Obama invites gays to Pope visit
 

OBAMA WELCOMES RELIGIOUS REBELS - Catholic League

Apparently, Obama has decided to make a mockery of the Pope's visit (23 Sept) to the White House by inviting a bunch of weirdos as well.

By inviting this group of weirdos to the White House during the Pope's visit, he is demonstrating his religious intolerance.

Atheists
Gay nuns and priests
Transgenders
Pro-abortionists
Also attending is Gene Robinson, the first openly gay Episcopal bishop, who left his wife of 14 years for his male partner, then last year “divorced” that partner.

I'm not Catholic but I defy anyone to prove to me that Obama is the Christian that liberals attempt to insist he is. It is easier for me to believe he is Muslim as that one individual said at the Trump rally than to believe all the assertions attempting to convince us that he is Christian. Just because he attended a hate monger preaching church in the past, it doesn't prove he is any way a Christian convert and this just makes it even harder to believe.

Question: Will he treat the Pope like he treated the leader of Israel, and walk out of/ignore a meeting with him to eat dinner?

He'll probably also invite Al Sharpton, the families of Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin, Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the leaders of ACORN, black lives matter and CARE as well, so what's the difference?

It is intuitively obvious to even a casual observer you don't know what the heck you are talking about!!!!

This pope is different than popes in the past something I find refreshing.

Gay Catholics find a new tone under Pope Francis, and from their own bishops - Religion News Service

The other thing that is quite obvious you are a bigot....

Same old lame liberal limp wrist attacks ... your bigoted bigot comment.

What is obvious is this ... Obama is not an American in any true sense of the word. He is a Left wing flame thrower who hates the society he "leads"

Allah Akbar does seem to be his guiding philosophy ... even a close minded idiot like you can no longer deny the reality we see.

Perhaps you don't know or can't remember this Pope went out and washed the feet of the poor.....

He his head and shoulders above the content of this post.

It's not about the Pope, it's about the disrespect the president plans on showing him

You do realize the term limp wrist implies I am gay?

Thank you for making my case....

:agree:

This Pope has shown respect in his positions on the poor, the divorced and gays.

Your views are out of step with his!

Oh look another one!!!

And I care about that WHY?

You might have to spell it out for him/her because it is obvious that they don't have the common sense to understand what you are saying. I'm still waiting for the racist accusation, because I don't condone this presidents policies or agenda. No patriotic American would. But, then again I believe in American freedom and exceptionalism. I'm not a European socialist liberal. And I say that with the utmost disrespect to the other poster.

Actually, it is quite OBVIOUS that you don't understand the definition of "bigot." But, I also understand that if your "education" is not given to you, a liberal doesn't have much understanding of a lot of issues.

Here, let me GIVE you or help you understand why you are mistaken (WRONG). A bigot by definition does not tolerate. I tolerate but don't condone. The Pope tolerates but does not condone the sins. Get it? God hates the sin but loves the sinner. I am no better, and I hate the sin and tolerate the sinner. Not always, but as much as an average Christian can.

Obama is a total disgrace to our country and is the most disrespectful person in power that has ever lead (from behind) this country. And speaking of leading from behind, that seems to relate to this/his latest misadventure of inviting deviates to the meeting with the Pope. And I did use that word properly.

Not sure what you mean by "If your education is not given to you"

I had to pay for my education at a Catholic college... I come from working class stock. And I have helped to pay for my sisters children to get their education when their father would not!

I didn't find any tolerance in that post.

Sounds like Obama is disrespecting the Pope and Catholics in general by inviting so many deviants to the party. An atheist also. Of course, I doubt you would see it that way. Anyone that will compromise their integrity, morals and ethics to defend Obama must have no pride at all.

Who called the dogs out?

So now I am european socialist....You all can't stand people who call you out or who disagree with your positions.

LOL!!:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

I tried to explain the definition of Tolerate vs. Condone, but it must have gone over your head. Sorry if I sound impatient, but if one doesn't know the difference between words, then they really shouldn't make accusations that someone is a bigot when they don't know the definition.

And if you are Catholic and don't have a problem with someone disrespecting your Pope, then who am I to comment on it. After all, I am not Catholic. Maybe I should help you along and make some jokes about priests and little boys. Would that set your mind at ease?

I didn't call you a "European socialist" but if the shoe fits.............

Disagree with me all you want, but don't get insulted if I don't agree with you. I believe that the silent majority should voice their opinion regardless of PC. The left doesn't seem to have a problem with it.

Not going to ever wear that shoe....On the issue of gay rights your apparent position is NOT in the majority.

I'm not insulted...

Speaking of European socialism:

Attachment 54949

I said I went to a Catholic college and I did however, since the Church's handling of the wide spread sexual misconduct and child abuse I have become one of the many recovering Catholic's.

