Anger is good
 

when it is for liberal causes. Anger is bad when it is for conservative causes. The government controlled media tries to tell us that our anger is racist or homophobic to down play or trivialize our rebellion. Conservatives have every right to protest. Protesting has been something traditional for liberals over the years as the majority of Americans just go about their business. The media would be there with their cameras to show on the 6 o'clock news.(think Vietnam)
Now that average citizens across America are protesting, the media attempts to hide it by not covering it and twisting information to trivialize or condemn the protesters as bad or immoral people.
We the people cannot be beaten down by the progressive media's propaganda. It is our right to protest what they are attempting to do to our country.
Remember, you are going to be bombarded with the mantra:
Taxes are good and necessary.( I have read it here on this forum)
Protesting is bad.

It seems like yesterday when the liberals said that protesting was patriotic. Now they say it is bad. Wake up people!!!!

http://www.dailygut.com/?i=4529

Yes people did say Bush was a Nazi and many people on this site call Obama a socialist. Insults from the left and right. Neither side was or is correct.

But spitting on people, hurling the N word or F word at Congressmen is just plain wrong whoever does it right or left. The threat of gun violence is uncalled for and even the Tea Party has condemed the practice.

I was very upset at many things that Bush and Company did in the 8 years they were in power...but not once did I reach for my gun. Oh wait a minute I don't own a gun.

upholding and protecting the United States Constitution eliminates the need for anger.

Yoda

Apparently not!

Your are correct and they will pay in November.

just as the media is now "targeting" Palin for her use
 

of a cross hair to "target" the democratic seats to upset in November. The terminology of "targeting" has been used for who knows how long without commentary. As is the use of a cross hair on a subject to infer "targeting".
None of which ever intended the use of violence in anyway what so ever....until now. The distortion of the intent by using these terms and graphics only confirms the lengths the hypocritical opposition will take.
And of course that the persona involved, Palin, is their constant "target".
Hence trying to get the public at large off the real subject....a tactic that has worn out it's use and or contributed value on thinking Americans.

Finally the silent majority is beginning to stir and some are getting nervous about it and continue to discredit actions "aimed" at standing and being counted.....

I find it utterly amusing in this era of the words are mightier than the deeds that some media and individuals have the nerve to criticize others.
How consistently hypocritical!!!!!!!!!!!!

btk

Targeting can be indicated without using a gun sight symbol! The use of this symbol implies the use of a gun which, by its nature, is violent. In light of the nasty crowds using the N word and spitting on elected officals.....gas line being cut. One simply cannot look the other way.

And geez I thought Bush was the constant target of the liberals not Palin.

That video was played over and over again and no "n" word or spitting was seen or heard.

This is just the liberals trying to divert the attention from where it belongs

The fact of the matter is that they just passed an illegal bill that is against everything our constitution represents.
Angry is good. Angry crowds are part of our heritage going back to the early days of our founding.
Don't you people get tired of the same old tactics?

That is just BS....I just watched the video and you can clearly see what happens. Was the gas line not cut either?

Violence and threats against Tea Partiers
 

It is horrible the violence from the left (aka Democrats) against peaceful tea partiers!!!
http://www.foundingbloggers.com/word...party-protest/


Anger is good and healthy but the Democrats take it too far, just like they did when Bush was president.

I could have predicted that you would come up with some obscure link to show that the Democrats also do it. But the post clearly says this guy threatened violence...they did not spit on Breitbart. Did anyone from the left spit on Bush? Did any member of the Democratic party cry out "You Lie" during the State of the Union Speech" Those answers would be a know.

You quote horrible violence.....show me because this link clearly states no violence took place.

Did you look at the video of the spitting incidence or did you just let Fox tell you what happened?

WOW....an angry arguement to decide who started the being angry...such a waste of time

PS: All Donna did was post a blog that decried the media coverage which even you cannot dispute is a one way street !

This is a joke, right? Spitting is horrible violence. LOL

I do think Donna did a little more than post an anger blog. Her link is bogus...Her generalizations are bugus...government controlled media is bogus....denying the N video is bogus...You don't like what you read or hear...so continue to assume the info is false,far-fetched and extreme.

I did not respond to Donna's post....I responded to COLOGAL's post !!!

As far as media bias is concerned, there cannot be a brain around that, after this past election campaign, will not admit to the bias that exists in the media.....that is a given !