Companies like GE would demand 90 day terms so that their vendors could finance their business at no cost to GE.

Whirlpool purchased one of my customers some years ago and demanded 90 day terms and a 10% discount because they were Whirlpool. Fortunately for me was able to wave bye bye.

What is the point? Fidelity, SATURDAY, "jr. staff person," esoteric problem. The other brokerages are mon-fri 9-5. There is a contact person on your account. You can bet a difference between the Fidelity statement and the tax you pay will result in an inquiry, AN AUDIT, by the IRS.

Fair is a concept. Reality is what is. A small customer, you owe us five dollars and twenty cents and we are no shipping your order till you pay it. A big customer, who is say 20% of your total sales. Check lost in the mail, ok send me another one. I've asked customers how it is the post office looses checks but bills always seem to arrive on time.

Similar reason why I recommended it’s not worth the hassle to invest in ETF’s in a taxable account.

There’s another big difference between the two professions, which is pay. That’s why I decided to get my MBA in Finance and Economics rather than accounting. Bean counters are a dime a dozen and are required to think systematically, not creatively. Therefore their earnings upside is capped. Finance professionals are constantly challenged to find undiscovered ways to creatively add value and earnings potential is almost unlimited if they are good at what they do.

Suggestion-I think it is a plus that Fidelity is opened on Saturday and you can reach a HUMAN 24 hours a day seven days a week. However, with complex issues it is wise to use normal mon-fri 9-5 when more staff is available.

As far as finance,"What do you want the number to be," perhaps the question is what will the IRS accept. Our tax code is ONLY 180,000 pages.

Just an update finally:

1) i got incomplete tax statements in the mail the first time around
2) i got a second tax statement in the mail that said "There are no changes to the first tax statement"
3) I found the correct tax statement on line, downloaded it, and it was changed from the prior year's format, so I misread the statement. ie, they put the information from the income statement distributed from the oil and gas trust in the filing on the next to last page, and the distributions to my account on the last page. (never before had they put the Oil and Gas revenue prior to distributions on my account tax statement, and I read it as my distributions, which was my miss reading. ie they are trying to be everything to me by including non distribution information, Little Miss helpful, but they could NOT perform points 1 and 2 correctly.)

Admission:
I was so irritated on points 1 and 2 that I wasn't correctly reading on point 3 with the little time remaining to file.

So 66% Fidelity at fault for the first two points
I am 33% at fault for the third point

In my advancing age, i get more easily irritated at professionals who underperform
and to whom I am paying money.

yes, I am human.

You received the final correct information but somehow Fidelity is 66% at fault for your misreading the documents? That’s priceless logic.

Yea that's why many of us vendors stopped that practice and switched to discounts given upon the receipt of pre pay. Never extend terms to a company who you know will not honor an agreement.

Your comment is self-important about finance degrees, I got my accounting degree a long time ago. I've been the CFO of two public companies and the President of a cruise line. I got the jobs by thinking outside of the box using my background.

I've been in private practice as a CPA for 31 years now. Most "bean counters" as you call us are keyed upon giving the best tax advice we can but also consult and advise on matters of sales, expansion, pricing, equipment acquisition , mergers and acquisitions, buy sell agreements, retirement planning, etc. Not just "bean counters"!

On the subject the original poster brought up the problem Fidelity has and the other investments advisors have is they are waiting on information from the companies you invest in as to how "dividends" are broken up - into ordinary dividends, qualified dividends, Sec 1231 dividends, return of capital, non taxable dividends. This breakdown can change depending their own year end financial statements which aren't completed until months after 12/31/xx. They're a pain because returns are prepared based upon broker's preliminary tax statements and the returns cannot be filed because we have to wait and see if there are revisions. In years before 2021 we got two revisions to some of the original statements.

Likely we can blame this ALL on the ever changing tax laws coming out of the Deep State.

I think you can blame ALL of this on some old guy whose is past his prime that didn’t wait for his final information documents to be delivered. So he went on a crusade to prove he is still relevant to TOTV readers and some poor Fidelity customer service rep working the weekend shift. The movie Secondhand Lions comes to mind after reading this thread.

not great comprehension as there wasn't one coming in the mail, which would have the correct information, which was the point of the irritation of mailed document two which did not contain the missing information from the first document, but said there were no changes.

Accurately, the final information was available in early April.

Small comprehension issue with uncommon tax situations, but that's ok. .

the only correct interpretation you made from reading the post,

:beer3:

If i had the means to have health insurance and not care for an elderly parent, I might just be living there and golfing everyday, and not filing any tax statements.

:a040:

yes, but managing corporate finances is way different than managing a portfolio of unlimited choices against a benchmark of a frictionless index. Most accountants I have worked don't have the intuitive business valuation of a good decision or poor decision. They know the processes and legal requirements.

They advise, but don't decide. they know the cost of everything, but the value of nothing. . .

And we can debate this all day long, and neither of us will change our opinions.

The future is much more uncertain that the past accounting.