![]() |
Yes, eligibility for an Obamacare subsidy and the amount of the subsidy is not dependent on how much money you have, unless that money generates reportable income in excess of the MAGI maximum (about $65K). They only look at your MAGI for the subsidy calculation. As strange as it may sound, you could have a large net worth and still get a large subsidy depending on how your net worth is invested.
Quote:
|
Since Op asked for a physicians who take cash, but the thread has turned into a witch hunt that OP doesn’t believe in health insurance. I get her point of view.
Both of us have been in the medical field, combined 90 years of service, I get the OPs thoughts. I maybe having surgery, the cost to my insurance will be $98,487.00 my deductible is $8,000.00 plus 20% copay. So my insurance from the hospital I work for, will run me about $11,678.00. However I can use the same facility, with the same hand picked staff, and pay $7,657, CASH. If you have deductible, and you need a script, or a device ask how much it is for cash, it may save you some money |
This is an example of why pre-existing clauses are necessary in health insurance. When this person gets gravely ill they will either: 1. Show up at an ER as an uninsured, charity patient (meaning we all pay) or 2. get insurance under Obamacare (meaning those of us who have been paying premiums monthly our entire life, subsidize their care).
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No insurance is the choice you have made. How are you going to get around the fact that most doctors will not take cash only. My guess is they are not equipped to handle cash with their office staff and billing software. And unless collected at time of service have a good chance of getting stiffed. Now they have both large malpractice insurance plus attorney fees / collection agency fees. Most docs want to be just that docs. Billing is a headache. That is why many docs limit the kind of insurance they will accept. It is a huge burden to their staff coding, getting approvals, etc from the policies plus add on the out of state and government policies = nightmare. Either looks like your going to have to get on the phone and randomly call docs here and see if you can strike a deal or stay wherever it is you live now. If the docs office says they are not willing to accept cash ask them why they accept payment from co pays immediately prior to service. Tell them you are willing in essence to do the same thing accept give you the entire bill. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cash isn't the only available method of payment in this country. There are credit cards, debit cards, checks, cashier's checks, certified checks, money orders...
Most doctors are affiliated with at least one type of insurance that requires the patient to pay a co-pay. How do you think those co-pays get paid? The patient usually pays with a credit card, cash, debit card, or a check. Seriously you're turning a nothing into an issue. Just tell the doctor's office you'll be paying with a credit card and problem solved. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Gigi. There are those who will never understand not having medical insurance as a choice. I think you see that by now. Sometimes walking away is the thing to do.
If you find a good doctor who takes self-pay, will you send me a message. I am not currently looking, but maybe for future reference. Best of luck to you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd really like to see a source for that IDIOTIC number. Since healthcare as a whole represents about 17% of our GDP, how could the small billing portion represent 30%????? We did all our billing in-house at a cost of 3.4% of receipts. If you used a relatively expensive outside billing service it would run 7%, so let's use 5% as an average. 5% of 17% is 0.85%, a long way from 30 % I have a hard time believing anyone could read that number and think it was true, so I doubt it passes the "smell" test. In addition, I wouldn't worry about unemployment for these billers when the system is replaced with a huge government bureaucracy, wee all know how efficient those workers are. |
Quote:
Our collection rate on insured and Medicare patients was about 96%, on cash patients about 29%. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=golfing eagles;1705724]" I've also read that if universal health care went into effect, with all the billers that would be laid off, our GDP would drop 30% and really increase unemployment."
Too late our billing department with 21 people were let go 5 years ago. At first the new company was in US. Now it’s hard to find anyone that understands any medical terms. We had a $18,000 anesthesia bill, for surgery. 6 different people told me it was not covered because it was an office visit. It’s in appeals. Even hospital can’t get them to understand |
[QUOTE=asianthree;1705765]
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Try using GoodRX app. Pretty good discounts.
|
Quote:
|
[
Quote:Originally Posted by skyking View Post This is an example of why pre-existing clauses are necessary in health insurance. When this person gets gravely ill they will either: 1. Show up at an ER as an uninsured, charity patient (meaning we all pay) or 2. get insurance under Obamacare (meaning those of us who have been paying premiums monthly our entire life, subsidize their care). QUOTE=tophcfa;1705855]Couldn’t agree more![/QUOTE] Just how would a pre-existing clause prevent either of these things from happening? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.