![]() |
Driving with Marijuana in your blood
How much risk is presented to the public by having a person behind the wheel who tests positive for THC (the active drug in weed) in his blood?
The most comprehensive study to date has now been released. Read this link Washington Post And the conclusion by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as detailed in the study: Quote:
|
Well the person who made that quote must drive stoned a lot...if the driver is indeed stoned and not just registering weed in their system(which can remain for many days)then they are indeed impaired and should not be driving...I know
|
No risk from me. After smoking grass I can't find my golf cart or car.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Pot is classified in the same schedule of federally controlled substances as heroin, LSD, and ecstasy for a reason: it is mind altering, "has no currently accepted medical use", and it IMPAIRS people in their cognitive and physical functioning!
From the D.E.A.: "Drugs, substances, and certain chemicals used to make drugs are classified into five (5) distinct categories or schedules depending upon the drug’s acceptable medical use and the drug’s abuse or dependency potential. The abuse rate is a determinate factor in the scheduling of the drug; for example, Schedule I drugs are considered the most dangerous class of drugs with a high potential for abuse and potentially severe psychological and/or physical dependence…... Schedule I Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Schedule I drugs are the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence. Some examples of Schedule I drugs are: heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), methaqualone, and peyote Schedule II Schedule II drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with a high potential for abuse, less abuse potential than Schedule I drugs, with use potentially leading to severe psychological or physical dependence. These drugs are also considered dangerous. Some examples of Schedule II drugs are: cocaine, methamphetamine, methadone, hydromorphone (Dilaudid), meperidine (Demerol), oxycodone (OxyContin), fentanyl, Dexedrine, Adderall, and Ritalin…….. DEA / Drug Scheduling |
Yeah well now you're just quoting...
Quote:
Please don't quote from the paranoia brigade as there are logical reasons not to legalize it...then again I think alcohol is pretty useless and yet I love my beer.... |
These
old DEA quotes are so far off it is just plain funny. Reefer madness is alive and well in one poster for sure. |
Quote:
:bigbow: |
Quote:
Sober people see it. Stoners don't see it. |
Quote:
|
///
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I read somewhere the TV was pot free
|
Quote:
There are several who don't smoke pot. I know for sure that me and sweetie and Helene and the cats don't. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Duuuuuude
Quote:
|
Quote:
You just go on and enjoy yourself. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It would be nice if they were able to be productive and pay INTO the system for another 20 years, as it has a seriously shrinking number of payers per recipients. |
Quote:
Most of them probably aren't getting "fuzzied up" any more. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Overlooking that specificity in my post indicates another reason why "ridiculous" laws are passed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Addicted? American? Broke? This might help:" "If you are actively or recently addicted, live in the U.S., and are low on funds, this may be of use. I see it as getting the most out of the “disease model”. Thanks to Ram Meyyappan for offering to post this to our community.Addicted? American? Broke? This might help… | Memoirs of an Addicted Brain |
Quote:
It was sadly predictable. |
Quote:
How to Apply for Disability Benefits with Drug Addiction Note carefully where it says that if drugs cause your disability, NO MONEY. Might there be some unscrupulous doctors or lawyer who will misinform the government, sure. "It is not possible at this point in time to receive Social Security Disability benefits based solely on Drug Addiction. The Social Security Administration (SSA) will not grant disability benefits to people with disabilities that have been caused or worsened by addiction. If Drug Addiction is deemed immaterial to your disability, it is possible that the SSA will grant your disability claim. If, however, the SSA finds that your addiction materially affects your disability, it will not grant your application for disability benefits." The correct information if I am reading regulations correctly is that if an addiction is the cause of your illness and stopping the use of the substance would make you no longer disabled then NO MONEY, however if you remain disabled even if off drugs then you are covered. An alcoholic who drunk crashes her car and becomes paraplegic is still eligible even though the addiction caused the disability, getting sober won't make her walk again. Code of Federal Regulations § 416.935 Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We have been down this road so many times concerning marijuana that it is just a waste of time because stoners will always be stoners and stoners like all addicts can't or won't admit the truth.
What I find sad is that profiteers are succeeding in their pitch to legalize marijuana. It is just immoral and irresponsible for people readily agree to a drug that offers no benefit to the masses but can and does extreme harm . Ican't imagine a parent going along with their kids smoking pot Perhaps i am the only person in the world who hasn't smoked it. Heck I couldn't recognize the so call skunk smell people address here. I didn't do drugs for the same reason I stopped smoking cigarettes in 1973 for my health and that of my family and neighbors and to set good example for my children. I have far to much respect for myself and my body to fill it with junk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Personal Best Regards: |
Sharing
I thought I would share an experience from back in the 80's. There is a town which is quite a bit north of San Francisco and it is Guerneville. At the time it was and maybe still is a leader in marijuana both in growth and usage. Today probably usage as others have taken over growth. The whole town was a pot center. When the California authorities put up a sign on the main highway as to turn to go into Guerneville the citizens would tear it down as fast as it was put up. At Thanksgiving they had a very large warehouse and held an open dinner for all who wanted to attend. The whole town was "high". I went into a Bakery to buy a roll and coffee. The owner told me to go ahead and take what I wanted and welcome to his town. Of course there was no charge. All actually seemed high and were happy.Being a leading marijuana center in California is really saying something. It would be interesting where are those same people today? Most in those days would not know that Guerneville was there as there were no road signs telling it's location. I continue to remain strongly against pot but still remember the wild town that smelled of pot and was not tied to charging for products. :ho:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.