retiredguy123 |
08-31-2020 01:11 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by vermonster
(Post 1826162)
Actually it is quite the opposite. The social security part of the payroll tax is capped at an income level somewhere north of $100k; the part that covers medicare is not (although it was previously). Thus the higher your income is above the cap, the lower your effective rate of social security tax. This is known as a regressive tax, which means that the rate decreases as incomes rise. The other types of tax (in regard to their impact) are flat rate (medicare, e.g.) and progressive (the federal income tax, although it has become much less progressive than it used to be). That is why Warren Buffet decries that the effective tax rate (including all income and payroll taxes) on his income is lower that of his secretary.
|
You are referring to the taxes paid on income while working. That has very little to do with the monthly Social Security income that a retiree receives when they retire. A low income worker can receive as much as 90 percent of their pre-retirement income as a SS retirement income benefit. But, a high income person will only receive about 15 or 20 percent of their pre-retirement income as a retirement benefit.
Also, both low income and high income workers will receive the exact same Medicare benefit, even though the high income worker paid a lot more in Medicare taxes while working. And, after you turn 65, you have to pay a monthly premium for Medicare Part B. But, that premium is based in your income. Low income people pay about $140 per month, but high income people can pay about $400 per month for the same health insurance benefit.
So, high income workers pay more SS and Medicare taxes while working, pay a higher Medicare premium when they retire, and receive substantially less money, on a pro-rated basis, in benefits than low income workers. That is just the way math works.
|