If you are speaking of Kyle R. then I disagree with you. I am glad he put them down like rabid dogs. If you are replying to the other post that has nothing to do with the OP, then that is a different story.
Parents should be held responsible if there is proof of negligence. Personally, I have no problem with arsonists, rapists, etc. being taken care of in a manner that saves the taxpayer money and the system expensive time. Repeat offenders are leaches on society and a waste of resources. If judges would harshly penalize the perpetrators to begin with, maybe we would not have such a crime wave that lasts and lasts.

Kyle Rittenhouse didn't go into that crowd to shoot them up. He was there to stand guard over a car dealership so that violent rioters wouldn't burn the place down. He only fired the weapon when he was attacked and feared for his life.

Self defense is not a crime. If you don't want to get shot, don't beat a guy holding a gun with a skateboard.

So you're fine with vigilante justice. I'll remember that if I ever see you take a left turn without using your turn signal. #WeThePeople are watching.

He wasn't at the car dealership when he shot any of those three people.

News Flash, it was not "vigilante justice" by anyone's definition. It was Self Defense, and anyone with a one eyed seeing eye dog could see that. But, follow me around all you wish. I always use my turn signal. SOmetimes, I even remember to turn it off after I make my turn...:1rotfl:

He wasn't hunting them either. He was running from the violence and resorted to force once he felt his life was in danger. Anyone could see that.

Irrelevant...

Once again, irrelevant...