Originally Posted by Leadbone1 (Post 1780216)

The W.H.O just said it's 'rare' for asymptomatic people to spread the coronavirus!
So after all the endless guilting that has been done to people that refused to wear masks, because they we’re not sick, and knew that masks were ineffective anyway, we now find out that asymptomatic people rarely spread the disease!
Another major change from what we were initially told!
When are people going to accept that we have been fed incorrect data and supposed facts from the get go?

Originally Posted by Lindsyburnsy (Post 1780916)

Asymptomatic = not infected person with no symptoms
Presymptomatic = an infected person who has yet to show symptoms.

Originally Posted by Leadbone1 (Post 1780216)

The W.H.O just said it's 'rare' for asymptomatic people to spread the coronavirus!
So after all the endless guilting that has been done to people that refused to wear masks, because they we’re not sick, and knew that masks were ineffective anyway, we now find out that asymptomatic people rarely spread the disease!
Another major change from what we were initially told!
When are people going to accept that we have been fed incorrect data and supposed facts from the get go?

Originally Posted by DonnaNi4os (Post 1780469)

Medical professionals have been double masking for months for hours and hours every day. Their brains haven’t been so effected that they cannot treat their patients. I’m not buying the nitrogen/mask reference.

Originally Posted by La lamy (Post 1781464)

I don't understand how people can still believe that "masks were ineffective anyway". Have you seen any health professionals not wear one in the presence of disease? No right? So there's only one sensible conclusion in my book: they are believed to be effective if properly worn.

Originally Posted by jet10s (Post 1783695)

no wrong -- cotton over you face or other such things will not protect you from disease