didn’t feel they needed the right to terminate a fetus right up to partial birth, none of this would be occurring.
As Ronald Reagan once profoundly said: I notice all of the people arguing for abortions have already been born. |
Well if it’s a baby the minute the egg is fertilized then it’s a person!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What "many here" were arguing was that the Constitution limits what THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT can do, and that those things not determined by the Feds were to be determined by the states... |
Quote:
The skeptic in me believes it was not codified on purpose so that the issue could be used as a political weapon... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Remember, several Justice candidates stated their belief that this was settled law as well. And then it wasn't settled at all. Trying to wrap my head around how it could be used for a weapon. Not doubting that it's a possibility these days, just can't see how that would work. |
Somehow the thread has become all about the unborn child. Somehow the intent of the law/rule/whatever for traveling in the express lane has been understood and a NON-ISSUE.
Before the current "trend" of special interests needs/wants/hopes/desires/etc........we all understood that to use the express lanes there had to be more than one person in the car. At least those who tried the blow up dolls were worth a laugh........the fetus is a passenger? Now we are in the mode of picking fly specs out of the pepper to fit a case....to not obey the law we have all understood....is as I said previously......utter BS! |
Quote:
Maybe the idiots are those that are cheering this court over turning hundreds of years of decided law. Sadly at least 3 of them lied under oath to congress and NOTHING can be done about it, other than mainly. unpacking the court and that doesn't solve anything, it just kicks it down the road. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Growing up poor is not a disability, or even a disadvantage. It can be argued that growing up rich and spoiled causes harm. I grew up in a house so dilapidated that most walls were gone. We often didn't have water or electric. All five of us are productive adults (not in jail or on government aid). I didn't realize I was poor until 7th grade when I overheard the school teachers divvying up donated uniforms and my name was mentioned. Many great people, including presidents, grew up poor (they weren't aborted). |
Quote:
Even RBG said it was a bad decision. Not because she disagreed w/a woman's right to choose, but because the SCOTUS screwed the pooch in their decision... |
Quote:
Only congress can create laws. Attempts to enact legislation through the courts without the vote of the people is fundamentally inconsistent with the Republic we live in. |
Quote:
And "idiots cheering"? Not a good way to make your point... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But, I know of NO ONE that is arguing being poor is a reason to get an abortion. But, a lot of people say it can be a contributing factor. Just one of many possible examples, a poor single mother of 3 working 2 jobs gets pregnant and finds via testing that the child will only survive with a specific medication taken daily the medication costs $1000/month and if it is not taken they child will live a couple months in pure agony. But, that is not even important, what is, is the court deciding when life begins. This is more like a court deciding that people and their doctor should not be able to decide on surgery, because God doesn't believe in blood transfusions. Or any diseased organs have to be given a proper funeral since, they used to be part of a person. |
Quote:
The courts did not create law, they affirmed that the right was granted by the Constitution. Then a later court changes its mind. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the Constitution, or a law enacted by Congress, provided the right to abortion, the Supreme Court could not undo it. The Court can, however, overturn its previous decisions which it has done over 300 times. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It specifically states that: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They had a good reason. The initial RvW decision was a bad decision (not because of the content of the decision, that's another debate), but because it was wrong of the court to try to establish a law. It is not their job to do that. That power belongs to the legislative branch... RBG explained that quite clearly... |
Quote:
The First Amendment to the Constitution specifically provides for freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Now you tell me, which federal law provides the right to abortion or where it is addressed in the Constitution. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.