Originally Posted by VillagesDude (Post 2377947)

First, if the person was concerned about the meat and posted the “evidence” to social media, they have a duty to mitigate, which in this case would be not consuming the product and returning it to the point of sale for a satisfactory replacement or refund. If the meat appeared as tainted, why did the individual cut it up further rather than returning? For the example at hand, if the individual knowingly consumes the product and subsequently gets ill, they would not necessarily be successful in suit where they did not mitigate. That’s not to say if someone unsuspectingly purchases a food item and becomes ill, let say from listeria, they wouldn’t have a suit. Lots of that in the news lately. This would come under product liability law including negligence, breach of warranty, failure to warn, etc. in which case one of the local personal injury attorneys would consider. In the case at hand, just return the product for a satisfactory replacement or refund. (This should not be construed as legal advice; it is opinion.)

Originally Posted by CoachKandSportsguy (Post 2377945)

its the Clown World account, exposing clowns everywhere, not to be taken seriously
It has some great clips of your average everyday clowns who walk among us. .

Originally Posted by BrianL99 (Post 2377580)

Just heard about it.


https://x.com/i/status/1843851515527839766

Originally Posted by BrianL99 (Post 2377580)

Just heard about it.


https://x.com/i/status/1843851515527839766