![]() |
Choice A:
The government will provide you with reasonably priced healthcare. You can see most any doctor you want, at any time, without our approval. We'll pay for any recognized treatment you want, for any ailment you have. For about $150/month, you can buy additional coverage that will cover most deductibles and ancillary costs. Choice B. A private, profit-making company will manage your healthcare, within the bounds of what they think is reasonable, to insure they make a profit. They'll give you a free gym membership (that everyone wants, of course) and maybe 2 dental cleanings. In exchange, you save about $100/month on medical cost. In exchange for that $100, most Dr visits will be handled by a nurse or PA. You can't see any other Doctor, unless the Nurse/PA/Dr says you absolutely need to. If you need any special procedures or treatments, send them a message and they'll let you know if it fits into their business/profit model. For the price of Cable TV, you can get the best healthcare available in the world or you can opt to save yourself $150/month. Tough choice. |
Quote:
The medicare supplement plans start at $150 per month. Plus you may need to purchase a drug plan too. Florida Blue for example Monthly Cost $178-$660 Doesn't include: $185.00 Standard Part B premium |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, with traditional Medicare, you may be able to get 2 or 3 second opinions without a referral, but your advantage plan may not allow a second opinion at all. |
Quote:
There's hardly a 65 year old in America, who's not taking medication of some sort, on a regular basis. There's one and only one reason for have a Medicare Advantage Plan and that's COST. Everyone is entitled to get whatever kind of Medicare or Insurance plan they want, but the folks who come on here and promote Advantage Plans because they're a "better plan", are simply disingenuous. People are entitled to make a value decision, based on a cost/benefit analysis ... that's their right. Anyone who argues Medicare Advantage Plans offer better healthcare, are simply rationalizing their cost saving decision. |
Quote:
Thinking if you are healthy today and will stay that way forever is hopium. . so do healthy people who believe that then know how they will die? will it be a golf cart accident? someone else's fault? a tree falling? a lightning bolt? dementia/Alzheimers, which can result in a long life needing assisted living or in home care? but never needing any thing else but an annual physical and a gymn membership? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
My wife had 3 ER visits and 2 admissions, 3 cardiac procedures and a pacemaker. No bills. My plan has 50,000 in out of country coverage. We were lucky when we ran away from TVH 10 years ago because we passed the screening to change to BCBS TM sup Plan F. Now they would have rejected us for medical reasons. If you have a MA plan you might not be able to switch if you are ill. |
Quote:
THE BEST health insurance costs very little. It is simply this: -- Eat primarily high-quality and healthy food (Mediterranean diet is still the best) -- Get regular exercise with stretching and keep your weight in check -- Quality sleep and enough of it is important -- Have people in your life who routinely cause you stress? Ditch them. Not kidding, you want to be healthy or not? Eliminate stress. Brian, there are many people of young Medicare ages that are healthy and who very intentionally take care of themselves. I'm one of them and know others. They don't have need to see Doctors because they live like the above. So, some of them choose Advantage plans because why wouldn't they? Over a decade it's quite a lot of money saved (for a couple probably $40,000+). Plus they can switch plans every year in the 4th quarter. Of course, those healthy people could be in a bad car accident or get a serious disease -- guess what will happen then? They will get medical care. I hear and read a lot of justification from people about the premiums they pay for traditional Medicare - which I find interesting. If it's worth it to them, that's all that matters. But, I think some are convincing themselves that they're getting more than they actually are and they seem to need to convince others too. |
I’ve been on Medicare Advantage for over ten years (Careplus each year) and do you know how much I’ve saved over regular Medicare? Over that ten years I’ve paid a total of less than $3,000 out of pocket for my health care. I’ve had one major surgery, a sleep study with a CPAP machine prescription, the usual prescriptions for fairly routine issues, and great doctors, nurses and support. I really love my Medicare Advantage. Maybe I’ve been lucky, but I don’t see where traditional Medicare with a supplement plan could have been any better for me.
|
Gym membership
All my gym memberships, through the local YMCA’s and Lifetime, are free with my Medicare Supplement Plan. Mine is Renew Active. There is also Silver Sneakers.
|
The main objection to MA seems to be that MA denies necessary medical coverage while TM provides it with almost no questions asked.
