LOL, thinking back to my youth in Texas where the drinking age was 18.

Laws
 

First of all, I’m not condoning liquor sales to minors. With that said, I don’t understand how law enforcement can break the law to get you to break the law. It is illegal for a minor to purchase liquor, yet they use a minor to do just that.
Sounds like entrapment.

Everybody has an opinion on what to do. I guess it’s cheaper than getting Therapy in an office.

It’s a law. Obey the law

And put their parent or grandparents in jail with them. Unfortunately our civilized culture today doesn't have the same values or respect like it did 50, 60, 70 years ago. When so called adults allow youngsters to not follow law and rules what do you think happens.

Underage Drinking
 

Probably not, but it has to begin somewhere. It matters little if Mom and Dad preach the evils of underage drinking because kids hardly listen to what old folks have to say until it comes back to bite them in the butt.

I was an Ohio State Trooper for 28 years, and the toughest part of the job was to deliver a death message to a parent of an underage drinker who was killed in a traffic crash, and I delivered my fair share of that news. I think the laws should be stronger against both parties (kids and salespeople) instead of rationalizing that kids are going to drink anyway, so why use this money to penalize the salespeople who sell it to them? Perhaps Publix has an answer for that. Here are some 2022 statistics on juveniles involved in traffic fatalities and injuries while under the influence of alcohol. If this doesn't prompt a change in some thinking, I don't know what will.

"According to Ohio State Highway Patrol data, around 14% of teen fatalities in Ohio involved alcohol, while 42% of teen fatalities involved operating a vehicle while impaired, indicating a significant presence of impaired juvenile drivers in traffic crashes within the state; further, teen drivers are involved in a substantial portion of crashes overall, with 27% of crashes involving teens resulting in injuries."

Does anyone know if the next driver approaching them is a drunk juvenile, or a drunk driver, period? The answer is no.

I'd be outraged, but need to know the age. If they are 18 or older, they are old enough to be sent to war. If that's the case, they are old enough to drink. The government should not have it both ways. Either you're an adult or you are not.

Now, if they are five years old, that's another story. LOL!!

So a cop can't speed to catch up to a speeder? Can't "Lights N Siren" their way through an intersection to catch up to someone who ran a red light? They gotta sit and wait for it to turn green before they can give chase - not violating the speed limit while they do so?

They are not breaking the law by sending in a minor - an "agent of the government." They are presenting the clerk with the opportunity for them to break the law. No law against a minor TRYING to buy alcohol.

Yeah- makes perfect sense.

Just an FYI
 

The clerks are trained to look at ID before selling. There are reminders at every cash register. We know the obvious older customers but sometimes we are busy and it slips our mind. It’s still the law and we are ultimately responsible. Let me repeat that the employee is responsible. I feel bad for the employee.

They should go after bartenders that serve much too much alcohol to individuals. They create drunk drivers

It's a dumb law that should have been changed years ago.
18yo is more realistic, and 16-17 with a meal when accompanied by an adult.
That law works fine all over UK.

Let's just eliminate the drinking age entirely. You want a shot of whiskey, little 10-year-old kid? No problem. What's that, 15-year-old kid who doesn't have a drivers license yet? You want a case of beer? Sure thing. Because everyone knows you're mature enough to handle it.

The point, is that they're not supposed to be drinking alcohol outside of the assumed safety of their own home, with parental supervision. Kids are kids - many of them just don't know any better, they're immature - because - they're kids. They're supposed to be immature. Adults are supposed to know better, and are supposed to be the responsible ones in the situation. And so - adults in the relationship of "person who wants to buy a drug in a bottle that can cause intoxication and death versus person who has the drug in the bottle and makes money selling it" - are made responsible for the outcome of that relationship.

If anyone thinks a drug addict can't get drugs, I have a bridge to sell them. So let's just legalize heroin and fentanyl. They're no more addictive than alcohol, and all three of these things can kill someone who uses too much.

In Connecticut, we were required to check everyone's ID because the law was - you have to present one in order to buy booze. So any cashier who did NOT check - was breaking the law, and any customer who bought booze without showing their ID - no matter how old they were - was also breaking the law.

It's not a "close-down" violation, it's a citation as long as the person buying is over 21. But cashier have absolutely been given citations for NOT checking a customer's ID, regardless of how old they looked.

No ID, no service.

Yes, yes they are. They may not be as damaging (societaly, economically, etc.) as alcohol as alcohol abuse is far more prevalent, but it is certainly NOT more addictive.

7 Most Addictive Drugs | Drug Addiction Treatment | MA

The 5 Most Addictive Substances On Earth