Why would you even say this:

Maybe I should help you along and make some jokes about priests and little boys.

That incident is not a laughing matter!!!

:ho::clap2::mademyday:

I've never been against gay rights. I haven't lived in a time period where they didn't have the same rights as me. I do not agree with special rights though. And the silent majority does NOT condone the gay lifestyle, they tolerate it. Big difference. You can fool yourself, but don't try to make fools of others. Not everyone is gullible enough to believe that the gay lifestyle is normal.

Where are they? Perhaps they are too poor to leave?

Sorry, liberals, Scandinavian countries aren’t utopias | New York Post

Friend, you don't give up our faith due to a few bad incidents. I am not Catholic, but I wouldn't disrespect the Pope this way. And I do not see any other way of viewing this. Kind of like the way Obama has disrespected Israel when he ignored a visit from their leader.

I'm with you!

I can't get over the ignorance of this "conversation". It's this type of bigotry that destroys our countries' reputation and standing in the world as LEADERS. All people are created equal. ALL... not just heterosexual Christians. Ask the Pope. I think he'll say the same.

And what's with the anonymity of the original post? Just sayin'

:BigApplause::BigApplause:

Equal rights are NOT special rights!!! Make no mistake about that... You all are on silent nor in the majority.....

Your freedom of religion stops at other people's civil rights.

That's their cross to bear. I've only been married once and for 42 years, so far. Like I said, one can tolerate, but not necessarily condone. Thank you for an example that I could use.

It was NOT a few, the Church said it was just in the US....it was worldwide. Even the Pope's best friend was doing little boys. It was and still is a problem in the church.

I just reached a point at which I could not follow....

I'll see your New York Post and raise you a Huffington Post....

Denmark Is Considered The Happiest Country. You'll Never Guess Why.

Of course no surprise there ... you probably are gay.

Yes, that's what Obama always does ... he shoots the middle finger to conventional morals, standards and instituyions That's why he's a flame throwing lefty and the WORST, most divisive President in our history although Millard Fillmore was the dullest.

Keep the insults coming....just makes my point!

European socialism has contracted a fatal disease ... it's called multiculturalism.

It enables the host to temporarily feel better about itself but destroys its ability to reproduce and defend itself.

In the most delicious of Darwinian ironies, in about 100 years the Islamic invasion will destroy the host, and turn Scandinavia into another 3rd world hellhole like every other Islamic-majority place in this world (except for the oil rich areas)

Very bad, by the way, for "gay rights" as this will be the first to go ... oh well.

EXACTLY right ... excellent point

Interesting Red State article. Also, I can see where some posters get there rhetoric from.

Barack Obama will go down in history as the most successful president since Abraham Lincoln... | RedState

Just because the court said gays can get married doesn't make them married in God's eyes. Sorry if that makes God a bigot in your eyes, but I don't have the power to change that, even if I wished. If you are suggesting that Gays have a civil right to get married, then you are opening a big debate. They have always had that right, as long as they married according to the definition of marriage. One man and one woman. Personally, I think the government should leave their hands off of marriage as that should be a religious practice. And then that open a whole different aspect of the term marriage that the court can't dispute. The church says one man and one woman. Unless you are Mormon and then it's one man and several woman.

NC voters made the decision in that state to put a state constitutional amendment in that said marriage was defined as one man and one woman. That was the not so silent majority. Other states feel the same way. The court does not speak for the majority.

But, before calling someone out as being a bigot, learn the definition. A requirement for the term "bigot" is INTOLERANT. Just because most of America TOLERATES the gay lifestyle does not necessitate that they CONDONE the deviant/abnormal behavior. In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with loving another person of the same gender. Where I draw the line of what I condone or not, is that I feel that having sex with the same gender is abnormal or deviant behavior and not accepted as the norm. You can love someone else and cohabitate with them, but many of us feel that marriage is a religious experience that is defined as between one man and one woman.

Actually, I do NOT see marriage as a CIVIL right. You do not have a right to marry if you do not have anyone that wishes to marry you. You do not have the right to drive if you can't pass the test. There are stipulations on every privilege. Marriage has a stipulation (at least it did) that it is between a man and a woman. And that supposed civil right was always available to gays.

To call it discrimination is like saying it is discrimination if two cousins are refused a marriage license, or a brother and sister, or a man and two women, etc. If we start knocking down stipulations every time a small group of malcontents want a change, under the guise of discrimination, then we will have no set of laws, moral or statutory.

To summarize, I don't condone the gay lifestyle, but I tolerate it because I also have close relatives with that affliction. By definition, I am NOT a bigot.
So, if you call me an undeserved name, then be prepared for a long dissertation.