Has anyone with MA been denied treatment? If so, what were the circumstances? If MA denied treatment, did they provide alternative treatment? Did the patient suffer adverse medical consequences as a result of the denial? Did you appeal? Bring a lawsuit? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m amazed how many my age haven’t done any research on the topic, and have an almost “cavalier” approach as to what to do when they turn 65. Many, unfortunately, appear that cost and freebies will be the deciding factor as to what they choose. I feel it’s so important not to just to assess your current health conditions/situations, but look down the line 20-30 years from now, and determine what type of coverage would suit you best if diagnosed with a serious or terminal illness or if in need of rehab. Everyone’s situation is different - and one plan may work better for some than others. For me, I’m going with TM + Medigap. Even though I’m healthy and prescription-drug free at this time in my life, it will help me sleep better knowing I have the best coverage available if needed. It’s the same as house or auto insurance, I don’t go with the cheapest premium necessarily, but for what is the best actual coverage in the event I need to make a claim. (I’m a retired insurance claims manager). |
Quote:
good luck with that . . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m 63, and am paying almost $1000 a month for a solid health insurance policy. So, once I turn 65, and only paying for traditional Medicare + Supplement, I’ll be saving quite a bit in monthly health cost premiums. I understand those on tight, fixed incomes may have no other alternative than to go with MA. But I think most Villagers have a few extra dollars to invest in obtaining the best possible medical coverage available. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That is why it’s so important to make the correct decision when turning 65. |
1 Attachment(s)
I would highly recommend reading this book to anyone getting close to turning 65. I ordered it on Amazon, and after reading it passed it along to two of my good friends. We all signed up for the exact same plans (except for part D) after reading this book. Good luck to everyone navigating this very important decision.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
For those with a medigap plan, how much does it cost? And how much does it usually go up each year?
|
$189 per month for UHC Plan N. How much it goes up varies. The premium varies with age and some other factors.
Quote:
|
What is a "gold Medicare supplemental plan" ?
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Attained Age Ratings premiums are based on the policyholder's current age at the time of renewal or premium calculation. - Premiums increase as the policyholder ages, reflecting the higher risk associated with older age. Issue Age Ratings Premiums are based on the policyholder's age at the time the policy is purchased. - Premiums remain constant based on the issue age and do not increase as the policyholder gets older, though they may rise due to inflation or other factors. Community Ratings Premiums are the same for everyone in a specific geographic area or "community," regardless of age or other individual risk factors like health status. - Premiums may vary by location or plan type but not by individual age or health. In Sumter County, most insurers use attained age. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Part B IRMAA: Single: $106,000 or less: $185.00 (standard premium) $106,001 - $133,000: $259.00 $133,001 - $167,000: $370.00 $167,001 - $200,000: $480.90 $200,001 - $500,000: $591.90 Over $500,000: $628.90 Married Filing Jointly: $212,000 or less: $185.00 (standard premium) $212,001 - $266,000: $259.00 $266,001 - $334,000: $370.00 $334,001 - $400,000: $480.90 $400,001 - $750,000: $591.90 Over $750,000: $628.90 |
Every time this thread is restarted, it degenerates into the same few folks defending their decision to stay with TM, for reasons easily debunked, such as doctor availability and costs. I think people just tend to defend their choices, regardless of what they are. So I'm going to defend mine, right now.
We've been on Medicare Advantage since we became elgible, and have never had anything we needed rejected, including my wife's week in the hospital from a stoke last year, or any of the dozens of tests that followed. Yes, I complain about the lousy primary care doctors that are available here in-network, but I'm not convinced that paying an extra $1000/month between the two of us would improve our choices much in this healthcare desert, 45 minutes from the nearest city. We had great in-network doctors in Houston on the Kelsey-Seybold Medicare Advantage plan. Our current Humana "Giveback" PPO plan is free and even refunds the Social security deduction for Medicare. It includes Moffit Cancer Center in Tampa in-network. Even our great Kelsey plan in Houston didn't include MD Anderson, in-network. But either way, since we always choose a PPO, we can see any doctor we want if we don't like the in-network doctors, and it still covers 80%. That's the same as my old employer's United insurance, that cost me $500/month. I confess, I don't understand how MA stays in business giving insurance way for free. I suspect it has something to do with those $500 office call visits they bill the gooberment, that used to only cost me $25, back before doctors started billing insurance companies instead of patients. But after paying 3% of my wages for 50 years on a promise to get some back if I lived to 65, I see no reason to shell out $1000/mo of my life savings at the back end of this scam, for the same thing I can get for free. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.