Contact Ric Edelman Financial Engines. They will provide the info you need. Suggest you do not sacrifice investment growth for tax concerns. Also, insurance is not an investment - it is insurance. Insurance agents are not fiduciaries (who are required to look out for client’s best interest versus selling a product). Your best advice will come from a fiduciary, such as Edelman advisors. (I am not an Edelman employee). Best wishes on your research.

Agree.

My Trust lawyer is adamant about having it for the tax advantages (basically, the policy pays the tax upon the taxable event.. death). My financial advisor is adamant about not having it. Leaving the premiums in an investment account will pay the tax through growth in the account.

In a perfect economy, both strategies will produce the same result. The final decision will depend on you, your risk aversion, and financial position.

Advice
 

I heard it was a GREAT investment - from a guy selling insurance

I think Roth's are fantastic but they have funding limits. Indexed UL (IUL) or Variable UL (VUL) can be effective and IUL protects against downside loss. I stopped contributing to my traditional 401k and am contributing now to just potentially tax free vehicles of Roth and IUL.

"And this is why IUL is a riskier investment than traditional insurance. Critics say that risk is not properly disclosed and is borne by the policyholder. “Consumers should avoid IUL because the insurers and agents who sell the product have no obligation to work in the consumer's best interest.Sep 23, 2020"

From: Sounding The Alarm On Indexed Universal Life Insurance – Forbes Advisor

"As mentioned above the VUL can provide a death benefit guarantee up through a certain age. But that is really just the bare minimum and is no better than Term. The separate accounts can gain or lose at any rate the market chooses. As such the risk is on your shoulders as a policy holder.Feb 1, 2021"

From: Top 10 Pros and Cons of Variable Universal Life Insurance

Before I retired I taught life insurance to neophytes preparing for the licensing exam and to mutual fund and stock broker sales people.

At your age, assuming you live in The Villages and are over 60, I would not recommend Universal Life for you as a vehicle to amass retirement funds. Universal Life is nothing more than term insurance with an interest based side account to pay for the term insurance. Currently, interest rates are so low that most of your money money would be going to pay the cost of the term insurance - which, by the way, gets more expensive each year as you age. I suggest you ask a life insurance agent for an illustration and see how much premium you would have to pay at various interest rates - that are NOT guaranteed by the company.

The life insurance alternative to Universal Life is Variable Life. This works the same as Universal Life but is based on investment performance of various portfolios that you would select based on your risk tolerance. For older people, this can be very risky.

At your stage of life, I would suggest that you consider Life Insurance as a method of giving tax free and without probate to your descendants. I also suggest that, unless you are willing to take on risk, you reconsider a Roth IRA.