Medical... Arbitration Only..No Lawsuit

Medical... Arbitration Only..No Lawsuit

Notices

» Site Navigation
Home Page The Villages Maps The Villages Activities The Villages Clubs The Villages Book Healthcare Rentals Real Estate Section Classified Section The Villages Directory Home Improvement Site Guidelines Advertising Info Register Now Video Tutorials Frequently Asked Questions
» Newsletter Signup
» Premium Tower
» Advertisements
» Trending News
» Tower Sponsors




















» Premium Sponsors
» Banner Sponsors
» Advertisements
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Medical... Arbitration Only..No Lawsuit
  #1  
Old 05-01-2019, 12:56 PM
roob1 roob1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 78
Default Medical... Arbitration Only..No Lawsuit

A local eye group, prior to cataract surgery, requires the patient to sign a document giving up his/her right to sue the doc for liability/malpractice. Patient has to agree to resolve any issue usually open to lawsuit, by arbitration only.

Thoughts???

Last edited by roob1; 05-01-2019 at 01:15 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 05-01-2019, 01:39 PM
retiredguy123 retiredguy123 is offline
Soaring Eagle member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,185
Default

I think Florida law requires non-binding arbitration for malpractice issues, but does allow the patient to sue if they don't agree with the arbitration decision. Some doctors have tried to make the arbitration binding with a signed statement, but I don't think the courts have allowed it to be binding. I would read the agreement carefully to see if the doctor is changing the arbitration decision from non-binding to binding.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #3  
Old 05-01-2019, 02:06 PM
roob1 roob1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 78
Default

The patient agrees to binding arbitration, according to the document....no mention at all of non binding.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2019, 02:10 PM
retiredguy123 retiredguy123 is offline
Soaring Eagle member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roob1 View Post
The patient agrees to binding arbitration, according to the document....no mention at all of non binding.
There have been court cases where those agreements were not enforced because they were not consistent with the Florida statutory non-binding arbitration rules. So, if you sign the document, you can probably still sue the doctor if you don't agree with an arbitration decision.

Last edited by retiredguy123; 05-01-2019 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2019, 05:37 PM
blueash's Avatar
blueash blueash is offline
Platinum member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,853
Default

Exposure to litigation is part of the practice of medicine. You wouldn't get in a taxi if the cab driver made you sign away your right to sue if he ran a stop sign. You wouldn't go in a store if at the door you were forced to sign away your right to sue if the floor had not been mopped and you fell due to their negligence.

I wouldn't sign, and I say that as a retired MD. Also, please tell us what doctor or group has this policy so I and others can avoid it when it is time for our turn for cataract removal.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2019, 05:45 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: From Ohio, now happily live in Laurel Valley
Posts: 36,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash View Post
Exposure to litigation is part of the practice of medicine. You wouldn't get in a taxi if the cab driver made you sign away your right to sue if he ran a stop sign. You wouldn't go in a store if at the door you were forced to sign away your right to sue if the floor had not been mopped and you fell due to their negligence.

I wouldn't sign, and I say that as a retired MD. Also, please tell us what doctor or group has this policy so I and others can avoid it when it is time for our turn for cataract removal.
Ocala Eye. And they are excellent...…
__________________
I have to be myself, everyone else is taken.

Last edited by graciegirl; 05-03-2019 at 06:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
Wow
  #7  
Old 05-02-2019, 10:45 AM
thetruth thetruth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 413
Default Wow

Quote:
Originally Posted by roob1 View Post
A local eye group, prior to cataract surgery, requires the patient to sign a document giving up his/her right to sue the doc for liability/malpractice. Patient has to agree to resolve any issue usually open to lawsuit, by arbitration only.

Thoughts???
I do not like attorneys but this might be a good time to consult one. It should not cost much.

Your post-I suspect that what you are not saying is that you have signed such an agreement and now have an issue with completed surgery.

I'm not an attorney but I seem to recall seeing something about arbitration. If, I recall it was against arbitration and as it was explained the claimed arbitrator is actually PAID by the doctor and or the insurance company. FAIR? You are a one time injured
person. The arbitrator wants to keep their job and the persons signing their paycheck.

You've not asked but I had my cataracts done by Dr Wehrly of Lake Eye Associates just over a year ago AND I AM THRILLED WITH THE RESULTS.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2019, 04:28 AM
roob1 roob1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 78
Default

Researching is something we do PRIOR to making a commitment.

Actually, one arbitrator is chosen by the medical group, one by the "consumer", and the 3rd by the 2 chosen arbitrators.


Quote:
Originally Posted by thetruth View Post
I do not like attorneys but this might be a good time to consult one. It should not cost much.

Your post-I suspect that what you are not saying is that you have signed such an agreement and now have an issue with completed surgery.

I'm not an attorney but I seem to recall seeing something about arbitration. If, I recall it was against arbitration and as it was explained the claimed arbitrator is actually PAID by the doctor and or the insurance company. FAIR? You are a one time injured
person. The arbitrator wants to keep their job and the persons signing their paycheck.

You've not asked but I had my cataracts done by Dr Wehrly of Lake Eye Associates just over a year ago AND I AM THRILLED WITH THE RESULTS.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2019, 05:16 AM
ColdNoMore's Avatar
ColdNoMore ColdNoMore is offline
Sage
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Between 466 & 466A
Posts: 8,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roob1 View Post
A local eye group, prior to cataract surgery, requires the patient to sign a document giving up his/her right to sue the doc for liability/malpractice. Patient has to agree to resolve any issue usually open to lawsuit, by arbitration only.

Thoughts???
My first thought is that they've lost a lot of malpractice cases in court and are finding their medical malpractice insurance premiums...to be very high and have decided to go this route.

According to this article, the first thing to do is to find out what the State of Florida laws are...in regards to what is allowed and/or required in the notice to be signed.



Medical Malpractice Arbitration (poke here)

Quote:

The validity of an arbitration clause can be challenged in court. Courts are somewhat skeptical about arbitration clauses in medical malpractice cases, but most courts generally enforce them, depending on the circumstances.

However, arbitration clauses that fail to comply with state medical malpractice laws are often unenforceable. For example, a state law might require an arbitration clause to clearly indicate that a patient does not need to sign the agreement in order to receive treatment. Any clause that fails to comply with that requirement would probably be unenforceable.
__________________
Standing up for the underdog and against bullies...every chance I get.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2019, 05:18 AM
ColdNoMore's Avatar
ColdNoMore ColdNoMore is offline
Sage
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Between 466 & 466A
Posts: 8,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash View Post
Exposure to litigation is part of the practice of medicine. You wouldn't get in a taxi if the cab driver made you sign away your right to sue if he ran a stop sign. You wouldn't go in a store if at the door you were forced to sign away your right to sue if the floor had not been mopped and you fell due to their negligence.

I wouldn't sign, and I say that as a retired MD
. Also, please tell us what doctor or group has this policy so I and others can avoid it when it is time for our turn for cataract removal.
Although I'm not a retired MD...I totally agree with you.
__________________
Standing up for the underdog and against bullies...every chance I get.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
patient, arbitration, lawsuit, doc, sue

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.